Objective To compare the effectiveness of proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) and reconstruction nail with minimally invasive technique for ipsilateral femoral shaft and extracapsular hip fractures in young and middle-aged patients. Methods Sixty-nine young and middle-aged patients with ipsilateral femoral shaft and extracapsular hip fractures were treated between January 2000 and August 2010, and their data were analyzed retrospectively. Of them, fractures were fixed by reconstruction nail in 44 cases (reconstruction nail group) and by PFNA in 25 cases (PFNA group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, weight, injury cause, fracture type, or disease duration between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). The operation time, blood loss, fracture healing time, complications, and functional outcomes were compared between 2 groups to evaluate the effectiveness. Results The operation time and blood loss in the PFNA group were significantly less than those in the reconstruction nail group (P lt; 0.05). The follow-up time was 12-38 months (mean, 20 months ) in the PFNA group and was 12-48 months (mean, 22 months) in the reconstruction nail group. No complication occurred as follows in 2 groups: wound infection, deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, breakage of the implants, avascular necrosis of the femoral head, or serious rotation and shortening deformity of lower limbs. In the PFNA group and the reconstruction nail group, 1 patient underwent technical difficulty in nail implant and 7 patients underwent technical difficulty in proximal locking screw, respectively; 3 patients and 6 patients had intra-operative iatrogenic fracture of femoral shaft, respectively; and delayed union of femoral shaft was observed in 1 patient and 2 patients, respectively. The complication rate was 20% (5/25) in the PFNA group and 34% (15/44) in the reconstruction nail group, showing no significant difference (χ2=1.538, P=0.215). No significant difference was found in fracture healing time between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). At last follow-up, there was no significant difference in Harris hip score and Evanich knee score between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). Conclusion PFNA or reconstruction nail with minimally invasive technique is a good method to treat ipsilateral femoral shaft and extracapsular hip fractures, but the PFNA is superior to the reconstruction nail because of simple operation.
Objective To investigate the effect of treatment with proximal femoral nail (PFN) on femur intertrochanteric fractures in the old. Methods A retrospective study of 62 patients with femur intertrochantericfractures treated with PFN from October 2001 to September 2003 was carried out.The data of operative time, blood loss, intraoperative complications, wound drainage, postoperative complications, healing time, and hip function were recordedand compared with previous literature so as to evaluate the effect. Results All patients were followed up for 8-22 month(13.6 months on average). Intraoperative fracture occurred again in 2 cases. Two patients died of brain embolism and pulmonary infection respectively. Heterogeneous ossification occurred in 2 cases. Hip varus occurred in 1 case. Extra hip anteversion occurred in 1 case. The effect of other cases was satisfactory. The operative time was 76.5±29.1 min, the mean blood loss was 385.7±98.4 ml, the wound drainage was 45.5±21.7 ml, and the healing time was 13.2±3.8 weeks. According to the Sanders post-trauma hip function assessing system, the excellent and good rate was 89.6%. Conclusion The application of PFN is characterized by short operative time, less blood loss, stable fixation, so it is an effective way to treat femur intertrochanteric fracture in the old.
Objective To analyze the cl inical appl ication and effect of three operation methods in treatment of senile intertrochanteric fracture. Methods From July 2004 to February 2007, 73 patients with intertrochanteric fracture were treated. Of 73 patients, 33 patients were treated by artificial bipolar femoral head (ABFH group), 18 patients by dynamic hip screw (DHS group) and 22 by proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA group). In ABFH group, there were 19 males and 14 females with age of (72.5 ± 3.8) years. The injury was by tumbl ing in 19 cases, by accident traffic in 7 cases, fall ing from height in 4 cases and others in 3 cases, including 6 cases of type I, 9 cases of type II, 11 cases of type III and 7 cases of type IV accordingto Evans classification. The Harris hip score was 16.8 ± 4.8, and the disease course was (21.2 ± 7.8) hours. In DHS group, there were 10 males and 8 females with age of (69.5 ± 3.2) years. The injury was by tumbl ing in 11 cases, by accident traffic in 5 cases, fall ing from height in 1 case and other in 1 case, including 6 cases of type I, 3 cases of type II, 5 cases of type III and 4 cases of type IV according to Evans classification. The Harris hip score of was 18.6 ± 5.5, and the disease course was (19.8 ± 6.5) hours. In PFNA group, there were 13 males and 9 females with age of (70.3 ± 3.5) years. The injury was by tumbl ing in 11 cases, by accident traffic in 6 cases, fall ing from height in 3 cases and others in 2 cases, including 5 cases of type I, 6 cases of type II, 6 cases of type III and 5 cases of type IV according to Evans classification. The Harris hip score was 20.4 ± 6.6, and the disease course was (20.0 ± 5.8) hours. All fractures were fresh. There were no significant difference in general data between three groups (P gt; 0.05). Results In ABFH group, all incisions healed by first intention, but deep vein thrombosis occurred in 1 case on the postoperative third day. In DHS group, incisions healed by first intention in 16 cases and by second intention in 2 cases, coxa adducta occurred in 2 cases after operation. In PFNA group, all incisions healed by first intention. Cacothesis in pate occurred in 1 case after operation. There were significant differences in operation time, blood loss, and out-of-bed time (P lt; 0.05). The patients were followed up (30.5 ± 6.5) months in ABFH group, (27.6 ± 6.2) months in DHS group, and (24.8 ± 5.4) months inPFNA group. The union time of fracture was (7.5 ± 2.5) months in ABFH group, (8.4 ± 2.2) months in DHS group and (7.2 ± 2.4) months in PFNA group. There were significant differences in Harris score between before operation and after operation and between different time after operation in three groups (P lt; 0.05). Conculsion The three operative methods have some their superiority, but the replacement of artificial bipolar femoral head is more suitable for the senile unstable intertrochanteric fracture because of simply procedure, short operation time, less blood loss and early ambulation.
ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness of long and short proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) in the treatment of type A2.3 intertrochanteric fracture of femur (IFF). Methods The clinical data of 54 patients with type A2.3 IFF admitted between January 2020 and December 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the length of PFNA nail used in the operation, they were divided into long nail group (PFNA nail length>240 mm, 24 cases) and short nail group (PFNA nail length≤240 mm, 30 cases). There was no significant difference in baseline data such as gender, age, fracture side, body mass index, and time from fracture to operation between the two groups (P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency, intraoperative reduction quality score, fracture healing, and complications of the two groups were recorded and compared. Harris score was used to evaluate the hip function of patients at 1 year after operation. According to the relationship between the fracture line of type A2.3 IFF and the lesser trochanter, the two groups of patients were divided into type Ⅰ(the fracture line extends to the level of the lesser trochanter), type Ⅱ(the fracture line extends to less than 2 cm below the lesser trochanter), and type Ⅲ (the fracture line extends to more than 2 cm below the lesser trochanter), and the postoperative stability and internal fixator loosening of each subtype were evaluated. Results The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency in short nail group were significantly less than those in long nail group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the intraoperative reduction quality score between the two groups (P>0.05). Patients in both groups were followed up 12-18 months, with an average of 13.5 months. The postoperative stability score of short nail group was significantly lower than that of long nail group (P<0.05). The Harris score in the long nail group was significantly higher than that in the short nail group at 1 year after operation (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in Harris score grading between the two groups (P>0.05). Complications occurred in 3 cases of the long nail group (including 1 case of coxa varus caused by external nail entry point and 2 cases of loose internal fixator), and 7 cases of the short nail group (including 1 case of coxa varus caused by external nail entry point and 6 cases of loose internal fixator). Neither group had any anterior femoral arch damage, there was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups (P>0.05). The number of type Ⅲ patients was relatively small and not included in the statistics; there was no significant difference in the postoperative stability score and the incidence of internal fixator loosening between the long and short nail groups in type Ⅰ patients (P>0.05). In type Ⅱ patients, the postoperative stability score and the incidence of internal fixation loosening in the long nail group were significantly better than those in the short nail group (P<0.05).Conclusion Long PFNA fixation for type A2.3 IFF has longer operation time and more intraoperative blood loss, but the overall stability of fracture is better after operation. For type A2.3 IFF with fracture line extending to less than 2 cm below the lesser trochanter, long PFNA is used for fixation, although the surgical trauma is large, but the postoperative stability is better than that of short PFNA; for type A2.3 IFF with fracture line extending to the lesser trochanter, there is no significant difference in postoperative stability between long and short PFNAs.
Objective
To compare the effect of proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) and dynamic hip screw (DHS) in the treatment of intertrochanteric fracture in elderly patients with osteoporosis.
Methods
A total of 72 elderly patients with intertrochanteric fractures were enrolled between December 2011 and December 2014. According to the different surgical methods, the patients were divided into PFNA group (38 cases) and DHS group (34 cases). The operation time, perioperative blood loss, postoperative weight-bearing time, Harris score were compared between the two groups.
Results
All cases were followed up for 5–24 months (mean, 13.5 months). The operation time in PFNA group was shorter than that in DHS group [(40.25±24.23) vs. (72.65±34.65) minutes], the perioperative blood loss in PFNA group was less than that in DHS group [(136±56) vs. (256±102) mL], the postoperative weight-bearing time in PFNA group was earlier than that in DHS group [(5.24±4.52) vs. (15.69±6.78) days], and the Harris score in PFNA group was higher than that in DHS group (80.23±10.26 vs. 54.75±12.37) ; the differences above were all statistically significant (P<0.05).
Conclusion
Elderly patients with intertrochanteric fracture and osteoporosis treated with PFNA have shorter operation time, less wounds, better hip function, and earlier weight-bearing than the patients treated with DHS; the surgical method can improve the patient′ life quality.
Objective
To compare the effectiveness of the proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) and locking compression plate (LCP) in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures with the lateral unsubstantial femoral wall in elderly patients.
Methods
Between May 2009 and August 2012, 69 elderly patients with intertrochanteric fractures with the lateral unsubstantial femoral wall were treated. Fractures were fixed with PFNA in 36 patients (PFNA group), and with LCP in 33 patients (LCP group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, injury cause, side of fracture, and fracture AO type between 2 groups (P > 0.05). The incision length, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, total blood loss, fluoroscopy frequency, time for ambulation, and early (within 3 months) and late (more than 12 months) complications were compared. Fracture healing was assessed according to X-ray reexamination, the function of the hip joint was assessed according to the Harris hip scoring system.
Results
The incision length, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and time for ambulation of PFNA group were significantly less than those of LCP group (P < 0.05), but the fluoroscopy frequency of PFNA group was significantly more than that of LCP group (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in total blood loss between 2 groups (t=-1.686, P=0.096). The patients were followed up 12-24 months in PFNA group and 15-30 months in LCP group. The X-ray reexamination revealed fracture healing at (12.667±2.527) weeks in patients of PFNA group, and at (13.364±1.194) weeks in the others of LCP group except 1 case of nonunion, showing no significant difference (t=-1.443, P=0.154). There was no significant difference in Harris hip score between PFNA group (84.611±7.076) and LCP group (81.785±7.500) at 12 months after operation (t=1.626, P=0.109). The early complication rate and late complication rate were 16.7% (6/36) and 5.6% (2/36) in PFNA group and were 9.1% (3/33) and 9.1% (3/33) in LCP group, all showing no significant difference between 2 groups (χ2=0.871, P=0.481; χ2=0.320, P=0.665).
Conclusion
Both PFNA and LCP have good effectiveness in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures with the lateral unsubstantial femoral wall in the elderly patients. Each has its own advantages and disadvantages.
Objective To compare the effectiveness of the proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) and dynamic hip screw (DHS) in the treatment of elderly patients with intertrochanteric fractures. Methods Between May 2007 and May 2010, 63 elderly patients with intertrochanteric fractures were treated, and fractures were fixed with PFNA in 31 patients (PFNA group) and with DHS in 32 patients (DHS group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, injury cause, disease duration, and fracture type between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). Results All incisions healed by first intention. The incision length, operation time, and blood loss in PFNA group were significantly less than those in DHS group (P lt; 0.05). The averagefollow-up time was 13.6 months in PFNA group and was 13.8 months in DHS group. The fracture heal ing time was (11.80 ± 1.32) weeks in PFNA group and was (12.21 ± 1.26) weeks in DHS group, showing no significant difference (t=1.23, P=0.29). The complication rate was 0 in PFNA group and was 12.5% (4/32) in DHS group, showing no significant difference (P=0.06). After 1 year, Harris hip score of PFNA group (86.55 ± 10.32) was higher than that of DHS group (80.36 ±11.18) (t=2.28, P=0.03). Conclusion There are two surgical methods to treat intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly patient: PFNA and DHS, and each has advantages; for unstable intertrochanteric fractures, PFNA treatment is the first choice.
ObjectiveTo compare the clinical effect of proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) and locking proximal femoral plate (LPFP) for femoral intertrochanteric fracture in elderly patients.
MethodsWe respectively analyzed the clinical data of 116 senile patients with femoral intertrochanteric fracture treated between October 2008 and March 2014. Among them, 60 were treated with PFNA, and 56 were treated with LPFP. We compared the two groups of patients in terms of operating time, surgical blood loss, surgical complications, walking exercise time, fracture healing time and joint function recovery.
ResultsA total of 115 patients had regular follow-up from 12 to 24 months (averaging 15.7 months). One patient died. The operating time was (83.26±14.81) minutes in PFNA group and (102.58±15.31) minutes in LPFP group. The surgical blood loss was (202.16±33.14) mL in PFNA group and (255.80±45.92) mL in LPFP group. The walking exercise time was (1.80±0.91) weeks in PFNA group and (3.48±3.03) weeks in LPFP group. The fracture healing time was (11.80±2.26) weeks in PFNA group and (12.14±2.21) weeks in LPFP group. The postoperative Harris score for hip joint was 84.56±9.55 in PFNA group and 82.47±9.22 in LPFP group. There were statistical differences in operating time, surgical blood loss and walking exercise time (P<0.05), while no statistical differences were found in fracture healing time and postoperative Harris score for hip joint (P>0.05).
ConclusionPFNA and LPFP are effective methods for femoral intertrochanteric fracture in elderly people, but PFNA has a shorter operating time, less surgical blood loss and earlier walking exercise time.
ObjectiveTo investigate the lateral wall protection skills for aged femoral intertrochanteric fractures fixed with proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA).
MethodsSixty aged patients with femoral intertrochanteric fractures were treated with PFNA between March 210 and January 2011.According to Evans classification,31 were type Ⅰc,18 were Ⅰd,and 11 were type Ⅱ.Several skills were applied to prevent the breaking of the lateral wall.Post-operative complications,bone union and recovery of hip function were recorded.
ResultsThe patients were followed up for 12 to 18 months.All fractures were healed without infection or failure of internal fixation.
ConclusionPFNA is a good choice for the clinical treatment of unstable femoral intertrochanteric fractures in aged patients.To obtain better clinical result,the lateral wall must be considered and well protected.
ObjectiveTo compare the therapeutic effect between intramedullary fixation and external fixation on intertrochanteric fracture.
MethodsBetween June 2005 and June 2011, 32 patients with Evans-Jensen type Ⅲ intertrochanteric fracture were treated with proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA), Gamma nail, dynamic hip screw plate (DHS) or locking compression plate (LCP), separately. The operation duration, peri-operative bleeding, load time, Harris hip score and postoperative complications were observed in the patients, and were used to analyze the therapeutic effect among the four methods.
ResultsShorter operation duration, less bleeding in the surgery, smaller quantity of drainage after the operation (P<0.05) were found in group Gamma and group PFNA compared with those in group DHS and LCP. The duration of hospitalization didn't differ much between the two fixation systems (P>0.05). The difference in operation duration, operative bleeding and post-operative drainage between group Gamma and PFNA, and between group DHS and LCP was not significant (P>0.05).
ConclusionThe intramedullary fixation was better than external fixation for Evans-Jensen type Ⅲ intertrochanteric fracture.
