Evidence-based medicine is the conscientious, explicit and judicious use of current best evidence in making decisions about the care of individual patients. The practice of evidence-based medicine means to integrate individual clinical expertise with the best available external clinical evidence from systematic research. So evidence and its quality is the key issue of evidence-based medicine. The purpose of this article is to introduce to the healthcare professionals the sources of evidence and how to search for evidence for them.
Evidence has been retrieved through MEDLINE and Cochrane Libray about the treatment for patients with advanced Parkinson’s disease who suffered from on-off, dyskinesia and depression after chronic use of L-dopa. All of the evidence has been evaluated. Methods of evidence-based treatment were drawn up according to the evidence, clinciams’ experiences and patients’ preferences. All symptoms of the patient have been improved obviously.
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the gold standard for the design of clinical trials. Because of some practical difficulties, more and more researchers think that the appropriate use of non-randomized controlled trials may make up for the weakness of RCT and will achieve the same research purpose. Therefore, non-RCTs are also very important. Taking studies on multiple sclerosis for example, this article briefly introduces the significance of non-randomized contolled trials.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of all kinds of hemocoagulase on operative incisions.
MethodsDatabases including Web of Science, MEDLINE, EMbase, EBSCO, PubMed, CNKI, WanFang Data and VIP were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about hemocoagulase on operative incisions from the inception to June 20th, 2015. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed by RevMan 5.2 software.
ResultsA total of 16 RCTs involving 1 867 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that, compared with the control group, the hemostatic time (MD=-37.84, 95%CI -52.72 to -22.96, P<0.000 01), blood loss volume per unit area (MD=-0.09, 95%CI -0.10 to -0.07, P<0.000 01), PT of the first postoperative day (MD=-0.37, 95%CI -0.65 to -0.09, P=0.009) were significantly shorter in the hemocoagulase group. However, no significant differences were found in APTT, TT and FIB between two groups.
ConclusionHemocoagulase can reduce hemostatic time and blood loss volume in surgical incisions. Due to the limited quantity and quality of the included studies, the above conclusion needs to be further verified by more high quality studies.
Object To collect and summarize high quality clinical evidence on the use of hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) in health care generally. Method We searched MEDLINE (1980-2006), The Cochrane Library (Issue 1, 2006) and the China Biomedicine Database (1982-2006) for systematic reviews, meta-analyses and randomized controlled trials. The quality of included studies was critically evaluated. Result Thirteen systematic reviews (12 Cochrane reviews) on HBO were included. Results showed that HBO had some beneficial effect on acute coronary syndrome, ischemic stroke, multiple sclerosis, malignant otitis externa, idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss and tinnitus. It might also promote chronic wound healing and relieve radiation damage.Conclusions Since the avaliable randomized controlled trials for the systematic reviews we included are too small, further well-designed multicentre large-scale trials are needed to determine the efficacy and safety of HBO .
