摘要:目的:探討有機磷農藥中毒患者阿托品使用方法,提高搶救成功率。方法: 對2005年6月至2009年6月我院收治的有機磷農藥中毒病人281例進行分組,所有患者均使用阿托品療法,A組為2007年以后132例序貫阿托品療法患者,B組2007年以前為常規使用靜推繼之肌注阿托品療法149例患者,根據有機磷農藥對膽堿酯酶復能劑的療效分為高效組和低效組,并結合病情嚴重程度共分為重度有機磷農藥中毒膽堿酯酶復能劑高效組、重度有機磷農藥中毒膽堿酯酶復能劑低效組,輕度有機磷農藥中毒膽堿酯酶復能劑高效組、輕度有機磷農藥中毒膽堿酯酶復能劑低效組4組,分別從達到阿托品化時間、維持阿托品化效果、反跳和中間綜合征發生率、開始撤藥平均時間、總住院費用、總住院平均時間、護士勞動強度進行總結和分析。結果: 維持阿托品化療效Ａ組與B組間有顯著差異,P值lt;0.01,開始撤藥平均時間、總住院平均時間、總住院費用、護士勞動強度Ａ組與B組間均有差異,P值lt;0.05,發生反跳和中間綜合征發生率、達到阿托品化時間在高效組間比較無差異,低效組間比較無差異,高效組與低效組比較有顯著差異,P值lt;0.01,主要與中毒藥物種類和病情嚴重程度有關,其次與阿托品治療方法有關。 結論: 序貫阿托品療法治療有機磷農藥中毒優于常規使用靜推繼之肌注阿托品療法。Abstract: Objective: To discussion of atropine in organophosphorus pesticide poisoning patients with the use of two different methods to improve the success rate. Methods: For June 2005 to June 2009 inour hospital a total of organophosphorus pesticide poisoning 281 cases were divided into A group and B group, All patients were using atropine therapy, 132 cases of sequential therapy in patients with atropine is divided into A group, 149 cases of routine use of intravenous injection and intramuscular injection of atropine group patients were divided into B group, From the following aspects were analyzed and summarized, They are the maintenance of the effect of atropinization, the average time for the beginning of withdrawal, the total hospitalization costs, the total average time for hospitalization and nurses labor intensity. According to the organic phosphorus pesticide on the efficacy of cholinesterase agents are divided into efficient and inefficient groups groups, From the types of poisons, toxic ways, poisoning performance and Complications for stratified, They were divided into 4 groups, severe organophosphorus pesticide poisoning and cholinesterase reactivator can be highly effective group, severe organophosphorus pesticide poisoning and cholinesterase reactivator Lowefficacy group, mild organophosphorus pesticide poisoning and cholinesterase reactivator can be highly effective group, mild organophosphorus pesticide poisoning and cholinesterase reactivator Lowefficacy group, Correlation analysis Antijumping and the incidence of intermediate syndrome and atropinization time.Results:Maintain the efficacy of atropine of A group and B were significantly different between groups, Plt;0.01, the average time began to withdraw drugs, the total average time for hospitalization, total hospital charges, nursing labor intensity of A group and B are differences between the two groups, P＜0.05. Rebound occurs and the incidence of intermediate syndrome, to atropinization time high between the two groups showed no difference between the two groups showed no differences between inefficient and efficient group and inefficient group were significantly different, Plt;0.01, mainly related to poisoning by drug type and severity of illness, followed with atropine therapy. Conclusion:Atropine sequential therapy is superior to organophosphorus pesticide poisoning by conventional atropine treatmen.
ObjectiveTo observe the clinical efficacy of triple aerosol inhalation of pulmicort respules,ipratropine and ventolin in treatment of severe acute asthma exacerbations in adults.
Methods46 cases of severe asthmatic patients with acute exacerbations admitted between May 2011 and May 2013 were recruited in the study.They were randomly divided into a treatment group and a control group,23 cases in each group.The control group received aminophylline and methylprednisolone intravenously,while the treatment group received triple aerosol inhalation of pulmicort respules,ipratropine and ventolin on the basic treatment of the control group.The clinical efficacy,the score of asthma symptom of the day and night,the time of disappearance of symptoms and wheezing sound,the glucocorticoid dosage and the incidence of adverse reactions of each group were compared.
ResultsComparison of clinical efficacy of two groups drew significant differences (P<0.05) after 7 days.The score of asthma symptom of the day and night in the treatment group was lower than that of the control group (P<0.05).Except cough,the duration of wheezing,breathlessness,chest distress and extinction time of wheezing sound in the treatment group were shorter than those in the control group (P<0.05).The triple inhalation therapy can reduce the dosage and shorten the period of intravenous glucocorticoid treatment with slight adverse reactions (P<0.05).
ConclusionIn the treatment of severe asthmatic patients with acute exacerbations,the clinical efficacy of triple aerosol inhalation of pulmicort respules,ipratropine and ventolin on the base of intravenous treatment is satisfactory with rapid onset,which can also reduce the glucocorticoid dosage and the incidence of adverse reactions.So the combination therapy is worthy of clinical use.
