【摘要】 目的 確定在不同濃度七氟醚復合瑞芬太尼誘導無肌松氣管插管時瑞芬太尼的半數有效量（ED50）。 方法 2009年7月-2009年11月擇期手術患者60例，ASA I~II，年齡20~59歲，按照入室的順序隨機分為Ⅰ組（2%七氟醚組）和Ⅱ組（3%七氟醚組），預沖8%七氟醚誘導，眼瞼反射消失后，調節七氟醚呼氣末濃度分別維持在2%或3%，同時按照序貫法注入瑞芬太尼，瑞芬太尼注射90 s后氣管插管。記錄麻醉誘導前、患者意識消失時、插管前1 min、插管后1 min及插管后3 min心率、平均動脈壓的變化。 結果 2%、3%的七氟醚復合瑞芬太尼誘導氣管插管時瑞芬太尼的半數有效量（ED50）及其相對應的95%可信區間分別為0.585 μg/kg及0.533～0.626 μg/kg和0.492 μg/kg及0.451～0.572 μg/kg。 結論 2%、3%的七氟醚復合瑞芬太尼誘導氣管插管時瑞芬太尼的半數有效量及其相對應的95%可信區間分別為0.585 μg/kg及0.533～0.626 μg/kg和0.492 μg/kg及0.451～0.572 μg/kg。【Abstract】 Objective To determine the half effective dose (ED50) of remifentanil dose for tracheal intubation without neuromuscular relaxant in adult when combined with different concentration of sevoflurane. Methods Sixty ASA Ⅰ to Ⅱ adult aged 20 to 59 years old, scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia were enrolled in this study between July 2009 to November 2009. All patients were ranged randomly into Group Ⅰ (2% sevoflurane) and Group Ⅱ (3% sevoflurane).Anesthesia was induced with 8% sevoflurane in 100% oxygenat at 6 L/min.After the loss of eyelash reflex, remifentanil was injected over 30 s, end-tidal sevoflurane concentration 2% or 3% was maitained. The dose of remifentanil was determined by up-and-down method. In 90 s after the end of bolus administration of remifentanil, the trachea was intubated. Mean blood pressure and heart rate were recorded at anaesthetic induction, the loss of eyelash reflex, before, in 1 min and 3 min after intubation. Results ED50 values (95% confidence intervals)of remifentanil for tracheal intubation during 2% and 3% sevoflurane induction without neuromuscular relaxant were 0.585 μg/kg and 0.533 - 0.626 μg/kg, and 0.492 μg/kg and 0.451 - 0.572 μg/kg, respectively. Conclusion ED50 values (95% confidence intervals)of remifentanil for tracheal intubation 2% and 3% sevoflurane induction without neuromuscular relaxant are 0.585 μg/kg (0.533 - 0.626 μg/kg) and 0.492 μg/kg (0.451 - 0.572 μg/kg), respectively.
Objective To assess the safety and efficacy of sufentanil combined with propofol for painless fiberbronchoscopy. Methods A total of 120 patients undergoing fiberbronchoscopy were divided into two groups according to their admission sequence: group S (sufentanil + propofol, n=60) and group F (fentanil + propofol, n=60). Parameters including heart rate (HR), systol ic blood pressure (SBP), diastol ic blood pressure (DBP), saturation of blood oxygen (SPO2), dose of propofol, duration of the procedure, waking time and score of Observer’s Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (OAA/S) scale were recorded. Results The HR increased significantly 3 minutes after drug administration in both groups (Plt;0.05). The SPO2 decreased significantly 3 minutes after drug administration in both groups (Plt;0.05). The average dose of propofol and OAA/a score were similar between the two groups (Pgt;0.05). The waking time was significantly shorter in group S than in group F (Plt;0.05). Conclusion Sufentanil combined with propofol could offer a good sedative/analgesic effect during painless fiberbronchoscopy.
【摘要】 目的 比較術后芬太尼皮下鎮痛（PCSA）與硬膜外鎮痛（PCEA）的臨床效果，以及對胃腸功能的影響。 方法 2009年1-6月間觀察擇期硬膜外麻醉下經腹子宮切除術患者120例，術后分別實施PCSA與PCEA，觀察術后第4、8、12、24、48 h的鎮痛、鎮靜情況，呼吸循環、惡心嘔吐及其他不良事件，記錄術后首次肛門排氣時間，測評術后鎮痛滿意度。 結果 術后兩組患者鎮痛優良率均在90%以上，各時點鎮痛評分、鎮靜評分、惡心嘔吐發生率、首次肛門排氣時間以及患者鎮痛優良率差異均無統計學意義（Pgt;0.05）。 結論 術后芬太尼PCSA與PCEA一樣，效果確切，對術后胃腸功能無明顯影響，患者滿意，是一種安全、有效的鎮痛方法。【Abstract】 Objective To compare clinical efficiency and gastrointestinal reaction of subcutaneous patient-controlled analgesia (PCSA) and epidural patient-controlled analgesia (PCEA) with fentanyl analgesic for patients after operation. Methods A total of 120 patients having undergone transabdominal hysterectomy under epidural anesthesia between January and June 2009 accepted PCSA or PCEA after operation. We evaluated the state of analgesia and sedation at the 4th, 8th, 12th, 24th and 48th hour after operation. We also looked into the respiration, blood circulation, nausea, vomiting and other abnormal events of the patients during the first 48 hours after operation. At the same time, we recorded the first time of anal exsufflation after operation and the degree of patients’ satisfaction. Results The analgesic effective rate was higher than 90% in both groups. There were no significant differences in analgesia and sedation scores at above-mentioned points after operation, incidence of nausea and vomiting, first time of anal exsufflation or analgesic effective rate between the two groups. Conclusion PCSA with fentanyl can be as effective in relieving postoperative pain as PCEA with fentanyl without obvious adverse effect in the gastrointestinal function. Therefore, PCSA is a safe and effective method to alleviate postoperative pain.
