ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of the nose ring drain (NRD) in treatment of severe diabetic foot infection.MethodsThe clinical data of 35 patients with severe diabetic foot infection who were treated with NRD between June 2017 and June 2019 were analyzed retrospectively. There were 24 males and 11 females with an average age of 54.5 years (range, 28-82 years). All of them were type 2 diabetic patients. The diabetes duration was 3-20 years, with an average of 9.4 years. The diabetic foot duration was 4 months to 2 years, with an average of 1.16 years. There were 16 cases of left foot and 19 cases of right foot. According to Wagner’s grading, there were 11 cases of grade 2, 20 cases of grade 3, and 4 cases of grade 4, all of which were moderate and severe infection of diabetic foot wound. Postoperative wounds were treated with “nibble-like” debridement until the patient’s epidermis regenerated and healed. During the treatment process, the indexes of bacterial culture type of wound secretions, duration of antibiotic therapy, wound healing method, healing time, amputation rate, and other indicators were analyzed and summarized.ResultsAll 35 patients were followed up 3-6 months, with an average of 4.5 months. Postoperative bacterial culture of wounds showed that 5 cases of Staphylococcus aureus, 4 cases of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 5 cases of Escherichia coli, 3 cases of Enterobacter cloacae, 3 cases of coagulase-negative Staphylococcus, and 15 cases of other types were detected. The duration of antibiotic therapy ranged from 3 to 15 days, with an average of 9.1 days. The wound was autolytically healed without skin grafting, and the healing time was 62-82 days, with an average of 72.3 days. During the follow-up, 3 cases (8.6%) had amputation due to the patient’s poor blood glucose control, which led to a large spread of infection. In addition, among the other patients with wound healing, there was no recurrence of wound infection or new ulcer on the original surface.ConclusionThe NRD is a simple operation for treatment of severe diabetic foot infection, which can effectively control wound infections and promote wound healing and regeneration without skin grafting.
Objective To systematically review the efficacy of oxygen therapy for diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). MethodsThe PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, WanFang Data, and VIP databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCT) on the efficacy of different oxygen therapies for DFUs from inception to April 1, 2024. Two reviewers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. Statistical analysis was performed using R software, and GraphPad Prism was used for graphical representations. ResultsA total of 61 RCTs involving 4 306 DFUs cases were included in the analysis. The oxygen therapies examined primarily included hyperbaric oxygen, topical oxygen, and ozone therapy. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) indicated that hyperbaric oxygen therapy ranked highest for healing rate, area reduction rate, and healing time (SUCRA values were 0.957, 0.868, and 0.869, respectively). However, hyperbaric oxygen therapy also ranked higher for amputation rate and adverse events (SUCRA values were 0.616 and 0.718, respectively). Further subgroup analysis revealed that hyperbaric oxygen therapy maintained the highest ranking in area reduction rate across subgroups defined by publication language and treatment duration. ConclusionHyperbaric oxygen therapy has advantages in terms of healing rate, area reduction rate, and healing time for DFUs, but it is also associated with higher amputation rates and adverse events. Due to the limited quantity and quality of the included studies, more high-quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.
Diabetic foot infection (DFI) is one of the main causes of hospitalized patients with diabetic foot. DFI should be diagnosed according to the clinical manifestations, and the severity of infection should be graded in time. Diabetic foot wounds are mostly chronic wounds, and there are many kinds of bacterial infections. The bacteria and antibiotics resistance will change with the progress of the disease. Bacterial biofilm is also one of the important causes of antibiotic resistance. Reasonable and timely surgical treatment combined with effective antibiotic treatment is an effective measure to deal with the challenge of DFI. On this basis, multidisciplinary cooperation will achieve the best clinical outcome.
ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical therapeutic effect of silver ions dressing for patient with diabetic foot ulcers.
MethodsAccording to the diagnostic and classification criteria of diabetes and diabetic foot of World Health Organization (WHO), outpatients and inpatients with diabetic foot ulcers admitted to the Department of Burns and Plastic Surgery of Dazhou Central Hospital from October 2013 to May 2015 were randomly divided into a silver ion dressing treatment group and a traditional dressing treatment group. The effective rate, time of occurrence of granulation tissue, wound healing time and wound area reduction ratio between the two groups were compared by using SPSS17.0 software.
ResultsA total of 80 patients were included, of which 40 patients in each group. Compared with the control group, the total effective rate was higher (92.5% vs. 62.5%, P=0.001), the occurrence time of granulation tissue (6.4±0.72 vs. 10.8 ±1.9, P=0.000) and wound healing time (31.3±8.2 vs. 47.4±11.5, P=0.000) were shorter, and the wound area reduction ration was greater (46.3±7.6 vs. 32.6±6.1, P=0.000) in the silver ions dressing group with significant differences.
ConclusionThe effects of silver-containing dressings is superior to Vaseline dressing in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers.
To investigate the change of bacterial load appl ied with iodophors and rivanol of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs), furthermore to evaluate the effect of both in removing superficial microbes of DFUs. Methods From March 2006 to March 2007, 30 patients were randomly divided into control group (group A, n=10), iodophor group (group B, n=10) and rivanol group (group C, n=10). There were 18 males and 12 females with an average age of 59.8 years (range 46-78 years). The wound size ranged from 3 cm × 2 cm to 15 cm × 10 cm. The disease course was 6 weeks to 6 months (mean 2.1months). Each wound was debrided and irrigated before process, then drug was compressed on the wound for 5 minutes, and irrigated again. The samples gained for three times, before, immediately and 24 hours after the process. Each sample was diluted before cultivation, the bacteria of wound were counted and compared among 3 groups. Results The cultures of specimens showed that the load decreased in every group, each cultured colony of specimen grew well, and there were no significant differences between 3 groups immediately after procedure (P gt; 0.05). There were significant differences between group B and groups A, C (P lt; 0.05), but there were no significant difference between group A and group C 24 hours after treatment (P gt; 0.05). Conclusion Both iodophors and rivanol could remove the bacteria on the surface of wound. Topical germicide could reduced bacterial load in the wound of diabetic foot, the role of steril izing and bacteriostasis of iodophors were better than that of rivanol.
ObjectiveTo explore the clinical efficacy of ultrasound debridement combined with autolytic debridement in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers.MethodsA total of 60 diabetic foot ulcers patients who were diagnosed and treated in Jinshan Hospital of Fudan University from April 2019 to April 2020 were enrolled in the study and randomly divided into two groups, with 30 cases in each group. The trial group received autolytic cleansing combined with ultrasound debridement treatment, and the control group only received autolytic debridement treatment. The baseline conditions, wound treatment efficacy, number of dressing changes, length of hospital stay, treatment cost, wound healing time, wound shrinkage rate, and the time required for the wound to turn into 100% red granulation were compared between the two groups.ResultsThere was no statistically significant difference in gender, age, duration of diabetes or Wagner grade of diabetic foot between the two groups (P>0.05). The efficacy of wound healing in the trial group was better than that in the control group (Z=?2.146, P=0.032). The number of dressing changes [(11.76±2.23) vs. (17.34±4.43) times] and the length of stay [(18.03±3.73) vs. (25.43±4.43) d] in the trial group were lower than those in the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). The difference in treatment cost between the two groups was not statistically significant (P>0.05). The wound healing time of the trial group [(48.43±18.34) vs. (65.24±19.62) d], the wound shrinkage rate [(78.35±8.34)% vs. (56.53±6.54)%] and the time required for the wound to turn into 100% red granulation [(16.34±2.42) vs. (24.55±3.23) d] were better than those of the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). During the treatment process, no patient in the trial group had wound bleeding and had difficulty in stopping bleeding during ultrasonic debridement, and no patient had intolerable pain related to ultrasonic debridement. No patients in either group withdrew early.ConclusionsUltrasound debridement combined with autolytic debridement can effectively improve the curative effect of patients with diabetic foot ulcers and shorten the wound healing time. Therefore, it is worthy of promotion and application in the wound care of patients with diabetic foot ulcers.
Objective
To investigate the clinical features and risk factors of diabetic foot.
Methods
A total of 100 patients with diabetic foot and 158 diabetic patients without diabetic foot were selected from April 2012 to May 2015 in Meishan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine. Clinical data of the patients in the two groups was comparatively analyzed. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to explore the risk factors.
Results
The age, duration of diabetes, incidences of complications, count of white blood cells, level of fibrinogen, level of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and level of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) in diabetic foot group were significantly higher than those in non-diabetic foot group (P<0.05), while the ankle-brachial index, level of hemoglobin and level of albumin in diabetic foot group were significantly lower than those in non-diabetic foot group (P<0.05). The independent risk factors of diabetic foot were Wanger grade, age, ankle-brachial index, hs-CRP, albumin and HbA1c (P<0.05). HbA1c and hs-CRP level were independent risk factors of disease severity in patients with diabetic foot; the difference of prognosis in patients with different Wanger grading was statistically significant (Z=–4.394, P<0.001).
Conclusions
The risk of diabetic foot in diabetic patients increases with older age, the more serious Wanger grade, the higher hs-CRP and HbA1c level, and the lower ankle-brachial index and albumin level. Taking precautions based on the patient’s situation is conducive to early prevention of amputation in diabetic patients with diabetic foot.
ObjectiveTo overview the systematic reviews on efficacy and safety of hyperbaric oxygen in treatment of diabetic foot.MethodsCNKI, CBM, VIP, WanFang Data, The Cochrane Library, PubMed and EMbase databases were searched to collect systematic reviews or meta-analyses on the efficacy and safety of hyperbaric oxygen therapy for diabetic foot from inception to November 17th, 2019. Two researchers independently screened literature and extracted data. Then, AMSTAR 2 tool and PRISMA statement were used to evaluate the methodological quality and reporting quality of included systematic reviews, and the outcome indicators were comprehensively analyzed.ResultsA total of 10 systematic reviews were included. The results of AMSTAR 2 suggested that 6 systematic reviews were of extremely low quality, 3 of low quality, and 1 of high quality. The PRISMA score ranged from 16.5 to 27. The results of the included systematic reviews showed that hyperbaric oxygen therapy might be superior to other interventions in ulcer healing rate and large amputation rate without increasing the risk of adverse events. ConclusionsThe existing systematic reviews/meta-analysis evidence shows that hyperbaric oxygen therapy may have certain curative effect on diabetic foot, however, its methodology and report quality evaluation are insufficient.
ObjectiveTo provide a comprehensive summary of the technological evolution, clinical protocols, mechanisms of action, and current research progress of tibial transverse transport (TTT), with the goal of facilitating its standardized application in clinical practice. Methods A systematic review of both domestic and international literature on TTT for the treatment of diabetic foot was conducted. The analysis encompassed technical developments, surgical protocols, combination therapies, regenerative mechanisms, and clinical outcomes. Results Diabetic foot is one of the most severe complications of diabetes mellitus. Conventional treatments show limited efficacy in patients with advanced stages, such as Wagner grade 3/4 or Texas grade C and above. TTT, an evolution of the Ilizarov technique, promotes tissue regeneration through the “tension-stress principle”. The procedure for the treatment of diabetic foot has evolved from an open large cortical window (120 mm×20 mm) to a minimally invasive small window (50 mm×15 mm), with incision length reduced to 10 mm and simplified external fixators. A dual-incision technique (10 mm apart) is now applied at 5 cm distal to the tibial tuberosity. Bone transport typically begins 3-5 days postoperatively at a rate of 1 mm/day, incorporating the “accordion technique” (2 weeks distraction+3 days stabilization+reverse transport). Multicenter studies report a limb salvage rate of 96.1%, wound healing rate of 96.3%, and amputation rate of less than 5%. Combining TTT with vascular reconstruction and antibiotic-loaded bone cement further enhances outcomes. There are also a series of studies on the mechanism of TTT in treating diabetic foot. TTT has been shown to activate the hypoxia-inducible factor 1α-vascular endothelial growth factor/stromal cell-derived factor 1 (HIF-1α-VEGF/SDF-1) signaling pathway to facilitate microcirculatory reconstruction; mobilize immune cells and rebalance macrophage polarization, thereby improving the inflammatory microenvironment; recruit stem cells via chemotaxis to accelerate re-epithelialization; and promote the release of regenerative small extracellular vesicles. Conclusion TTT demonstrates promising clinical potential in the treatment of diabetic foot, particularly in improving limb perfusion and promoting tissue repair. However, the underlying mechanisms have not been fully elucidated. Further in-depth investigations are required. In addition, the current lack of high-quality randomized controlled trials highlights the urgent need for rigorously designed randomized controlled trial to validate the efficacy and safety of this technique.
摘要:目的:探討2型糖尿病合并糖尿病足患者與胰島素抵抗的關系。方法:205例2型糖尿病患伴糖尿病足患者作為觀察組,無足部病變的糖尿病患者作為對照組,觀察其體重指數、空腹血糖、胰島素、血脂等指標,兩組間進行比較并相關性分析、多元回歸分析。胰島素抵抗指數(HOMAIR)=FPG×FIns/22.5。結果:糖尿病足患者的HOMAIR顯著高于無糖尿病的患者(Plt;0.05)。多元回歸分析顯示糖尿病病程、LDL及BMI是影響2型糖尿病足患者胰島素抵抗的主要危險因素。結論:糖尿病足患者存在著更嚴重的胰島素抵抗。Abstract: Objective: To discuss the relationship between diabetes and pedopathy of type II diabetes and insulin resistance. Methods:The diabetes type II patients were divided into group A (combined with pedopathy) and group B (without pedopathy). The blood glucose and insulin of empty stomach, BMI,Alc and lipid were detected. The insulin resistance index (HOMAIR) was calculated and compared between two groups. Results:The HOMAIR was higher in group A than that in group B (Plt;0.05).The duration of disease,LDL and BMI was positive related with diabetes pedopathy. Conclusion:The insulin resistance was more worse in pedopathy of Type II diabetes.
