| 1. |
?Fan L, Strasser-Weippl K, Li JJ, et al. Breast cancer in China. Lancet Oncol, 2014, 15(7):e279-e289.
|
| 2. |
Stavros AT, Thickman D, Rapp CL, et al. Solid breast nodules:use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Radiology, 1995, 196(1):123-134.
|
| 3. |
Miyamoto Y, Ito T, Takada E, et al. Efficacy of sonazoid (perflubutane) for contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the differentiation of focal breast lesions:phase 3 multicenter clinical trial. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2014, 202(4):W400-W407.
|
| 4. |
Hu Q, Wang XY, Zhu SY, et al. Meta-analysis of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions. Acta Radiol, 2015, 56(1):25-33.
|
| 5. |
Szabó BK, Saracco A, Tánczos E, et al. Correlation of contrast-enhanced ultrasound kinetics with prognostic factors in invasive breast cancer. Eur Radiol, 2013, 23(12):3228-3236.
|
| 6. |
Kwon HJ, Lee J. Low-cost quasi-real-time elastography using B-mode ultrasound images. Biomed Mater Eng, 2014, 24(4):1673-1692.
|
| 7. |
Lo CM, Chen YP, Chang YC, et al. Computer-aided strain evaluation for acoustic radiation force impulse imaging of breast masses. Ultrason Imaging, 2014, 36(3):151-166.
|
| 8. |
Kim YS, Park JG, Kim BS, et al. Diagnostic value of elastography using acoustic radiation force impulse imaging and strain ratio for breast tumors. J Breast Cancer, 2014, 17(1):76-82.
|
| 9. |
W?hrle NK, Hellerhoff K, Notohamiprodjo M, et al. Automated breast volume scanner (ABVS):a new approach for breast imaging. Radiologe, 2010, 50(11):973-981.
|
| 10. |
Wang HY, Jiang YX, Zhu QL, et al. Differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions:a comparison between automatically generated breast volume scans and handheld ultrasound examinations. Eur J Radiol, 2012, 81(11):3190-3200.
|
| 11. |
Wang ZL, Xu JH, Li JL, et al. Comparison of automated breast volume scanning to hand-held ultrasound and mammography. Radiol Med, 2012, 117(8):1287-1293.
|
| 12. |
Kaplan SS. Automated whole breast ultrasound. Radiol Clin North Am, 2014, 52(3):539-546.
|
| 13. |
Wojcinski S, Gyapong S, Farrokh A, et al. Diagnostic performance and inter-observer concordance in lesion detection with the automated breast volume scanner (ABVS). BMC Med Imaging, 2013, 13:36-47.
|
| 14. |
Scheidhauer K, Walter C, Seemann MD. FDG PET and other imaging modalities in the primary diagnosis of suspicious breast lesions. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2004, 31 Suppl 1:S70-S79.
|
| 15. |
Hou MF, Chuang HY, Ou-Yang F, et al. Comparison of breast mammography, sonography and physical examination for screening women at high risk of breast cancer in Taiwan. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2002, 28(4):415-420.
|
| 16. |
Friedewald SM, Rafferty EA, Rose SL, et al. Breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis in combination with digital mammography. JAMA, 2014, 311(24):2499-2507.
|
| 17. |
Kneeshaw PJ, Lowry M, Manton D, et al. Differentiation of benign from malignant breast disease associated with screening detected microcalcifications using dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Breast, 2006, 15(1):29-38.
|
| 18. |
Di Maggio C. State of the art of current modalities for the diagnosis of breast lesions. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2004, 31 Suppl 1:S56-S69.
|
| 19. |
Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Bieling HB, et al. MRI for diagnosis of pure ductal carcinoma in situ:a prospective observational study. Lancet, 2007, 370(9586):485-492.
|
| 20. |
Bartella L, Thakur SB, Morris EA, et al. Enhancing nonmass lesions in the breast:evaluation with proton (1H) MR spectroscopy. Radiology, 2007, 245(1):80-87.
|
| 21. |
Kuhl CK, Schild HH. Dynamic image interpretation of MRI of the breast. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2000, 12(6):965-974.
|
| 22. |
Murakami R, Kumita S, Yoshida T, et al. FDG-PET/CT in the diagnosis of recurrent breast cancer. Acta Radiol, 2012, 53(1):12-16.
|
| 23. |
Cermik TF, Mavi A, Basu S, et al. Impact of FDG PET on the preoperative staging of newly diagnosed breast cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2008, 35(3):475-483.
|
| 24. |
Eubank WB, Mankoff DA. Evolving role of positron emission tomography in breast cancer imaging. Semin Nucl Med, 2005, 35(2):84-99.
|
| 25. |
Obenauer S, Hermann KP, Grabbe E. Applications and literature review of the BI-RADS classification. Eur Radiol, 2005, 15(5):1027-1036.
|
| 26. |
Bruening W, Uhl S, Fontanarosa J, et al. Noninvasive diagnostic tests for breast abnormalities:update of a 2006 review. Rockville (MD):Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US), 2012:18-51.
|
| 27. |
Sadigh G, Carlos RC, Neal CH, et al. Accuracy of quantitative ultrasound elastography for differentiation of malignant and benign breast abnormalities:a meta-analysis.Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2012, 134(3):923-931.
|
| 28. |
Lei J, Yang P, Zhang L, et al.Diagnostic accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography for benign and malignant lesions in breasts:a meta-analysis.Eur Radiol, 2014, 24(3):595-602.
|
| 29. |
Xu HB, Li L, Xu Q.99Tcm sestamibi scintimammography for the diagnosis of breast cancer:meta-analysis and meta-regression.Nucl Med Commun, 2011, 32(11):980-988.
|
1/5
WeChat