ObjectivesTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of autologous bone marrow cells therapy for patients with diabetic foot. GRADE system was used to evaluate the evidence quality of outcomes.MethodsWe searched databases including PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CBM, WanFang Data and CNKI for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about bone marrow cell transplantation in patients with diabetic foot from inception to February 28th 2017. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software. The evidence quality was evaluated by using GRADE profiler 3.6 software.ResultsFour RCTs were included. Meta-analysis showed that the bone marrow cell transplantation could decrease the rate of amputation (RR=0.08, 95%CI 0.00 to 1.32, P=0.08) and rest pain score (MD=–1.89, 95%CI –2.24 to –1.55, P<0.000 01), increase the rate of ameliorate ulcer healing (RR=2.01, 95%CI 1.45 to 2.79,P<0.000 1) and the quantity of new collateral vessels (MD=1.33, 95%CI 0.60 to 2.05,P<0.000 3). Besides, bone marrow cell transplantation could improve ankle-brachial index (MD=0.16, 95%CI 0.10 to 0.22,P<0.000 01) and transcutaneous arterial oxygen tension (MD=18.81, 95%CI 16.06 to 21.57,P<0.000 01). No adverse event was reported for all included studies. The qualities of evidence for all outcomes were rated as "low" to "very low".ConclusionBased on the current evidence, autologous bone marrow cells transplantation therapy has a certain effect and it is safe for patients with diabetic foot. However, due to the limited quantity and quality of included studies, the above conclusions are still needed more multicenter clinical trials with large sample size to confirm.
The annual incidence of diabetic foot ulcers in China is as high as 8.1%, which ranks first among the causes of chronic wounds in China. Although through the efforts of several generations of podiatrists and the building of multidisciplinary collaboration team, the major amputation rate in patients with diabetic foot ulcers in China has been decreased significantly, it is still far higher than the level of developed countries in Europe and the United States. Therefore, in order to cope with the increasing occurrence and recurrence of refractory diabetic foot ulcers, in addition to further optimizing the construction of multidisciplinary collaboration team, it is an urgent topic for us to explore the construction of a multidisciplinary integrated team to seamlessly connect the diagnosis and treatment of different aspects of foot disease. This article describes the importance and necessity of building a wound repair center with Chinese characteristics, which is a model of multidisciplinary integrated team, aiming at provide a theoretical basis for establishing a multidisciplinary integrated management model and realizing seamless connection between diagnosis and treatment, so as to further improve the cure rate of diabetic foot ulcers.
ObjectiveTo understand the status of life quality and fatigue level in patients with diabetic foot and to explore its influencing factors.
MethodsRandom sampling method was used in collecting the general data of 80 diabetic foot patients from January 2013 to January 2014. The questionnaire of Fatigue Scale-14 and Diabetes Specific Quality of Life Scale were analyzed, and the influencing factors of fatigue and life quality were investigated.
ResultsThe total score mean value of fatigue was 8.63±3.39 and the total score mean value of life quality was 71.00±19.84. The life quality and fatigue in patients with diabetic foot were positively correlated (P ＜ 0.01) .
ConclusionsThe life quality of patients needs to be improved. We should especially pay attention to their mental health and try to meet their psychological needs, in order to ease the patients’ fatigue level and improve their life quality. The key for diabetic foot nursing is to discover and assess the fatigue symptoms of patients with diabetic foot diseases.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the clinical efficacy and safety of hyperbaric oxygen therapy as adjunctive treatment for diabetic foot ulcers.
MethodsSuch databases as The Cochrane Library (Issue 1, 2014), PubMed, EMbase, CBM, VIP, CNKI and WanFang Data were searched up to January 2014 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about hyperbaric oxygen therapy as adjunctive treatment for diabetic foot ulcers. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and assessed methodological quality of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.2 software.
ResultsFourteen RCTs involving 910 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that, hyperbaric oxygen therapy combined with routine therapy was superior to routine therapy alone regarding ulcer healing rates (RR=2.16, 95%CI 1.43 to 3.26, P=0.000 3), incidence of major amputation (RR=0.20, 95%CI 0.10 to 0.38, P < 0.000 01), reduction of ulcer area (MD=1.73, 95%CI 1.34 to 2.11, P < 0.000 01), and improvement of transcutaneous oxygen tension (MD=14.75, 95%CI 2.01 to 27.48, P=0.02). However, no significant difference was found between the two group in minor amputation rates (RR=0.70, 95%CI 0.24 to 2.11, P=0.53). In addition, neither relevant serious adverse reaction nor complications were reported when using hyperbaric oxygen therapy as adjunctive treatment.
ConclusionCurrent evidence shows that hyperbaric oxygen therapy as adjunctive treatment could improve ulcer healing and reduce incidence of major amputation.
Objective To review the progress in amputation technique of diabetic foot. Methods Recent l iterature concerning the amputation technique of diabetic foot was reviewed and analyzed. Results According to the different levels of the amputation, the diabetic foot’s amputation can be classified as major amputation and minor amputation, and differentkinds of methods can derive from these styles. Different factors should be considered when the style and method of amputation are chosen. Conclusion To the diabetic foot amputation, the general rule is to l imit the amputation level on the premise of the good cl inical effect. The health state, the region of the diabetic foot, the tissue perfusion, the susceptibil ity to infection in local tissue, and the abil ity of wound healing are important factors in selecting the styles and methods of diabetes-related amputations. Importance should be attached to the synthesis treatments of diabetes to prevent the higher level amputation.
Objective To assess the effectiveness of intensive versus routine education on diabetes mellitus for preventing diabetic foot ulcer. Methods We electronically searched CENTRAL (Issue 1, 2013), PubMed (1978-2013), EMbase (1978-2013), VIP (1989-2013) and WanFang Data (1980-2013), hand-searched correlated proceedings and retrieved the references of included studies, for the randomized controlled trials on intensive versus routine education on diabetes mellitus for preventing diabetic foot ulcer all over the world. Two reviewers independently screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data, and assessed the methodological quality of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.2 software. Results Twelve trials involving 1 841 patients were finally included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: a) the incidence of diabetic foot ulcer in the intensive education group was lower than the routine group, with a significant difference (RR=0.51, 95%CI 0.30 to 0.84, P=0.008); b) two groups were alike in the amputation rate, with no significant difference (OR=0.54, 95%CI 0.17 to 1.67, P=0.28); and c) the score of knowledge on diabetes mellitus was higher in the intensive education group than in the routine education group, with a significant difference (MD=7.32, 95%CI 3.57 to 11.06, P=0.000 1). Conclusion Current evidence shows that: compared with routine education, intensive education could reduce the incidence of diabetic foot ulcer effectively. However, the above conclusion should be verified by conducting more high quality studies.
摘要:目的:探討2型糖尿病合并糖尿病足患者與胰島素抵抗的關系。方法:205例2型糖尿病患伴糖尿病足患者作為觀察組,無足部病變的糖尿病患者作為對照組,觀察其體重指數、空腹血糖、胰島素、血脂等指標,兩組間進行比較并相關性分析、多元回歸分析。胰島素抵抗指數(HOMAIR)=FPG×FIns/22.5。結果:糖尿病足患者的HOMAIR顯著高于無糖尿病的患者(Plt;0.05)。多元回歸分析顯示糖尿病病程、LDL及BMI是影響2型糖尿病足患者胰島素抵抗的主要危險因素。結論:糖尿病足患者存在著更嚴重的胰島素抵抗。Abstract: Objective: To discuss the relationship between diabetes and pedopathy of type II diabetes and insulin resistance. Methods:The diabetes type II patients were divided into group A (combined with pedopathy) and group B (without pedopathy). The blood glucose and insulin of empty stomach, BMI,Alc and lipid were detected. The insulin resistance index (HOMAIR) was calculated and compared between two groups. Results:The HOMAIR was higher in group A than that in group B (Plt;0.05).The duration of disease,LDL and BMI was positive related with diabetes pedopathy. Conclusion:The insulin resistance was more worse in pedopathy of Type II diabetes.
Objective To systematically analyze the randomized controlled trials that compare tissue-engineered skin (TES) with conventional treatment for chronic diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) in terms of effectiveness and utilization.Methods We searched the electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CBMWeb, CNKI, and VIP) in order to compare the efficiency and safety between TES and conventional treatment (CT) in the patients with DFU. In addition, we manually searched reference lists from original studies and review articles.Results Seven trials were included, which were all randomized controlled trials and had a duration of DFU over 6 weeks. There were 880 participants that met inclusion criteria in all studies, and all patients underwent pre-treatment procedures and were treated by TES (human skin equivalents, living skin equivalents or bioengineered skin, such as Graftskin, Dermagraft and Graftjacket) for 12 weeks. All trials had two groups: the treatment group and the control group, but the two trials divided the treatment groups into 3 different dosages and 2 different ulcer allocation subgroups, respectively. Meta-analysis results showed significant differences in the rate of complete wound closure (Plt;0.0001, 95%CI 0.08 to 0.20) and in the occurrence of complications and severe adverse events (P=0.008, 95%CI – 0.06 to – 0.01) between TES treated patients and conventionally treated patients. Conclusion The review shows TES improves completed closure of DFU compared with CT, and it is more effective in reducing side effects.
Diabetic foot infection (DFI) is one of the main causes of hospitalized patients with diabetic foot. DFI should be diagnosed according to the clinical manifestations, and the severity of infection should be graded in time. Diabetic foot wounds are mostly chronic wounds, and there are many kinds of bacterial infections. The bacteria and antibiotics resistance will change with the progress of the disease. Bacterial biofilm is also one of the important causes of antibiotic resistance. Reasonable and timely surgical treatment combined with effective antibiotic treatment is an effective measure to deal with the challenge of DFI. On this basis, multidisciplinary cooperation will achieve the best clinical outcome.
ObjectiveTo study the effectiveness of tibial transverse transport combined with the antibiotics embedded bone cement in the treatment of chronic infection of foot and ankle with lower extremity ischemic diseases.MethodsA retrospective analysis was performed on 28 patients with ischemic diseases of lower extremities associated with chronic foot and ankle infection who were treated with tibial transverse transport combined with antibiotic bone cement between August 2015 and October 2019. There were 22 males and 6 females, with an average age of 65.6 years (range, 41-86 years). There were 25 cases of diabetic foot, 2 cases of arteriosclerosis obliterans, and 1 case of thromboangiitis obliterans. The course of infection ranged from 1 to 27 years, with an average of 14.9 years. The healing condition and time of foot and ankle in all patients were recorded and compared, and the Wagner grading and WIFi (W: lower extremity wound classification; I: ischemic classification; Fi: foot infection classification) grading were compared before and at last follow-up.ResultsThe wound surface of 1 diabetic foot patient improved at 111 days after operation, without purulent secretion, and lost follow-up. The remaining 27 cases were followed up 5 to 21 months (mean, 8.4 months). There was no necrosis in the tibial osteotomy incision and the local flap. After operation, 21 cases showed needle reaction of external fixator, but the needle infection gradually improved after the corresponding treatment. Among the 24 patients with diabetic foot, 1 died of multiple organ failure due to pulmonary infection. Acute lower extremity vascular embolism occurred in 1 case, and the foot was amputated due to acute gangrene. In the remaining 22 cases, the wound healing time of foot and ankle was 2.5-11.0 months (mean, 4.6 months). At last follow-up, Wagner grading and WIFi grading of the patients were significantly improved when compared with those before operation (P<0.05). One patient with thromboangiitis obliterans had foot and ankle healing at 6 months after operation. Two patients with lower extremity arteriosclerosis obliterans had foot and ankle healing at 16 and 18 months after operation, respectively.ConclusionTibial transverse transport combined with the antibiotics embedded bone cement is effective in treating chronic infection of foot and ankle with lower extremity ischemic diseases.
