The Low Anterior Resection Syndrome Score after The Intersphincteric Resection for Low Rectal Cancer_CHINESE JOURNAL OF BASES AND CLINICS IN GENERAL SURGERY

Authors：

 MAMing-xing ,  CONGJin-chun , CHENChun-sheng , XIAZhi-xiu

Department of Colorectal Surgery, Shengjing Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, Liaoning Province, China;

Corresponding?author：

CONGJin-chun, Email: congjinchun@sj-hospital.org

Keywords：

Low anterior resection syndrome score; Intersphincteric resection; Low anterior resection

DOI：

10.7507/1007-9424.20160315

Video：

Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Objective The low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) score is a simple and visual instrument assessing sphincter preserving surgery for low rectal cancer. The purpose of this study is to analyze the feasibility of using LARS score to assess the function after intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer. Methods Between March 2013 and June 2015, 76 patients underwent sphincter preserving surgery for low rectal cancer, 23 cases underwent intersphincteric resection set as ISR group, the other 53 cases received low anterior resection set as LAR group. LARS score, Saito function questionnaire, Wexner score, and European organization for research and treatment of cancer (EORTC) quality of life questionnaire core 30 (QLQ-C30), questionnaire module for colorectal cancer (QLQ-CR29) were compared for the two groups. Results There were 63.2 percent patients (48/76) appeared major LARS, 27.6 percent (21/76) minor LARS and 9.2 percent (7/76) no LARS, there were no statistically difference between the ISR and LAR groups (P=0.727), but the item of incontinence due to liquid stools appeared more obvious in ISR group (P=0.009). The items of faecel incontinence and sore skin for EORTC QLQ-CR29 were serious in ISR group (P < 0.05), the other item of EORTC QLQ-CR29 and EORTC QLQ-C30, Saito function questionnaire, Wexner score were similar between the two groups (all P > 0.05). Conclusion The anal function after intersphincteric resection is non-inferior to the low anterior resection for low rectal cancer, but both can appear serious low anterior resection syndrome.

Citation： MA Ming-xing, CONG Jin-chun, CHEN Chun-sheng, XIA Zhi-xiu. The Low Anterior Resection Syndrome Score after The Intersphincteric Resection for Low Rectal Cancer. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BASES AND CLINICS IN GENERAL SURGERY, 2016, 23(10): 1225-1230. doi: 10.7507/1007-9424.20160315 Copy

1.	Kyzer S, Gordon PH. Experience with the use of the circular stapler in rectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum, 1992, 35(7):696-706.
2.	Schiessel R, Karner-Hanusch J, Herbst F, et al. Intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer tumors. Br J Surg, 1994, 81(9):1376-1378.
3.	Martin ST, Heneghan HM, Winter DC. Systematic review of outcomes after intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer. Br J Surg, 2012, 99(5):603-612.
4.	Monson JR, Weiser MR, Buie WD, et al. Practice parameters for the management of rectal cancer (revised). Dis Colon Rectum, 2013, 56(5):535-550.
5.	Pachler J, Wille-Jorgensen P. Quality of life after rectal resection for cancer, with or without permanent colostomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2005, 18(2):CD004323.
6.	Aaronson NK,Ahmedzai S,Bergman B,et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30:a quality of life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst, 1993, 85(5):365-376.
7.	Sprangers MA, te Velde A, Aaronson NK. The construction and testing of the EORTC colorectal cancer-specific quality of life questionnaire module (QLQ-CR38). European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Study Group on Quality of Life. Eur J Cancer, 1999, 35(2):238-247.
8.	Gujral S, Conroy T, Fleissner C, et al. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Group. Assessing quality of life in patients with colorectal cancer:an update of the EORTC quality of life questionnaire. Eur J Cancer, 2007, 43(10):1564-1573.
9.	Emmertsen KJ, Laurberg S. Low anterior resection syndrome score:development and validation of a symptom-based scoring system for bowel dysfunction after low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Ann Surg, 2012, 255(5):922-928.
10.	Saito N, Ono M, Sugito M, et al. Early results of intersphincteric resection for patients with very low rectal cancer:an active approach to avoid a permanent colostomy. Dis Colon Rectum, 2004, 47(4):459-466.
11.	Jore JM, Wexner SD. Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum, 1993, 36(1):77-97.
12.	Cong JC, Chen CS, Ma MX, et al. Laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer:comparison of stapled and manual coloanal anastomosis. Colorectal Dis, 2014, 16(5):353-358.
13.	Rahbari NN, Weitz J, Hohenberger W, et al. Definition and grading of anastomotic leakage following anterior resection of the rectum:a proposal by the International Study Group of Rectal Cancer. Surgery, 2010, 147(3):339-351.
14.	叢進春, 戴顯偉, 張宏, 等. 低位直腸癌經內外括約肌間切除術后直腸肛管向量測壓的研究. 中國普外基礎與臨床雜志, 2007, 14(6):634-638.
15.	叢進春, 戴顯偉, 張宏, 等. 超低位直腸癌經括約肌間切除術后的肛門功能評價. 中國現代醫學雜志,2008, 18(6):795-798.
16.	池畔, 林惠銘, 盧星榕, 等. 腹腔鏡經盆腔入路括約肌間超低位直腸前切除術治療直腸癌可行性研究. 中國實用外科雜志, 2010, 30(3):203-205.
17.	Emmertsen KJ, Laurberg S; Rectal Cancer Function Study Group. Impact of bowel dysfunction on quality of life after sphincter-preserving resection for rectal cancer. Br J Surg, 2013, 100(10):1377-1387.
18.	Hou XT, Pang D, Lu Q, et al. Validation of the Chinese version of the low anterior resection syndrome score for measuring bowel dysfunction after sphincter-preserving surgery among rectal cancer patients. Eur J Oncol Nurs, 2015, 19(5):495-501.
19.	Chen TY, Wiltink LM, Nout RA, et al. Bowel function 14 years after preoperative short course radiotherapy and total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer:report of a multicenter randomized trial. Clin Colorectal Cancer, 2015, 14(2):106-114.
20.	Ekkarat P, Boonpipattanapong T, Tantiphlachiva K, et al. Factors determining low anterior resection syndrome after rectal cancer resection:a study in Thai patients. Asian J Surg, 2015, pii:S1015-9584(15) 00086-X.
21.	Luca F, Valvo M, Guerra-Cogorno M, et al. Functional results of robotic total intersphincteric resection with hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016, 42(6):841-847.
22.	Samalavicius NE, Dulskas A, Lasinskas M, et al. Validity and reliability of a Lithuanian version of low anterior resection syndrome score. Tech Coloproctol. 2016, 20(4):215-220.
23.	Carrillo A, Enríquez-Navascués JM, Rodríguez A, et al. Incidence and characterization of the anterior resection syndrome through the use of the LARS scale (low anterior resection score). Cir Esp, 2016, 94(3):137-143.
24.	Beppu N, Kimura H, Matsubara N, et al. Long-term functional outcomes of total mesorectal excision following chemoradiotherapy for lower rectal cancer:stapled anastomosis versus intersphincteric resection. Dig Surg, 2016, 33(1):33-42.
25.	叢進春, 陳春生, 馬明星, 等. 新輔助治療對局部進展期直腸癌患者的生活質量的影響.中國普通外科雜志, 2014, 23(4):451-457.

1. Kyzer S, Gordon PH. Experience with the use of the circular stapler in rectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum, 1992, 35(7):696-706.
2. Schiessel R, Karner-Hanusch J, Herbst F, et al. Intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer tumors. Br J Surg, 1994, 81(9):1376-1378.
3. Martin ST, Heneghan HM, Winter DC. Systematic review of outcomes after intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer. Br J Surg, 2012, 99(5):603-612.
4. Monson JR, Weiser MR, Buie WD, et al. Practice parameters for the management of rectal cancer (revised). Dis Colon Rectum, 2013, 56(5):535-550.
5. Pachler J, Wille-Jorgensen P. Quality of life after rectal resection for cancer, with or without permanent colostomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2005, 18(2):CD004323.
6. Aaronson NK,Ahmedzai S,Bergman B,et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30:a quality of life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst, 1993, 85(5):365-376.
7. Sprangers MA, te Velde A, Aaronson NK. The construction and testing of the EORTC colorectal cancer-specific quality of life questionnaire module (QLQ-CR38). European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Study Group on Quality of Life. Eur J Cancer, 1999, 35(2):238-247.
8. Gujral S, Conroy T, Fleissner C, et al. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Group. Assessing quality of life in patients with colorectal cancer:an update of the EORTC quality of life questionnaire. Eur J Cancer, 2007, 43(10):1564-1573.
9. Emmertsen KJ, Laurberg S. Low anterior resection syndrome score:development and validation of a symptom-based scoring system for bowel dysfunction after low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Ann Surg, 2012, 255(5):922-928.
10. Saito N, Ono M, Sugito M, et al. Early results of intersphincteric resection for patients with very low rectal cancer:an active approach to avoid a permanent colostomy. Dis Colon Rectum, 2004, 47(4):459-466.
11. Jore JM, Wexner SD. Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum, 1993, 36(1):77-97.
12. Cong JC, Chen CS, Ma MX, et al. Laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer:comparison of stapled and manual coloanal anastomosis. Colorectal Dis, 2014, 16(5):353-358.
13. Rahbari NN, Weitz J, Hohenberger W, et al. Definition and grading of anastomotic leakage following anterior resection of the rectum:a proposal by the International Study Group of Rectal Cancer. Surgery, 2010, 147(3):339-351.
14. 叢進春, 戴顯偉, 張宏, 等. 低位直腸癌經內外括約肌間切除術后直腸肛管向量測壓的研究. 中國普外基礎與臨床雜志, 2007, 14(6):634-638.
15. 叢進春, 戴顯偉, 張宏, 等. 超低位直腸癌經括約肌間切除術后的肛門功能評價. 中國現代醫學雜志,2008, 18(6):795-798.
16. 池畔, 林惠銘, 盧星榕, 等. 腹腔鏡經盆腔入路括約肌間超低位直腸前切除術治療直腸癌可行性研究. 中國實用外科雜志, 2010, 30(3):203-205.
17. Emmertsen KJ, Laurberg S; Rectal Cancer Function Study Group. Impact of bowel dysfunction on quality of life after sphincter-preserving resection for rectal cancer. Br J Surg, 2013, 100(10):1377-1387.
18. Hou XT, Pang D, Lu Q, et al. Validation of the Chinese version of the low anterior resection syndrome score for measuring bowel dysfunction after sphincter-preserving surgery among rectal cancer patients. Eur J Oncol Nurs, 2015, 19(5):495-501.
19. Chen TY, Wiltink LM, Nout RA, et al. Bowel function 14 years after preoperative short course radiotherapy and total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer:report of a multicenter randomized trial. Clin Colorectal Cancer, 2015, 14(2):106-114.
20. Ekkarat P, Boonpipattanapong T, Tantiphlachiva K, et al. Factors determining low anterior resection syndrome after rectal cancer resection:a study in Thai patients. Asian J Surg, 2015, pii:S1015-9584(15) 00086-X.
21. Luca F, Valvo M, Guerra-Cogorno M, et al. Functional results of robotic total intersphincteric resection with hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016, 42(6):841-847.
22. Samalavicius NE, Dulskas A, Lasinskas M, et al. Validity and reliability of a Lithuanian version of low anterior resection syndrome score. Tech Coloproctol. 2016, 20(4):215-220.
23. Carrillo A, Enríquez-Navascués JM, Rodríguez A, et al. Incidence and characterization of the anterior resection syndrome through the use of the LARS scale (low anterior resection score). Cir Esp, 2016, 94(3):137-143.
24. Beppu N, Kimura H, Matsubara N, et al. Long-term functional outcomes of total mesorectal excision following chemoradiotherapy for lower rectal cancer:stapled anastomosis versus intersphincteric resection. Dig Surg, 2016, 33(1):33-42.
25. 叢進春, 陳春生, 馬明星, 等. 新輔助治療對局部進展期直腸癌患者的生活質量的影響.中國普通外科雜志, 2014, 23(4):451-457.

Previous Article
Precise Dissection of Lymph Node Guided by Carbon Nanoparticles in Reoperation for Thyroid Cancer Recurrence
Next Article
Laparoscopic versus Conventional Open Appendectomy for Appendicitis

CHINESE JOURNAL OF BASES AND CLINICS IN GENERAL SURGERY

The Low Anterior Resection Syndrome Score after The Intersphincteric Resection for Low Rectal Cancer

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Previous Article

Next Article

Format

Content