Guideline implementation with decision support checklist (GUIDES) aims to assist the self-reflection of evidence-based clinical decision support system (CDSS) related professionals to enhance the process monitor and continuous improvement of evidence-based CDSS. This paper interpreted the development process, target user, and assessment method of GUIDES, analyzed the practical value of GUIDES through a typical example, and then reflected on the GUIDES and current studies on evidence-based CDSS in China. It is expected to provide references for future studies.
ObjectivesTo provide methodology support for the tracking assessment of specific resolution execution through evidence-based construction of tracking assessment index system for resolution execution of WHO essential medicine accessibility resolution, so as to further promote and improve the establishment of national essential medicine policies, and offer a methodology reference to survey and assess the resolution executions in other public health fields.MethodsA multi-disciplinary team was set up to preliminarily construct the index system by means of earlier system assessment index through index screening based on Delphi method. The weight of each index was determined by analytic hierarchy process.ResultsAfter two rounds of expert consultation, the index system available for resolution execution measures and results of WHO essential medicine accessibility were established, including 9 indexes of resolution execution measures. Meanwhile, the execution results of index contained 4 first class indexes, 13 second class indexes and 36 third class indexes. Each of the indexes obtained its own weight according to degree of importance.ConclusionsIn this study, the assessment index for resolution execution of essential medicine accessibility is established, however, the empirical research is still required to further verify the scientificity as well as feasibility of this index system.
Objective To retrospectively analyze the clinical and imaging features of multi-segmental lumbar intervertebral disc protrusion and its treatment with the limited recessive decompression operation. Methods Twenty two patients (14 males and 8 females, aged 49-68 years) were admitted to hospital from March 1999 to March 2004. They suffered from multisegmental lumbar intervertebral disc protrusion that involved L1S1 and were treated with the limited recessive decompression operation. Results The follow-up for 4-21 months showed that 16 of the patients had an excellent outcome, 5 had a good outcome, and 1 had fair outcome. There were nosuch operative complications as nerve root lesions and putamen lesions. Conclusion The limited recessive decompression operation is one of the available good treatments for multi-segmental lumbar intervertebral disc protrusion. It solves problems of herniation and stenosis and maintains stability ofthe spine.
Objective To give a review and commentary on the treatment of acute foot and ankle injuries. Methods Based on the treatment experience and recent l iterature, a commentary on acute foot and ankle injuries were given, included the basic and cl inical research results, evaluation before operation, and treatment methods of the soft tissue and bone injuries. Results The treatment of acute foot and ankle injuries is still a hot point in orthopaedic surgery. Operative and non-operative treatment of fresh Achilles tendon rupture can achieve satisfactory results, and early weight-bearing do not increase the re-rupture rate. The time delay between first debridement and injury within 24 hours does not increase the infection rate. For the treatment of severe ankle fractures, attentions should be paid to the cartilage injury, and anatomic reduction, good real ignment, and the congruity recovery are very important. The treatment determination of calcaneal fractures depends on the fully understanding injury mechanisms, classifications, and treatment method. Talus fractures should try to be treated by experienced surgeons. Operation and fixation methods of Lisfranc injury depends on different injury types. Conclusion Acute foot and ankle injuries are common in cl inical, to achieve a satisfactory result in evaluation and treatment, it is important to have a fully evaluation of the injury type, and choose the best operation time and suitable treatment methods, as well as to fully understand the biomechanical characteristics of different regions.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the method quality of systematic reviews/Meta analysis published in nursing journals.
MethodsWe retrieved Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, Chinese academic literature online publishing pool and Chinese Scientific Journals Database (the duration was from the beginning to August, 2013). The systematic reviews and Meta analysis published in nursing journals were included, and were evaluated by 10 items in OQAQ (Oxman-Guyatt Overview Quality Assessment Questionnaire).
ResultsA total of 74 literatures were included in the analysis, including 17 systematic reviews and 57 Meta-analyses. It showed that the mean OQAQ score was 2.92±1.63. About 4.1%, 8.1%, 31.1%, 43.2%, 29.7%, 55.4%, 16.2%, 37.8%, and 60.8% studies stated literature research methods used to find evidence; had reasonably comprehensive search; avoided bias in the selection of studies by duplicate screening; reported the criteria used for assessing the validity of the included studies; concluded the findings by the data or analysis; provided a list of studies; assessed using appropriate criteria; reported the methods used to synthesis the findings; and combined the findings of the included studies appropriately.
ConclusionThe systematic reviews/Meta analysis of the overall quality in nursing field is low. The search strategy, inclusion and exclusion criteria, quality assessment and data analysis is particularly prominent, researchers should conduct rigorous methodological training.
ObjectivesTo construct a follow-up evaluation indicator system on the implementation of the WHO resolution of " Access to essential medicines” by systematic review, and to provide a methodological support for tracking the implementation of the resolution, with a view to providing evidence of decision-making to promote the accessibility of essential medicines and further promote and improve the national essential medicine policy. It also provides a methodological reference for investigating the implementation of other public health sector resolutions.MethodsPubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CBM, WanFang Data and CNKI databases and relevant international or national official websites of pharmaceutical administration department or academic organization were searched to collect studies on accessibility of WHO essential drugs from inception to February, 2016. Two researchers independently screened literature, extracted data, and qualitative analysis was used to sort out and screen the evaluation indicators for the implementation of the WHO resolution of "Access to essential medicines".ResultsA total of 60 relevant literatures, three guides and 19 progress reports of the World Health Assembly from official websites were included. Through the screening of indicators, we could get two parts: the indicators of measures to implement the resolution and the indicators of the results of the implementation of the resolution.ConclusionsThis study analyzes the implementation of the resolution of the health system in the progress report of the World Health Assembly 2013–2015, divides the implementation of the resolution into two parts: the implementation of the resolution and the results of the implementation of the resolution. An indicator system for establishing measures and evaluation the resolution has been found. Expert consultations will be further developed to establish the final indicators for the implementation of the "Access to essential medicines".
Objective To evaluate the application of the Huaxi Intelligent Endoscopic Skill Training and Assessment System in minimally invasive surgery (MIS) skills training and provide insights for optimizing MIS training models, we analyzed trainee performance during training and assessment. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on the use of this system across 28 medical institutions from January 2022 to January 2025. Results By January 2025, the standardized deployment of 139 simulation units had been completed. A total of 403 trainees from various surgical specialties, including thoracic surgery and general surgery, participated in five customized endoscopic skill training modules: endoscopic recognition, grasping training, positioning and placement, cutting training, and suturing training. Throughout the training period, a total of 78 participants took part in 27 formal assessments. Correlation analysis based on Spearman showed that pre-assessment training pass rates were significantly correlated with final assessment scores, indicating enhancing the quality of each training module and overall training efficacy is a key to improving the effectiveness of MIS training. Conclusion The Huaxi Intelligent Endoscopic Skill Training and Assessment System effectively supports MIS training and evaluation.
Objective To summarize the assessment methods of anal function after low/ultralow rectal anastomosis in patients with rectal cancer. Methods Domestic and international publications on the study of evaluation of anal function after low/ultralow rectal anastomosis in patients with rectal cancer were collected and reviewed. Results Anal function of patients with rectal cancer was usually evaluated by feeling of discharge, continence, perceptual function of rectum, defecate frequency, and defecation time, anal manometry and three-dimensional vector manometry were used as well. Recovery of anal function in patients with rectal cancer after low/ultralow rectal anastomosis depended on the integrity of anal canal, length of remaining rectum, level of anastomosis, and integrity of mucosa. Conclusions Subjective assessment methods and auxiliary measuring instruments are the common means to evaluate the rectal-anal function. Subjective assessment method is simple and direct, but its accuracy is low; Auxiliary measuring instruments have high accuracy, while their examination costs are high and that of costs are not popular, the new assessment methods are needed for further research.
Objective To investigate the scientificity of patient-reported outcomes instrument for asthma ( Asthma-PRO) , which maybe used to evaluate the efficacy of anti-asthma drugs in clinical trials and clinical practice.Methods 366 asthma patients and 100 healthy subjects were face-to-face interviewed by well-trained investigators, and the data of Asthma-PRO instrument were collected. The psychometric performance such as reliability, validity, responsiveness and clinical feasibility in the Asthma-PRO instrument was evaluated. Results The split-half reliabilities of the Asthma-PRO instrument and each dimension were greater than 0.8. In the analysis of internal consistency of each dimension, the cronbach’s alpha coefficient was greater than 0.7. Factor analysis showed that the instrument has good construct validity. The scores of each of the facets and total scores between the asthma patients and the healthy subjects were different. The recovery rate and the efficient rate of the questionnaire were more than 95%, and the time required to complete a questionnaire was within 20 minutes, indicating that the scale had a high clinical feasibility. Conclusion The Asthma-PRO instrument has good reliability, validity, responsiveness and clinical feasibility.
Objective To evaluate diagnostic accuracy of several relevant cut-off points of Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA) for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in Chinese middle-aged adults. Methods Databases including PubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library (Issue 5, 2016), OVID, CBM, CNKI, VIP, WanFang Data were searched for diagnostic tests about MoCA for MCI from April 9th 2005 to December 31st 2015. Two reviewers independently screened literatures according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data and assessed the methodological quality by QUADAS-2 tool. Then, meta-analysis was performed by Stata 14.0 software. Results A total of 27 studies involving 5 755 participants were included with mean ages from 60 to 80 years old. Among them, 1 997 were diagnosed as MCI patients by Petersen criteria. Based on maximal area under the ROC curve as well as optimal pooled sensitivity and specificity, the optimal cutoff value of MoCA was 25/26, the pooled sensitivity was 0.96 with 95%CI 0.93 to 0.97, specificity was 0.83 with 95%CI 0.75 to 0.89, and DOR was 107 with 95%CI 61 to 188. The subgroup analysis with different research designs, different sources of study participants and different MoCA versions all indicated 25/26 as an optimal cut-off value. Conclusion The optimal cutoff value of MoCA in Chinese middle-aged adults for screening MCI by Petersen criteria was 25/26.
