Objective
To explore how to integrate the various sources of information in designing an evidence-based nursing care plan for preventing gastrointestinal hemorrhage (GIH) after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD).
Method
Papers and references about prevention of GIH after PD were searched between September and October 2015, and an evidence-based nursing care plan was drawn up and implemented from November 2015 to January 2016.
Results
A total of 79 papers were found and of which 17 were aviliable. Thirty-nine patients were cared on the basis of the effective project, of whom one was dignosed with GIH on the 3rd postoperative day and the rate of post-PD hemorrhage was 2.6%. All patients were diacharged on the 6th or 7th postoperative day.
Conclusion
Exploring evidences under the guidance of scientific method and applying them to clinical nursing can prevent post-PD hemorrhage and improve life quality of patients.
Coronary heart disease with gastrointestinal bleeding is common in clinical practice. The disease is dangerous and has a high mortality rate. This article will review the risk factors for coronary heart disease with gastrointestinal bleeding (including Helicobacter pylori infection, long-term use of antiplatelet drugs and combined anticoagulation drugs), blood transfusion strategies (including hemoglobin transfusion thresholds and platelet transfusion strategies), and the management of antithrombotic drugs after bleeding (including the management of antiplatelet drugs and the management of anticoagulation combined with antiplatelet drugs). The purpose is to provide a theoretical basis for the diagnosis and treatment of coronary heart disease with gastrointestinal bleeding.
【Abstract】ObjectiveTo summarize the study on the feasibility of celiac axis ligation. Methods Literatures about celiac axis ligation were reviewed retrospectively. ResultsCeliac axis branches included common hepatic artery， splenic artery， left gastric artery which had many variation and collateral flow between celiac and mesenteric vessels by gastroduodenal artery and pancreaticoduodenal artery. Celiac axis could be possibly ligated without obvious complications in patients who had celiac axis injuries, celiac artery aneurysms, upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage, excision of carcinoma around the celiac axis and portal hypertension. However, gallbladder necrosis or perforation, focal infarction of the liver even higher mortality had also been reported. ConclusionCeliac axis ligation should not be performed routinely, but it is surgically possible and may be a life saving approach in certain circumstances.
Objective To systematically evaluate the effectiveness and safety of China-made omeprazole in treating acute non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Methods Such databases as PubMed, MEDLINE, Springer, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, VIP, CBM and WanFang data were searched to collect the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about China-made omeprazole in treating acute non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding, and the references of included studies were also retrieved. The retrieval time was from inception to December 2012. Two reviewers independently screened the literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted the data, and assessed the quality, and then the meta-analysis was conducted by using RevMan 5.1 software. Results A total of 11 RCTs were included. Among all 1 075 patients, 544 were in the treatment group, while the other 531 were in the control group. The results of meta-analysis showed that, there were no significant differences in the total effective rate (OR=0.68, 95%CI 0.35 to 1.33, P=0.26) and safety (RR=1.33, 95%CI 0.45 to 3.91, P=0.96) between the China-made omeprazole and imported omeprazole. Conclusion China-made omeprazole is effective and safe in treating acute non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding in comparison with the imported omeprazole.
ObjectivesTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of esomeprazole versus omeprazole in the treatment of acute non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (ANVUGIB).MethodsPubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, WanFang Data and VIP databases were electronically searched to collect the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about the efficacy and safety of esomeprazole versus omeprazole in the treatment of ANVUGIB from inception to January, 2019. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies, then, meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 17 RCTs involving 2 086 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that, the total effective rate of esomeprazole group was higher than omeprazole group (RR=1.09, 95%CI 1.04 to 1.14, P=0.000 6), the incidence of adverse reactions was lower than omeprazole group (OR=0.27, 95%CI 0.18 to 0.40, P<0.000 01), the average hemostasis time was shorter than omeprazole group (MD=?0.64, 95%CI ?0.94 to ?0.34, P<0.0001), and the difference were statistically significant.ConclusionsCurrent evidence shows that in the treatment of ANVUGIB, esomeprazole has rapid hemostasis, significant effect and fewer adverse reactions, which is worthy of wide application and promotion. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high-quality studies are required to verify the above conclusions.
Objective To investigate the effect of emergency fast-track treatment on dangerous upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Methods Seventy-six patients who received traditional treatment between October 2020 and March 2021 were included in the traditional treatment group, and 82 patients who entered the emergency fast track for dangerous upper gastrointestinal bleeding between April 2021 and September 2021 were included in the fast-track treatment group. The patients in the traditional treatment group were treated with the traditional single-subject diagnosis and treatment mode, and the patients in the fast-track treatment group were treated according to the multidisciplinary diagnosis and treatment procedures of emergency fast track for dangerous upper gastrointestinal bleeding. The length of emergency stay, 24-hour endoscopic completion rate, effective rate, and length of hospital stay were compared between the two groups. Results The length of emergency stay [(3.75±3.19) vs. (6.51±4.72) h], the effective rate (96.3% vs. 85.5%) and the length of hospital stay [(8.26±2.51) vs. (11.07±2.79) d] were significantly better in the fast-track group than those in the traditional treatment group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the 24-hour endoscopic completion rate between the two groups (96.3% vs. 96.1%, P>0.05). Conclusion Compared with the traditional treatment mode, the fast-track treatment mode can significantly improve the treatment efficiency, and reduce the lengths of emergency stay and hospital stay.
