Objective To assess the effect of integrated traditional Chinese medicine with western medicine (ICWM) in the treatment of SARS. Methods We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Chinese BioMed Database ( CBM ) , and the Intemet performed handsearching in Chinese journals and reference lists. We included randomised controlled trials and prospective controlled studies of integrated Chinese medicine with western medicine versus western medicine alone in people with SARS. Three independent reviewers collected details of study population, interventions, and outcomes using a data extraction form. We conducted meta-analysis for similar data of studies.Results Nine studies (n =812) were included, all with the possibility of containing serious bias. ICWM in the treatment of SARS was associated with the following reductions: case fatality [ OR 0.32, 95% CI (0.14,0.71 ) ] , fever clearance time [ WMD -1.17, 95% CI ( -1.83, -0.50 ) , symptom remission time [ WMD-1.47, 95% CI ( - 1.96, - 0. 98) ] and the number of inflammation absorption cases [ MD 1.63, 95% CI(0.95, 2.80 ) ], having no significant difference in symptom scores of convalescents [ WMD -1.25, 95% CI ( -2.71, 0.21 ) ], cumulative dose of corticosteroids [ WMD - 236.96, 95% CI ( - 490.64, 16.73) ] and inflammation absorption mean time [ WMD 0.63, 95% CI ( - 1.33, 2.59) ] .Conclusions Due to the methodological limitations of the studies, the effect of ICWM for SARS is unclear. The apparent improvements in cases fatality, fever clearance time, syndromes remission time and numbers of inflammation absorption cases warrant further evaluation with high quality and large scale trials to be expected.
ObjectiveTo use failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) to check and improve the risk of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 nucleic acid detection, and explore the application effect of FMEA in the emergency inspection items.MethodsFMEA was used to sort out the whole process of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 nucleic acid detection from January 30 to February 21, 2020. By establishing the theme, setting up a team, analyzing the failure mode and potential influencing factors. Then calculate the risk priority number (RPN), formulate preventive measures and implement continuous improvement according to the analysis results.ResultsA total of 2 138 cases were included. After improvement, the number of potential failure modes has been reduced by 2 (17 vs.19); the value of total RPN decreased (3 527.49 vs. 1 858.28). There was significant difference in average RPN before and after improvement [(185.66±74.34) vs. (97.80±37.97); t=6.128, P<0.001].ConclusionsIn the early stage of emergency inspection items, using FMEA can systematically check the risk factors in the process, develop improvement measures. It also can effectively reduce the risk of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 nucleic acid detection in hospital.
Objective To investigate the quality of the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) integrated with western medicine for severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS). Method All the randomized controlled trials of traditional Chinese medicine integrated with western medicine for SARS worldwide were gained by electronic searching and hand searching. The quality of the RCTs was analyzed by the quality grade evaluation used in Cochrane handbook.The sample size, the baseline data, the results indexes were also analyzed. Results Seven RCTs included 501 SARS cases were identified. The quality grade of one RCT is B, the other six RCTs were graded C. None pre-specified sample size. One RCT tested the differences of the baseline data by statistic method. One RCT reported quality of life as result index. None reported the adverse events.Conclusions Current RCTs of TCM integrated with western medicine can’t provide b evidence for clinical practice because of the poor quality.
At present, there are few studies on patients with epilepsy (PWE) and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), and the results of many studies are inconsistent. SARS-CoV-2 may cause new seizures through a variety of mechanisms, and the susceptibility and mortality of PWE to SARS-CoV-2 remains controversial. During the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, anxiety, depression and other psychological problems were common among epileptic patients. Clinicians providing telemedicine, telephone chat and video call can effectively reduce the risk of psychological disorders in PWE patients. At the same time, there are many interactions between antiepileptic drugs and various antiviral drugs, which should be carefully considered when using. Considering that the research results are few and many studies contradict each other, PWE and SARS-CoV-2 deserve further exploration in future studies.
The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 is characterized by a long incubation period, strong infectivity and general susceptibility to the population. At present, there are no specific medicines that can treat coronavirus disease 2019. In order to increase the understanding of the molecular biology of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 and try to find effective treatments, we used SnapGene Viewer to analyze the genomic sequences of five strains of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 that published by National Genomics Data Center. The results showed that the genome length of this virus was about 29.8 kb and twelve open reading frames were predicted, and five nucleotide change sites were found in the open reading frames. In addition, we analyzed drugs used during the outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome, current drugs for the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 and other possible drugs, to find some possible medicines with clinical treatment effects.
At present a better way for the treatment of SARS is to search and apply the best evidence that comes from the same kind of diseases and symptoms in the past and include personal experiences of clinicians. The intervention should be adjusted with the development of basic research. In this paper the important of projects are predicted and necessity of randomized controlled trials are discussed emphasizing scientific value of case reports and case series for such disease. It is essential to well justify priority and integrate resources for the trials against SARS.
Objective To analyze the effective measures to intercept the infection chain of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS), and to study the effective methods for prevention and control. Methods A total of 17 clinically diagnosed SARS cases, 6 suspect cases and 202 people closely contacted with case were dealt with differently according to appropriate criteria, and 144 medical staff was given timely safety measures. Results One of seventeenth cases was diagnosed after its death, and the rest were isolated and treated, and among them 1 died, 9 were cured, and 6 were improved obviously. Six suspect cases were separated and treated in hospital, 5 were cured and 1 improved obviously. Among 202 closely contacted people there were no the secondary infected cases, and neither among all the related medical staff and other people. Conclusion To analyze seriously the infection chain and take effective and feasible interceptive measures are the best approach to prevent and control the spread of SARS and avoid the occurrence of the secondary infected cases.
The diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 should not only depend on nucleic acid test, but also be based on clinical information such as medical history and radiographic findings. It’s critical to identify patients with high risk of rapid progression. Treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 should be individualized according to the underlying diseases and progression manner. For severely ill patients, oxygen and nutrition supplementation need to be strengthened, and for some highly selected cases, administration of glucocorticoids might be beneficial.
Objective To investigate the adverse drug reactions (ADRs) of patients with SARS in Xiao Tang Shan Hospital. Methods We developed and distributed Drug Use Handbook and established ADRs monitoring group to guide resaonable drug use. We followed up the process and collected clinical report on ADRs. We retrospectively analyzed the data on ADRs by the classification and grade of ADRs according to WHO and Hospital Information Sysytem (HIS) of Chinese PLA General Hospital. Results We collected 193 (87 males and 106 females) patients with ADRs among 680 SARS patients with incidence rate of ADRs of 28.38%. The ADRs incidence rate was higher in females and elders. Critical SARS patients and SARS patients with diabetes were more susceptible to ADRs. Large dosage and combination of drugs may induce ADRs. Steroids may be a main cause of ADRs. The ADRs incidence rate induced by injection was higher than that induced by all kinds of oral drugs. ADRs mainly happened in hematological, endocrine and digestive systems. Conclusion SARS patients are prescribed many kinds of medications. Large dosage of so many medications may lend to high incidence rate of ADRs. Steroid should be cautiously used in the treatment of SARS.
Currently, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is still widely prevalent around the world, leading to a major threat to the global public health. COVID-19 mainly involves the respiratory system, but extrapulmonary manifestations including that of the nervous system also exist in the setting of COVID-19. Misdiagnosis and delayed treatment of the disease may easily cause when ocular, especially neuro-ophthalmological symptoms are the first symptoms in early COVID-19, as the neuroophthalmological manifestations are rarely reported. First-line clinicians need to ask about not only respiratory symptoms such as fever, cough and sore throat, but also diplopia, impaired vision, eye motion pain, abnormal gait or other neurological deficits at the first reception, as these extrapulmonary manifestations are often signs of serious infection. The neuroophthalmological manifestations and possible underlying etiology of COVID-19 were summarized in this review, hoping to provide an early identification and effective treatment of COVID-19 for clinicians. More extensive studies are needed in the future to confirm the causal relationship between COVID-19 and neuroophthalmological disease to provide a sufficient basis for a comprehensive understanding of COVID-19.
