ObjectiveTo summary the safety and efficiency of the minimally invasive direct cardiac surgery (MIDCS) approach in elderly patients with heart disease.
MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 60 patients underwent MIDCS in Beijng Anzhen Hospital between April 2010 and January 2013. There were 34 males and 26 females with mean age of 66.4±4.8 years and mean weight of 66.1±10.6 kg.
ResultsMean cardiopulmonary bypass time and aortic cross-clamp time was 141.2±57.2 minutes and 99.8±37.6 minutes respectively. A total of 37 patients (90.2%) recovered to beat automatically after heart ceased operation. Median mechanical ventilation time was 17.1±9.1 hours. Mean intensive care unit stay was 22.1±12.2 hours. Mean post operative hospital stay was 7.0±2.5 days. Mean incision length was 5.3±0.9 cm. Mean pericardial draining volume was 466.6±412.1 ml in the first day after operation. No transfusion occurred in 27 (45.0%) patients. Early postoperative mortality was 3.3% (2/60). There were 2 patients of reexplorations for bleeding, 1 patient of the twice tracheal intubation, 1 patient of cardiac arrest after operation, 2 patients of poor healing of skin incision, and 1 patient of injury of right phrenic nerve. When leaving hospital, 47 patients were in heart functional class Ⅰ, 8 patients in class Ⅱ, and 3 patients in class Ⅲ.
ConclusionMIDCS is associated with good operative effect in the near future with superior safety and broad application range in elderly patients with heart disease.
ObjectivesTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of oral drugs for treating women with uncomplicated lower urinary tract infection.MethodsPubMed, The Cochrane Library, EMbase, CBM, WanFang Data, CNKI and VIP databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of oral drugs for treating females with uncomplicated lower urinary tract infection from inception to November, 2018. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed risk of bias of included studies, then, network meta-analysis was performed by using " gemtc” packages in R 3.5.1 software.ResultsA total of 38 RCTs were included. The results of network meta-analysis showed that: quinolones (RR=1.24, 95%CI 1.11 to 1.37), furantoin (RR=1.21, 95%CI 1.06 to 1.37), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMZ) (RR=1.20, 95%CI 1.06 to 1.35), fosfomycin (RR=1.17, 95%CI 1.04 to 1.31) and penicillin (RR=1.18, 95%CI 1.05 to 1.33) were superior to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS) in clinical cure. Quinolones were better than fosfomycin (RR=1.07, 95%CI 1.03 to 1.12), penicillin (RR=1.18, 95%CI 1.13 to 1.23) and cephalosporin (RR=1.13, 95%CI 1.08 to 1.19); furantoin was better than penicillin (RR=1.15, 95%CI 1.08 to 1.21) and cephalosporin (RR=1.10, 95%CI 1.04 to 1.17); TMP-SMZ was better than penicillin (RR=1.15, 95%CI 1.09 to 1.21) and cephalosporin (RR=1.11, 95%CI 1.04 to 1.16); fosfomycin was better than penicillin (RR=1.10, 95%CI 1.04 to 1.16) in bacteriological cure. The adverse effect rates of quinolones were lower than furantoin (RR=0.83, 95%CI 0.70 to 0.98), TMP-SMZ (RR=0.88, 95%CI 0.78 to 0.99) and fosfomycin (RR=0.74, 95%CI 0.59 to 0.93), and which of fosfomycin was higher than penicillin (RR=1.33, 95%CI 1.01 to 1.74) and NSAIDS (RR=1.46, 95%CI 1.11 to 1.92). All differences were statistically significant.ConclusionsCurrent evidence shows that uncomplicated lower urinary tract infection should be recommended to therapy containing quinolones. Due to limited quality and quantity of included studies, more high-quality studies are required to verify the above conclusion.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of JAK inhibitor in the treatment of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). MethodsThe PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, CNKI, WanFang Data, and VIP databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the efficacy and safety of JAK inhibitors in patients with axSpA from inception to December, 2023. Two reviewers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies Meta-analysis was then performed using RevMan 5.3 software. ResultsA total of 7 RCTs involving 1 602 patients were included, including 852 patients in the experimental group and 750 patients in the placebo group. The results of meta-analysis showed that in terms of clinical efficacy, ASAS20 (RR=1.67, 95%CI 1.50 to 1.86, P<0.01), ASAS40 (RR=2.30, 95%CI 1.93 to 2.73, P<0.01), ΔBASFI (MD=?1.04, 95%CI ?1.21 to ?0.87, P<0.01), and ΔBASMI (MD=?0.30, 95%CI ?0.41 to ?0.19, P<0.01) of JAK inhibitors in the treatment of axSpA patients were significantly higher than those in the placebo group. In terms of safety, adverse event (RR=1.09, 95%CI 0.97 to 1.21, P=0.14) and major adverse events, such as diarrhea (RR=1.18, 95%CI 0.55 to 2.51, P=0.67), nasopharyngitis (RR=0.98, 95%CI 0.55 to 1.75, P=0.96), liver enzyme abnormalities (RR=1.83, 95%CI 0.84 to 3.99, P=0.13), and headache (RR=1.94, 95%CI 0.77 to 4.87, P=0.16) were statistically insignificant. ConclusionCurrent evidence shows that JAK inhibitors can improve the clinical efficacy in the axSpA patients, and the safety is high. Due to the limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.
ObjectiveTo evaluate safety and effectiveness of stent placement and emergency surgery in treatment of proximal colon cancer obstruction.MethodsThe PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials, CNKI, CBM, Wanfang Data, etc. were searched comprehensively. The literatures of Chinese and English randomized controlled trial and retrospective comparative study of stent placement and emergency surgery for the proximal colon cancer obstruction were retrieved. The RevMan 5.3 and Stata 12.0 softwares were used. The meta-analysis was made on the safety and effectiveness of these two treatments.ResultsA total of 9 literatures involving 636 patients were included, all of them were the retrospective studies, 4 of them only reported the clinical success rate and technical success rate. The technical success rate of stent placement was 0.94 [95% CI (0.91, 0.96)]. The clinical success rate was 0.90 [95% CI (0.87, 0.93)]. Compared with the emergency surgery group, the total complication rate and the temporary stoma rate were lower [OR=0.32, 95% CI (0.11, 0.94), P=0.04; OR=0.18, 95% CI (0.05, 0.65), P=0.009] and the hospital stay was shorter [MD=–2.97, 95% CI (–4.52, –1.41), P=0.000 2] in the stent placement group. The perioperative mortality rate, laparoscopic surgery rate, 5-year disease-free survival rate, and 5-year overall survival rate had no significant differences between these two groups (P>0.05).ConclusionCompared with emergency surgery, endoscopic stent placement for treatment of proximal colon cancer obstruction has a lower incidence of complications, temporary colostomy rate, shorter hospital stay, and it has no significant differences in mortality, laparoscopic surgery rate, and survival rate.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy of treatments for β-coronaviruses.MethodsPubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, SinoMed, CNKI and WanFang Data databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized controlled trials (non-RCTs) of treatments for β-coronaviruses from inception to June 17th, 2020. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Meta-analysis was then performed using Stata 14.0 software.ResultsA total of 109 studies invoving 23 210 patients were included. The results of the systematic review showed that compared with standard of care, corticosteroids could reduce mortality and increase cure rate for COVID-19. However, chloroquine could decrease cure rate. In severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) patients, corticosteroids could decrease the cure rate. In Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) patients, ribavirin/interferon/both drugs showed higher mortality.ConclusionsThe currently limited evidence shows that corticosteroids may be effective to COVID-19 patients while having limited effects on SARS patients. Hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine may have negative effects on COVID-19 patients. Ribavirin/interferon may be harmful to MERS patients. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusions.
Objective A multicenter, randomized, single-blind, parallel-controlled noninferiority study was used to evaluate the short-term safety and effectiveness of domestic polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) suture anchor for rotator cuff repair by comparing with the imported PEEK suture anchor commonly used in clinical practice. Methods A total of 59 patients with rotator cuff tears who were admitted between May 2019 and October 2019 were selected as the research objects. Among them, 3 patients were excluded because they did not meet the selection criteria, and 1 patient withdrew from the study because of serious adverse events. A total of 55 patients were included in the study. They were randomly divided into trial group (n=27) and control group (n=28). The trial group used PEEK suture anchors produced from REJOIN Company, and the control group used PEEK suture anchors from American Arthrex Company. Two patients in control group were lost to follow-up. Twenty-seven patients in trial group and 26 patients in control group were included in the final quantitative analysis. There was no significant difference (P>0.05) in gender, age, disease duration, side and sizes of rotator cuff tears, composition ratio of patients with type 2 diabetes, and preoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Constant-Murley score, University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) score, and visual analogue scale (VAS) score. The patients were followed up regularly after operation. The postoperative follow-up included safety evaluation (complications, anchor position, and anchor bone reaction) and effectiveness evaluation (shoulder joint function and pain scores, rotator cuff integrity based on Sugaya classification criteria). Results The operations in both groups were successfully completed, and there was no complication related to the operation and suture anchor. All incisions healed by first intention. There was no significant difference in follow-up time between trial group [(5.85±0.77) months] and control group [(5.96±0.72) months] (t=0.535, P=0.595). MRI examination indicated that the repaired tendons were fixed and the anchors did not get loose or torn. At 1 day, 3 months, and 6 months after operation, there was no patient with grade 3-4 anchor bone reaction in the two groups, and there was no significant difference in the bone reaction grading between groups (P>0.05). After operation, the VAS scores of the two groups gradually decreased, and the ASES scores, Constant-Murley scores, and UCLA scores gradually increased, and there were significant differences between groups at each time point (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between groups at different time points (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in Sugaya classification of rotator cuff integrity at 1 day, 3 months, and 6 months after operation between groups (P>0.05). Conclusion The short-term safety and effectiveness of domestic PEEK suture anchors in rotator cuff tear repair are not significant different from those of imported PEEK suture anchors commonly used in clinical practice.
ObjectivesTo systematically review the efficacy of pelvic floor electrical stimulation on urinary dysfunction.MethodsPubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CBM, CNKI, VIP and WanFang Data databases were searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the efficacy of pelvic floor electrical stimulation on urinary dysfunction from inception to August 2018. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed risk of bias of included studies; then, meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 9 RCTs involving 559 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that the pelvic floor electrical stimulation group was superior to the control group in bladder volume before and after treatment(MD=79.25, 95%CI 40.36 to 118.15, P<0.000 1), residual urine volume (MD=35.50, 95%CI 7.60 to 63.41, P=0.01), maximum detrusor pressure (MD=5.19, 95%CI 2.11 to 8.27, P<0.001), number of leaks (RR=1.95, 95%CI 1.39 to 2.52, P<0.000 01), daily average urination frequency (RR=2.64, 95%CI 1.97 to 3.31, P<0.000 01), and international lower urinary tract score (MD=5.07, 95%CI 2.17 to 7.96, P=0.000 6).ConclusionsCurrent evidence shows that pelvic floor electrical stimulation is an effective therapy for urinary dysfunction. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality-studies are required to verify the above conclusion.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of acupuncture on postpartum depression (PPD).MethodsPubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, WanFang Data and VIP databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the efficacy and safety of acupuncture in treatment of PPD from inception to February 2021. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed risk of bias of included studies. Meta-analysis was then performed by using Stata16.0 software.ResultsA total of 13 RCTs involving 899 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that there was no significant difference between hand acupuncture and fluoxetine hydrochloride in HAMD score (MD=0.45, 95%CI ?0.52 to 1.41, P=0.36), clinical effective rate (RR=0.93, 95%CI 0.70 to 1.23, P=0.59), and clinical cure rate (RR=0.88, 95%CI 0.44 to 1.76, P=0.73). However, hand acupuncture was superior in safety to fluoxetine hydrochloride (RR=0.04, 95%CI 0.01 to 0.28, P<0.05). There was no significant difference in clinical effective rate (RR=1.08, 95%CI 0.87 to 1.36, P=0.49) and cure rate (RR=1.31, 95%CI 0.84 to 2.04, P=0.24) between both groups.ConclusionsThe current evidence shows that there are no differences between hand acupuncture and non-acupuncture in reducing HAMD score, improving the clinical effective rate and clinical cure rate. Due to the limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high-quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusions.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy of 10 commonly used intrauterine devices (IUD) by network meta-analysis.MethodsPubMed, The Cochrane Library, EMbase, Web of Science, POPLINE, CNKI, WanFang Data, SinoMed, CMCI, ChiCTR databases and websites were electronically searched to collect randomized clinical trials (RCTs) on efficacy of 10 IUDs from inception to December 31st, 2019. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies; then, network meta-analysis was performed by using WinBUGS 1.4.3 software and Stata 13.0 software.ResultsA total of 67 RCTs involving 59 991 IUD users were included. The results of network meta-analysis indicated that after 1 year of use, GyneFix had a lower pregnancy rate than those of TCu220C, TCu380A, YCu300, OCu165 and MLCu375, and its effectiveness ranked second out of ten IUDs (SUCRA=77.1%). YCu200 had a lower pregnancy rate than that of TCu220C, which ranked third (SUCRA=71.5%). After 2 years of use, GyneFix had a lower pregnancy rate than those of TCu220C, TCu380A and OCu165, which had the highest probability to be the most effective intervention (SUCRA=92.1%). YCu200 had a lower pregnancy rate than those of TCu220C, TCu380A, YCu300, OCu165, GCu200, GammaCu and MLCu375, and its effectiveness ranked second (SUCRA=81.2%).ConclusionsCurrent evidence shows that the risk of pregnancy of GyneFix and YCu200 are lower at 1 and 2 years of use, which suggests they possess superior short-term effectiveness. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are required to verify above conclusions.
ObjectiveTo investigate safety and effectiveness of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) in municipal hospitals.MethodsThe clinic data of patients underwent pancreatoduodenectomy in the Leshan People’s Hospital from November 2017 to January 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into LPD group and open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD) group according to the operation methods, and the indicators of perioperative safety and effectiveness of the two groups were compared.ResultsA total of 72 patients were enrolled in this study, including 30 patients in the LPD group and 42 patients in the OPD group. There were no significant differences in the age, gender, and other baseline indicators between the two groups (P>0.05). Although the operative time of the LPD group was longer than that of the OPD group (P<0.05), the intraoperative blood loss in the LPD group was significantly less than that in the OPD group (P<0.05), the postoperative hospital stay, postoperative exhaust time, and postoperative ambulation time in the LPD group were shorter than those in the OPD group (P<0.05). And there were no significant differences in the terms of intraoperative red blood cell transfusion, intraoperative blood transfusion rate, postoperative ICU hospitalization time, hospitalization expenses, overall complications and specific complications (except incision infection rate of LPD group was significantly lower than OPD group, P=0.031) between the two groups (P>0.05). There were no significant differences in the positive rate of resection margin, number of lymph node dissection, and positive rate of lymph node between the two groups (P>0.05).ConclusionLPD has the same safety and effectiveness as OPD in the perioperative period in municipal hospitals, and is more conducive to postoperative recovery of patients.
