ObjectiveTo systematically review the effect of pre-treating the catheters with dexamethasone for preventing PICC-associated phlebitis.
MethodsWe electronically searched PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library (Issue 4, 2012), CNKI, CBM, WanFang Data and CQVIP for studies about pre-treating the catheters with dexamethasone to prevent PICC-associated phlebitis from inception to March 2013. Relevant studies including grey literature were also manually searched. Two reviewers independently screened studies according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data and evaluated the methodological quality of the included studies. Then meta-analysis was performed using the software RevMan 5.0.
ResultsA total of 13 studies involving 1 965 cases (1 025 cases in the dexamethasone group, and 940 cases in the control group) were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that pre-treating the catheters with dexamethasone could significantly decrease the incidence of PICC-associated phlebitis (RR=0.29, 95%CI=0.22 to 0.39, P < 0.000 1). However, no significant difference was found for the PICC-associated other complications, such as pipe blockage, bleeding, swelling of puncture site, allergy and atopic catheter.
ConclusionPre-treating the catheters with dexamethasone soltion before inserting could reduce the incidence of PICC-associated phlebitis. The aforementioned conclusion needs to be further validated by more high-quality and large-scale randomized controlled trials.
Objective To systematically evaluate the influence of PICC (peripherally inserted central catheter) ultrasound guidance on success rates and incidences of complications of elbow catheterization. Methods The Cochrane Library (Issue 3, 2012), Library of JBI evidence-based nursing center, MEDLINE, EMbase, CBM, VIP, CNKI and WanFang Data were searched for relevant studies to influence on success rates of puncture and catheterization and complications from upper arm placement of PICC ultrasound guidance as well as conventional PICC placement from inception to March, 2012. The data were extracted according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria by two reviewers, the quality of included studies was also evaluated. Meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.1, or only descriptive analysis was conducted instead. Results Eleven randomized controlled trials, five clinical controlled trials and four cohort studies were included, involving 4 052 patients. The results of meta-analysis showed that, upper arm placement of PICC ultrasound guidance combined with modified Seldinger technique was associated with significantly higher one-time success rates of puncture and catheterization than conventional PICC placement below the elbow, with significant differences (OR=4.71, 95%CI 1.97 to 11.28, P=0.000 5; OR=8.63, 95%CI 1.92 to 38.82, P=0.005). Conventional elbow catheterization had a significantly higher incidence of phlebitis than catheterization on the elbow that under the guidance of PICC ultrasound and modified Seldinger technique (OR=0.13, 95%CI 0.08 to 0.21, Plt;0.000 01). Conclusion Elbow catheterization under the guidance of PICC ultrasound combined with modified Seldinger technique has an obvious advantage in improving the success rates of puncture and catheterization and reducing the incidence of complications, compared with conventional elbow catheterization.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy of pulse indicating continuous cardiac output (PICCO) monitoring for guiding the treatment of patients with septic shock.MethodsDatabases including PubMed, The Cochrane Library, EMbase, Web of Science, CBM, WanFang Data, VIP and CNKI were electronically searched from inception to February 2017 to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about PICCO monitoring on treatment guidance of patients with septic shock. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then meta-analysis was performed using Stata 12.0 software.ResultsA total of 20 RCTs involving 1 253 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed: compared with central venous pressure (CVP) measurements, the treatment of sepsis bundles informed by PICCO could significantly shorten the length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay (MD=–2.74, 95%CI –3.40 to –2.09, P<0.001), reduce the ICU mortality (RR=0.49, 95%CI 0.36 to 0.67, P<0.001) and 28-day mortality (RR=0.61, 95%CI 0.43 to 0.87, P=0.006).ConclusionCurrent evidence shows the PICCO monitoring can significantly improve the prognosis of septic shock. Due to limited and quantity quality of the included studies, more high-quality studies are needed to verify above conclusion.
ObjectiveTo retrospectively analyze the causes and risk factors of unplanned extubation (UE) in cancer patients during peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) retention, so as to provide references for effectively predicting the occurrence of UE. Methods27 998 cancer patients who underwent PICC insertion, maintenance and removal in the vascular access nursing center of our hospital from January 2016 to June 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. General information, catheterization information, and maintenance information were collected. The Chi-squared test was used for univariate analysis, multivariate analysis was used by binary unconditional logistic regression. They were randomly divided into modeling group and internal validation group according to the ratio of 7∶3. The related nomogram prediction model and internal validation were established. ResultsThe incidence of UE during PICC retention in tumor patients was 2.80% (784/27 998 cases). Univariate analysis showed that age, gender, diagnosis, catheter retention time, catheter slipping, catheter related infection, catheter related thrombosis, secondary catheter misplacement, dermatitis, and catheter blockage had an impact on UE (P<0.05). Age, diagnosis, catheter retention time, catheter slipping, catheter related infection, catheter related thrombosis, secondary catheter misplacement, and catheter blockage are independent risk factors for UE (P<0.05). Based on the above 8 independent risk factors, a nomogram model was established to predict the risk of UE during PICC retention in tumor patients. The ROC area under the predicted nomogram was 0.90 (95%CI 0.89 to 0.92) in the modeling group, and the calibration curve showed good predictive consistency. Internal validation showed that the area under the ROC curve of the prediction model was 0.91 (95%CI 0.89 to 0.94), and the trend of the prediction curve was close to the standard curve. ConclusionPatients aged ≥60 years, non chest tumor patients, catheter retention time (≤6 months), catheter slipping, catheter related infections, catheter related thrombosis, secondary catheter misplacement, and catheter blockage increase the risk of UE. The nomogram model established in this study has good predictive ability and discrimination, which is beneficial for clinical screening of patients with different degrees of risk, in order to timely implement targeted prevention and effective treatment measures, and ultimately reduce the occurrence of UE.
Objective?To investigate the role of low-dose heparin added to total nutrient admixture (TNA) solutions in the prevention of catheter related infections (CRIs). Methods?One-hundred three newborn infants with periph-erally inserted central catheter (PICC) were divided into heparin group (n=63) and control group (n=40). The patients in the heparin group received TNA with 0.5 U/ ml heparin. The patients in the control group received TNA without heparin. We retrospectively analyzed the incidence of CRTs in the two groups. Results?We found that the incidence of CRIs was 0 in the heparin group and 12.5% (5/40) in the control group. The incidence of catheter obstruction was 6.3% (4/63) in the heparin group and 20% (8/40) in the control group. The incidence of catheter-tip colonization was 1.58% (1/40) in the heparin group and 17.5% (7/40) in the control group. The incidences of CRIs, catheter obstruction, and catheter-tip colonization were signiicantly lower in the heparin group than those in the control group (Plt;0.05). Conclusion?TNA solutions with 0.5U/ml heparin have decreased catheter obstruction and CRIs.
