ObjectiveTo investigate the efficacy and safety of intravitreal ranibizumab and (or) triamcinolone combined with laser photocoagulation for macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) during one year period.
MethodsThe data of 31 eyes from 31 consecutive patients with macular edema secondary to BRVO during one year follow-up visit were retrospectively analyzed. Mean best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) logMAR was (0.74±0.36) and mean central retinal thickness (CRT) was (484.48±164.81)μm at baseline. All patients received standardized clinical comprehensive examinations including vision, intraocular pressure and optical coherence tomography for diagnosis before treatment. All patients received intravitreal injections of 0.5 mg ranibizumab (0.05 ml) at first visit. The continue PRN treatment were based on the visual acuity changes and the optical coherence tomography findings. Eyes received combined triamcinolone acetonide 0.05 ml (40 mg/ml) and ranibizumab for macular edema recurrence after two injections of ranibizumab and received laser photocoagulation during 10-14 days after third injections of ranibizumab. Mean injection of ranibizumab was 3.52±2.01, 15 eyes with triamcinolone acetonide (0.84±1.21), 21 eyes with laser photocoagulation (0.97±0.95) and 12 eyes with three treatment. Compared the visual acuities and CRTs of the first and the last visits by statistical analysis.
ResultsMean visual acuity improved significantly to 0.42±0.33 logMAR (t=6.611, P=0.000). Mean improvement of visual acuity was 2.90±3.07 lines. A gain of three or more logarithmic lines was evaluated in 20/31 eyes (64.52%) at the last visit. Mean CRT was (326.19±117.80)μm (t=4.514, P=0.000).Mean reduction of CRT was (333.58±134.17)μm. A decrease of 100μm of CRT was evaluated in 17/31 eyes (54.84%). No severe ocular and systematic side effect was found.
ConclusionThe efficacy and safety of intravitreal ranibizumab and (or) triamcinolone combined with laser photocoagulation for macular edema secondary to BRVO were assured.
ObjectiveTo observe the efficacy of different administration of conbercept on choroidal neovasculature (CNV) in patients with pathological myopia (PM).MethodsA retrospective case-control study. From June 2012 to June 2017, 57 patients (61 eyes) with PM-CNV diagnosed in the Ophthalmology Department of General Hospital of Central Theater Command were included in this study. All patients underwent BCVA, intraocular pressure, refractive index, slit lamp microscope, FFA, OCT examination and axial length (AL) measurement. An international standard vision chart was used in the BCVA test, which was converted to logMAR vision. According to the initial treatment plan, the patients were divided into 1+PRN treatment group (group A) and 3+PRN treatment group (group B), with 27 patients (31 eyes) and 30 patients (30 eyes), respectively. There was no significantly statistical difference in baseline data between the two groups (P＞0.05). The eyes was injected with 10 mg/ml of conbercept 0.05 ml (including conbercept 0.5 mg). After completion of initial treatment, on-demand treatment was performed according to repeated treatment standards. The average follow-up time was 30.8 months. The time point for curative effect determination was 24 months after treatment. The frequency and recurrence rate of vitreous cavity injections in the two groups of patients and the changes of BCVA, central macular thickness (CMT), diopter and AL were compared and observed. Continuous variables were compared between groups by independent sample t test. Categorical variables were compared by χ2 test. logMAR BCVA and injection frequency were compared by Wilcoxon rank test. Comparison of CMT before and after treatment was performed by paired t test.ResultsAfter 24 months, the number of intravitreal injections in group A and group B were 3.94±1.88 and 4.83±1.72, respectively, with statistically significant difference (Z=－2.182, P=0.029). After completion of initial treatment, the number of retreatments in group A and group B were 2.94±1.88 and 1.83±1.72, respectively, with significantly statistical different (Z=－2.330, P=0.020). The CNV recurrence rates were 38.71% and 13.33%, respectively, with statistically significant difference (χ2=5.074, P=0.024). Compared with prior treatment, the average BCVA at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after treatment significantly increased in group A and B (Group A: Z=5.634, 5.367, 5.532, 6.344, 6.135l; P＜0.05. Group B: Z=5.809, 5.090, 5.341, 5.939, 8.103; P＜0.05). At 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment, there was no statistically significant difference in the average BCVA of the two groups (Z=－0.966, －0.932, －0.523, －1.759; P=0.334, 0.351, 0.601,0.079); the difference was statistically significant at 24 months (Z=－2.525, P=0.012). Compared with CMT before treatment, the difference in the average CMT reduction of the eyes in groups A and B was statistically significant at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months (Group A: t=4.691, 2.624, 2.121, 1.921, 2.237; P＜0.05. Group B: t=4.947, 4.554, 5.290, 5.567, 5.314; P＜0.05); the average CMT comparison between the two groups was not statistically significant (P=0.457, 0.871, 0.505, 0.333, 0.798). During the follow-up period, there were no ocular complications and systemic adverse reactions.ConclusionsDifferent administration methods for the treatment of PM-CNV by intravitreal injection of conbercept are safe and effective, which can effectively improve BCVA and reduce CMT. Total injection of 3+PRN is more than 1+PRN. However, the injections of retreatment and CNV recurrence rate is lower, and the final follow-up vision is better.
ObjectiveTo observe the clinical effect of prolonged photodynamic therapy (PDT) irradiation time combined with intravitreal injection of ranibizumab in the treatment of circumscribed choroidal hemangioma (CCH).MethodsA retrospective clinical study. From March 2012 to March 2018, 51 eyes of 51 patients diagnosed in Shenzhen Eye Hospital were included in the study. Among the patients, the tumor of 36 eyes were located in macular area, of 15 eyes were located outside macular area (near center or around optic disc). All patients underwent BCVA, color fundus photography, FFA, ocular B-scan ultrasonography and OCT examinations. The BCVA examination was performed using the international standard visual acuity chart, which was converted into logMAR visual acuity. OCT showed 48 eyes with macular serous retinal detachment. of 36 eyes with tumor located in macular area, the logMAR BCVA was 0.05±0.05, the tumor thickness was 4.5±2.2 mm, the diameter of tumor was 9.7±3.6 mm. Of 15 eyes with tumor located outside macular area, the logMAR BCVA was 0.32±0.15, the tumor thickness was 3.8±1.4 mm, the diameter of tumor was 7.7±1.9 mm. PDT was performed for all eyes with the irradiation time of 123 s. After 48 h, all patients received intravitreal injections of 0.5 mg ranibizumab (0.05 ml). At 1, 3 and 6 months after treatment, the same equipment and methods before treatment were used for related examination. BCVA, subretinal effusion (SRF), tumor leakage and size changes were observed. BCVA, tumor thickness and diameter before and after treatment were compared by t test.ResultsAt 6 months after treatment, the tumor was becoming smaller without scar formation. FFA showed that the blood vessels in the tumor were sparse compared with those before treatment, and the fluorescence leakage domain was reduced. OCT showed 43 eyes of macular serous detachment were treated after the combined treatment. The logMAR BCVA were 0.16±0.15 and 0.55±0.21 of the eyes with tumor located in or outside macular area, respectively. The difference of logMAR BCVA between before and after treatment was significant (t=－2.511, －2.676; P=0.036, 0.040). Both the tumor thickness (t=3.416, 3.055; P=0.011, 0.028) and diameter (t=4.385, 4.171; P=0.002, 0.009) of CCH patients were significantly reduced compared with that before treatment.ConclusionThe tumor of CCH can be reduced by prolonged PDT irradiation time combined with intravitreal injection of ranibizumab.
ObjectiveTo observe the effect of intravitreal injection of conbercept in the treatment of retinopathy of premature (ROP) and to analyze the factors related to the therapy.MethodsA retrospective study. A total of 57 patients (57 eyes) with pre-threshold type 1 (30 patients, 30 eyes), threshold ROP (21 patients, 21 eyes) and acute aggressive posterior ROP (APROP, 6 patients, 6 eyes)) from premature infants by retinal screening in Henan Provincial People’s Hospital during October 2017 and June 2018 were enrolled in this study. All children were received routinely intravitreal injected 10 mg/ml conbercept 0.025 ml (0.25 mg) within 24 hours after diagnosis. Fundus examination was performed 7 days after injection. The interval of examination was 1?3 weeks according to fundus conditions. The mean follow-up was 30.1±4.6 weeks. For patients with relapse or no response to treatment, repeated intravitreal injection of conbercept or laser photocoagulation therapy was given. The retinal blood vessels of the affected eyes were observed. Logistic stepwise regression analysis was used for the correlation test of multiple factors.ResultsAmong 57 eyes, 49 eyes and 8 eyes were treated with 1 or 2 times of intravitreal injection of conbercept. After 24 weeks of treatment, in 57 eyes, 26 eyes were cured (45.6%), 22 eyes improved (38.6%), 8 eyes relapsed (14.0%), and 1 eye aggravated (1.8%). The recurrence time was 12.9±4.5 weeks after the first injection, and the corrected gestational age was 49.0±6.7 weeks. There were significant differences in initial injection time, lesion range among the cure, improved and recurrence eyes (F=5.124, 7.122; P＜0.01, ＜0.01). Parameters of ROP condition, including ROP diagnosis (pre-threshold type 1, threshold and APROP), zone (zone 1 and 2), stage (stage 2 and 3) and plus lesions, were significant different among the cure, improved and recurrence eyes (χ2=11.784, 14.100, 6.896, 9.935; P＜0.01, ＜0.01, ＜0.05, ＜0.01). Logistic stepwise regression analysis showed that the recurrence rate was correlated with ROP zone, more likely recurrence at zone 1 than zone 2 (Wald=9.879, OR=27.333, P=0.002). No injection-related complications such as endophthalmitis, cataract and glaucoma were found during treatment and follow-up period.ConclusionsIntravitreal injection of conbercept is effective in the treatment of ROP without obvious adverse reactions. Lesion zoning is associated with recurrence after treatment.
Objective To study the effect of dimethyloxalylglycine (DMOG) on angiogenesis in Choke Ⅱ zone of rats cross-zone perforator flaps and its mechanism. Methods One hundred and twenty-six adult male Sprague Dawley rats were randomly divided into DMOG group, YC-1 group, and control group, with 42 rats in each group. Cross-zone perforator flap model with size of 12 cm×3 cm was made on the back of rats in the three groups. DMOG group was intraperitoneally injected with DMOG (40 mg/kg) at 1 day before operation, 2 hours before operation, and 1, 2, and 3 days after operation; YC-1 group and control group were intraperitoneally injected with YC-1 (10 mg/kg) and the same amount of normal saline at the same time points, respectively. The survival of flap was observed after operation. At 7 days after operation, the survival area of flap in each group was measured and the survival rate of flap was calculated. Flap transmittance test, gelatin-lead oxide angiography, and HE staining were used to observed the angiogenesis in the Choke Ⅱ zone of flaps in each group. Immunohistochemical staining and Western blot were used to detect the expressions of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α) in Choke Ⅱ zone of flaps in each group. The expressions of VEGF and HIF-1α were also determined by ELISA at 3, 5, and 7 days. Results At 7 days after operation, there was no obvious necrosis at the distal end of the flap in DMOG group, while necrosis occurred in both the control group and YC-1 group, mainly located at the distal end. The flap survival rate of DMOG group was 90.28%±1.37%, which was significantly higher than that of YC-1 group (84.28%±1.45%) and control group (85.83%±1.60%) (P<0.05). DMOG group had more angiogenesis in Choke Ⅱ zone and the vascular structure was clear and complete. In YC-1 group and control group, the vessels in Choke Ⅱ zone was less and the vascular structure was disordered. The number of vessels was (25.56±1.29)/field in the DMOG group, which was significantly higher than that in the YC-1 group [(7.38±0.54)/field] and the control group [(14.48±0.91)/field] (P<0.05). At 3, 5, and 7 days after operation, HIF-1α and VEGF expressions in ChokeⅡzone of DMOG group were significantly higher than those in YC-1 group and control group (P<0.05). ConclusionDMOG can promote angiogenesis in Choke Ⅱ zone, accelerate the early angiogenesis of the flap, improve the microcirculation and blood supply in the potential zone of the flap, reduce the injury of flap ischemia and hypoxia, and increase the survival rate of the flap.
Objective
To review the research progress of P75 neurotrophin receptor (P75NTR) so as to clarify its mechanism, and to explore its relationship with nonunion so as to provide a new idea for the treatment of nonunion.
Methods
The related domestic and foreign literature of P75NTR in recent years was extensively reviewed, summarized, and analyzed to find out the mechanism of action of P75NTR and the pathological factors of nonunion formation.
Results
P75NTR can express in nonunion tissues and lead to defect of fibrin degradation and inhibition of angiogenesis, which play an important role in the pathogenesis of nonunion.
Conclusion
It needs to be confirmed by further study whether the purpose of treating nonunion can be achieved by blocking the effects described above of P75NTR.
The therapeutic effect of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) was determined by a number of factors. Comprehensive thorough analysis of clinical features, imaging results and treatment response can predict the potential efficacy and possible vision recovery for the patient, and also can optimize the treatment regime to make a personalized therapy plan. Precise medicine with data from genomics, proteomics and metabolomics study will provide more objective and accurate biology basis for individual precise treatment. The future research should focus on comprehensive assessment of factors affecting the efficacy of anti-VEGF therapy, to achieve individualized precise diagnosis and treatment, to improve the therapeutic outcome of nAMD.
Objective
To compare the efficacy of intravitreal injection of ranibizumab and bevacizumab in the treatment of pathological myopia choroidal neovascularization (PM-CNV).
Methods
It is a retrospective case study. Seventy-nine patients (79 eyes) with PM-CNV were enrolled in this study. There were 26 males (26 eyes) and 53 females (53 eyes), with the mean age of (30.77±5.53) years. The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure, slit lamp microscope, fundus color photography, fundus fluorescein angiography, and optical coherence tomography (OCT) were performed. BCVA was recorded as logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR). The central retinal thickness (CMT) was measured by OCT (Cirrus HD-OCT). The eyes were divided into bevacizumab treatment group (38 eyes) and ranibizumab treatment group (41 eyes). There was no difference of the mean logMAR BCVA, intraocular pressure and CMT between two groups (t=?0.467, ?1.983, 1.293;P=0.642, 0.051, 0.200). The eyes in bevacizumab treatment group were treated with bevacizumab 0.05 ml (1.25 mg), and the eyes in ranibizumab treatment group were treated with ranibizumab 0.05 ml (0.5 mg). Times of injection between two groups were compared. The changes of intraocular pressure were observed at 1, 7 days and 1 month after treatment. The changes of logMAR BCVA and CMT at 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after treatment and systemic adverse reactions occur were compared.
Results
At the 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after treatment, the mean logMAR BCVA of the bevacizumab treatment group and the ranibizumab treatment group was significantly improved than that before treatment (F=132.374,P＜0.01). There was no significant difference in the mean logMAR BCVA at different time points between the two groups (F=0.095,P=0.759). The mean CMT of the two groups was lower than that before treatment (F=151.653,P＜0.01). There was no significant difference in the mean CMT between the two groups (F=0.332,P=0.566). No retinal detachment, endophthalmitis, cataract and persistent high intraocular pressure were associated with drug, injection-related eye and systemic adverse events during follow-up. Seven eyes had conjunctiva bleeding after treatment, 11 patients (11 eyes) complained of shadow floaters after treatment.
Conclusion
Intravitreal injection of bevacizumab or ranibizumab can equally effectively improve the visual acuity and reduce the CMT of PM-CNV patients.
