ObjectiveTo compare the half-year clinical efficacy of three different surgical root coverage methods including lateral sliding flap (LSF), subepithelial connective tissue graft (CTG) and acellular dermal matrix allograft (ADM).
MethodsEighteen patients (24 teeth) with gingival recession treated in our hospital between December 2012 and July 2015 were selected and divided into three groups according to a certain sequence with 8 teeth in each group. The three groups of teeth were treated with LSF, CTG and ADM respectively. Gingival recession, probing depth and keratinized gingival width at both baseline and 6 months after surgery of all patients were recorded for inner- and inter-group comparison.
ResultsAll three methods proved to be effective within 6 months with an awerage of 2.8-4.0 mm in decrease extent of gingival recession (P<0.01). LSF did not significantly change the probing depth (P>0.05) as the other two did (P<0.01). The differences among three surgical methods compared before and after surgery were all significant (P<0.05).
ConclusionLSF, CTG and ADM are all effective surgical means for root coverage. Within 6 months, CTG presents better effects than ADM, and ADM better than LSF.
Objective To summarize and review the heterogeneity of bone marrow derived stem cells (BMDSCs) and its formation mechanism and significance, and to analyze the possible roles and mechanisms in intestinal epithel ial reconstruction. Methods The related l iterature about BMDSCs heterogeneity and its role in intestinal epithel ial repair was reviewed and analyzed. Results The heterogeneity of BMDSCs provided better explanations for its multi-potency. The probable mechanisms of BMDSCs to repair intestinal epithel ium included direct implantation into intestinal epithel ium, fusion between BMDSCs and intestinal stem cells, and promotion of injury microcirculation reconstruction. Conclusion BMDSCs have a bright future in gastrointestinal injury caused by inflammatory bowl disease and regeneration.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy of acellular dermal matrix (ADM) and subepithelial connective tissue flap (sCTG) on patients with gingival recession (GR).MethodsPubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, WanFang Data and VIP databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about the efficacy of ADM and sCTG on patients with GR from inception to August 11st, 2019. Two reviewers indepeudently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies, and then meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software and Stata 12.1 software.ResultsA total of 9 RCTs were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: there were no significant differences in probing depth (PD) (MD3m=?0.04, 95%CI ?0.18 to 0.11, P=0.63; MD6m=?0.01, 95%CI ?0.13 to 0.12, P=0.90) and GR degree (MD3m=?0.10, 95%CI ?0.37 to 0.18, P=0.48; MD6m=?0.02, 95%CI ?0.33 to 0.29, P=0.89) in 3 and 6 months after operative between two groups. But the clinical attachment loss (CAL) in 3 months after operation (MD=0.33, 95%CI 0.00 to 0.66, P=0.05) and width of keratinized tissue (KTW) in 6 months after operation (MD=?0.48, 95%CI ?0.76 to ?0.20, P=0.000 7) of sCTG group were superior to ADM group, the differences were statistically significant.ConclusionCurrent evidence shows that there are no differences in PD and GR degree in 3 months and 6 months after operation between ADM and sCTG group. But the CAL in 3 months after operation and KTW in 6 months after operation of sCTG group is superior to ADM group. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high-quality studies are needed to verify above conclusion.
