Objective To diversify the methods of human physiology teaching for medical students at Chang Gung University College of Medicine. Methods We divided the grades of semester evaluation for physiology into two parts: 70% for lecture-examinations, 30% for non-examination-associated learning model including oral presentation of a scientific paper (conference), problem-based learning (PBL) performance, and quizzes. Results By a questionnaire survey at the end of the semester, we found that students were willing to spend time preparing non-examination-associated learning model; and from their own evaluations, the effectiveness of non-examination-associated learning was comparable to lecture-examination methods. Conclusion We conclude that from this analysis of students’ learning attitude and actual time (in hours per week) spent in each learning models, non-examination-associated learning model is well accepted and appeares to be as effective as traditional examination-forced study.
Objective To study the effect of PBL teaching method which was applied in the clinical practice of diabetes nursing, and to analyze its advantages and shortages. Methods Seventy-seven undergraduates in major of nursing were randomly grouped into two: one as an experimental group was taught with PBL teaching method, while the other as a control group was taught with traditional teaching method. The questionnaire and final examination were adopted to analyze the teaching effect. Results The effect of PBL teaching method was better in the experimental group for stimulating learning motivation, helping students to closely combine the theory and practice, and promoting communication ability. However, there was no statistical difference in final examination between the two groups (Pgt;0.05). Conclusion PBL teaching method is much better than traditional teaching method in clinical nursing practice of internal medicine, for it can guide students to get the approaches for solving problems and cultivate their integrated diathesis and other abilities.
Objective To explore the short term and long term effectiveness of the problem-based learning (PBL) in clinical skill training. Methods A total of 162 clinical medicine undergraduates in Grade 2003 (7-years study) and 2004 (5-year study) who were supposed to intern in the internal medicine departments were randomly divided into the PBL group (n=75) and the control group with traditional training (n=87) for having their clinical skills training. Then t test was applied to compare the two groups about the scores of intern rotation examination and graduate OSCE as well. Results About the baseline: the students in the two groups got similar scores in their internal medicine exam before clinical intern rotation (84.04±7.40 vs. 82.63±8.77, P=0.287). About the short term effectiveness: compared to the control group, the students in the PBL group got higher subjective evaluation from their supervised clinicians (P=0.006). In writing examination, the students of those two group got similar scores in knowledge part (54.17±9.26 vs. 51.67±9.56, P=0.92), while the PBL group won in case reasoning question (20.39±5.27 vs. 16.51±4.90, Plt;0.001). About the long term effectiveness: in the graduate OSCE, the two groups got similar scores in skills operation such as punctures and lab results analyses (P=0.567 and P=0.741), while the students in the PBL group had better performance at the case reasoning and standard patients treating (75.59±9.85 vs. 71.11±12.01, P=0.027). Conclusion With the great short term and long term effectiveness, the PBL applied in the clinical skill training improves the students’ ability of both synthesized analyses and the integrated clinical skills such as clinical thinking and interpersonal communication, but doesn’t aim at the basic knowledge and operation skills.
Objective?To assess the effect of problem-based learning (PBL) to improve clinical practice skills for clinical students after graduation. Methods?Computer retrieval was conducted to search for controlled studies comparing PBL with non-PBL. The quality of the included studies was critically evaluated and data were analyzed. Results?A total of 16 articles were included. The results showed that in integrated capabilities, PBL teaching was superior to traditional teaching methods. Whether in self-evaluation or objective evaluation, in terms of legal and ethical aspects of health care, research and presentation skills and ability to solve problem, PBL teaching was superior to non-PBL-learning methods. But in other aspects, it was yet controversial whether PBL-learning was better than non-PBL-learning. Conclusion?Problem-based learning could improve clinical practice skills for clinical students after graduation. However, most trials included are of low quality, so large-scale randomized controlled trials of higher quality are needed to confirm this.
ObjectivesTo systematically review the application of evidence-based medicine (EBM) combined with problem-based learning (PBL) method in clinical teaching.MethodsDatabases including WanFang Data, CNKI, VIP, CBM, PubMed and EMbase were searched to identify eligible randomized controlled trials that compared EBM plus PBL with traditional lecture based learning (LBL) method in clinical teaching from inception to March 28th, 2020. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed risk bias of included studies. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata 14.0 software.ResultsA total of 33 randomized controlled trials with 2 855 students were included. The results showed that students in EBM combined with PBL group obtained better scores of specialized theory (WMD=6.87, 95%CI 5.08 to 8.66, P<0.001), skills examination (WMD=10.57, 95%CI 8.98 to 12.16, P<0.001) and case analysis (WMD=9.79, 95%CI 4.71 to 14.88, P<0.001), comparing with those in LBL group. Besides, EBM combined with PBL method improved students’ overall ability including independent learning capability, clinical thinking ability, problem-solving capability, literature exploring capacity, communication and presentation skills and team-work ability.ConclusionsApplication of EBM combined with PBL method can improve clinical teaching quality.
Outcome-based education (OBE) emphasizes student learning outcomes as the core, utilizing a backward design approach to construct the curriculum. In teaching practice based on OBE, teachers need to develop a blueprint in advance that is closely aligned with the content of the teaching, aiming to promote deep learning and ensure that students can fully demonstrate their learning outcomes. Electroencephalogram (EEG) is a widely used technology in the field of neuroscience, and the special EEG changes convey a variety of information, which is crucial to the study of diseases. However, due to its specialization and learning difficulty, EEG teaching has been facing many challenges. Under the guidance of OBE concept, traditional knowledge lecture and problem-based learning (PBL) are organically integrated, combined with case analysis and flipped classroom teaching mode, which are applied in EEG teaching practice, in order to obtain more ideal teaching effect.
Objectives To train postgraduate medical students the ability of effectively using network resources and independently studying, and to explore new model of clinical liver cancer teaching. Methods The teaching model of problembased learning (PBL) to clinical liver cancer teaching was applied. Results The teaching model of PBL changed graduate student the status of passive acceptance to active participation. The teaching process was full of livingness, and the teaching quality was improved.Conclusion The teaching model of PBL can break through the limitations of passive acceptance of book knowledge in traditional teaching model and improve the ability to handle the comprehensive clinical knowledge of liver cancer, which provides a new model to the teaching of liver cancer to graduate medical students in clinic.
ObjectivesTo systematically review the efficacy of problem-based learning (PBL) model in clinical oncology teaching.MethodsPubMed, EMbase, CNKI, WanFang Data, CBM databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of PBL model used in clinical oncology teaching in China from January, 2000 to March, 2019. Two reviewers independently screened the literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies, then, meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 and Stata 12.0 software.ResultsA total of 29 RCTs involving 2 238 subjects were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: PBL model in clinical oncology teaching was superior to traditional lecture-based learning (LBL) model on the total score (MD=6.50, 95%CI 4.44 to 8.55, P<0.000 01), theoretical knowledge score (MD=4.58, 95%CI 3.38 to 5.78, P<0.000 01), case analysis score (MD=4.26, 95%CI 3.38 to 5.78, P<0.000 01), skill operation score (MD=6.10, 95%CI 4.77 to 7.43, P<0.000 01), overall course satisfaction (RR=1.74, 95%CI 1.34 to 2.27, P<0.000 01), increased learning interest (RR=1.52, 95%CI 1.28 to 1.81, P<0.000 1), improved teamwork cooperation (RR=1.67, 95%CI 1.39 to 2.01, P=0.002), and improved self-study ability (RR=1.51, 95%CI 1.20 to 1.90, P<0.000 1), the differences were statistically significant.ConclusionsCurrent evidence shows that the PBL model can improve clinical teaching effect of oncology and learning satisfaction. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies accumulated, more high quality studies are required to verify above conclusion.
Objective To assess the effect of problem-based learning (PBL) versus traditional methods in nursing students. Methods Computer retrieval was conducted to search for controlled studies comparing PBL and traditional methods. The quality of included studies was critically evaluated and data were analyzed by using The Cochrane Collaboration’s RevMan 5.0 software. Results A tota1 of 321 articles were retrieved, but only l1 were included. Metaanalyses showed that there was no significant difference between PBL and traditional methods in the objective knowledge of nursing students (SMD 0.12, 95%CI -0.32 to 0.56, P=0.6gt;0.05); but PBL was superior to traditional methods in the training of critical thinking (WMD 11.52, 95%CI 6.29 to 16.74), conflict resolution skills (WMD 8.09, 95%CI 5.02 to 11.16), clinical problem-solving skills (WMD 0.43, 95%CI 0.22 to 0.64), and communication skills (WMD 1.56, 95%CI 0.17 to 2.95). Although no significant difference was identified in the training of clinical decision-making skills, collaborative skills, and self-directed learning skills, PBL tended to be superior to traditional methods. Conclusion PBL tends are associated with better learning results among nursing students compared with traditional methods. However, most trials included in the review were of low quality, so large-scale randomized controlled trials of higher quality are needed to confirm this.
The main approaches to medical education reform that have been introduced elsewhere in the world, including the integration of basic and clinical sciences into organ-based model, the establishment of a Center for Faculty Development and problem-based learning (PBL) have been introduced to the College of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University (CSMU) since the mid 1990s. The process of developing the PBL approach can be divided into the following stages: Observation (1994-2000): In this stage, CSMU observed the practice and effectiveness of PBL programs in other domestic and foreign medical schools. At the same time, we assessed the possibility of introducing PBL to Chung Shan. When the authority decided to introduce PBL, a PBL committee was inaugurated. Preparation (2000-2002): In this stage, tutor training took place, as well as PBL case writing workshops to reach consensus among the faculty. To reduce the total amount of curricula and traditional teaching hours, we combined and simplified related curricula, so that one and half weekdays were reserved for PBL tutorials and students’ self-study. A preliminary course about how to learn well, including the philosophy and methodology of learning as well as evidence-based medicine (EBM), was integrated into premedical curricula. Practice (2002-2004): In light of the number of trained tutors and written cases that have been prepared, and the desire that the PBL would be successful from the start, CSMU chose to introduce PBL to the clinical curricula first in a hybrid curriculum design. This meant that the traditional teaching was retained at the beginning. Evaluation of PBL by the students was done at the end of each semester. Tutor meetings were held twice per semester. Advancement (2004-2006): In this stage, PBL was introduced to the basic medical curricula as well as to the premedical general curricula. Based on our experience and comprehensive evaluation, a PBL guidebook for tutors and students has been published and delivered to both groups. We also developed an on-line evaluation system containing the evaluation forms for students and tutors. Excellence (2006 onwards): In this stage, the PBL website and learning resources will be further developed, and we are designing the system for on-line PBL practice.In conclusion, the introduction to PBL for medical education is reasonable and feasible. It requires b administrative support, a long-standing and high commitment of the PBL committee, consensus among the faculty and an appropriate planning and evaluation mechanism.
