ObjectiveTo evaluate safety and effectiveness of stent placement and emergency surgery in treatment of proximal colon cancer obstruction.MethodsThe PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials, CNKI, CBM, Wanfang Data, etc. were searched comprehensively. The literatures of Chinese and English randomized controlled trial and retrospective comparative study of stent placement and emergency surgery for the proximal colon cancer obstruction were retrieved. The RevMan 5.3 and Stata 12.0 softwares were used. The meta-analysis was made on the safety and effectiveness of these two treatments.ResultsA total of 9 literatures involving 636 patients were included, all of them were the retrospective studies, 4 of them only reported the clinical success rate and technical success rate. The technical success rate of stent placement was 0.94 [95% CI (0.91, 0.96)]. The clinical success rate was 0.90 [95% CI (0.87, 0.93)]. Compared with the emergency surgery group, the total complication rate and the temporary stoma rate were lower [OR=0.32, 95% CI (0.11, 0.94), P=0.04; OR=0.18, 95% CI (0.05, 0.65), P=0.009] and the hospital stay was shorter [MD=–2.97, 95% CI (–4.52, –1.41), P=0.000 2] in the stent placement group. The perioperative mortality rate, laparoscopic surgery rate, 5-year disease-free survival rate, and 5-year overall survival rate had no significant differences between these two groups (P>0.05).ConclusionCompared with emergency surgery, endoscopic stent placement for treatment of proximal colon cancer obstruction has a lower incidence of complications, temporary colostomy rate, shorter hospital stay, and it has no significant differences in mortality, laparoscopic surgery rate, and survival rate.
Objective To compare the early compl ications of carotid stenting (CAS) and carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in treatment of carotid artery stenosis. Methods Between January 2005 and December 2007, 63 patients with carotid artery stenosis were treated with CEA in 36 cases (CEA group) and with CAS in 27 cases (CAS group). There were 42 males and 21 females with an average age of 67.5 years (range, 52-79 years). The locations were the left side in 28 cases and the rightside in 35 cases. The carotid stenosis was 60%-95% (mean, 79%). The major cl inical symptoms were stroke and transient ischemic attack. The cranial CT showed old cerebral infarction in 24 cases, lacunar infarction in 22 cases, and no obvious abnormal change in 17 cases. The encephalon, heart, and local compl ications were compared between 2 groups within 7 days after operation. Results In CEA group, encephalon compl ications occurred in 3 cases (8.3%), heart compl ications in 2 cases (5.6%), and local compl ications in 5 cases (13.9%); while in CAS group, encephalon compl ications occurred in 8 cases (29.6%), heart compl ications in 1 case (3.7%), and local compl ications in 3 cases (11.1%). The encephalon compl ication ratio of CAS group was significantly higher than that of CEA group (χ2=4.855, P=0.028); and there was no significant difference in other compl ications ratios between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). Conclusion CEA is the first choice to treat carotid artery stenosis.
ObjectiveThis study was aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of mechanical thrombectomy using the AngioJet System for the treatment of lower extremity acute arterial embolism and thrombosis.MethodsThe clinical data of 20 patients with acute lower extremity arterial embolism and thrombosis admitted to the Department of Vascular Surgery in the People’s Hospital in Gansu Province where the author worked from September 2016 to March 2017, were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were treated with the AngioJet mechanical thrombectomy system. Clinical data of the patients were retrospectively collected. The clinical efficacy of AngioJet mechanical thrombectomy wasanalyzed.ResultsEighteen (90.0%) of the 20 patients successfully completed the mechanical thrombectomy by using the AngioJet System. The mean time for hospital stay and operation was (4.2±1.4) d and (1.3±0.4) h, respectively. The average doses of urokinase and heparin during operation were (35.80±12.30) ×104 U and (45.10±8.30) mg, respectively. Two patients received a complementary treatment of incision for removing the thrombus. Two patients received catheter-directed thrombolysis after the mechanical thrombectomy, 5 patients received bare-metal stent implantation after balloon expansion. Clinical success was in 16 cases. According to the Cooley standard, 10 patients were in excellent condition,6 in good condition, 2 in fair condition, and 2 in poor condition. There were 2 cases of distal arterial embolization,2 cases of antecardial discomfort of bradycardia, and 4 cases of bleeding at the puncture point, but no serious bleeding complications such as gastrointestinal and intracranial hemorrhage occurred. A total of 16 patients presented myoglobinuria during and after operation. All patients were followed up for 6–12 months. The results of ultrasound examination showed that the artery was patency in 15 cases. One patient died of myocardial infarction in 9 months after surgery,2 patients developed lower extremity ischemia symptoms again after surgery, and 2 patients had lower extremity ulcer caused by lower extremity ischemia symptoms. During the follow-up period, no lower limb necrosis, amputation, and death occurred in the remaining patients.ConclusionsThe AngioJet mechanical thrombectomy system is safe and effective. Combined with the use of catheter-directed thrombolysis and stent implantation, the AngioJet mechanical thrombectomy could lead to quick recovery of the perfusion of the lower extremity and improve the limb salvage rates, exhibiting excellent clinical value.
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of pancreatic duct stenting in prevention of post-ERCP (endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography) pancreatitis for patients at high risk. Methods We searched the Controlled Trials Database of the Cochrane Upper Gastro-Intestinal and Pancreatic Disease Group (Issue 1, 2004), Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (Issue 1, 2004), MEDLINE (1966-2004, 4), EMBASE (1985-2004, 4), CBMdisk (1970-2004, 4), and the Chinese Cochrane Center Database of Clinical Trials; we handsearched 8 Chinese journals, and references of eligible studies were also screened for inclusion. Randomized controlled trials on pancreatic stent for preventing post-endoscopic restrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis (PEP) were identified.The systematic review was conducted using methods recommended by the Cochrane Collaboration. Results Six trials involving 468 high-risk patients for post-ERCP pancreatitis were included. The incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis was significantly reduced by pancreatic duct stenting (Peto RR 0.31, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.52; P＜0.000 01; NNT=6). The incidence of severe PEP was also significantly lower in pancreatic duct stenting group compared with the control group (Peto OR 0.13, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.47; P=0.002; NNT=24). The results were consistent with the sensitivity-analysis when abstracts were excluded. Conclusion Pancreatic duct stenting appears to be an effective method to prevent PEP. Due to the limitation of the included trials and their methodology, the results should be considered with caution. High quality and large-scale trials are required.
ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy and safety in the treatment of malignant gastric outlet obstruction between gastrojejunostomy (GJ) and self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) placement.MethodsThe relevant literatures of efficacy and safety of GJ and SEMS placement in the treatment of malignant gastric outlet obstruction were searched in the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Clinical Trial, VIP, CNKI, Wanfang Data databases. The data were extracted and evaluated by the RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 12 articles with 1 505 patients were included, of which 620 underwent the GJ (GJ group) and 885 underwent the SEMS placement (SEMS group); 3 RCTs, 9 non-RCTs. The meta-analysis results showed: the length of hospital stay [MD=5.83, 95%CI (4.24, 7.42), P<0.000 01] and time of postoperative recovery diet [MD=3.41, 95%CI (1.79, 5.03), P<0.000 1] of the SEMS group were significantly shorter than those of the GJ group; Although the incidence of complications of the GJ group was significantly higher than that of the SEMS group [OR=1.85, 95%CI (1.27, 2.70), P=0.001], the technical success rate [OR=2.72, 95%CI (1.13, 6.53), P=0.03] and clinical success rate [OR=1.86, 95%CI (1.35, 2.57), P=0.000 2] were higher and the survival time was longer [MD=38.31, 95%CI (28.98, 47.64), P<0.000 01] of the GJ group as compared with the SEMS group.ConclusionsSEMS placement is more effective in recovering dietary capacity, length of hospital stay, and incidence of complications, while GJ is more effective in survival time, technical success rate, and clinical success rate. In clinical practice, we could choose different surgical method according to patient situation.
ObjectiveTo summarize the various treatment methods for reducing jaundice in the elderly patients with malignant obstructive jaundice (MOJ), and provide reference for the treatment of elderly MOJ.MethodUsing “malignant obstructive jaundice” as the Chinese keyword and the English keyword, a computer search of the literatures on the treatment of elderly MOJ patients was conducted and reviewed.ResultsThe treatment methods of reducing jaundice in elderly MOJ included radical surgery, cholangiojejunostomy, endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage, endoscopic biliary stent implantation, percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage and stent implantation. Radical surgery was the most effective, but it was traumatic and had many complications for elderly patients. Cholangiojejunostomy was effective and suitable for elderly patients who cannot tolerate major surgery. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage was less traumatic to elderly patients, but technical difficulty. Endoscopic biliary stent implantation was currently the first-line choice for the treatment of elderly patients with advanced MOJ. Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage and stent implantation were suitable for elderly and frail patients with high obstruction.ConclusionThe treatment of elderly MOJ needs to be individualized and regionalized, and appropriate treatment methods should be selected according to the patient’s condition and the medical level of the medical center.
