ObjectiveTo investigate the risk factors of carotid endarterectomy.MethodThe literatures about carotid artery stenosis in the past 30 years were screened through literature retrieval, and the study of surgical risk factors related to carotid artery stenosis were reviewed.ResultsThere were many risk factors associated with the carotid endarterectomy, including demographic, underlying disease, surgical factors, perioperative management, and so on. However, the risk factors analysis were not comprehensive enough in the current study, so there was still lack of effective methods to predict the surgical risk of carotid artery stenosis.ConclusionTo fully understand the risk factors of carotid endarterectomy and to establish a multi-factor prediction model is the direction of further research.
Objective To update available evidence on safety and efficacy of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) versus carotid artery stenting (CAS) in treatment of carotid artery stenosis by a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
Methods A comprehensive search was performed of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of science, WanFang, and CNKI databases (from January 1990 to July 2015), to collect articles and past systematic reviews, and then abstraced lists of recent scientific conferences which were related with safety and efficacy of CEA versus CAS in treatment of carotid artery stenosis. At last, Meta analysis was performed by RevMan 5.1 software.
Results Fifteen RCTs enrolling 9 828 patients were included in the Meta-analysis. Compared with CAS, CEA was associated with a significantly lower incidences of any stroke or death within 30 days after surgery (OR=0.63, 95% CI: 0.51-0.77, P＜0.05) and any stroke or death during follow-up, or ipsilateral stroke after 30 days of operation (OR=0.61, 95% CI: 0.48-0.76, P＜0.05）, but associated with a significantly greater incidences of myocardial infarction (OR=1.81, 95% CI: 1.14-2.87, P=0.01) and cranial neuropathy (OR=18.28, 95% CI: 7.99-41.82, P＜0.05) within 30 days after surgery.
Conclusion In comparison with CAS, CEA is associated with a lower incidences of stroke or death and a greater incidence of myocardial infarction and cranial neuropathy within 30 days after surgery, and was associated with a significantly lower incidence of any stroke or death during follow-up, or ipsilateral stroke after 30 days of operation. So the results of Meta-analysis support continued use of CEA as the standard method in treatment of carotid artery stenosis.
Objective To compare the early compl ications of carotid stenting (CAS) and carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in treatment of carotid artery stenosis. Methods Between January 2005 and December 2007, 63 patients with carotid artery stenosis were treated with CEA in 36 cases (CEA group) and with CAS in 27 cases (CAS group). There were 42 males and 21 females with an average age of 67.5 years (range, 52-79 years). The locations were the left side in 28 cases and the rightside in 35 cases. The carotid stenosis was 60%-95% (mean, 79%). The major cl inical symptoms were stroke and transient ischemic attack. The cranial CT showed old cerebral infarction in 24 cases, lacunar infarction in 22 cases, and no obvious abnormal change in 17 cases. The encephalon, heart, and local compl ications were compared between 2 groups within 7 days after operation. Results In CEA group, encephalon compl ications occurred in 3 cases (8.3%), heart compl ications in 2 cases (5.6%), and local compl ications in 5 cases (13.9%); while in CAS group, encephalon compl ications occurred in 8 cases (29.6%), heart compl ications in 1 case (3.7%), and local compl ications in 3 cases (11.1%). The encephalon compl ication ratio of CAS group was significantly higher than that of CEA group (χ2=4.855, P=0.028); and there was no significant difference in other compl ications ratios between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). Conclusion CEA is the first choice to treat carotid artery stenosis.
ObjectiveTo analyze the effect of carotid artery stenosis degree and intervention for carotid artery stenosis on the incidence of central nervous system complications after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCABG) and explore the influencing factors. MethodsA total of 1 150 patients undergoing OPCABG in our hospital from June 2018 to June 2021 were selected and divided into two groups according to whether there were central nervous system complications, including a central nervous system complication group [n=61, 43 males and 18 females with a median age of 68.0 (63.0, 74.0) years] and a non-central nervous system complication group [n=1 089, 796 males and 293 females with a median age of 65.5 (59.0, 70.0) years]. The risk factors for central nervous system complications after OPCABG were analyzed. ResultsUnivariate analysis showed that age, smoking, hyperlipidemia, preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction, intra-aortic ballon pump (IABP), postoperative arrhythmia, postoperative thoracotomy and blood transfusion volume were associated with central nervous system complications. The incidence of central nervous system complications in patients with severe carotid artery stenosis or occlusion (11.63%) was higher than that in the non-stenosis and mild stenosis patients (4.80%) and moderate stenosis patients (4.76%) with a statistical difference (P=0.038). The intervention for carotid artery stenosis before or during the operation did not reduce the incidence of central nervous system complications after the operation (42.11% vs. 2.99%, P<0.001). Age, postoperative arrhythmia, severe unilateral or bilateral carotid artery stenosis and occlusion were independent risk factors for postoperative central nervous system complications (P<0.05). Conclusion The age, smoking, hyperlipidemia, preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction, intraoperative use of IABP, postoperative arrhythmia, secondary thoracotomy after surgery, blood transfusion volume and OPCABG are associated with the incidence of postoperative central nervous system complications in patients. Age, postoperative arrhythmia, severe unilateral or bilateral carotid artery stenosis and occlusion are independent risk factors for postoperative central nervous system complications. In patients with severe carotid artery stenosis, preoperative treatment of the carotid artery will not reduce the incidence of central nervous system complications.
Objective To compare the long-term efficacy of carotid artery stenting (CAS) and carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in the treatment of carotid artery stenosis by meta-analysis. Methods PubMed, Embase, Medline, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang database, Chongqing VIP database, and SinoMed were searched, for randomized controlled trials comparing the efficacy of CAS and CEA in the treatment of carotid artery stenosis published before September 2nd, 2021. Stata 15.1 software was used to analyze the long-term outcome data, including any stroke, ipsilateral stroke, fatal or disabling stroke, any death, combined endpoint of stroke or death, and carotid artery restenosis. Results A total of 20 English articles from 9 studies were included, involving 8551 patients (4658 in the CAS group and 3893 in the CEA group). The medians of the follow-up time of these studies were 2-10 years. The meta-analysis showed that the risks of any stroke [hazard ratio (HR)=1.33, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.16, 1.52), P<0.0001], ipsilateral stroke [HR=1.26, 95%CI (1.02, 1.55), P=0.034], and the combined endpoint of stroke or death [HR=1.17, 95%CI (1.02, 1.33), P=0.021] in the CAS group were significantly higher than those in the CEA group, while the risks of fatal or disabling stroke [HR=1.19, 95%CI (0.94, 1.51), P=0.152], any death [HR=1.06, 95%CI (0.95, 1.18), P=0.302], and restenosis [HR=1.20, 95%CI (0.96, 1.49), P=0.111] were not significantly different between the CAS group and the CEA group. Conclusions CAS and CEA have similar risks in terms of long-term fatal or disabling stroke, death, and carotid artery restenosis, but the long-term risks of any stroke, ipsilateral stroke and combined endpoint of death or stroke of CAS are higher than those of CEA. CEA is still the preferred non-drug method for carotid artery stenosis.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the safety, efficacy, and advantages of transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) in patients with high-risk carotid artery stenosis. MethodsThe patient was a 76-year-old male with severe symptomatic stenosis of the right internal carotid artery, complicated by multiple high-risk factors (such as cardiac insufficiency, history of coronary stent implantation, aortic calcification). Given his unsuitability for carotid endarterectomy and the high perioperative risk associated with transfemoral carotid artery stenting, TCAR was performed. The procedure involved puncturing the common carotid artery via a small cervical incision to establish a temporary carotid-to-femoral venous reversed-flow pathway. Following balloon predilation, a stent was deployed, and the reversed-flow system was used to divert potential plaque debris outward, thereby reducing the risk of intraoperative cerebral embolism. ResultsThe procedure was completed successfully. The operation time was approximately 70 min, the estimated blood loss was 20 mL. Postoperatively, the patient did not experience complications such as stroke, neurological deficit, or hyperperfusion syndrome. Although carotid sinus reflex-induced hypotension occurred, which stabilized after pharmacological management. The results of following-up at 3 months showed the stent was patent with no evidence of in-stent restenosis. ConclusionsThe findings of this case indicate that TCAR combines the cerebral protection advantages of carotid endarterectomy with the minimally invasive features of transfemoral carotid artery stenting. Its reversed-flow mechanism helps effectively prevent intraoperative embolism, offering a safe and viable revascularization option for patients with high-risk carotid artery stenosis.
Objective
To investigate the clinical characteristics and mechanisms of ocular manifestations
related to carotid artery stenosis.
Methods
The general clinic data and related ocular manifestations in 124 patients with
carotid artery stenosis were retrospectively.
Results
In the 124 patients, 36 (29%) had ocular manifestations, and 28 (22. 6 %)
complained the ocular discomfort as the first symptom. Among the 36 patients,
31 patients (86.1%) had been disclosed unilateral or double stenosis of internal
carotid artery by carotid Doppler ultrasound examination, and the result of digital subtract angiography revealed middle and severe degree of internal carotid artery stenosis in 8 and 23 patients respectively. There was no statistic difference of incidence of ocular manifestations between 67 patients of severe internal carotid artery stenosis and 34 patients with middle one（chi;２test,P =0.266 2，P＞0.05). The ocular manifestations included amaurosis fugax (52.8%),acute decline or loss of the visual ability and defect of visual fields (36.1%), binocular diplopia (13.9%), ptosis (13.9%), and persistent high intraocular pressure(2.8%) one patient might had several ocular manifestations simultaneously. In 36 patients, central retinal artery occlusion had been diagnosed in 4, venous stasis retinopathy in 1,central or branch retinal vein occlusion in 6, neovascular glaucoma in 1, and anterior ischemic opticneuropathy in 2. One patient with double occlusion of internal carotid artery didnrsquo;t have any ocular manifestation.
Conclusion
Carotid artery stenosis, especially internal carotid artery may lead to acute or
chronic ocular ischemic lesions, and the occurrence of ocular manifestations in
chronic ocular ischemic lesions relates to compensa tion of collateral circulation；patients with ocular ischemic lesions are recomm end to undergo a routine carotid artery examination.
(Chin J Ocul Fundus Dis, 2006,22:376-378)
ObjectiveTo analyze the short-term and long-term efficacy of staged coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and carotid artery stenting (CAS) compared with CABG alone in patients with coronary heart disease with preoperative history of stroke and carotid stenosis. MethodsWe reviewed the clinical data of 55 patients (48 males, 7 females, aged 67.62±7.06 years) with coronary heart disease and carotid stenosis who had a history of stroke and underwent CABG+CAS or CABG alone in Zhongshan Hospital from 2008 to 2017. There were 13 patients in the staged CABG+CAS group and 42 patients in the CABG alone group. The differences in the incidence of perioperative adverse events and long-term survival between the two groups were studied, and univariate and multivariate analyses were carried out to determine the independent risk factors of long-term adverse events. Results Perioperative adverse events occurred in 1 (7.69%) patient of the staged CABG+CAS group, and 4 (9.52%) patients of the CABG alone group (P=0.84). During the follow-up period (67.84±37.99 months), the long-term survival rate of patients in the staged CABG+CAS group was significantly higher than that in the CABG alone group (P=0.02). The risk of long-term adverse events in the staged CABG+CAS group was 0.22 times higher than that in the CABG alone group (95%CI 0.05-0.92, P=0.04). ConclusionStaged CABG+CAS can significantly improve the long-term survival prognosis without increasing the perioperative risk. It is a safe and effective treatment, but prospective randomized studies are still needed to further confirm this finding.
ObjectiveTo explore the treatment outcome of carotid endarterectomy combined with vertebral artery transposition in patients with severe stenosis to occlusion of the vertebral artery V1 segment and the ipsilateral carotid artery.MethodsFrom June 2017 to September 2020, patients with severe stenosis to occlusion of the vertebral artery V1 segment and the ipsilateral carotid artery treated with carotid endarterectomy combined with vertebral artery transposition in Fuwai Hospital were retrospectively analyzed.ResultsFinally 12 patients were enrolled, including 10 males and 2 females with an average age of 67.8±6.0 years. Twelve patients were successfully operated and the follow-up time was 1-3 years. The stenosis degree of the V1 segment of the vertebral artery decreased from 83.5%±11.8% to 24.9%±14.3% (P＜0.001). The stenosis degree of carotid artery decreased from 85.6%±11.0% to 0% (P＜0.001). Postoperative follow-up showed that the symptoms of symptomatic patients before surgery improved. The 1-year and 3-year patency rates were 100.0%, and there were no peripheral nerve injury complications, perioperative deaths or strokes.ConclusionCarotid endarterectomy combined with vertebral artery transposition can treat ipsilateral carotid artery stenosis and vertebral artery stenosis at the same time, improve blood supply to the brain, improve patients' symptoms and has high promotion value.
ObjectiveTo summarize the experience in treating the elderly patients (≥75 years old) with carotid artery stenosis, and to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the carotid endarterectomy (CEA).
MethodsThe datum of 312 cases with carotid artery stenosis and underwent the CEA in the vascular surgery department of Peking Union Medical College Hospital from October 2009 to October 2012 were retrospectively analized.The risk factors of the CEA in treating the elderly patients were analized, and the measures to prevent perioperative complications were discussed.
ResultsThirty-nine cases were brought into the research.The mean follow-up was (22.18±8.71) months.Thirty-three cases (84.6%) were male and 6 cases (15.4%) were female.The median age was 77 years old (75-82 years old).Eleven cases (28.2%) were with bilateral lesions, and 7 cases (17.9%) were asymptomatic.A total of 39 CEA procedures were successfully performed, 22 artificial vascular patches (56.4%) and 16 shunts (41.0%) were used.The mean average hospital stay was (17.38±5.39) days.One case showed cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome in 2th day after operation, another 1 case was found ipsilateral restenosis in 15th month after operation.
ConclusionCEA is a safe and effective measure in treating the elderly patients with carotid artery stenosis, if the the indications of surgery is performed strictly.
