ObjectiveTo re-evaluate the systematic review and meta-analysis (SR/MAs) of the efficacy of robot-assisted pedicle screw placement. MethodsThe CNKI, VIP, WanFang Data, SinoMed, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were electronically searched to collect SR/MAs of robot-assisted pedicle screw placement from inception to April 28, 2023. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and then assessed the quality of reports, methodological quality, risk of bias, and the strength of evidence quality by using PRISMA, AMSTAR-Ⅱ, ROBIS, and GRADE tool. ResultsA total of 20 SR/MAs were included. The results of the included studies showed that robot-assisted pedicle screw placement was more accurate and had a lower number of complications compared with freehand pedicle screw placement. The quality of reports, methodology, and evidence for pedicle screw placement efficiency in all SR/MAs were low or extremely low, with a high risk of bias. The main reasons included high heterogeneity of included studies, unclear research methods and selection criteria, and missing key reporting processes. ConclusionRobot-assisted pedicle screw placement may have better clinical efficiency than traditional freehand pedicle screw placement. But the quality of relational SR/MAs is low.
Objective To explore the therapeutic effect of rehabilitation therapy combined with computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacture (CAD/CAM) of orthopedic insoles on deputy scaphoid inflammation. Methods We selected the patients with deputy scaphoid inflammation who had treated in Sichuan Province Orthopedic Hospital between July 2018 and February 2020. The patients were randomly divided into control group and experimental group by drawing lots. The control group received rehabilitation therapy, while the experimental group received rehabilitation therapy combined with CAD/CAM orthopedic insoles. The clinical efficacy was tested at the 5th and 12th weeks after treatment, and the foot pain was assessed by Visual Analogue Scoring (VAS), and the foot function was assessed by the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Association (AOFAS) scale. Results A total of 78 patients were included, and 3 patients dropped out. There was no significant difference in sex, age, weight or course of disease between the two groups (P>0.05). Before treatment, there was no statistically significant difference in VAS score (t=0.329, P=0.743) or AOFAS score (t=0.431, P=0.668) between the two groups. At the 5th and 12th weeks after treatment, the VAS score of the experimental group was lower than that of the control group (t=4.517, 5.299; P<0.001), and the AOFAS score was higher than that of the control group (t=6.239, 5.779; P<0.001). Over time, the VAS score of the two groups decreased (P<0.05), while the AOFAS score increased (P<0.05). Conclusion Rehabilitation therapy combined with CAD/CAM of orthopedic insoles have better curative effect than traditional rehabilitation therapy for deputy scaphoid inflammation.
ObjectiveTo compare the safety and accuracy of pedicle screw placement assisted by robot system with freehand pedicle screw placement in upper thoracic surgery.MethodsBetween December 2017 and December 2019, 39 cases with upper thoracic pedicle screw internal fixation were included in the study, including 19 cases in robot group (group A, robot assisted pedicle screw placement) and 20 cases in freehand group (group B, freehand pedicle screw placement). There were 104 screws implanted in group A and 108 screws in group B. There was no significant difference in age, gender composition, body mass index, disease type, number of screws implanted, and segmental distribution between the two groups (P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative drainage were recorded and compared between the two groups. CT scan was performed in all patients at 2 days after operation to evaluate the screw accuracy based on the Gertzbein-Robbins grading standard.ResultsThe operation time of group A was significantly longer than that in group B (t=2.759, P=0.009). There was no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss and postoperative drainage between the two groups (t=?0.796, P=0.431; t=?0.814, P=0.421). At 2 days after operation, according to Gertzbein-Robbins grading standard, the accuracy of pedicle screw implantation in group A were grade A in 94 screws, grade B in 9 screws, and grade C in 1 screw; and in group B were grade A in 72 screws, grade B in 26 screws, grade C in 9 screws, and grade D in 1 screw; the difference between the two groups was significant (Z=4.257, P=0.000). The accuracy rate of group A was 99.04%, and that of group B was 90.74%, showing significant difference (χ2=7.415, P=0.006).ConclusionCompared with traditional freehand pedicle screw placement, robot-assisted pedicle screw placement significantly improves the accuracy and safety of screw placement without increasing the bleeding and postoperative drainage.
ObjectiveTo analyze the risk factors of acute wound infection in orthopedic patients.
MethodsA retrospective analysis was made on the clinical data of 576 orthopedic patients in accordance with the inclusion criteria between July and October 2012. There were 345 males and 231 females, aged 18-95 years (mean, 44 years). Single factor analysis was used for related factors, and logistic regression analysis of multi-factors for risk factors of acute wound infection.
ResultsWound infection occurred in 73 of 576 patients (12.7%). Single factor analysis showed that the influence factors were gender, education, smoking history, nutritional status (hemoglobin, red blood cell count, serum albumin, and total serum protein), blood glucose level, shock history, wound situation (characteristics, multiple injuries, and cleaning), type of injuries, the time of trauma handling, antibiotic use, whether to stay in ICU, wound pain score, drug analgesia, patient controlled analgesia, and dressings and cleaning solution choice. The logistic regression analysis showed that the gender, time of trauma handling, blood glucose level, wound pain score, dressing choice, and wound characteristics were the risk factors of acute wound infection (P<0.05).
ConclusionTo achieve the best results in clinical prevention of infection, these risk factors (gender, the time of trauma handling, blood glucose level, wound pain score, dressing choice, and wound characteristics) should be considered well.
Znic (Zn) alloys with good cytocompatibility and suitable degradation rate have been a kind of biodegradable metal with great potential for clinical applications. This paper summarizes the biological role of degradable Zn alloy as bone implant materials, discusses the mechanical properties of different Zn alloys and their advantages and disadvantages as bone implant materials, and analyzes the influence of different processing strategies (such as alloying and additive manufacturing) on the mechanical properties of Zn alloys. This paper provides systematic design approaches for biodegradable Zn alloys as bone implant materials in terms of the material selection, product processing, structural topology optimization, and assesses their application prospects with a view to better serve the clinic.
Objective To explore the application of robot-assisted pedicle screw fixation combined with total endoscopic decompression and interbody fusion in single segment lumbar decompression and fusion. Methods A total of 27 cases undergoing single segment lumbar decompression and fusion between August 2020 and May 2021 in the People’s Hospital of Deyang City were retrospectively collected. They were divided into group A and B according to their surgery method. The patients in group A underwent robot-assisted pedicle screw fixation combined with total endoscopic decompression and interbody fusion surgery, while the ones in group B underwent traditional posterior decompression and fusion. The operation time, amount of bleeding, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score before operation and one month and three months after operation, and success rate of screw placement were compared. Results There were 12 patients in group A, 5 males and 7 females, aged (59.83±6.79) years, and 15 patients in group B, 6 males and 9 females, aged (53.73±14.87) years. The amount of intraoperative bleeding [(195.00±45.23) vs. (240.00±47.06) mL] and postoperative hospital stay [(5.92±1.56) vs. (8.33±3.62) d] in group A were less than those in group B (P<0.05), while the operation time [(185.80±52.13) vs. (160.70±21.37) min] and the success rate of screw placement [100.0% (48/48) vs. 96.7% (58/60)] had no statistical difference between the two groups (P>0.05). The VAS score and ODI score of the two groups decreased significantly over time (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in VAS score between the two groups at the same time point before operation, one month after operation, or three months after operation (P>0.05). The ODI score of group A was better than that of group B one month after operation (P=0.010), but there was no significant difference between the two groups before operation or three months after operation (P>0.05). Conclusion Compared with traditional open surgery, the application of robot-assisted total endoscopic lumbar decompression and fusion technology in single segment lumbar fusion has good early clinical outcome, high success rate of screw placement, and small trauma, which is beneficial to early functional recovery and has the significance of further exploring its application prospect.
Objective To explore the timing of indwelling urinary catheter removal in male patients undergoing orthopedic surgery under general anesthesia by a prospective randomized controlled study. Methods Male patients who underwent orthopedic surgery under general anesthesia in the First People’s Hospital of Shuangliu District between September 2019 and January 2021 were selected prospectively. The patients were randomly assigned to group A (pull out the catheter before anesthesia) and group B (pull out the catheter within 24 hours after anesthesia) at a ratio of 1∶1 by sortition. The age, operation duration, operation site, heart rate when pulling out the catheter, first urination, urinary tract infection, patient comfort score, nursing satisfaction score and patient satisfaction related indicators of the two groups were recorded and analyzed. Results A total of 120 patients were included in the study. All patients successfully completed the trial without dropping out or quitting. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of age, operation duration and operation site (P>0.05). No urinary tract infection occurred in both groups. There was no significant difference in the first urination between the two groups (P>0.05). The heart rate of patients in group A when pulling out the catheter was slower than that of group B [(74.62 ± 11.38) vs. (84.52 ± 8.98) times/min], and the satisfaction of patients in group A (group A: 46 cases were satisfied, 11 cases were relatively satisfied, 3 cases were dissatisfied; group B: 17 cases were satisfied, 25 cases were relatively satisfied, 18 cases were dissatisfied), comfort score (17.82±2.73 vs. 16.68±2.13), and nursing satisfaction score (19.62±1.59 vs. 16.32±2.05) were better than those in group B (P<0.05). Conclusions For male patients who need catheterization before orthopedic surgery under general anesthesia, pulling out the catheter before waking up after anesthesia can effectively reduce the physiological stress reaction of patients, reduce discomfort, improve patient satisfaction, and reduce the workload of nurses after surgery, which is conducive to early rehabilitation exercise of patients.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of robot-guided percutaneous fixation and decompression via small incision in treatment of advanced thoracolumbar metastases. Methods A clinical data of 57 patients with advanced thoracolumbar metastases admitted between June 2017 and January 2021 and met the selection criteria was retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 26 cases were treated with robot-guided percutaneous fixation and decompression via small incision (robot-guided group) and 31 cases with traditional open surgery (traditional group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, body mass index, lesion segment, primary tumor site, and preoperative Tokuhashi score, Tomita score, Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS), visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Oswestry disability index (ODI), Karnofsky score, and Frankel grading between groups (P>0.05). The operation time, hospital stays, hospital expenses, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage volume, duration of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, blood transfusion, complications, and survival time were compared. The pedicle screw placement accuracy was evaluated according to the Gertzbein-Robbins grading by CT within 4 days after operation. The pain, function, and quality of life were evaluated by VAS score, ODI, Karnofsky score, and Frankel grading. Results During operation, 257 and 316 screws were implanted in the robot-guided group and the traditional group, respectively; and there was no significant difference in pedicle screw placement accuracy between groups (P>0.05). Compared with the traditional group, the operation time, hospital stays, duration of ICU stay were significantly shorter, and intraoperative blood loss and postoperative drainage volume were significantly lesser in the robot-guided group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in hospital expenses, blood transfusion rate, and complications between groups (P>0.05). All patients were followed up 8-32 months (mean, 14 months). There was no significant difference in VAS scores between groups at 7 days after operation (P>0.05), but the robot-guided group was superior to the traditional group at 1 and 3 months after operation (P<0.05). The postoperative ODI change was significantly better in the robot-guided group than in the traditional group (P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in the postoperative Karnofsky score change and Frankel grading change when compared to the traditional group (P>0.05). Median overall survival time was 13 months [95%CI (10.858, 15.142) months] in the robot-guided group and 15 months [95%CI (13.349, 16.651) months] in the traditional group, with no significant difference between groups (χ2=0.561, P=0.454) . Conclusion Compared with traditional open surgery, the robot-guided percutaneous fixation and decompression via small incision can reduce operation time, hospital stays, intraoperative blood loss, blood transfusion, and complications in treatment of advanced thoracolumbar metastases.
ObjectiveTo study the present situation of hospital orthopedic surgery incision infection, in order to provide the basis for further intervention.
MethodsProspective investigation combined with retrospective investigation method was adopted in our study to perform a statistical analysis on orthopedic surgery incision infections among 545 patients in our hospital between January and December 2012.
ResultsDuring the one year of follow-up, there were 10 cases of surgical incision infection among all the 545 patients, with an infection rate of 1.83%. The infection rate of class-Ⅰ incision was 0.46%, of class-Ⅱ was 5.13%, and of class-Ⅲ/Ⅳ was 12.12%, and the Cochrane-Armitage trend chi-square test showed significant trend among them (χ2=28.273, P<0.001). Based on different operation risk index, patients with index 1, 2, 3 had a surgical site infection rate of 0.82%, 2.60%, and 18.75%, respectively. The higher the index, the higher the surgery incision infection rate, and the trend was statistically significant (χ2=12.916, P<0.001). The infection rate was 1.43% for elective surgical procedures, and was 3.15% for emergency surgery, but there was no significant difference (P>0.05).
ConclusionOrthopedic surgery has a high-risk surgical site infection rate, and incision classification and surgical risk index have statistical correlation with the incidence of hospital infection. In order to ensure the security of patients and reduce medical disputes, we should pay close attention to orthopedic surgery infection.
【Abstract】 Objective To investigate the appl ication and significance of computer assisted orthopedicsurgery(CAOS) in orthopedic trauma surgery. Methods In orthopedic trauma surgery, the appl ication status of CAOS was?analysed and the related problems were summarized. Results At present, CAOS is seldom used to reduce fractures but frequently used to insert internal fixation devices and reconstruct the cruciate l igament in orthopedic trauma surgery. And the studies have shown its superiority. During CAOS appl ication, surgeons should pay attention to some problems such as the disadvantages, cl inical evaluation, the roles of the surgeons and correct micro-traumatic concept. Conclusion CAOS is very important and cannot be replaced in orthopedic trauma minimal invasion surgery and surgeons should pay attention to some important related problems to make it develop successfully in the study of CAOS.
