ObjectiveTo explore the application effect of standardized management on video-electroencephalogram (VEEG) monitoring.MethodsIn January 2018, a multidisciplinary standardized management team composed with doctors, technicians, and nurses was established. The standardized management plan for VEEG monitoring from outpatient, pre-hospital appointment, hospitalization and post-discharge follow-up was developed; the special quilt for epilepsy patients was designed and customized, braided for the patient instead of shaving head, standardized the work flow of the staff, standardized the health education of the patients and their families, and standardized the quality control of the implementation process. The standardized managemen effect carried out from January to December 2018 (after standardized managemen) was compared with the management effect from January to December 2017 (before standardized managemen).ResultsAfter standardized management, the average waiting time of patients decreased from (2.08±1.13) hours to (0.53±0.21) hours, and the average hospitalization days decreased from (6.63±2.54) days to (6.14±2.17) days. The pass rate of patient preparation increased from 63.14% to 90.09%. The capture rate of seizure onset increased from 73.37% to 97.08%. The accuracy of the record increased from 33.12% to 94.10%, the doctor’s satisfaction increased from 76.34±29.53 to 97.99±9.27, and the patient’s satisfaction increased from 90.04±18.97 to 99.03±6.51. The difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).ConclusionStandardization management is conducive to ensuring the homogeneity of clinical medical care, reducing the average waiting time and the average hospitalization days, improving the capture rate and accuracy of seizures, ensuring the quality of medical care and improving patient’s satisfaction.
Diabetic foot infection (DFI) is one of the main causes of hospitalized patients with diabetic foot. DFI should be diagnosed according to the clinical manifestations, and the severity of infection should be graded in time. Diabetic foot wounds are mostly chronic wounds, and there are many kinds of bacterial infections. The bacteria and antibiotics resistance will change with the progress of the disease. Bacterial biofilm is also one of the important causes of antibiotic resistance. Reasonable and timely surgical treatment combined with effective antibiotic treatment is an effective measure to deal with the challenge of DFI. On this basis, multidisciplinary cooperation will achieve the best clinical outcome.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effectiveness of multidisciplinary doctor-nurse collaboration team on the perioperation management of geriatric patients with hip fractures.MethodsThe clinical data of 489 geriatric patients with hip fractures (femoral neck fracture and intertrochanteric fracture) between January 1st 2016 and January 1st 2018 was retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 279 patients were treated with the multidisciplinary doctor-nurse collaboration care (observation group) and 210 patients were treated with the conventional therapeutics and nursing care (control group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, cause of injury, type and classification of fracture, the interval between injury and admission, and Charlson index between the two groups (P>0.05). The surgery rates, time from hospitalization to operation, length of stay, and the incidences of perioperative complications were compared between the two groups.ResultsThe surgery rate was 90.32% (252/279) in observation group and 80.48% (169/210) in control group, showing significant difference between the two groups (χ2=9.703, P=0.002). The time from hospitalization to operation and length of stay in observation group [(5.39±2.47), (10.56±3.76) days] were significant shorter than those in control group [(6.13±2.79), (12.27±3.11) days] (t=?3.075, P=0.002; t=?5.330, P=0.000). The incidence of respiratory complications was 46.15% in control group and 30.56% in observation group; the incidence of cardiovascular system complications was 69.23% in control group and 51.19% in observation group; the incidence of cerebrovascular system complications was 20.12% in control group and 11.11% in observation group; the incidence of deep venous thrombosis was 40.24% in control group and 25.40% in observation group. The incidences of perioperative complications were significantly lower in observation group than in control group (P<0.05).ConclusionMultidisciplinary doctor-nurse collaboration team is conducive not only to improve the surgery rates, but also to reduce perioperative complications as well as shorten the length of stay and preoperative waiting time.
The concept of enhanced recovery after surgery(ERAS) has been well accepted by medical providers, which can be realized by a multidisciplinary team approach and minimally invasive surgical technology performed during perioperative periods. As the outcomes of the ERAS protocols, well effects are anticipated, and consistent outcomes are actually obtained. At the same time, there are some aspects which are not consistent including ① the evolution and challenge of ERAS concept:connotation and extension, ② consensus and arguments on the evaluation standard of ERAS protocol, ③ the cause of poorly compliance in medical providers and patient, ④ the function of multimodal programme and multidisciplinary team approach in ERAS protocol, which one is better? ⑤ methods and barriers of implementing enhanced recovery in clinic application.
Abstract: Objective To investigate prognosis factors of primary small cell carcinoma of the esophagus (PSCCE), and to optimize the treatment strategy of PSCCE. Method We retrospectively analyzed clinical data of 15 patients (13 males and 2 females with an age of 57.7±2.3 years) with middle thoracic PSCCE in West China Hospital from June 2005 to February 2010. We searched ISI and MEDLINE from April 2001 to February 2010 to extract clinical data of 139 PSCCE patients with 94 males and 45 females with an age of 63.3±10.7 years. We analyzed prognosis factors of the 139 patients including gender, age, tumor location, pathological type, lesions stage and treatment strategy by Kaplan-Meier. Difference in survival curves between limited disease patients and extended disease patients was tested by log-rank test. Results Among the 15 patients, 14 patients had limited disease, and 1 patient had extended disease. Their data were not included in survival analysis because the follow-up was incomplete. Among the 139 patients, 88 patients had limited disease with their 2-year survival rate of 31.8% (28/88). Fifty-one patients had extended disease with their 2-year survival rate of 7.8% (4/51). The 2-year survival rate between limited-disease patients and extended-disease patients was statistically different(P<0.05). Radiation therapy in combination with chemotherapy had significant influence on the survival rate of patients with either local lesions or advanced lesions(P< 0.05), while other factors such as gender, age and tumor location had no significant influence on their survival rate(P>0.05). Conclusion Chemotherapy is the fundamental treatment of PSCCE, which plays an important role in reducing PSCCE preoperative staging and restraining PSCCE postoperative recurrence and metastasis. Surgery and radiation therapy are effective for patients with local lesions. Local treatment in combination with chemotherapy is effective for patients with limited disease. Radiation therapy in combination with chemotherapy is the standard therapy for patients with extended lesions,
The diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer is a systematic and frameworking medical task in a multidisciplinary manner. New models, new technologies, new regimens, and new drugs have been developed to explore the best strategies to improve the survival of patients with gastric cancer. Here we discussed the research progress and guideline updates in four aspects, including the accurate staging-classification-based treatment strategy, the quality control in the surgery, the rational perioperative neoadjuvant-adjuvant therapies, and molecular classification joint with precision medicine. The purpose is to further promote the standardized gastric cancer management in China and emphasize its importance. From the updates of knowledge and the transformation of understanding and recognition, to the quality improvement, it’s critical to reduce the heterogeneity of the quality of gastric cancer management in China, as well as enhance adherence to guidelines and consensuses.
Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) is a treasure of the Chinese nation. Presence of clinical effects represents a fundamental issue for TCM development. Nevertheless, the complexities of TCM interventions often result in presented effects deviating from expected ones, a phenomenon so called as "effect off-target"; this issue has become a major challenge for the development and use of TCM interventions. In continuing efforts, we have proposed an innovative evidence-based medicine model for studying the effects of TCM interventions, termed "systems evidence-based medicine (sysEBM)". Essentially, the sysEBM model integrates clinical and non-clinical evaluation to develop a systematic pathway for studying effects of TCM interventions, and the methodological steps typically include the development of PICO framework for a putative effect, exploration of the effect and confirmation of the effect by using animal models, observational studies and clinical trials. As an additional step, multidisciplinary technologies including pharmaceutical, pharmacological, information and biological technologies will be used to provide multidimensional analyses of potential action networks and mechanisms of TCM interventions. Building on this concept, we have developed a sysEBM model ("6R" model) for acupuncture and marketed Chinese patent medicines by integrating real-world evidence, clinical trials, evidence syntheses, and rapid recommendation methodologies, as well as information technology and biomedical technologies. We also applied this model for developing TCM interventions for maternal health, critical care, and knee osteoarthritis.
Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is a neurological disorder characterized by an unexplained increase in intracranial pressure that primarily affects obese women of childbearing age, but individuals of any age, gender, or weight may also be affected. Its signature symptoms include disc edema, headache, visual disturbance, and throbbing tinnitus. Due to potentially serious complications, such as vision loss, accurate diagnosis and appropriate treatment management are critical to improving patients' quality of life. Ophthalmologists play a key role in the treatment process, as about half of patients first visit the eye department. Diagnosis of IIH depends not only on clinical presentation, but also on the exclusion of other diseases that may cause similar symptoms, and imaging and other tests to ensure an accurate diagnosis. In order to improve diagnostic accuracy and treatment efficiency, multidisciplinary collaborative diagnosis and treatment mode is advocated, especially in the face of patients with complex trauma or systemic diseases, which can effectively shorten the treatment time and ensure patient safety. Future research directions include establishing China's IIH epidemiological database, exploring clinical diagnosis and treatment methods and basic scientific research, aiming at forming diagnosis and treatment standards suitable for China's national conditions, improving medical level and improving patient prognosis. At the same time, a deeper understanding of the different forms of IIH will better serve the affected populations.
With the increasing number of chronic kidney disease (CKD) population globally, establishing an optimal model of CKD care has become an important issue. The major contents of CKD care include patient education, control of CKD risk factors (such as increased blood pressure and glucose), management of CKD complications, and preparation process of renal replacement therapy in pre-dialysis patients. Compared with other non-communicable diseases management, evidence-based evidence related to CKD care is limited. Based on the related studies worldwide, combined with the characteristics of CKD population and previous experiences in China, this paper discusses the management mode of non-dialysis CKD population.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of multidisciplinary team (MDT) on perioperative complications and clinical efficacy of patients who were receiver radical operation to treat lung cancer by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). MethodsEighty patients in the Thoracic Surgery Department of First Hospital of Lanzhou University from December 2017 to February 2019 who were diagnosed lung cancer were divided into two groups. Forty patients in the MDT group were treated with MDT discussion. The control group consisted of 40 patients who were treated without MDT discussion. The incidence of postoperative complications and clinical efficacy were compared between the two groups . ResultsThere was no statistical difference in incision infection, atelectasis, pleural effusion and pulmonary leakage between the two groups. However, the incidence of postoperative pulmonary infection (5% vs. 20%, P=0.043) and the overall postoperative complications (17.5% vs. 42.5%, P=0.015) in the MDT group was lower than that in the control group with a statistical difference. In the MDT group, the operative time (140.3±8.0 min vs. 148.8±6.8 min, P<0.001), intraoperative bleeding ( 207.8±19.4 mL vs. 222.0±28.3 mL, P=0.010), lymph node dissection number (25.1±6.2 vs. 20.1±7.0, P=0.001), postoperative drainage (273.0±33.5 mL vs. 24.0±52.5 mL, P<0.001), drainage duration (81.9±6.1 h vs. 85.3±8.1 h, P=0.039), pain on the first day after surgery (4.6±0.7 vs. 5.4±0.7), P<0.001), pain on the second day (2.5±0.7 vs. 3.0±0.8, P=0.002), pain on the third day (1.1±0.8 vs. 1.5±0.6, P=0.014), postoperative activity time (40.7±6.7 h vs. 35.3±7.1 h, P<0.001), postoperative recovery time (6.8±0.9 d vs. 7.4±0.7 d, P=0.003), patient satisfaction (8.1±1.4 vs. 7.2±2.0, P=0.020) were significantly better than those of the control group with statistical differences. But there was no statistical difference in the conversion to thoracotomy between the two group. ConclusionMDT discussion can reduce the surgical risk and postoperative complications, improve the clinical efficacy and accelerate the postoperative rehabilitation of patients, which has a good clinical significance.