Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for aortic stenosis has been confirmed to be safe and efficient, and its status has gradually increased with the continuous updating of guidelines. But for severe pure aortic valve regurgitation, it has long been considered a relative contraindication to TAVR. However, many elderly, high-risk patients with pure aortic regurgitation have also been treated with TAVR and prognosis was improved through off-label use of transcatheter heart valves due to contraindications to surgery or intolerance. But because of the complexity and challenging anatomic features, high technical requirements, limited device success rate, high rate of complications, and lack of randomized controlled studies to confirm its safety and efficacy, TAVR treatment of pure aortic regurgitation has been evolving in a debate. In recent years, with the application of new-generation valves and an increasing number of studies, some new insights have been gained regarding TAVR for severe aortic regurgitation, and this article will review the progress of research on TAVR for severe pure aortic regurgitation.
Pure native aortic valve regurgitation (NAVR) is one of the common heart valve diseases, and the prognosis of symptomatic chronic NAVR is poor. Although transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is currently an "off-label" procedure, it remains the option for patients with high risk for surgery. In this case, an 81-year-old man with multiple comorbidity and high Society of Thoracic Surgeons score, the risk for surgery is rather high. Through the preoperative evaluation by the multidisciplinary heart team, considering that the patient had calcification at the junction of annulus, as well as mild aortic stenosis, after careful consideration, 29# Venus A-Valve was chosen. After the procedure, the symptoms were obviously improved and the follow-up effect was good. Due to various causes of NAVR, great anatomical variation of annulus, little calcification of aortic valve, and lack of anchor point and other problems, the procedure to treat NAVR with TAVR is still difficult. At the same time, there are few valve systems developed for the anatomical characteristics of aortic regurgitation valve. TAVR in the treatment of patients with high risk for surgery still requires long-term practice and technical development.
Objective
To evaluate possibility and reliability of the technique of artificial pulmonary valve reconstruction in right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction.
Methods
We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 35 patients with artificial pulmonary valve reconstruction of right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction surgery in our hospital between February 2012 and December 2016. There were 35 patients with 19 males and 16 females at age of 10 years ranged 5 months to 42 years and body weight of 26 (8–62) kg. There were 21 patients with artificial moncusp valve, 6 patients with bicuspid technology, 8 patients with comprehensive forming method.
Results
Average extracorporeal circulation time was 75–251 (120±37) min. Aorta blocking time was 32–185 (72±28) min. ICU stay time was 14–225 (59±51) hours. Breathing machine auxiliary time was 6–68 (24±18) hours. There were 3 early postoperative deaths. There was no death during the long term following-up time. Thirty-two patients survived with heart function of class Ⅰ in 20 patients, class Ⅱ in 10 patients, class Ⅲ in 2 patients.
Conclusion
In right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction using the technique of artificial pulmonary valve reconstruction in the operation, it can reduce early postoperative right ventricular volume load. To smooth out perioperative patients, the surgical technique is simple, cheap, safe, but long-term follow-up still needs further observation.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the mid-term outcomes between tricuspid valve detachment (TVD) and non-detachment (NTVD) for ventricular septal defect (VSD).Methods The patients who underwent perimembranous VSD repair in the Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, West China Hospital from 2015 to 2020 were included. According to the surgical method, the patients were divided into a TVD group and a NTVD group. The clinical data of the two groups were compared.Results Totally 538 patients were included in the study. There were 240 patients in the TVD group, including 121 males and 119 females, with an average age of 3.85±8.42 years and an average weight of 14.12±12.97 kg. There were 298 patients in the NTVD group, including 149 males and 149 females, with an average age of 4.42±9.36 years and an average weight of 14.87±12.51 kg. There was no statistical difference in the age, weight, sex, preoperative New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification or tricuspid regurgitation (TR) degree between the two groups (P＞0.05). Median follow-up was 30 (23, 40) months in the TVD group, and 29 (23, 41) months in the NTVD group (P=0.600). After operation, one patient in each group developed third-degree atrioventricular block and recovered to sinus rhythm before discharge (P=0.848). No pacemaker was needed. There was no statistical difference in the length of stay (P=0.054), mortality (P=1.000), in-hospital reoperation (P=0.199), or follow-up reoperation (P=0.505). More than 98% of patients in both groups had postoperative TR less than moderate (P=0.926). At the last follow-up, only 7 (2.9%) patients in the TVD group were detected trivial residual shunting, and 14 (4.7%) in the NTVD group (P=0.289). No one needed to have reoperation because of residual VSD. The TVD group showed less TR during the follow-up (P=0.019).Conclusion TVD is an alternative technique which can be safely used in the closure of VSD, especially in technologically mature medical center. Appropriate tricuspid valve detachment for those hard-to-expose VSDs does not result in poorer tricuspid valve function or higher risk of atrioventricular block, and might reduce the incidence of residual shunting.
Objective
To compare the postoperative outcomes of modified single-patch technique and one-and-a-half-patch technique for complete atrioventricular septal defect (CAVSD) with a large ventricular component (>1 cm).
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed clinical data of 79 CAVSD patients with a large ventricular component (>1 cm) in Shanghai Children's Medical Center from January 2005 through January 2016. There were 37 males, 42 females with a median age of 8 months (range, 1.5 months to 10.2 years). Among the patients, 45 patients (20 males, 25 females) with a median age of 6 months(range, 1.5 months to 10.2 years) received modified single patch technique and 34 patients (17 males, 17 females) with a median age of 5.3 months (range, 2.5 months to 8.3 years) underwent one-and-a-half-patch (1.5-patch) technique. All the patients complicated with complex malformation such as double outlet of right ventricular, single ventricle, and transposition of great arteries were excluded.
Results
The mortality and reoperation rate in modified single-patch group were higher than those of the one-and-a-half-patch group. There were 2 postoperative early deaths in the modified single-patch group (4.4%). Among them, one patient died of postoperative valvular regurgitation and heart pump failure. The other one died of respiratory failure caused by severe pneumonia. There were 3 reoperations. Two patients performed valve plastic surgery because of valve regurgitation and one patient because of residual ventricular septal defect. There was no death and reoperation in the one-and-a-half-patch technique group. No left ventricular outflow tract obstruction and atrioventricular block in both groups were developed.
Conclusion
The 1.5-patch technique is an attractive clinical option in CAVSD patients with a large ventricular component.
Functional tricuspid valve regurgitation (TR) is often secondary to left-sided valvular heart diseases. The precise diagnosis of TR degree and reasonable treatment can improve the long-term prognosis of patient. Now we believe that rectifying the TR during left cardiac valve surgery can prevent a further development of TR and avoid the reducing of the cardiac function for patients with moderate TR, tricuspid valve annulus diameter>40 mm in late diastole, tricuspid valve diameter/body surface area>21 mm/m2, and intraoperative tricuspid valve diameter >70 mm, especially for patients with atrial fibrillation and atrial enlargement. The use of prosthetic ring can effectively prevent recurrence of TR in long term and we should try to use hard or semihard "C" shape prosthetic ring as much as possible. The tricuspid valve replacement should be avioded because of its higher mortality.
ObjectiveTo assess outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for pure native aortic valve regurgitation.MethodsA total of 129 patients underwent transfemoral TAVR in Fuwai Hospital from May 2019 to October 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 83 males and 46 females with an average age of 72.26±8.97 years. The patients were divided into a pure native aortic valve regurgitation group (17 patients) and an aortic valve stenosis group (112 patients).ResultsThe incidence of valve in valve was higher in the pure native aortic valve regurgitation group (47.0% vs. 16.1%, P<0.01). There was no statistical difference between the two groups in conversion to surgery, intraoperative use of extracorporeal circulation, intraoperative left ventricular rupture, postoperative use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), peripheral vascular complications, disabled stroke, death, or pacemaker implantation. There was no statistical difference in the diameter of annulus (25.75±2.21 mm vs. 24.70±2.90 mm, P=0.068) or diameter of outflow tract (25.82±3.75 mm vs. 25.37±3.92 mm, P=0.514) between the pure native aortic valve regurgitation group and the aortic valve stenosis group.ConclusionTransfemoral TAVR is a feasible method for patients with pure native aortic valve regurgitation. The diameter of annulus plane, the diameter of outflow tract and the shape of outflow tract should be evaluated.
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has been confirmed to be safety and efficacy for high-risk elderly aortic stenosis, and the clinical effect of TAVR for medium and low-risk aortic stenosis is not worse than that of surgery. The development of surgical techniques and instruments has made cardiologists attempt to broaden the surgical indications. Many elderly and high-risk patients with pure native aortic regurgitation have been treated “off label” with similar techniques, completing artificial valve replacement, restoring valve function and improving the prognosis. However, due to the high requirements of surgical techniques and surgical complications, there is a lack of randomized controlled studies to confirm its safety and effectiveness. Unlike aortic stenosis, native aortic regurgitation presents unique challenges for transcatheter valves. In this article, the authors review current advances in the treatment of aortic valve regurgitation with TAVR.
Objective To investigate the treatment and prognosis of moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) in coronary artery disease(CAD). Methods From January 1998 to May 2006, 28 patients of CAD with moderate IMR underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and mitral valve plasty(MVP, 24) or mitral valve replacement (MVR,4). The Reed method were used in 9 cases, the annuloplasty ring were used in 15 cases. Mechanical valve were implanted in 1 case and biological valve in 3 cases. Results There was no operative or hospital death. Twentysix patients were followed up to a mean period of 41 months. There were two late death(one was MVP, the other was MVR). In MVP cases, nineteen patients were in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class Ⅰ and Ⅱ, 3 in class Ⅲ, which was better than that of preoperative one. Ultrasonic cardiography (UCG) examination showed no mitral regurgitation in 5 cases, mild in 7, light in 6, moderate in 3, severe in 1. Left atrial volume (LAV) and left ventricular enddiastolic volume (LVEDV) were 54.1±12.7ml and 60.9±14.8 ml, decreased more significantly than that preoperatively (Plt;0.05). In MVR cases, 2 cases were survival and followed. One patient was in NYHA functional class Ⅰ, 1 in class Ⅱ, which was better than that of preoperative one. Conclusion Moderate IMR with CAD should be treated carefully. MVP with annuloplasty ring have better early results. For patients with bad heart function and abnormal left ventricular wall motion, the late results need more studies.
The technique of transcatheter aortic valve implantation has become increasingly mature. Although the transapical approach has a certain degree of minimally invasive trauma, it still has the characteristics such as heart beating without cardiopulmonary bypass, and the low technical requirements of catheter guide wire. In particular, the valve path is short and coaxial, which is easy to manipulate, and pure regurgitation and stenosis can be easily operated and are not subject to the limit of peripheral artery stenosis. It is still one of China's main approaches for transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Its perioperative management still has specific features and differs from the femoral artery approach. In addition, there is little relevant literature abroad. Therefore, domestic experts in this field were organized to discuss the development of perioperative management specifications to provide reference and techniques support for developing this field in China and further improve the quality of clinical operation and perioperative management. It will provide more safe and more effective medical services to these patients.
