Report and quality analysis of health technology assessment_Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

Authors：

YAN Yilong ^1,2,3 , WANG Yongsheng ^1,2,3 , LI Ying ^1,2 , ZHANG Hairong ^1,2 , CAI Zhisheng ¹ , SONG Guihang ⁴ , YANG Kehu ^1,2 ,  LI Xiuxia ^1,2,3 ,  DING Guowu ^1,3

1. Evidence-Based Social Science Research Center/Health Technology Assessment Center, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, P. R. China;
2. Key Laboratory of Evidence Based Medicine and Knowledge Translation of Gansu Province, Lanzhou 730000, P. R. China;
3. School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, P. R. China;
4. Gansu Healthcare Security Administration, Lanzhou 730000, P. R. China;

Corresponding?author：

LI Xiuxia, Email: lixiuxia@lzu.edu.cn; DING Guowu, Email: dinggwlzu@163.com

Keywords：

Health technology; Health technology assessment; Status survey; Reporting quality; Bibliometric analysis

DOI：

10.7507/1672-2531.202210193

Video：

Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Objective To investigate the health technology assessment reports, analyze publication characteristics and report quality, and explore hot topics in health technology assessment. Methods Web of Science and CNKI databases were searched to collect complete health technology assessment reports from inception to January 2023. SPSS 26.0 software was used to analyze the publication journals, countries, number of authors, assessment types and assessment contents of the assessment reports. The report quality was assessed based on International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment (INAHTA) report criteria (2007 edition). VOSviewer 1.6.11 was used to analyze keywords clustering. Results A total of 216 papers were included, with 158 published by Chinese authors, and a rapid growth trend in the number of reports over past four years. The rate of reports on health technology social adaptability assessment was only 17.13%. Among the Chinese reports, 25 were general health technology assessments, 35 were rapid assessments, and 3 were mini assessments. Among the English reports, 4 were rapid assessments, and 54 were regular healthcare technology assessments. For the 14 items in the INAHTA reporting criteria, the reporting rates were high for the brief summary (98.61%), problem description (94.91%), and results discussion entries (97.69%). However, the reporting rates were low for criteria such as personnel responsibilities, conflict of interest statements, and peer review statements, at 31.94%, 19.44%, and 3.24% respectively. English literature generally exhibited higher report quality. Conclusion In recent years, the volume of health technology assessment reports in China has been increasing, with developments in assessment types and application fields. However, there are also problems with standardization of reporting.

Citation： YAN Yilong, WANG Yongsheng, LI Ying, ZHANG Hairong, CAI Zhisheng, SONG Guihang, YANG Kehu, LI Xiuxia, DING Guowu. Report and quality analysis of health technology assessment. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2023, 23(8): 945-950. doi: 10.7507/1672-2531.202210193 Copy

1.	王海銀, 何達, 王賢吉, 等. 國內外衛生技術評估應用進展及建議. 中國衛生政策研究, 2014, 7(8): 19-23.
2.	Chalkidou K, Marten R, Cutler D, et al. Health technology assessment in universal health coverage. Lancet, 2013, 382(9910): e48-e49.
3.	李靜. 衛生技術評估的基本方法. 中國循證醫學雜志, 2003, 3(4): 315-320.
4.	陳英耀, 劉文彬, 唐檬, 等. 我國衛生技術評估與決策轉化研究概述. 中國衛生政策研究, 2013, 6(7): 1-6.
5.	Bridges JF, Jones C. Patient-based health technology assessment: a vision of the future. Int J Technol Assess Health Care, 2007, Winter,23(1): 30-35.
6.	O'Rourke B, Oortwijn W, Schuller T, et al. The new definition of health technology assessment: a milestone in international collaboration. Int J Technol Assess Health Care, 2020, 36(3): 187-190.
7.	趙琨, 隋賓艷, 郭武棟, 等. 衛生技術評估的國際經驗及啟示. 中國衛生經濟, 2012, 31(2): 87-89.
8.	Oortwijn W. The role of health technology assessment in selected middle-income countries/regions. Bejing: CNHDRC, 2011.
9.	倪春霞. 我國衛生技術評估發展研究. 武漢: 武漢大學, 2017.
10.	隋賓艷, 齊雪然. 英國NICE衛生技術評估研究決策轉化機制及對我國的啟示. 中國衛生政策研究, 2015, (7): 74-78.
11.	茅藝偉, 陳英耀, 唐檬, 等. 我國衛生技術評估決策轉化現狀及影響因素的定性研究. 中國衛生質量管理, 2015, 22(2): 91-94.
12.	INAHTA. A checklist for health technology assessment reports. 2007.
13.	Henshall C. Role and uses of HTA in health systems. Beijing: CNHDRC, 2011.
14.	嵇承棟, 朱琳懿, 萬悅竹, 等. 國際衛生技術評估機構協作網衛生技術評估報告清單解讀. 中國循證醫學雜志, 2016, 16(3): 369-372.
15.	辛子藝, 劉婷, 陳少賢. 廣東省基層適宜衛生技術使用現狀及篩選評價探討. 中國初級衛生保健, 2014, 28(2): 10-13.
16.	歐盟AdHopHTA項目組. 醫院衛生技術評估: 手冊與工具包. 上海: 上海交通大學出版社, 2017.
17.	NICE. Technology appraisal recommendation summary. 2011.
18.	Moberg J, Oxman AD, Rosenbaum S, et al. The GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) framework for health system and public health decisions. Health Res Policy Syst, 2018, 16(1): 45.
19.	Schünemann HJ, Reinap M, Piggott T, et al. The ecosystem of health decision making: from fragmentation to synergy. Lancet Public Health, 2022, 7(4): e378-e390.
20.	Ritrovato M, Faggiano FC, Tedesco G, et al. Decision-oriented health technology assessment: one step forward in supporting the decision-making process in hospitals. Value Health, 2015, 18(4): 505-511.

1. 王海銀, 何達, 王賢吉, 等. 國內外衛生技術評估應用進展及建議. 中國衛生政策研究, 2014, 7(8): 19-23.
2. Chalkidou K, Marten R, Cutler D, et al. Health technology assessment in universal health coverage. Lancet, 2013, 382(9910): e48-e49.
3. 李靜. 衛生技術評估的基本方法. 中國循證醫學雜志, 2003, 3(4): 315-320.
4. 陳英耀, 劉文彬, 唐檬, 等. 我國衛生技術評估與決策轉化研究概述. 中國衛生政策研究, 2013, 6(7): 1-6.
5. Bridges JF, Jones C. Patient-based health technology assessment: a vision of the future. Int J Technol Assess Health Care, 2007, Winter,23(1): 30-35.
6. O'Rourke B, Oortwijn W, Schuller T, et al. The new definition of health technology assessment: a milestone in international collaboration. Int J Technol Assess Health Care, 2020, 36(3): 187-190.
7. 趙琨, 隋賓艷, 郭武棟, 等. 衛生技術評估的國際經驗及啟示. 中國衛生經濟, 2012, 31(2): 87-89.
8. Oortwijn W. The role of health technology assessment in selected middle-income countries/regions. Bejing: CNHDRC, 2011.
9. 倪春霞. 我國衛生技術評估發展研究. 武漢: 武漢大學, 2017.
10. 隋賓艷, 齊雪然. 英國NICE衛生技術評估研究決策轉化機制及對我國的啟示. 中國衛生政策研究, 2015, (7): 74-78.
11. 茅藝偉, 陳英耀, 唐檬, 等. 我國衛生技術評估決策轉化現狀及影響因素的定性研究. 中國衛生質量管理, 2015, 22(2): 91-94.
12. INAHTA. A checklist for health technology assessment reports. 2007.
13. Henshall C. Role and uses of HTA in health systems. Beijing: CNHDRC, 2011.
14. 嵇承棟, 朱琳懿, 萬悅竹, 等. 國際衛生技術評估機構協作網衛生技術評估報告清單解讀. 中國循證醫學雜志, 2016, 16(3): 369-372.
15. 辛子藝, 劉婷, 陳少賢. 廣東省基層適宜衛生技術使用現狀及篩選評價探討. 中國初級衛生保健, 2014, 28(2): 10-13.
16. 歐盟AdHopHTA項目組. 醫院衛生技術評估: 手冊與工具包. 上海: 上海交通大學出版社, 2017.
17. NICE. Technology appraisal recommendation summary. 2011.
18. Moberg J, Oxman AD, Rosenbaum S, et al. The GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) framework for health system and public health decisions. Health Res Policy Syst, 2018, 16(1): 45.
19. Schünemann HJ, Reinap M, Piggott T, et al. The ecosystem of health decision making: from fragmentation to synergy. Lancet Public Health, 2022, 7(4): e378-e390.
20. Ritrovato M, Faggiano FC, Tedesco G, et al. Decision-oriented health technology assessment: one step forward in supporting the decision-making process in hospitals. Value Health, 2015, 18(4): 505-511.

Previous Article
Acupuncture and moxibustion for Parkinson’s disease: an overview of systematic reviews
Next Article
The construction of terminology standard for hospital quality and safety

Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

Report and quality analysis of health technology assessment

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Previous Article

Next Article

Format

Content