ObjectiveTo explore the postoperative effect of preoperative anemia on patients undergoing unilateral total hip arthroplasty (THA).MethodsA total of 200 patients undergoing unilateral primary THA from July to September 2018 were selected. According to the preoperative hemoglobin level and the World Health Organization definition of anemia (hemoglobin below 120 g/L for women and below 130 g/L for men), the patients were divided into the non-anemia group and the anemia group. All anemia patients were given dietary guidance and balanced diet before the operation, and no drug treatment was given. Both groups adopted accelerated rehabilitation strategy during the perioperative period, and postoperative anemia was treated according to a unified standard. The intraoperative blood loss and length of operation of the two groups were recorded. The presence of anemia on the first postoperative day, postoperative blood transfusion rate, incidence of postoperative complications (hypotension, nausea and vomiting on the first postoperative day, and infection-related unplanned readmission within 90 days after discharge), range of motion of the hip joint (hip flexion and hip abduction), and length of hospital stay were compared between the two groups.ResultsIn the 200 patients, 51 (25.50%) presented anemia before surgery and 149 did not. There were 114 cases developing mild anemia and 7 cases developing moderate anemia after surgery in the non-anemia group, with an anemia incidence of 81.21%; in the anemia group, there were 30 cases of mild anemia and 20 cases of moderate anemia, and 1 case did not have anemia after surgery. The postoperative transfusion rates of the non-anemia group and the anemia group were 2.01% and 11.76%, respectively, and the incidences of postoperative complications were 7.38% and 35.29%, respectively; the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). However, there was no statistically significant difference in hip mobility or length of hospital stay between the two groups (P>0.05).ConclusionsQuite a few patients undergoing THA have anemia before surgery. The incidence of postoperative anemia is high due to the trauma and massive bleeding of the operation, and preoperative anemia will aggravate anemia after surgery. Preoperative anemia can increase the perioperative transfusion rate of THA patients, increase the incidence of postoperative complications, and affect the hospitalization experience of patients.
The strategies of individualized enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) are particularly important in the anesthesia management of same-day surgery. This review focuses on the perioperative management of day surgeries following the experiences of Day Surgery Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University and different surgeries’ guidelines of ERAS, including anesthesia evaluation, preoperative education and optimization, comorbidity management, airway management, choice of technologies and drugs during anesthesia, intraoperative monitor and anesthesia management, postoperative analgesia, postoperative nausea and vomiting prevention, and postoperative management, which is significant to ensure the discharge of the patient in time for same-day surgeries.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of enhanced recovery after pancreaticoduodenectomy surgery (ERAS).MethodsPubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane library, CBM, CNKI and VIP databases were electronically searched to collect clinical controlled trials of comparing ERAS and the traditional rehabilitation management in patients who received pancreaticoduodenectomy from inception to March 31st, 2017. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies, then, meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.2 software.ResultsA total of 12 non-randomized historical controlled trials involving 2 588 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that ERAS shortened postoperative hospital stay (MD=–5.44, 95%CI –7.73 to –3.15, P<0.000 01) and the time to the first passage of flatus (MD=–1.40, 95%CI –2.60 to –0.20,P=0.02), reduced the rate of postoperative complication (OR=0.61, 95%CI 0.52 to 0.72, P<0.000 01), pancreatic fistula (OR=0.81, 95%CI 0.66 to 0.99,P=0.04) and delayed gastric emptying (OR=0.49, 95%CI 0.38 to 0.63, P<0.000 01). However, there was no significant difference in incidences of biliary fistula, abdominal cavity infection, wound infection and postoperative pulmonary infection between two groups.ConclusionsThe application of ERAS in pancreaticoduodenectomy is effective and does not increase postoperative complication. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are required to verify above conclusions.
Esophageal cancer threatens the lives and health of humans for a long time owing to its high morbidity and mortality. Surgical treatment is still the first choice for early-stage esophageal cancer now, but its high mortality and complication rate during perioperative period cause a huge physiological and psychological burden on patients. The concept of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) was first proposed for colorectal surgery, and later promoted to other surgical fields. Its application in esophagectomy successfully reduces the high mortality and complication rate in the perioperative stage and promotes the rapid recovery of patients. However, the application of ERAS in the field of esophageal cancer is relatively late, and its promotion and application are relatively limited compared to other surgical procedures. In this paper, we review the relevant literature at home and abroad in combination with the current progress of ERAS application of esophageal cancer in China. We also summarize the relevant problems related to the implementation of ERAS, in order to help the promotion and application of ERAS in the surgical treatment of esophageal cancer.
Objective To investigate the application of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in da Vinci robotic McKeown surgery for esophageal cancer. Methods Clinical data of patients admitted to the First Hospital of Lanzhou University and undergoing da Vinci robotic McKeown surgery for esophageal cancer from 2017 to 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the treatment, they were divided into two groups, a conventional group and an ERAS group. Patients in the conventional group were treated with the conventional perioperative treatment mode of thoracic surgery, and patients in the ERAS group were treated with accelerated rehabilitation surgical treatment mode. Relevant hospitalization indicators and postoperative complication rates were compared between the two groups. Results Finally 128 patients were collected, including 106 males and 22 females, with an average age of 61.91 years. There were 71 patients in the conventional group and 57 patients in the ERAS group. The postoperative pain index in the ERAS group was significantly lower than that in the conventional group (P<0.05), and the duration of postoperative analgesic pump used in the ERAS group was shorter than that in the conventional group (2.39±0.49 d vs. 3.13±0.63 d, P<0.001). There was no statistical difference in the incidence of postoperative related complications (gastroesophageal reflux, anastomotic stenosis, anastomotic fistula, arrhythmia, recurrent laryngeal nerve injury, chylothorax, anastomosis stomatitis or incisional infection) between the two groups (P>0.05), but the incidence of postoperative lung infection in the ERAS group was statistically lower (12.28% vs. 26.76%, P=0.043), and the volume of postoperative pleural effusion was statistically less compared with the conventional group (P<0.05). In the ERAS group, the surgery time (294.35±15.19 min vs. 322.79±59.09 min, P<0.001), postoperative exhaust time (1.44±0.39 d vs. 1.94±0.43 d, P<0.001), postoperative removal time of nasolasal tube (6.79±0.73 d vs. 8.21±0.86 d, P<0.001), hospital stay (19.88±3.36 d vs. 21.34±3.59 d, P=0.020), hospitalization costs (105 575.28±8 960.75 yuan vs. 137 894.64±19 518.60 yuan, P<0.001) were all lower or shorter than those of the conventional group. Postoperative activity was longer in the ERAS group than that in the conventional group (P<0.05), but there was no statistical difference in preoperative anesthesia time between the two groups (P=0.841). Conclusion The application of ERAS in da Vinci robotic McKeown surgery for esophageal cancer can effectively alleviate the physiological and psychological burden of patients, reduce the occurrence of postoperative related complications, effectively shorten the total hospital stay, save hospitalization costs, and reduce the economic burden of patients and society. Therefore, it can be promoted and applied in the clinic.
The concept of enhanced recovery after surgery(ERAS) has been well accepted by medical providers, which can be realized by a multidisciplinary team approach and minimally invasive surgical technology performed during perioperative periods. As the outcomes of the ERAS protocols, well effects are anticipated, and consistent outcomes are actually obtained. At the same time, there are some aspects which are not consistent including ① the evolution and challenge of ERAS concept:connotation and extension, ② consensus and arguments on the evaluation standard of ERAS protocol, ③ the cause of poorly compliance in medical providers and patient, ④ the function of multimodal programme and multidisciplinary team approach in ERAS protocol, which one is better? ⑤ methods and barriers of implementing enhanced recovery in clinic application.
Objective To explore the application effect of same-day surgery mode in adult patients with inguinal hernia repair under enhanced recovery after surgery mode. Methods The perioperative data of adults undergoing inguinal hernia repair in the Day Surgery Center of West China Hospital, Sichuan University between August 2020 and March 2022 were analyzed retrospectively. The adult patients with inguinal hernia repair who received routine daytime surgery were taken as the control group (routine group), and the adult patients with inguinal hernia repair who received same-day surgery were selected as the trial group (same-day group). The differences in safety, cost and patient experience between the two groups were compared and analyzed. Results A total of 319 patients were included, including 152 in the routine group and 167 in the same-day group. There was no significant difference in gender, education level, occupation and hernia ring diameter between the two groups (P>0.05). The age of the patients in the same-day group was older than that in the routine group [(49.49±12.88) vs. (46.41±14.12) years, P<0.05]. The hernia position of the two groups was mostly on the right side, but there was a difference in the hernia position (P<0.05). In terms of safety indicators, the majority of patients in the two groups used local anesthesia. The proportion of local anesthesia (98.2% vs. 76.3%), the amount of intraoperative bleeding [2.8 (2.0, 5.0) vs. 1.3 (0.0, 5.0) mL] in the same-day group were higher than those in the routine group, and the operation time [25.2 (20.0, 33.0) vs. 32.3 (26.0, 40.7) min] in the same-day group was shorter than that in the routine group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the time of getting out of bed and the complications rate on the 3rd and 28th days after operation (P>0.05). There were no intraoperative complications in both groups. In terms of cost indicators, there was no significant difference between the two groups in the hospitalization cost (P>0.05). The surgery cost of the same-day group was higher than that of the routine group [1472.0 (1438.1, 1614.6) vs. 1450.3 (1428.1, 1438.1) yuan, P<0.05]. The drug cost [109.2 (81.3, 138.7) vs. 255.8 (127.0, 261.6) yuan] and the total medical cost [8418.5 (8207.4, 9129.9) vs. 8912.1 (8325.9, 9177.9) yuan] in the same-day group were lower than those in the routine group (P<0.05). In terms of patient experience indicators, the postoperative pain score [0.3 (0.0, 1.0) vs. 0.2 (0.0, 0.0)] and satisfaction score [3.3 (3.0, 4.0) vs. 3.0 (3.0, 3.0)] of the same-day group were higher than those of the routine group (P<0.05). Conclusion Both the same-day surgery mode and the routine surgery mode of adult patients with inguinal hernia repair have high safety, but the same-day surgery mode is more economical and patient satisfaction is higher than the routine surgery mode, which suggest that the same-day surgery mode of adult patients with inguinal hernia repair under enhanced recovery after surgery mode is feasible, safe and economic, and further optimizes and improves the content and quality of daytime surgical medical services.
Objective
To evaluate the safety and necessity of shortening the time of preoperative fasting and fluid limitation in lumber disc herniation patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery.
Methods
A total of 141 eligible patients were assigned into the control group (n=70) and the intervention group (n=71) between April and September 2015. The control group received traditional fasting method while the intervention group received new preoperative fasting method. The time of fasting food and fluid limitation, the incidences of hunger, thirsty, aspiration, postoperative nausea and vomiting, postoperative abdominal distension, and length of stay and the subjective feeling in hospital were compared between the two groups.
Results
The average time of preoperative fasting and fluid limitation were (13.09±2.30) and (7.84±2.10) hours in the control group and (6.88±0.96) and (4.68±1.08) hours in the intervention group. The incidence of thirsty in the intervention group was shorter than that in the control group, and the subjective feeling in hospital of the intervention group was better than that in the control group (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, the incidence of postoperative abdominal distension, and length of hospital stay between the two groups (P>0.05).
Conclusions
Shortening the time of preoperative fasting and fluid limitation can improve the subjective feeling in hospital of lumber disc herniation patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery, not increasing the incidences of complications. It can be applied gradually.
Objective
To investigate the opinions of operating room nurse (ORN) on enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS).
Methods
A questionnaire survey was performed among 215 ORNs in West China Hospital. There were 10 males and 205 females at age of 33.4±8.84 years.
Results
A total of 154 ORNs (71.6%) thought that we already had very good ERAS theory but we still needed more practice. Thirty-four ORNs(15.8%) thought that the application of ERAS was poor in our clinic comparing to other countries.A percentage of 84.2% (181/215) ORNs thought the criteria to judge whether the ERAS succeed or not should be average days of hospitalization, patients' feeling, and experience and social satisfactions. Besides, 78.1% (168/215) ORNs selected team building as the key point of ERAS success. There were 91.2% (196/215) ORNs who believed expert consensus and ERAS guide should be worked out and propagandized through academic forum or conference in order to popularize the ERAS.
Conclusion
The theory of ERAS has already been accepted by almost all the clinicians and team building is the best way to make ERAS work well.
Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is a protocol designed to improve perioperative outcomes by multidisciplinary team with evidence-based interventions. The implementation of ERAS concept has been proved to reduce postoperative complications and hospital stay. The anesthesia management under the concept of ERAS is the basis of safe and smooth ambulatory surgical protocol. This article summarizes the latest clinical evidence at home and abroad, and reviews the preoperative optimization, anesthesia mode selection, ventilation strategies, fluid management, temperature support, pain management, postoperative nausea and vomiting prevention, postoperative nutritional support, and postoperative sleep improvement in the management of anesthesia under ERAS concept, in order to provide a reference for anesthesia management in ambulatory surgery.
