ObjectiveTo explore the fusion effect of allograft Cages on transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF).MethodsThe clinical data of 30 patients (38 vertebral segments) who underwent TLIF with allograft interbody fusion Cages between January 2015 and January 2017 were retrospectively analysed. There were 25 males and 5 females with an average age of 56.9 years (range, 44-72 years). The lesions included 20 cases of lumbar disc herniation, 7 cases of lumbar spondylolisthesis, and 3 cases of lumbar spinal stenosis. The operation section included 4 cases of L3, 4, 13 cases of L4, 5, 5 cases of L5, S1, 6 cases of L4, 5-L5, S1, and 2 cases of L3, 4-L4, 5. The disease duration was 6-36 months (mean, 12 months). The clinical effectiveness was evaluated by visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Oswestry disability index (ODI), and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score at preoperation, 3 months and 6 months after operation, and last follow-up. The fusion rate was evaluated by anteroposterior and lateral X-ray films and CT three-dimensional reconstruction at 3 and 6 months after operation. The intervertebral space height was measured on anteroposterior and lateral X-ray films at preoperation, 3 days, 3 months, and 6 months after operation.ResultsThe operation time was 2.1-4.3 hours (mean, 3.1 hours), and the intraoperative blood loss was 150-820 mL (mean, 407.5 mL). The follow-up time was 8-25 months (mean, 16.4 months). One Cage split at 6 months after operation without Cage movement and neurologic symptoms; none of the other patients had Cage prolapse, displacement, and fragmentation. No local or systemic allergy or infection signs was found in all patients. No nerve compression or symptoms was observed during the follow-up. The postoperative VAS score, ODI score, and JOA score improved significantly when compared with preoperative scores (P<0.05); and the scores at 6 months and at last follow-up were significantly improved when compared with those at 3 months after operation (P<0.05); but no significant difference was found between at 6 months and at last follow-up (P>0.05). The fusion rate was 55.3% (21/38), 92.1% (35/38), and 100% (38/38) at 3 months, 6 months, and last follow-up postoperatively. The intervertebral space height was increased significantly at 3 days, 3 months, 6 months, and last follow-up postoperatively when compared with preoperative ones (P<0.05); and the loss of intervertebral space height was significant at last follow-up when compared with postoperative at 3 days (P<0.05).ConclusionThe allograft interbody fusion Cage contributes to the spine interbody fusion by providing an earlier stability and higher fusion rate.
Objective To compare the curative effect of posterior lumbar interbody fusion with autologous il iac crest to that of interbody fusion cage for adult instabil ity of lower lumbar. Methods From February 2003 to October 2006,60 inpatients with lower lumbar instabil ity were treated. Patients were randomized into 2 groups: bone-graft group (n=28) was treated with posterior lumbar interbody fusion with two autologous il iac crests, while cage group (n=32) was treated with posterior lumbar interbody fusion with two quadrate cages. In the bone-graft group, 17 males and 11 females aged (52.78 ± 10.50) years with 3-16 months of disease course, there were 12 cases of degenerative instabil ity, 14 isthmus sl it ol isthe and 2 iatrogenic instabil ity, including 1 case of L3,4, 17 cases of L4,5 and 10 cases of L5, S1. Relative disc space height was (23.24 ± 6.62) mm, disc space activity was (10.50 ± 5.07)o, sagittal saw sl ippage distance was (4.50 ± 1.15) mm and the JOA score was 18.56 ± 2.68. In the cage group, 19 males and 13 females aged (51.75 ± 10.44) years with 3.5-14.0 months of disease course, there were 16 cases of degenerative instabil ity, 14 isthmus sl it ol isthe and 2 iatrogenic instabil ity, including 16 cases of L4,5 and 16 cases of L5, S1. Relative disc space height was (24.34 ± 7.22) mm, disc space activity was (11.12 ± 5.67)o, sagittal saw sl ippage distance was (4.38 ± 0.75) mm and the JOA score was 19.00 ± 4.12. There was no significant difference between the two groups in termsof age, gender, JOA score, disc space activity and relative disc space height preoperatively (P gt; 0.05). Results All patients received the follow-up at the 1st, 3rd, 6th and 12th month postoperatively. There was no significant difference in operation time and hemorrhage amount between the two groups (P gt; 0.05), but significant difference in the cost of operation (P lt; 0.01). Two cases in the bone-graft group suffered donor site pain and received no treatment. Three cases in the bone-graft group and 2 cases in the cage group had symptom of nerve injury 1-2 days after surgery, which were cured after expectant treatment. There were no pseudoarticulation formation, intervertebral space infection and cage aversion in both groups. Significant difference of relative disc space height was found in each group pre- and post- operatively (P lt; 0.01) and significant differences were evident between the two groups at any of the time points (P lt; 0.01). One month after operation, there was significant difference between the two groups (P lt; 0.05). There was also significant difference at the 3rd, 6th and 12th month after operation (P lt; 0.01). No sign offusion was found in each group at the 1st and 3rd month after operation. In bone-graft group, there were 7 vertebral fusion cases 6 months after operation and 23 vertebral fusion cases 12 months after operation. In cage group, there were 8 vertebral fusion cases 6 months after operation and 29 vertebral fusion cases 12 months after operation. There was no significant difference in the rate of fusion at 6 and 12 months follow-up between the two groups (P gt; 0.05). Significant difference of JOA scores was found in each group pre- and post- operatively (P lt; 0.05). And no significant difference in JOA scores at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months follow-up was evident between the two groups (P gt; 0.05). Conclusion There is no significant difference between the two groups in the fusion time, the fusion rate and the cl inical symptoms alleviation, indicating autologous il iac crest is appl icable to interbody fusion for the treatment of adult instabil ity of lower lumbar and good therapeutic effect can be achieved with no immunoreaction and lower cost.
Objective To observe the effect of titanium mesh cage with self-locked titanium plate on the cervicalinter-body fusion after anterior discectomy of multilevel cervical intervertebral disc protrusion. Methods The therapeuticeffect of 18 patients who received the treatment of titanium mesh cage with self-locked titanium plate from September 2004 to June 2007 were retrospectively analyzed, including 11 males and 7 females (aged 32-75 years, 54 years on average). The course of disease was 6 months to 15 years (5.8 years on average). Sixteen patients suffered sensory dysfunction in l imbs. Concerning the muscle strength of extremities, 3 cases were on the second level, 12 were on the third level, 1 was on the fourth level, and 2 were on the fifth level. Sixteen cases had pyramidal sign, 13 had retention of urine and feces, 8 had sexual dysfunction, and 7 combined with symptoms of nerve root type. Twelve cases were consecutive multilevel and 6 cases were discontinuous multilevel. The mean JOA scores were 8.30 ± 1.21 preoperatively. X-ray films and MRI showed degeneration and protrusion of intervertebral disc and compression of cervical cord preoperatively. The height of involved intervertebral space was (6.40 ± 0.87) mm on X-ray films preoperatively. Results All the incisions were healed by first intention. All the patients were followed up for 6-36 months (18 months on average). The recovery of extremities motor function was better than that of sensory function at the early stage after operation. Muscular tension decreased after operation and mobil ity of l imbs was improved. The operated segments were instantly stable and sol id fusion was observed at 3-6 months after operation. JOA scores at 6 months after operation was 12.60 ± 0.78 with an improvement rate of 51.8%, indicating significant difference wasevident when compared with the JOA scores before operation (P lt; 0.05). The height of involved intervertebral space increased significantly to (8.20 ± 0.46) mm postoperatively, indicating the difference was significant (P lt; 0.05). According to Odom’s evaluation scale, 17 patients were graded as excellent and 1 as good. No death and compl ications of spinal cord, nerve, trachea and esophagus were observed. The cage witnessed no translocation. Conclusion Titanium mesh cage with self-locked titanium plate is more stable and effective for the treatment of multilevel cervical intervertebral disc protrusion.
ObjectiveTo discuss the safety and effectiveness of combined dynamic cervical implant (DCI) and Cage fusion in the treatment of two-level cervical disc protrusion.
MethodsBetween September 2009 and June 2011, 16 cases of two-level cervical disc protrusion were treated with combined DCI and Cage fusion. Of 16 cases, 10 were male and 6 were female, with a mean age of 44.1 years (range, 37-64 years) and with a mean disease duration of 5.1 years (range, 2-8 years), including 8 cases of cervical myelopathy, 5 cases of nerve root cervical myelopathy, and 3 cases of mixed cervical myelopathy. Radiological results indicated degenerative intervertebral discs and compressed never root or spinal cord. Involved discs included C3,4 and C4,5 (1 case), C3,4 and C5,6(5 cases), C4,5 and C5,6 (3 cases), C4,5 and C6,7 (5 cases), and C5,6 and C6,7 (2 cases). The neck disability index (NDI), Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, and visual analogue scale (VAS) were used to evaluate the neurological function and pain relief. The stabilities and activities of involved segments, intervertebral fusion, and displacement of Cages were observed during follow-up.
ResultsPrimary healing of incisions was obtained in all cases; no complication of hematoma, infection, cerebrospinal fluid leakage, or neural function damage occurred. All 16 patients were followed up 18 months on average (range, 6-36 months). The cervical X-ray results indicated that the activities of involved segments was (7.8±3.1)°, showing no significant difference (t=0.655, P=0.132) when compared with preoperative value [(7.3±2.6)°]. No implant loosening was observed; slight heterotopic ossification occurred in 1 patient at the posterior rim of intervertebral space. No cage loosening or sinking was seen, and good fusion was achieved. The mean time of fusion was 4.5 months (range, 3-8 months). NDI, JOA, and VAS scores at last follow-up (18.3±5.1, 15.7±1.5, and 3.4±1.8 respectively) were significantly improved (t=2.131, P=0.016; t=3.126, P=0.024; t=6.102, P=0.038) when compared with preoperative scores (49.6±11.3, 12.8±2.0, and 6.7±1.2 respectively).
ConclusionA combination of DCI and intervertebral Cage fusion has satisfactory early effectiveness in treatment of two-level cervical intervertebral protrusion for maintaining the stability and activity of cervical vertebrae.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of three-dimensional (3D) printing artificial vertebral body and interbody fusion Cage in anterior cervical disectomy and fusion (ACCF) combined with anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACDF).MethodsThe clinical data of 29 patients with multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy who underwent ACCF combined with ACDF between May 2018 and December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 13 patients were treated with 3D printing artificial vertebral body and 3D printing Cage as 3D printing group and 16 patients with ordinary titanium mesh Cage (TMC) and Cage as TMC group. There was no significant difference in gender, age, surgical segment, Nurick grade, disease duration, and preoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, and Cobb angle of fusion segment between the two groups (P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hospitalization stay, complications, and implant fusion at last follow-up were recorded and compared between the two groups; JOA score was used to evaluate neurological function before operation, immediately after operation, at 6 months after operation, and at last follow-up; VAS score was used to evaluate upper limb and neck pain. Cobb angle of fusion segment was measured and the difference between the last follow-up and the immediate after operation was calculated. The height of the anterior border (HAB) and the height of the posterior border (HPB) were measured immediately after operation, at 6 months after operation, and at last follow-up, and the subsidence of implant was calculated.ResultsThe operation time of 3D printing group was significantly less than that of TMC group (t=3.336, P=0.002); there was no significant difference in hospitalization stay and intraoperative blood loss between the two groups (P>0.05). All patients were followed up 12-19 months (mean, 16 months). There was no obvious complication in both groups. There were significant differences in JOA score, VAS score, and Cobb angle at each time point between the two groups (P<0.05). There was an interaction between time and group in the JOA score (F=3.705, P=0.025). With time, the increase in JOA score was different between the 3D printing group and the TMC group, and the increase in the 3D printing group was greater. There was no interaction between time and group in the VAS score (F=3.038, P=0.065), and there was no significant difference in the score at each time point between the two groups (F=0.173, P=0.681). The time of the Cobb angle interacted with the group (F=15.581, P=0.000). With time, the Cobb angle of the 3D printing group and the TMC group changed differently. Among them, the 3D printing group increased more and the TMC group decreased more. At last follow-up, there was no significant difference in the improvement rate of JOA score between the two groups (t=0.681, P=0.502), but the Cobb angle difference of the 3D printing group was significantly smaller than that of the TMC group (t=5.754, P=0.000). At last follow-up, the implant fusion rate of the 3D printing group and TMC group were 92.3% (12/13) and 87.5% (14/16), respectively, and the difference was not significant (P=1.000). The incidence of implant settlement in the 3D printing group and TMC group at 6 months after operation was 15.4% (2/13) and 18.8% (3/16), respectively, and at last follow-up were 30.8% (4/13) and 56.3% (9/16), respectively, the differences were not significant (P=1.000; P=0.264). The difference of HAB and the difference of HPB in the 3D printing group at 6 months after operation and last follow-up were significantly lower than those in the TMC group (P<0.05).ConclusionFor patients with multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy undergoing ACCF combined with ACDF, compared with TMC and Cage, 3D printing artificial vertebrae body and 3D printing Cage have the advantages of shorter operation time, better reduction of height loss of fusion vertebral body, and maintenance of cervical physiological curvature, the early effectiveness is better.
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of Poster Fusion Cage combined with xenogeneic bone graft augmentation for bone defect management in distal radius fractures. MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 20 patients with bone defects complicating distal radius fractures who met the selection criteria and were treated between June 2022 and June 2024. The cohort comprised 2 males and 18 females, aged 54-87 years (mean, 63.3 years). Etiologies included falls in 17 cases, traffic accidents in 2 cases, and crush injury in 1 case. According to AO classification, there were 5 cases of type A, 8 cases of type B, and 7 cases of type C. The interval from injury to operation ranged from 2 to 10 days (mean, 5.8 days). All patients underwent volar plate fixation augmented with Poster Fusion Cage and demineralized xenogeneic bone matrix grafting. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, fracture healing time, and postoperative complications were recorded. Radiographic parameters, including radial height, volar tilt, and ulnar deviation, were measured on standardized X-ray films obtained immediately postoperatively and at last follow-up, and whether secondary reduction loss occurred was judged. At last follow-up, wrist range of motion (extension, flexion, radial deviation, ulnar deviation, pronation, and supination) and grip strength (expressed as a percentage of the contralateral side) were measured. Wrist function was assessed using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score and Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) score. Results The operation time was 70-200 minutes (mean, 116.4 minutes), and the intraoperative blood loss was 10-80 mL (mean, 36.5 mL). All surgical incisions healed by first intention, with no neurovascular complications documented. All patients were followed up 9-12 months (mean, 11.6 months). All fractures healed normally, with a healing time of 8-14 weeks (mean, 9.95 weeks). No significant difference was observed in radial height, volar tilt, or ulnar deviation between immediate postoperatively and last follow-up (P>0.05). All fractures achieved satisfactory reduction, with no secondary loss of reduction or implant failure occurring during follow-up. At last follow-up, the range of motion of the affected wrist joint was 60°-65° (mean, 62.5°) in extension, 67°-75° (mean, 71.1°) in flexion, 18°-23° (mean, 20.4°) in radial deviation, 28°-33° (mean, 30.1°) in ulnar deviation, 69°-80° (mean, 74.7°) in pronation, and 69°-82° (mean, 75.6°) in supination. Grip strength recovered to 75%-85% (mean, 80%) of the contralateral side. Functional scores showed a DASH score of 5-15 (mean, 9.4) and PRWE score of 8.0-12.5 (mean, 10.2). ConclusionThe combination of Poster Fusion Cage and xenogeneic bone graft augmentation provides a safe and effective treatment for bone defects in distal radius fractures.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effectiveness of modified direction-changeable lumbar Cage in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF).MethodsA retrospective analysis was made of 161 patients with single segment L4 or L5 isthmic spondylolisthesis treated between January 2013 and December 2015. According to the implantation of Cage, they were divided into trial group (85 cases, modified direction-changeable lumbar Cage implanted in TLIF) and control group (76 cases, traditional nondirection-changeable Cage implanted in TLIF). There was no significant difference in the general data of gender, age, disease duration, slippage segment, and slippage grade between the two groups (P>0.05). The intraoperative implantation time of Cage, Cage position adjustments times, fluoroscopy times during implantation of Cage, fluoroscopy exposure time, and total operation time were recorded and compared between the two groups. Visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores were used to evaluate the effectiveness of the patients before operation, and at 3, 6, and 12 months after operation, and the incidence of complications was recorded and analyzed. CT examinations were performed at 6 and 12 months after operation, and lumbar fusion was evaluated by Bridwell criteria.ResultsThe intraoperative implantation time of Cage, Cage position adjustments times, fluoroscopy times during implantation of Cage, fluoroscopy exposure time, and total operation time in trial group were significant less than those in control group (P<0.05). All the 161 patients were followed up 12-18 months (mean, 14.3 months). There was 1 case of dural sac tear in the trial group and 1 case of superficial infection in the control group; no complication such as dural tear and infection occurred in other patients. The fusion rate was 76.5% (64/85) in the trial group and 57.9% (44/76) in the control group at 6 months after operation, showing significant difference (χ2=6.44, P=0.02); at 12 months after operation, the fusion rate was 96.5% (82/85) in the trial group and 90.8% (69/76) in the control group (including 3 cases of Cage displacement and 4 cases of screw breakage), showing no significant difference in the fusion rate between the two groups (χ2=1.54, P=0.26). The VAS and ODI scores of the two groups decreased gradually at 3, 6, and 12 months after operation, and improved significantly when compared with those before operation (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in VAS and ODI scores between the two groups before and after operation (P>0.05).ConclusionBoth Cages can obtain the similar effectiveness. The modified direction-changeable lumbar Cage can significantly reduce the fluoroscopy times and radiation dose during TLIF, shorten the operation time, and effectively reduce the radiation exposure of patients and medical staff.
Objective To summarize the basic research and the cl inical appl ication of biodegradable interbody fusion Cage. Methods Recent l iterature concerning biodegradable interbody fusion Cage at home and abroad was extensively reviewed, and current developments of the basic research and the cl inical appl ication of biodegradable interbody fusion Cage were investigated. Results Basic research showes that the stiffness of biodegradable interbody fusion Cage is lower than that of metall ic Cage, so it can enhance interbody fusion. As interbody fusion proceeded, biodegradable interbody fusion Cage degrades constantly, but the speed of degradation can not keep in parallel with that of fusion. In addition, the tissue response to degradation products is controversy. Cl inical appl ication showes that the biodegradable interbody fusion Cage can enhance interbody fusion and maintain disc space height. The short term results are good, however, the long term results need further observation. Conclusion Biodegradable interbody fusion Cage can effectively enhance interbody fusion.
ObjectiveTo summarize the advances in research on Cage subsidence following lumbar interbody fusion, and provide reference for its prevention.MethodsThe definition, development, clinical significance, and related risk factors of Cage subsidence following lumbar interbody fusion were throughout reviewed by referring to relevant domestic and doreign literature in recent years.ResultsAt present, there is no consensus on the definition of Cage subsidence, and mostly accepted as the disk height reduction greater than 2 mm. Cage subsidence mainly occurs in the early postoperative stage, which weakens the radiological surgical outcome, and may further damage the effectiveness or even lead to surgical failure. Cage subsidence is closely related to the Cage size and its placement location, intraoperative endplate preparation, morphological matching of disk space to Cage, bone mineral density, body mass index, and so on.ConclusionThe appropriate size and shape of the Cage usage, the posterolateral Cage placed, the gentle endplate operation to prevent injury, the active perioperative anti-osteoporosis treatment, and the education of patients to control body weight may help to prevent Cage subsidence and ensure good surgical results.
