| 1. |
Jolles BM, Zangger P, Leyvraz PF. Factors predisposing to dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty: a multivariate analysis. J Arthroplasty, 2002, 17(3): 282-288.
|
| 2. |
Robinson RP, Simonian PT, Gradisar IM, et al. Joint motion and surface contact area related to component position in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Br), 1997, 79(1): 140-146.
|
| 3. |
Lewinnek GE, Lewis JL, Tarr R, et al. Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 1978, 60(2): 217-220.
|
| 4. |
Widmer KH. Is there really a “safe zone” for the placement of total hip components?//Bebazzo F, Falez F, Dietrich M. Bioceramics and Alternative Bearings in Joint Arthroplasty. Springer, 2006: 249-252.
|
| 5. |
Tezuka T, Heckmann ND, Bodner RJ, et al. Functional safe zone is superior to the Lewinnek safe zone for total hip arthroplasty: Why the Lewinnek safe zone is not always predictive of stability. J Arthroplasty, 2019, 34(1): 3-8.
|
| 6. |
Tiberi JV, Antoci V, Malchau H, et al. What is the fate of total hip arthroplasty (THA) acetabular component orientation when evaluated in the standing position? J Arthroplasty, 2015, 30(9): 1555-1560.
|
| 7. |
Pankaj A, Mittal A, Chawla A. The validity and reproducibility of cross table radiographs compared with CT scans for the measurement of anteversion of the acetabular component after total hip arthroplasty. Bone Joint J, 2017, 99-B(8): 1006-1011.
|
| 8. |
呂明, 吳堅, 柳劍, 等. 全髖置換術后髖臼和股骨假體聯合前傾角的CT 研究. 重慶醫學, 2014, (24): 3127-3129, 3132.
|
| 9. |
Abdel MP, von Roth P, Jennings MT, et al. What safe zone? The vast majority of dislocated THAs are within the Lewinnek safe zone for acetabular component position. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2016, 474(2): 386-391.
|
| 10. |
Amlie E, H?vik ?, Reiker?s O. Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty with 28 and 32-mm femoral head. J Orthop Traumatol, 2010, 11(2): 111-115.
|
| 11. |
孔剛, 劉克貴, 張樹棟, 等. 骨盆體位性角度變化對全髖關節置換術中髖臼放置角度的影響. 中華骨科雜志, 2018, 38(11): 683-689.
|
| 12. |
Wan Z, Malik A, Jaramaz B, et al. Imaging and navigation measurement of acetabular component position in THA. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2009, 467(1): 32-42.
|
| 13. |
Au J, Perriman DM, Neeman TM, et al. Standing or supine x-rays after total hip replacement-when is the safe zone not safe? Hip Int, 2014, 24(6): 616-623.
|
| 14. |
Perets I, Walsh JP, Close MR, et al. Robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty: Clinical outcomes and complication rate. Int J Med Robot, 2018, 14(4): e1912. doi: 10.1002/rcs.1912.
|
| 15. |
Banchetti R, Dari S, Ricciarini ME, et al. Comparison of conventional versus robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty using the Mako system: An Italian retrospective study. Journal of Health and Social Sciences, 2018, 1: 37-48.
|
| 16. |
Perets I, Walsh JP, Mu BH, et al. Short-term clinical outcomes of robotic-arm assisted total hip arthroplasty: A pair-matched controlled study. Orthopedics, 2021, 44(2): e236-e242.
|
| 17. |
Ng N, Gaston P, Simpson PM, et al. Robotic arm-assisted versus manual total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Bone Joint J, 2021, 103-B(6): 1009-1020.
|