Efficacy of three types of transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with upper limb hemiparesis after stroke: a network meta-analysis_Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

Authors：

PENG Tong ¹ ,  ZHAO Yaning ¹ , LIU Yao ¹ , ZHANG Wei ^1,2 , ZHENG Guanglei ¹ , YANG Tianhe ¹

1. College of Nursing and Rehabilitation, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan 603210, P. R. China;
2. Department of Nursing, the Affiliated Hospital of North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan 603210, P. R. China;

Corresponding?author：

ZHAO Yaning, Email: 993241932@qq.com

Keywords：

Stroke; Transcranial direct current stimulation; Btdcs; Atdcs; Ctdcs; Upper limb; Network meta-analysis

DOI：

10.7507/1672-2531.202207123

Video：

Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Objective To systematically review the efficacy of three transcranial direct current stimulation protocols (anodal stimulation, cathodal stimulation, and bipolar stimulation) on upper extremity function interventions in stroke patients. Methods PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, CBM, WanFang Data and VIP databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the efficacy of three transcranial direct current stimulation protocols on upper extremity function interventions in stroke patients from inception to April 2022. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies; then, the network meta-analysis was performed by using R software and ADDIS software. Results A total of 64 RCTs involving 3 968 patients were included. The results of network meta-analysis showed that, the probability order of the three stimulation methods on FMA-U, MBI, NIHSS score was: anode>bipolar>cathode>control. In addition, the probability order on ARAT and BBT score was: anode>cathode>bipolar>control. Conclusion Current evidence shows that the intervention effect of anodic stimulation on upper limb function of stroke patients may be better. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high-quality studies are needed to verify above conclusion.

Citation： PENG Tong, ZHAO Yaning, LIU Yao, ZHANG Wei, ZHENG Guanglei, YANG Tianhe. Efficacy of three types of transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with upper limb hemiparesis after stroke: a network meta-analysis. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2022, 22(12): 1436-1444. doi: 10.7507/1672-2531.202207123 Copy

1.	《中國腦卒中防治報告》編寫組. 《中國腦卒中防治報告2020》概要. 中國腦血管病雜志, 2022, 19(2): 136-144.
2.	Kramer SF, Hung SH, Brodtmann A. The impact of physical activity before and after stroke on stroke risk and recovery: a narrative review. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep, 2019, 19(6): 28.
3.	Raghavan P. Upper limb motor impairment after stroke. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am, 2015, 26(4): 599-610.
4.	Gittler M, Davis AM. Guidelines for adult stroke rehabilitation and recovery. JAMA, 2018, 319(8): 820-821.
5.	Chase HW, Boudewyn MA, Carter CS, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation: a roadmap for research, from mechanism of action to clinical implementation. Mol Psychiatry, 2020, 25(2): 397-407.
6.	Kim H, Kim J, Lee G, et al. Task-related hemodynamic changes induced by high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation in chronic stroke patients: an uncontrolled pilot fNIRS study. Brain Sci, 2022, 12(4): 453.
7.	Alisar DC, Ozen S, Sozay S. Effects of bihemispheric transcranial direct current stimulation on upper extremity function in stroke patients: a randomized double-blind sham-controlled study. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis, 2020, 29(1): 104454.
8.	Llorens R, Fuentes MA, Borrego A, et al. Effectiveness of a combined transcranial direct current stimulation and virtual reality-based intervention on upper limb function in chronic individuals post-stroke with persistent severe hemiparesis: a randomized controlled trial. J Neuroeng Rehabil, 2021, 18(1): 108.
9.	Kim SH. Effects of dual transcranial direct current stimulation and modified constraint-induced movement therapy to improve upper-limb function after stroke: a double-blinded, pilot randomized controlled trial. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis, 2021, 30(9): 105928.
10.	Chen SC, Yang LY, Adeel M, et al. Transcranial electrostimulation with special waveforms enhances upper-limb motor function in patients with chronic stroke: a pilot randomized controlled trial. J Neuroeng Rehabil, 2021, 18(1): 106.
11.	Yao X, Cui L, Wang J, et al. Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation with virtual reality on upper limb function in patients with ischemic stroke: a randomized controlled trial. J Neuroeng Rehabil, 2020, 17(1): 73.
12.	Palimeris S. Combining a tailored strength training program with transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) to improve upper extremity function in chronic stroke patients. Montreal: McGill University, 2020.
13.	Liao WW, Chiang WC, Lin KC, et al. Timing-dependent effects of transcranial direct current stimulation with mirror therapy on daily function and motor control in chronic stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study. J Neuroeng Rehabil, 2020, 17(1): 101.
14.	Mazzoleni S, Tran VD, Dario P, et al. Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) combined with wrist robot-assisted rehabilitation on motor recovery in subacute stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng, 2019, 27(7): 1458-1466.
15.	Jin M, Zhang Z, Bai Z, et al. Timing-dependent interaction effects of tDCS with mirror therapy on upper extremity motor recovery in patients with chronic stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study. J Neurol Sci, 2019, 405: 116436.
16.	Beaulieu LD, Blanchette AK, Mercier C, et al. Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of bilateral transcranial direct current stimulation combined to a resistance training program in chronic stroke survivors: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled pilot study. Restor Neurol Neurosci, 2019, 37(4): 333-346.
17.	Dehem S, Gilliaux M, Lejeune T, et al. Effectiveness of a single session of dual-transcranial direct current stimulation in combination with upper limb robotic-assisted rehabilitation in chronic stroke patients: a randomized, double-blind, cross-over study. Int J Rehabil Res, 2018, 41(2): 138-145.
18.	Achacheluee ST, Rahnama L, Karimi N, et al. The effect of unihemispheric concurrent dual-site transcranial direct current stimulation of primary motor and dorsolateral prefrontal cortices on motor function in patients with sub-acute stroke. Front Hum Neurosci, 2018, 12: 441.
19.	曲斯偉, 朱琳, 宋為群. 經顱直流電刺激聯合運動再學習方案對卒中患者上肢運動功能的改善作用. 中國腦血管病雜志, 2017, 14(1): 20-24.
20.	曲斯偉, 宋為群. 陰極經顱直流電刺激對卒中患者上肢運動功能的影響. 中國腦血管病雜志, 2017, 14(12): 622-627.
21.	Mazzoleni S, Tran VD, Iardella L, et al. Randomized, sham-controlled trial based on transcranial direct current stimulation and wrist robot-assisted integrated treatment on subacute stroke patients: Intermediate results. IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot, 2017, 2017: 555-560.
22.	Koh CL, Lin JH, Jeng JS, et al. Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation with sensory modulation on stroke motor rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2017, 98(12): 2477-2484.
23.	Straudi S, Fregni F, Martinuzzi C, et al. tDCS and robotics on upper limb stroke rehabilitation: effect modification by stroke duration and type of stroke. Biomed Res Int, 2016, 2016: 5068127.
24.	Pinto EF, Gupta A, Kulkarni GB, et al. A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study of transcranial direct current stimulation as an augmentation intervention for the attenuation of motor deficits in patients with stroke. J ECT, 2021, 37(4): 281-290.
25.	Triccas LT, Burridge JH, Hughes A, et al. A double-blinded randomised controlled trial exploring the effect of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation and uni-lateral robot therapy for the impaired upper limb in sub-acute and chronic stroke. NeuroRehabilitation, 2015, 37(2): 181-191.
26.	Viana RT, Laurentino GE, Souza RJ, et al. Effects of the addition of transcranial direct current stimulation to virtual reality therapy after stroke: a pilot randomized controlled trial. NeuroRehabilitation, 2014, 34(3): 437-446.
27.	Lee SJ, Chun MH. Combination transcranial direct current stimulation and virtual reality therapy for upper extremity training in patients with subacute stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2014, 95(3): 431-438.
28.	Fusco A, Iosa M, Venturiero V, et al. After vs. priming effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on upper extremity motor recovery in patients with subacute stroke. Restor Neurol Neurosci, 2014, 32(2): 301-312.
29.	Cha HK, Ji SG, Kim MK, et al. Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation of function in patients with stroke. J Phys Ther Sci, 2014, 26(3): 363-365.
30.	Wu D, Qian L, Zorowitz RD, et al. Effects on decreasing upper-limb poststroke muscle tone using transcranial direct current stimulation: a randomized sham-controlled study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2013, 94(1): 1-8.
31.	Rossi C, Sallustio F, Di Legge S, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation of the affected hemisphere does not accelerate recovery of acute stroke patients. Eur J Neurol, 2013, 20(1): 202-204.
32.	Rocha S, Silva E, Foerster á, et al. The impact of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) combined with modified constraint-induced movement therapy (mCIMT) on upper limb function in chronic stroke: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Disabil Rehabil, 2016, 38(7): 653-660.
33.	Lindenberg R, Renga V, Zhu LL, et al. Bihemispheric brain stimulation facilitates motor recovery in chronic stroke patients. Neurology, 2010, 75(24): 2176-2184.
34.	屈亞萍, 吳東宇, 涂顯琴, 等. 經顱直流電刺激對緩解卒中患者上肢痙攣的療效觀察. 中國腦血管病雜志, 2009, 6(11): 586-589.
35.	Kim DY, Lim JY, Kang EK, et al. Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on motor recovery in patients with subacute stroke. Am J Phys Med Rehabil, 2010, 89(11): 879-886.
36.	Hesse S, Werner C, Schonhardt EM, et al. Combined transcranial direct current stimulation and robot-assisted arm training in subacute stroke patients: a pilot study. Restor Neurol Neurosci, 2007, 25(1): 9-15.
37.	Prathum T, Piriyaprasarth P, Aneksan B, et al. Effects of home-based dual-hemispheric transcranial direct current stimulation combined with exercise on upper and lower limb motor performance in patients with chronic stroke. Disabil Rehabil, 2022, 44(15): 3868-3879.
38.	陳勇, 孫媛媛, 張倩怡. 經顱直流電刺激聯合鏡像神經元康復訓練治療腦卒中后偏癱患者的療效分析. 現代醫學與健康研究電子雜志, 2022, 6(5): 80-83.
39.	任莎莎, 王曉菊, 陳安亮, 等. 經顱直流電刺激聯合音樂鏡像療法對腦卒中偏癱患者負性情緒及上肢運動功能的影響. 中華物理醫學與康復雜志, 2021, 43(11): 1003-1006.
40.	楊婷, 陳慧柚, 高政, 等. 經顱直流電刺激聯合上肢機器人訓練對腦卒中后偏癱上肢運動功能影響的磁共振彌散張量成像研究. 中華物理醫學與康復雜志, 2021, 43(9): 781-786.
41.	余紅, 陳正君. 鏡像療法聯合經顱直流電刺激對腦卒中偏癱患者上肢運動功能的影響. 中華物理醫學與康復雜志, 2021, 43(9): 801-803.
42.	王超, 牛德旺, 吳文波. tDCS療法應用于腦卒中后偏癱患者的效果及對感覺功能的影響分析. 醫學理論與實踐, 2021, 34(14): 2533-2534.
43.	李小麗. 鏡像神經元運動模仿訓練聯合經顱直流電刺激對腦卒中后偏癱患者上肢功能及日常生活能力的影響. 新疆醫科大學學報, 2021, 44(6): 713-717.
44.	張潔, 王春方, 楊飛, 等. 陰極經顱直流電刺激聯合機器人治療對腦卒中后上肢功能障礙的影響. 中華物理醫學與康復雜志, 2021, 43(3): 235-238.
45.	王岫, 張穎, 王春方, 等. 經顱直流電刺激結合針刺治療腦卒中后上肢功能障礙的臨床療效. 中國康復, 2021, 36(3): 131-134.
46.	Di Lazzaro V, Dileone M, Capone F, et al. Immediate and late modulation of interhemipheric imbalance with bilateral transcranial direct current stimulation in acute stroke. Brain Stimul, 2014, 7(6): 841-848.
47.	魏月, 夏靜, 舒艷, 等. 經顱直流電刺激對腦梗死偏癱患者上肢功能及血清BDNF, NGF, NT-3水平的影響. 現代醫學與健康研究電子雜志, 2020, 4(17): 1-3.
48.	段秋霞. 經顱直流電刺激聯合任務導向性訓練對腦卒中后偏癱患者肢體功能及NIHSS評分的影響. 湖北科技學院學報(醫學版), 2020, 34(4): 329-331.
49.	鄒飛, 王禮強, 劉波. 陰極經顱直流電刺激對腦卒中偏癱患者上肢功能康復的影響. 中國康復醫學雜志, 2020, 35(6): 732-734.
50.	王強. 鏡像療法聯合經顱直流電刺激對腦卒中患者上肢運動功能障礙的療效研究. 西安: 西安體育學院, 2020.
51.	劉遠文, 黃麗, 張淑嫻, 等. 經顱直流電刺激聯合虛擬現實訓練治療腦卒中患者上肢功能的隨機對照單盲研究. 華西醫學, 2020, 35(5): 544-549.
52.	姜妍. 經顱直流電刺激治療腦卒中后手功能障礙的療效觀察. 呼和浩特: 內蒙古醫科大學, 2020.
53.	周金生, 呂曉, 章麗麗, 等. 經顱直流電刺激治療聯合常規輔助治療在腦卒中偏癱患者上肢功能康復中的應用. 現代實用醫學, 2020, 32(5): 579-580.
54.	鄭蘇, 彭力, 穆敬平. 經顱直流電刺激聯合分期針刺對腦卒中偏癱患者上肢運動功能的影響. 中國醫藥導報, 2020, 17(10): 86-89.
55.	孫武東, 蔡倩, 徐亮, 等. 經顱直流電刺激聯合雙側訓練對腦卒中患者上肢功能恢復的影響. 中華物理醫學與康復雜志, 2020, (3): 205-206-207-208.
56.	陳慧, 蔡倩, 徐亮, 等. 經顱直流電刺激聯合鏡像療法對腦卒中患者上肢運動功能的影響. 中國康復理論與實踐, 2020, 26(3): 301-305.
57.	華強, 夏文廣, 李冰冰, 等. 經顱直流電刺激聯合虛擬情景互動訓練對腦梗死偏癱上肢功能及ADL的影響. 中國康復, 2020, 35(1): 15-18.
58.	鄭嬋娟, 夏文廣, 段璨, 等. 經顱直流電刺激對腦卒中后上肢及手功能恢復的隨機對照研究. 中國康復, 2019, 34(12): 623-626.
59.	湯從智, 蔡倩, 楊璽, 等. 經顱直流電刺激介入任務導向性訓練對腦卒中患者上肢功能障礙的影響. 中華物理醫學與康復雜志, 2019, 41(8): 570-574.
60.	張勝利. 抗阻運動聯合經顱直流電刺激治療對卒中后偏癱患者肢體功能影響觀察. 齊齊哈爾醫學院學報, 2019, 40(12): 1499-1500.
61.	金景, 蔣蘇, 潘曉勵, 等. 經顱直流電刺激聯合康復訓練對腦卒中偏癱患者認知功能及肢體運動功能的影響. 中華物理醫學與康復雜志, 2019, 41(6): 415-417.
62.	張麗群. 經顱直流電刺激在卒中后上肢痙攣臨床應用的機制研究. 昆明: 昆明醫科大學, 2019.
63.	李亞斌, 馮海霞, 王紅霞, 等. 經顱直流電刺激結合鏡像神經元康復訓練對腦卒中患者上肢功能及體感誘發電位的影響. 中國康復, 2019, 34(4): 187-190.
64.	郭麗云, 降凌燕, 趙亞路. 經顱直流電刺激結合感覺功能訓練對腦卒中后感覺障礙的療效觀察. 中國康復, 2018, 33(6): 472-475.
65.	周艷平, 張妍昭, 王剛, 等. 經顱直流電刺激聯合運動想象療法改善腦卒中患者上肢功能的療效觀察. 中華物理醫學與康復雜志, 2018, 40(9): 657-661.
66.	王彥青, 肖小華. 經顱直流電刺激聯合常規康復治療在腦卒中偏癱上肢運動功能和失語癥康復中的作用分析. 齊齊哈爾醫學院學報, 2018, 39(5): 510-511.
67.	唐朝正. 經顱直流電刺激改善慢性期腦卒中手功能障礙的腦機制研究. 福州: 福建中醫藥大學, 2016.
68.	尹昱, 左秀芹, 呂艷玲, 等. 經顱直流電刺激對腦卒中患者上肢運動功能障礙的療效. 中國康復理論與實踐, 2015, (7): 830-833.
69.	張韶輝, 吳朝陽, 曹韡悅, 等. 經顱直流電刺激聯合上肢智能等速訓練器治療對腦卒中偏癱患者上肢運動功能的影響. 山西醫藥雜志, 2019, 48(15): 1823-1826.
70.	Gong Y, Long XM, Xu Y, et al. Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with transcranial direct current stimulation on motor function and cortex excitability in subacute stroke patients: A randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil, 2021, 35(5): 718-727.
71.	Pollock A, Farmer SE, Brady MC, et al. Interventions for improving upper limb function after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2014, (11): CD010820.
72.	李懿, 屈云, 茍巍, 等. 陽極經顱直流電刺激治療腦卒中后手功能障礙的Meta分析. 中國康復醫學雜志, 2016, 31(9): 1001-1007.
73.	朱毅, 郭佳寶, 顧一煌, 等. 陰極經顱直流電刺激改善腦卒中患者上肢功能障礙的系統評價. 中國康復理論與實踐, 2014, (4): 311-317.
74.	Elsner B, Kugler J, Pohl M, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for improving activities of daily living, and physical and cognitive functioning, in people after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2020, (11): CD009645.
75.	Khedr EM, Shawky OA, El-Hammady DH, et al. Effect of anodal versus cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation on stroke rehabilitation: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 2013, 27(7): 592-601.
76.	何曉闊, 劉慧華, 余果, 等. 經顱直流電刺激與功能性電刺激的不同時序組合對腦卒中偏癱患者腦功能連接的即時影響. 中國康復醫學雜志, 2021, 36(10): 1213-1219.
77.	Nudo RJ. Mechanisms for recovery of motor function following cortical damage. Curr Opin Neurobiol, 2006, 16(6): 638-644.
78.	Zhao C, Woodman GF. Converging Evidence that neural plasticity underlies transcranial direct-current stimulation. J Cogn Neurosci, 2021, 33(1): 146-157.
79.	Siebner HR, Lang N, Rizzo V, et al. Preconditioning of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation with transcranial direct current stimulation: evidence for homeostatic plasticity in the human motor cortex. J Neurosci, 2004, 24(13): 3379-3385.
80.	Polanía R, Paulus W, Antal A, et al. Introducing graph theory to track for neuroplastic alterations in the resting human brain: a transcranial direct current stimulation study. Neuroimage, 2011, 54(3): 2287-2296.
81.	Nicolo P, Magnin C, Pedrazzini E, et al. Comparison of neuroplastic responses to cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation and continuous theta burst stimulation in subacute stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2018, 99(5): 862-872.
82.	Mondini V, Mangia AL, Cappello A. Single-session tDCS over the dominant hemisphere affects contralateral spectral EEG power, but does not enhance neurofeedback-guided event-related desynchronization of the non-dominant hemisphere's sensorimotor rhythm. PLoS One, 2018, 13(3): e0193004.
83.	Takai H, Tsubaki A, Sugawara K, et al. Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation over the primary motor cortex on cerebral blood flow: a time course study using near-infrared spectroscopy. Adv Exp Med Biol, 2016, 876: 335-341.
84.	Mahmoudi H, Borhani Haghighi A, Petramfar P, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation: electrode montage in stroke. Disabil Rehabil, 2011, 33(15-16): 1383-1388.
85.	Lotze M, Markert J, Sauseng P, et al. The role of multiple contralesional motor areas for complex hand movements after internal capsular lesion. J Neurosci, 2006, 26(22): 6096-6102.
86.	Bradnam LV, Stinear CM, Barber PA, et al. Contralesional hemisphere control of the proximal paretic upper limb following stroke. Cereb Cortex, 2012, 22(11): 2662-2671.

1. 《中國腦卒中防治報告》編寫組. 《中國腦卒中防治報告2020》概要. 中國腦血管病雜志, 2022, 19(2): 136-144.
2. Kramer SF, Hung SH, Brodtmann A. The impact of physical activity before and after stroke on stroke risk and recovery: a narrative review. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep, 2019, 19(6): 28.
3. Raghavan P. Upper limb motor impairment after stroke. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am, 2015, 26(4): 599-610.
4. Gittler M, Davis AM. Guidelines for adult stroke rehabilitation and recovery. JAMA, 2018, 319(8): 820-821.
5. Chase HW, Boudewyn MA, Carter CS, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation: a roadmap for research, from mechanism of action to clinical implementation. Mol Psychiatry, 2020, 25(2): 397-407.
6. Kim H, Kim J, Lee G, et al. Task-related hemodynamic changes induced by high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation in chronic stroke patients: an uncontrolled pilot fNIRS study. Brain Sci, 2022, 12(4): 453.
7. Alisar DC, Ozen S, Sozay S. Effects of bihemispheric transcranial direct current stimulation on upper extremity function in stroke patients: a randomized double-blind sham-controlled study. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis, 2020, 29(1): 104454.
8. Llorens R, Fuentes MA, Borrego A, et al. Effectiveness of a combined transcranial direct current stimulation and virtual reality-based intervention on upper limb function in chronic individuals post-stroke with persistent severe hemiparesis: a randomized controlled trial. J Neuroeng Rehabil, 2021, 18(1): 108.
9. Kim SH. Effects of dual transcranial direct current stimulation and modified constraint-induced movement therapy to improve upper-limb function after stroke: a double-blinded, pilot randomized controlled trial. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis, 2021, 30(9): 105928.
10. Chen SC, Yang LY, Adeel M, et al. Transcranial electrostimulation with special waveforms enhances upper-limb motor function in patients with chronic stroke: a pilot randomized controlled trial. J Neuroeng Rehabil, 2021, 18(1): 106.
11. Yao X, Cui L, Wang J, et al. Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation with virtual reality on upper limb function in patients with ischemic stroke: a randomized controlled trial. J Neuroeng Rehabil, 2020, 17(1): 73.
12. Palimeris S. Combining a tailored strength training program with transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) to improve upper extremity function in chronic stroke patients. Montreal: McGill University, 2020.
13. Liao WW, Chiang WC, Lin KC, et al. Timing-dependent effects of transcranial direct current stimulation with mirror therapy on daily function and motor control in chronic stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study. J Neuroeng Rehabil, 2020, 17(1): 101.
14. Mazzoleni S, Tran VD, Dario P, et al. Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) combined with wrist robot-assisted rehabilitation on motor recovery in subacute stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng, 2019, 27(7): 1458-1466.
15. Jin M, Zhang Z, Bai Z, et al. Timing-dependent interaction effects of tDCS with mirror therapy on upper extremity motor recovery in patients with chronic stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study. J Neurol Sci, 2019, 405: 116436.
16. Beaulieu LD, Blanchette AK, Mercier C, et al. Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of bilateral transcranial direct current stimulation combined to a resistance training program in chronic stroke survivors: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled pilot study. Restor Neurol Neurosci, 2019, 37(4): 333-346.
17. Dehem S, Gilliaux M, Lejeune T, et al. Effectiveness of a single session of dual-transcranial direct current stimulation in combination with upper limb robotic-assisted rehabilitation in chronic stroke patients: a randomized, double-blind, cross-over study. Int J Rehabil Res, 2018, 41(2): 138-145.
18. Achacheluee ST, Rahnama L, Karimi N, et al. The effect of unihemispheric concurrent dual-site transcranial direct current stimulation of primary motor and dorsolateral prefrontal cortices on motor function in patients with sub-acute stroke. Front Hum Neurosci, 2018, 12: 441.
19. 曲斯偉, 朱琳, 宋為群. 經顱直流電刺激聯合運動再學習方案對卒中患者上肢運動功能的改善作用. 中國腦血管病雜志, 2017, 14(1): 20-24.
20. 曲斯偉, 宋為群. 陰極經顱直流電刺激對卒中患者上肢運動功能的影響. 中國腦血管病雜志, 2017, 14(12): 622-627.
21. Mazzoleni S, Tran VD, Iardella L, et al. Randomized, sham-controlled trial based on transcranial direct current stimulation and wrist robot-assisted integrated treatment on subacute stroke patients: Intermediate results. IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot, 2017, 2017: 555-560.
22. Koh CL, Lin JH, Jeng JS, et al. Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation with sensory modulation on stroke motor rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2017, 98(12): 2477-2484.
23. Straudi S, Fregni F, Martinuzzi C, et al. tDCS and robotics on upper limb stroke rehabilitation: effect modification by stroke duration and type of stroke. Biomed Res Int, 2016, 2016: 5068127.
24. Pinto EF, Gupta A, Kulkarni GB, et al. A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study of transcranial direct current stimulation as an augmentation intervention for the attenuation of motor deficits in patients with stroke. J ECT, 2021, 37(4): 281-290.
25. Triccas LT, Burridge JH, Hughes A, et al. A double-blinded randomised controlled trial exploring the effect of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation and uni-lateral robot therapy for the impaired upper limb in sub-acute and chronic stroke. NeuroRehabilitation, 2015, 37(2): 181-191.
26. Viana RT, Laurentino GE, Souza RJ, et al. Effects of the addition of transcranial direct current stimulation to virtual reality therapy after stroke: a pilot randomized controlled trial. NeuroRehabilitation, 2014, 34(3): 437-446.
27. Lee SJ, Chun MH. Combination transcranial direct current stimulation and virtual reality therapy for upper extremity training in patients with subacute stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2014, 95(3): 431-438.
28. Fusco A, Iosa M, Venturiero V, et al. After vs. priming effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on upper extremity motor recovery in patients with subacute stroke. Restor Neurol Neurosci, 2014, 32(2): 301-312.
29. Cha HK, Ji SG, Kim MK, et al. Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation of function in patients with stroke. J Phys Ther Sci, 2014, 26(3): 363-365.
30. Wu D, Qian L, Zorowitz RD, et al. Effects on decreasing upper-limb poststroke muscle tone using transcranial direct current stimulation: a randomized sham-controlled study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2013, 94(1): 1-8.
31. Rossi C, Sallustio F, Di Legge S, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation of the affected hemisphere does not accelerate recovery of acute stroke patients. Eur J Neurol, 2013, 20(1): 202-204.
32. Rocha S, Silva E, Foerster á, et al. The impact of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) combined with modified constraint-induced movement therapy (mCIMT) on upper limb function in chronic stroke: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Disabil Rehabil, 2016, 38(7): 653-660.
33. Lindenberg R, Renga V, Zhu LL, et al. Bihemispheric brain stimulation facilitates motor recovery in chronic stroke patients. Neurology, 2010, 75(24): 2176-2184.
34. 屈亞萍, 吳東宇, 涂顯琴, 等. 經顱直流電刺激對緩解卒中患者上肢痙攣的療效觀察. 中國腦血管病雜志, 2009, 6(11): 586-589.
35. Kim DY, Lim JY, Kang EK, et al. Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on motor recovery in patients with subacute stroke. Am J Phys Med Rehabil, 2010, 89(11): 879-886.
36. Hesse S, Werner C, Schonhardt EM, et al. Combined transcranial direct current stimulation and robot-assisted arm training in subacute stroke patients: a pilot study. Restor Neurol Neurosci, 2007, 25(1): 9-15.
37. Prathum T, Piriyaprasarth P, Aneksan B, et al. Effects of home-based dual-hemispheric transcranial direct current stimulation combined with exercise on upper and lower limb motor performance in patients with chronic stroke. Disabil Rehabil, 2022, 44(15): 3868-3879.
38. 陳勇, 孫媛媛, 張倩怡. 經顱直流電刺激聯合鏡像神經元康復訓練治療腦卒中后偏癱患者的療效分析. 現代醫學與健康研究電子雜志, 2022, 6(5): 80-83.
39. 任莎莎, 王曉菊, 陳安亮, 等. 經顱直流電刺激聯合音樂鏡像療法對腦卒中偏癱患者負性情緒及上肢運動功能的影響. 中華物理醫學與康復雜志, 2021, 43(11): 1003-1006.
40. 楊婷, 陳慧柚, 高政, 等. 經顱直流電刺激聯合上肢機器人訓練對腦卒中后偏癱上肢運動功能影響的磁共振彌散張量成像研究. 中華物理醫學與康復雜志, 2021, 43(9): 781-786.
41. 余紅, 陳正君. 鏡像療法聯合經顱直流電刺激對腦卒中偏癱患者上肢運動功能的影響. 中華物理醫學與康復雜志, 2021, 43(9): 801-803.
42. 王超, 牛德旺, 吳文波. tDCS療法應用于腦卒中后偏癱患者的效果及對感覺功能的影響分析. 醫學理論與實踐, 2021, 34(14): 2533-2534.
43. 李小麗. 鏡像神經元運動模仿訓練聯合經顱直流電刺激對腦卒中后偏癱患者上肢功能及日常生活能力的影響. 新疆醫科大學學報, 2021, 44(6): 713-717.
44. 張潔, 王春方, 楊飛, 等. 陰極經顱直流電刺激聯合機器人治療對腦卒中后上肢功能障礙的影響. 中華物理醫學與康復雜志, 2021, 43(3): 235-238.
45. 王岫, 張穎, 王春方, 等. 經顱直流電刺激結合針刺治療腦卒中后上肢功能障礙的臨床療效. 中國康復, 2021, 36(3): 131-134.
46. Di Lazzaro V, Dileone M, Capone F, et al. Immediate and late modulation of interhemipheric imbalance with bilateral transcranial direct current stimulation in acute stroke. Brain Stimul, 2014, 7(6): 841-848.
47. 魏月, 夏靜, 舒艷, 等. 經顱直流電刺激對腦梗死偏癱患者上肢功能及血清BDNF, NGF, NT-3水平的影響. 現代醫學與健康研究電子雜志, 2020, 4(17): 1-3.
48. 段秋霞. 經顱直流電刺激聯合任務導向性訓練對腦卒中后偏癱患者肢體功能及NIHSS評分的影響. 湖北科技學院學報(醫學版), 2020, 34(4): 329-331.
49. 鄒飛, 王禮強, 劉波. 陰極經顱直流電刺激對腦卒中偏癱患者上肢功能康復的影響. 中國康復醫學雜志, 2020, 35(6): 732-734.
50. 王強. 鏡像療法聯合經顱直流電刺激對腦卒中患者上肢運動功能障礙的療效研究. 西安: 西安體育學院, 2020.
51. 劉遠文, 黃麗, 張淑嫻, 等. 經顱直流電刺激聯合虛擬現實訓練治療腦卒中患者上肢功能的隨機對照單盲研究. 華西醫學, 2020, 35(5): 544-549.
52. 姜妍. 經顱直流電刺激治療腦卒中后手功能障礙的療效觀察. 呼和浩特: 內蒙古醫科大學, 2020.
53. 周金生, 呂曉, 章麗麗, 等. 經顱直流電刺激治療聯合常規輔助治療在腦卒中偏癱患者上肢功能康復中的應用. 現代實用醫學, 2020, 32(5): 579-580.
54. 鄭蘇, 彭力, 穆敬平. 經顱直流電刺激聯合分期針刺對腦卒中偏癱患者上肢運動功能的影響. 中國醫藥導報, 2020, 17(10): 86-89.
55. 孫武東, 蔡倩, 徐亮, 等. 經顱直流電刺激聯合雙側訓練對腦卒中患者上肢功能恢復的影響. 中華物理醫學與康復雜志, 2020, (3): 205-206-207-208.
56. 陳慧, 蔡倩, 徐亮, 等. 經顱直流電刺激聯合鏡像療法對腦卒中患者上肢運動功能的影響. 中國康復理論與實踐, 2020, 26(3): 301-305.
57. 華強, 夏文廣, 李冰冰, 等. 經顱直流電刺激聯合虛擬情景互動訓練對腦梗死偏癱上肢功能及ADL的影響. 中國康復, 2020, 35(1): 15-18.
58. 鄭嬋娟, 夏文廣, 段璨, 等. 經顱直流電刺激對腦卒中后上肢及手功能恢復的隨機對照研究. 中國康復, 2019, 34(12): 623-626.
59. 湯從智, 蔡倩, 楊璽, 等. 經顱直流電刺激介入任務導向性訓練對腦卒中患者上肢功能障礙的影響. 中華物理醫學與康復雜志, 2019, 41(8): 570-574.
60. 張勝利. 抗阻運動聯合經顱直流電刺激治療對卒中后偏癱患者肢體功能影響觀察. 齊齊哈爾醫學院學報, 2019, 40(12): 1499-1500.
61. 金景, 蔣蘇, 潘曉勵, 等. 經顱直流電刺激聯合康復訓練對腦卒中偏癱患者認知功能及肢體運動功能的影響. 中華物理醫學與康復雜志, 2019, 41(6): 415-417.
62. 張麗群. 經顱直流電刺激在卒中后上肢痙攣臨床應用的機制研究. 昆明: 昆明醫科大學, 2019.
63. 李亞斌, 馮海霞, 王紅霞, 等. 經顱直流電刺激結合鏡像神經元康復訓練對腦卒中患者上肢功能及體感誘發電位的影響. 中國康復, 2019, 34(4): 187-190.
64. 郭麗云, 降凌燕, 趙亞路. 經顱直流電刺激結合感覺功能訓練對腦卒中后感覺障礙的療效觀察. 中國康復, 2018, 33(6): 472-475.
65. 周艷平, 張妍昭, 王剛, 等. 經顱直流電刺激聯合運動想象療法改善腦卒中患者上肢功能的療效觀察. 中華物理醫學與康復雜志, 2018, 40(9): 657-661.
66. 王彥青, 肖小華. 經顱直流電刺激聯合常規康復治療在腦卒中偏癱上肢運動功能和失語癥康復中的作用分析. 齊齊哈爾醫學院學報, 2018, 39(5): 510-511.
67. 唐朝正. 經顱直流電刺激改善慢性期腦卒中手功能障礙的腦機制研究. 福州: 福建中醫藥大學, 2016.
68. 尹昱, 左秀芹, 呂艷玲, 等. 經顱直流電刺激對腦卒中患者上肢運動功能障礙的療效. 中國康復理論與實踐, 2015, (7): 830-833.
69. 張韶輝, 吳朝陽, 曹韡悅, 等. 經顱直流電刺激聯合上肢智能等速訓練器治療對腦卒中偏癱患者上肢運動功能的影響. 山西醫藥雜志, 2019, 48(15): 1823-1826.
70. Gong Y, Long XM, Xu Y, et al. Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with transcranial direct current stimulation on motor function and cortex excitability in subacute stroke patients: A randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil, 2021, 35(5): 718-727.
71. Pollock A, Farmer SE, Brady MC, et al. Interventions for improving upper limb function after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2014, (11): CD010820.
72. 李懿, 屈云, 茍巍, 等. 陽極經顱直流電刺激治療腦卒中后手功能障礙的Meta分析. 中國康復醫學雜志, 2016, 31(9): 1001-1007.
73. 朱毅, 郭佳寶, 顧一煌, 等. 陰極經顱直流電刺激改善腦卒中患者上肢功能障礙的系統評價. 中國康復理論與實踐, 2014, (4): 311-317.
74. Elsner B, Kugler J, Pohl M, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for improving activities of daily living, and physical and cognitive functioning, in people after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2020, (11): CD009645.
75. Khedr EM, Shawky OA, El-Hammady DH, et al. Effect of anodal versus cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation on stroke rehabilitation: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 2013, 27(7): 592-601.
76. 何曉闊, 劉慧華, 余果, 等. 經顱直流電刺激與功能性電刺激的不同時序組合對腦卒中偏癱患者腦功能連接的即時影響. 中國康復醫學雜志, 2021, 36(10): 1213-1219.
77. Nudo RJ. Mechanisms for recovery of motor function following cortical damage. Curr Opin Neurobiol, 2006, 16(6): 638-644.
78. Zhao C, Woodman GF. Converging Evidence that neural plasticity underlies transcranial direct-current stimulation. J Cogn Neurosci, 2021, 33(1): 146-157.
79. Siebner HR, Lang N, Rizzo V, et al. Preconditioning of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation with transcranial direct current stimulation: evidence for homeostatic plasticity in the human motor cortex. J Neurosci, 2004, 24(13): 3379-3385.
80. Polanía R, Paulus W, Antal A, et al. Introducing graph theory to track for neuroplastic alterations in the resting human brain: a transcranial direct current stimulation study. Neuroimage, 2011, 54(3): 2287-2296.
81. Nicolo P, Magnin C, Pedrazzini E, et al. Comparison of neuroplastic responses to cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation and continuous theta burst stimulation in subacute stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2018, 99(5): 862-872.
82. Mondini V, Mangia AL, Cappello A. Single-session tDCS over the dominant hemisphere affects contralateral spectral EEG power, but does not enhance neurofeedback-guided event-related desynchronization of the non-dominant hemisphere's sensorimotor rhythm. PLoS One, 2018, 13(3): e0193004.
83. Takai H, Tsubaki A, Sugawara K, et al. Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation over the primary motor cortex on cerebral blood flow: a time course study using near-infrared spectroscopy. Adv Exp Med Biol, 2016, 876: 335-341.
84. Mahmoudi H, Borhani Haghighi A, Petramfar P, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation: electrode montage in stroke. Disabil Rehabil, 2011, 33(15-16): 1383-1388.
85. Lotze M, Markert J, Sauseng P, et al. The role of multiple contralesional motor areas for complex hand movements after internal capsular lesion. J Neurosci, 2006, 26(22): 6096-6102.
86. Bradnam LV, Stinear CM, Barber PA, et al. Contralesional hemisphere control of the proximal paretic upper limb following stroke. Cereb Cortex, 2012, 22(11): 2662-2671.

Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

Efficacy of three types of transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with upper limb hemiparesis after stroke: a network meta-analysis

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Previous Article

Next Article

Format

Content