ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy of Chinese herbal enema in ileus patients.
MethodsThe randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs about Chinese herbal enema and gastrointestinal intubation versus western medicines in the treatment of ileus disease was searched in PubMed, Web of Science, EMbase, The Cochrane Library (Issue 4, 2013), CBM, CNKI, VIP and WanFang Data from the date of their establishment to July 2013. Two reviewers independently screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data, and assessed the methodological quality of included studies. Then meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.1.
ResultsA total of 27 RCTs and 3 quasi-RCTs involving 3 074 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that the Chinese herbal enema and gastrointestinal intubation group was superior to the control group in raising the total clinical effective rate (OR=4.69, 95%CI 3.70 to 5.94, P < 0.000 01), as well as shortening the hospitalization time (SMD=-1.19, 95%CI-1.42 to-0.96, P < 0.000 01), time of anus exhaust (SMD=-1.52, 95%CI-1.76 to-1.28, P < 0.000 01), defecation (SMD=-2.27, 95%CI-3.43 to-1.11, P=0.000 1), time of gastric tube indwelling (SMD=-1.56, 95%CI-1.86 to-1.27, P < 0.000 01), and symptoms complete resolution (SMD=-0.74, 95%CI-1.11 to-0.37, P < 0.000 1), all with significant differences.
ConclusionChinese herbal enema and gastrointestinal intubation is more beneficial than western medicine alone for ileus. Due to limited quality of the included studies, the abovementioned conclusion still needs to be verified by conducting more high quality blinding RCTs.
Objective
To explore the effect of 16F gastric tube on pain relief in postoperative lung cancer patients.
Methods
A total of 118 lung cancer patients were treated with radical resection of lung cancer in our hospital between January 2015 and May 2016. The patients were assigned into two groups: a 16F gastric tube group (16F group, 60 patients, 30 males and 30 females at age of 41-73 (52.13±7.83) years and a 28F drainage tube group (28F group, 58 patients, 25 males and 33 females at age of 45-75 (55.62±4.27) years. Clinical effects were compared between the two groups.
Results
There was no statistical difference in drainage time (4.47±1.03 dvs. 4.24±1.16 d, P=0.473), drainage amount (560.37±125.00 mlvs. 656.03±132.45 ml, P=0.478), incidences of pneumothorax (5/60 vs. 2/58, P=0.439), pleural effusion (6/60 vs. 3/58, P=0.522), and subcutaneous emphysema (3/60 vs. 1/58, P=0.635) between the two groups (P>0.05). The pain caused by the drainage tube in the16F group was less than that in the 28F drainage tube group with a statistical difference (F=4 242.996, P<0.001). The frequency of taking analgesics in the 16F group was significantly less than that in the 28F group (12/60vs. 26/58, P<0.001).
Conclusion
The effects of draining pleural effusions and promoting lung recruitment are similar between the 16F group and the 28F group. However, the wound pain caused by 16F gastric tube is significantly less than that by 28F drainage tube.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the safety and feasibility of non-nasogastric tube throughout the perioperative period of classical Whipple pancreaticoduodenectomy. MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 63 patients who underwent Whipple pancreaticoduodenectomy at West China Hospital of Sichuan University from June 2020 to August 2023. According to whether nasogastric tube was placed throughout the perioperative period, the patients were divided into nasogastric tube group (NGT group, n=32) and no nasogastric tube group (no NGT group, n=31). The intraoperative indicators such as gastrointestinal anastomosis mode and outcome measures such as postoperative hospital stay were compared between the two groups. Results① Preoperative baseline data: the proportion of benign diseases (P=0.005) and preoperative pancreatitis (P=0.003) of the no NGT group were higher than those of the NGT group, and other preoperative baseline data, such as age and sex, were not statistically significant (P>0.05). ② Intraoperative index: the proportion of circular stapler (P=0.009) was smaller and the operation time was shorter (P<0.001), but there was no significant difference in the anastomosis, intraoperative blood transfusion and intraoperative bleeding (P>0.05). ③ Postoperative outcome measures: the postoperative length of hospital stay (P<0.001) and the incidence of delayed gastric emptying (P<0.001) of the no NGT group were lower than those in the NGT group, but the postoperative time of food intake, incidence of pancreatic fistula, incidence of postoperative bleeding, and Clavien-Dindo grade of complications were not significant (P>0.05), and on one died within 30 d after operation. ConclusionsThe results of this study preliminarily show that, it is safe and feasible not to place nasogastric tubes throughout the perioperativeperiod in patients undergoing classical Whipple pancreaticoduodenectomy. Compared with placing nasogastric tube, it can shorten the postoperative hospital stay, reduce the incidence of postoperative delayed gastric emptying.
