ObjectiveTo summarize the research progress of preoperative regional-arterial chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer.
MethodThe literatures about the research progress of preoperative regional-arterial chemotherapy in the advanced gastric cancer were reviewed.
ResultsThe preoperative regional-arterial chemotherapy in the advanced gastric cancer could decrease the tumour stage, improve the R0 resection rate and the long-term survival rate, effectively improve the drug concentrations of tumor and portal vein, and not only kill or damage cancer cells directly, but also prevent the metastasis of liver and lymph nodes effectively, and reduce the side effects, cause the nuclear pyknosis and fracture of cancer cells in a short time. The course of preoperative regional-arterial chemotherapy in the advanced gastric cancer generally was 4-9 weeks, and then whether the surgery treatment was decided to undergo according to the results of the curative effect evaluation.
ConclusionsThe preoperative regional-arterial chemotherapy in the advanced gastric cancer has more advantages than intravenous chemotherapy, further research of multicenter and large clinical trials, would inaugurate a wider application prospects.
ObjectiveTo investigate the risk factors of hepatoduodenal lymph node (HDLN) metastasis in patients with advanced gastric cancer and its effect on prognosis.
MethodsClinical datas of patients with advanced gastric cancer who underwent D2 radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer and HDLN dissection between Jan 2011 and Nov 2013 in department of general surgery of Ankang Central Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the independent risk factors associated with HDLN metastasis. Survival curves were performed to compare the survival rate of patients with or without HDLN metastasis and of patients with HDLN metastasis or with other lymph node metastasis. A Cox proportional hazards model was used for the multivariate analysis of risk factors for death in advanced gastric cancer.
ResultsThe incidence of HDLN metastasis was 10.7% in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed that the middle or lower stomach cancer (OR=6.014, P=0.002) and stage T3 or T4 (OR=5.133, P=0.021) were independent risk factors for HDLN metastasis. The 2-year overall survival (OS) rate was 36.7% in patients with HDLN metastasis. It was lower in patients with HDLN metastasis compared with those without (P=0.002). Limited to node-positive patients, patients with HDLN metastasis demonstrated decreased 2-year OS rate compared with node-positive patients without HDLN metastasis (P=0.027). Cox proportional hazard analysis identified poorly differentiated or undifferentiated cancer, stage of T3 or T4, and HDLN metastasis were independent poor prognostic factors in the patients with advanced gastric cancer (P < 0.05).
ConclusionsCancer located in the middle or lower stomach, and stage T3 or T4 were independent risk factors for HDLN metastasis in patients with advanced gastric cancer. HDLN metastasis demonstrated a poor prognosis.
ObjectiveTo compare the effect and safety between laparoscopic versus laparotomy D2 radical gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer.
MethodsTwo hundred and seventeen patients with advanced gastric cancer who were treated in our hospital from March 2011 to March 2014 were selected as research objects. According to surgical method, they were divided into laparoscopy group (103 patients received laparoscopic D2 radical gastrectomy) and laparotomy group (114 patients received laparotomy D2 radical gastrectomy). Comparison of the surgical effect-related indicators between 2 groups was performed.
ResultsIn the aspect of intra-operative indicators:the operation time, proximal margin length, distal margin length, and the number of removal lymph node between the 2 groups did not significantly differed with each other (P>0.05); while the bleeding volume and the length of incision in laparoscopy group were significantly less (shorter) than those of laparotomy group (P<0.05). In the aspect of post-operative indicators:the time to first flatus, time to resumed oral intake, time to ambulation, post-operative hospital stay, time of analgesics given, and the total incidence of postoperative complication in laparoscopy group were significantly shorter (less or lower) than those of laparotomy group (P<0.05), the operating cost in laparoscopy group was significantly higher than that of the laparotomy group (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in total treatment cost, mortality of gastric cancer, and recurrence or metastasis rate between the 2 groups (P>0.05).
ConclusionsBoth laparoscopic and laparotomy D2 radical gastrectomy in treatment of advanced gastric cancer can obtain good clinical effect. But compared with laparotomy D2 radical gastrectomy, laparoscopic D2 radical gastrectomy can reduce operative wound, reduce incidence of complications, improve postoperative recovery, and has higher safety.
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of postoperative intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion chemotherapy (IHPC) for advanced gastric cancer, so as to provide references for clinical practice and study. Methods The following databases including The Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMbase, CBM, CNKI, VIP and WanFang were searched on computer, and other searches were also performed to collect all relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on postoperative IHPC versus intravenous chemotherapy alone (IC) for advanced gastric cancer. The quality of the included studies was assessed according to Cochrane Handbook 5.1 for Systematic Review, and Meta-analysis was conducted by using RevMan 5.1 software. Results A total of 18 RCTs involving 2299 patients were included. The results of meta-analyses showed that: a) Efficacy evaluation: There were significant differences between the IHPC group and the IC group in 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year survival rate, 3- and 5-year recurrence rate, and 3- and 5-year distant metastasis rate; the OR value and 95%CI were 1.88 (1.49, 2.39), 2.45 (1.64, 3.67), 2.29 (1.92, 2.73), 2.17 (1.70, 2.76), 0.39 (0.29, 0.52), 0.54 (0.40, 0.72), 0.55 (0.38, 0.78), 0.58 (0.42, 0.81), respectively; b) Safety evaluation: There were significant differences between the IHPC group and the IC group in the incidence of abdominal pain, abdominal distension, nausea and vomiting; the OR value and 95%CI were 2.20 (1.58, 3.07), 7.00 (2.67, 18.36), 0.65 (0.45, 0.95), respectively. But there were no significant differences between the IHPC group and the IC group in the incidence of alopecia, ileus, bone marrow inhibition, and hepatic lesion. Conclusion Compared with IC, postoperative IHPC+IC can improve survival rate and reduce the recurrence and distant metastasis rate; additionally, it is safe and feasible, so it is recommended that the detailed condition of patients should be taken into consideration when the postoperative IHPC+IC therapy is applied to clinic.
ObjectiveTo compare the clinical effects of continuous hyperthermic peritoneal perfusion chemotherapy (CHPPC) and intravenous chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer patients, and find better nursing methods.
MethodsSixty advanced gastric cancer patients who underwent chemotherapy between June 2013 and June 2014 were divided into CHPPC group (group C, n=30) and intravenous chemotherapy group (group V, n=30). We recorded the nursing methods for both the two groups, patients' satisfaction to the nursing and treatment, peritoneal metastasis rate and quality of life during the chemotherapy.
ResultsThe life quality in group V was lower than that in group C (P<0.05). The differences in patients' satisfaction rate, peritoneal metastasis rate, and one-year survival rate were not significantly different between the two groups (P>0.05).
ConclusionFor patients with advanced gastric cancer requiring chemotherapy, in spite of higher cost and more complicated operations, CHPPC is superior in lower adverse events rate, better quality of life during chemotherapy and doesn't decrease patients' satisfaction to the nursing and treatment.
ObjectiveTo observe the clinical curative effect of interventional chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer.
MethodsThirty advanced gastric cancer patients underwent arterial infusion chemotherapy and embolization treatment between January and December 30, 2013. The treatment was carried out every three weeks. We evaluated the clinical results after the third treatment. The clinical improvement was assessed based on alleviation of such symptoms as epigastric pain, poor appetite, nausea, vomiting and fecal occult blood. The tumor size was evaluated through abdominal CT examination.
ResultsAbdominal pain relieved in 19 out of 28 patients (67.9%); appetite improved in 18 out of 24 patients (75.0%); vomiting relieved in 15 out of 16 cases (93.8%); and fecal 9 out of 12 patients with positive occult blood turned to negative (75.0%). The total effective rate was 83.3%, and 8 patients accepted interventional therapy after operation. The survival rates during the 6, 12 and 24-month follow-up were respectively 85.0%, 65.0%, and 25.0%.
ConclusionsInterventional chemotherapy and embolization treatment are effective for advanced gastric cancer, which can relieve symptoms and lower tumor stage. Some patients have a second chance of operation, which can be an effective method in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy containing tegafur gimeracil oteracil potassium (S-1) combined with surgery in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer.MethodsWe searched EMbase, PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CBM, CNKI and WanFang Data from inception to February 2017, to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about neoadjuvant chemotherapy containing S-1 combined with surgery in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 11 RCTs involving 971 advanced gastric cancer patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that the neoadjuvant chemotherapy containing S-1 combined with surgery group was superior to the control group in R0 resection rate (OR=2.75, 95%CI 1.91 to 3.95, P<0.000 01), 2 year survival rate (OR=1.72, 95%CI 1.01 to 2.93, P=0.05) and 3 year survival rate (OR=1.64, 95%CI 1.12 to 2.41, P=0.01), while there were no statistical differences in response rate (OR=1.33, 95%CI 0.70 to 2.51, P=0.39), 1 year survival rate (OR=1.50, 95%CI 0.64 to 3.53, P=0.35) and the incidence of postoperative complications (OR=1.00, 95%CI 0.66 to 1.51, P=0.98).ConclusionNeoadjuvant chemotherapy containing S-1 combined with surgery can improve the R0 resection rate, 2-year survival rate and 3-year survival rate without increase postoperative complications rate. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high-quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.
Objectives
To systematically review the efficacy and safety of docetaxel or epirubicin based regimens in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer.
Methods
We searched EMbase, PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CBM, CNKI and WanFang Data from inception to March 2017, to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on docetaxel or epirubicin based regimens in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software.
Results
A total of 12 RCTs involving 984 advanced gastric cancer patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that docetaxel based regimens were superior to epirubicin based regimens in ORR (RR=1.21, 95%CI 1.02 to 1.43, P=0.03), DCR (RR=1.13, 95%CI 1.01 to 1.26, P=0.03), 1-year survival rate (RR=1.26, 95%CI 1.01 to 1.56, P=0.04) and 2-year survival rate (RR=3.03, 95%CI 1.59 to 5.75, P=0.000 7), while there was no statistical difference between two groups in the incidence of grade Ⅲ to Ⅳ adverse events. The results of sensitivity analysis showed that docetaxel based regimens were superior to epirubicin based regimens in 2-year survival rate (RR=2.56, 95%CI 1.06 to 6.19, P=0.04), but there were no statistical differences in ORR (RR=1.13, 95%CI 0.88 to 1.45, P=0.34), DCR (RR=1.02, 95%CI 0.85 to 1.21, P=0.84) and 1-year survival rate (RR=1.29, 95%CI 0.92 to 1.80, P=0.14). The results of sensitivity analysis indicated that the overall outcomes might be affected by the risk bias of included studies. The comparision between docetaxel based regimens and epirubicin based regimens was consistent with the overall outcomes in the incidence of grade Ⅲ to Ⅳ adverse events.
Conclusions
Compared with epirubicin based regimens, docetaxel based regimens may have more clinical benefits for advanced gastric cancer patients. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are required to verify above conclusions.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the relationship between methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene C677T polymorphism and efficacy of fluorouracil-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC).
MethodsComputer retrieval in China Journal Full-text Database, Chinese Science and Technology Periodical Database, Wanfang database, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, PubMed, EMbase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science Database (from their establishment to May 28, 2013) was performed to include case-control studies on MTHFR gene C677T polymorphism and sensitivity to fluorouracil-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Statistical analysis was done by using RevMan 5.1 software.
ResultsSeven case-control studies with 775 patients were included. The meta-analysis showed that among MTHFR C677T genotypes, for TT vs. CC, OR=4.63, 95%CI (1.23, 17.4); and for CC+CT vs. TT, OR=0.21, 95%CI (0.06, 0.78). Subgroup analysis of Asian group showed that for TT vs. CC, OR=32.99, 95%CI (11.40,95.42); and for CC+CT vs. TT, OR=0.04, 95%CI (0.02, 0.10). Sensitivity analysis performed according to different detection methods showed that for TT vs. CC, OR=6.03, 95%CI (1.53, 23.72); and for CC+CT vs.TT, OR=0.17, 95%CI (0.04, 0.68).
ConclusionPolymorphism of MTHFR C677T gene may be associated with sensitivity to fluorouracil-based chemotherapy in patients with AGC.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of docetaxel (DOC) combined with oxaliplatin (OXA) regimen in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer.
MethodsSixty patients with advanced gastric cancer treated in our hospital from January 2008 to January 2011 were randomly divided into two groups. The treatment group (n=30) was given DOC combined with OXA regimen. Patients in this group were treated with DOC 75 mg/m2, ivgtt, d1; OXA 130 mg/m2, ivgtt, d4; with 21 days as a cycle. The control group (n=30) was given DCF regimen. Patients in the control group were treated with DOC 75 mg/m2, ivgtt, d1; cisplatin 75 mg/m2, ivgtt, d1; calcium folinate 200/m2, ivgtt, 2 h, d1-2; fluorouracil 400 mg/m2, bolus 10 minutes, fluorouracil 600 mg/m2 civ 22 h d1-2; also with 21 days as a cycle. All patients received two cycles of chemotherapy at least. The effective rate (complete remission+partial remission), adverse reactions, median survival time and quality of life were analyzed and compared between the two groups.
ResultsThe effective rates in the treatment group and the control group were 60.0% and 46.7% respectively, showing a non-significant difference (P>0.05). The appetite increasing rate (70.0% vs 43.3%), the weight gain rate (60.0% vs 33.3%), and the Karnofsky score improvement rate (63.3% vs 30.0%) of the treatment group were significantly higher than those of the control group (P<0.05). The adverse reactions were fewer in the treatment group, and most of them were between grade Ⅰ and Ⅱ. The median time of disease progression (5.8 months vs 5.6 months) and the median survival period (11.8 months vs 9.2 months) of the treatment group were longer than those in the control group.
ConclusionDOC combined with OXA regimen is effective in treating advanced gastric cancer. It can significantly improve the quality of life of the patients, and it has fewer adverse reactions. Meanwhile, the median survival period is prolonged. DOC combined with OXA regimen is worth to be applied in clinic.
