Objective To discuss venous drainage types of median hepatic lobe and their guiding significances on the selection of grafts. Methods Between April 2005 and March 2009, 109 potential living donors underwent 3-dimensional reconstruction of computed tomography (CT) and the volume of graft was determined in the center of organ transplantation of Ruijin Hospital. The venous drainage types of median hepatic lobe of each donor were analyzed by the computer-based liver operation-planning system in detail to assign middle hepatic vein (MHV) types according to Marcos classification and venous types of Ⅳb segment according to Nakamura classification. Results The branching pattern of MHV was divided into 3 types: Type Ⅰ and Ⅱwere relatively more accounting for 44.0% （48/109）, 37.6% （41/109）, and type Ⅲ was fewest 〔18.3% （20/109）〕. There were no significant differences in volume of whole liver, volume of left liver or left liver/total liver volume ratio among various types of MHV of the donor (Pgt;0.05). Ⅳb vein was also divided into 3 types: The most common was type Ⅰ, accounting for 72.4% (79/109); Type Ⅱ 〔12.8% （14/109）〕, type Ⅲ 〔14.7% （16/109）〕 were relatively fewer. At last, 37 donors provided right liver, for Marcos Ⅰ, Ⅱ, and Ⅲ type of donors, donors remained with MHV was 12/17, 8/11, and 5/9; for Nakamura Ⅰ, Ⅱ, and Ⅲ type of donors, those number were 16/26, 4/6, and 5/5. Conclusion In adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation, there may be great significances in accordance with Marcos and Nakamura typing results to harvest right lobe liver graft with or without MHV.
Objective To report our experience in living donor liver harvesting of right lobe grafts. MethodsThe data of 76 living donors of right lobe grafts hepatectomy between August 2007 and December 2008 were studied. Before operation, the graft size, remnant liver volume rate, fatty liver, middle hepatic vein type, and the level of portal hypertension of recipient were comprehensive assessed to determine whether harvested middle hepatic vein. The graft was harvested depending on the port vein and hepatic artery ischemia-line. B-ultrasound was used to definite the structure and branch of middle hepatic vein, and intraoperative cholangiography was performed to definite the structure and variation of bile duct. Donor operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, levels of bilirubin, international normalized ratio （INR）, and ALT, and complications after operation were recorded. Results All the operations were successful. The operative time was (8.3±1.3) h, the blood loss was (325±127) ml without blood transfusion in operation. The ALT, INR, and bilirubin recovered on the 12th day. The most common complication in early post-operation was wound infection in 5 cases, 4 cases had cholestasis, 4 cases occurred cross-section bile leakage, and 11 cases occurred varying degrees of delayed gastric emptying in 4～7 d after operation, who were all alleviated by corresponding treatments. The hospital stay was 9～21 d (median: 14 d) after operation. Conclusion Preoperative evaluation of the hepatic anatomy and precise surgical procedure are crucial, which will help the development of graft harvesting and rehabilitation of donor.
Objective To approach whether the postoperative recovery processes of the living donors and hepaticpatients after right hepatectomy is similar. Methods The clinical data of consecutive cases from 2009 to 2010 in our liver transplantation center was retrospectively analyzed， including 40 cases who donated the right lobe without the middlehepatic vein （living donor liver transpalntation-donor group， abbreviated as LDLT-D group） and 80 hepatic patients forright hepatectomy， in which 40 cases were hepatic patients without cirrhosis （liver disease-noncirrhosis group， abbreviatedas LD-NC group） and 40 cases were hepatic patients with cirrhosis （liver disease-with cirrhosis group， abbreviated asLD-WC group）. Preoperative liver function and general clinical data， intraoperative blood loss and transfusion， postoper-ative liver function， and complications were statistically analyzed in this study. Results The preoperative parameters of three groups were comparable. LDLT-D group experienced more intraoperative bleeding than LD-NC group 〔（765±411） mL vs. （584±242） mL， P=0.008〕， and was similar to LD-WC group 〔（666±224） mL， P=0.136〕. However， the average amount of blood transfusion products was similar among the 3 groups （P=0.108）. The levels of total bilirubin and INR of LDLT-D group were higher than LD-NC group and LD-WC group on the first and third day after operation （P＜0.05）. The levels of ALT and AST of LD-WC group were higher than LDLT-D group and LD-NC group （P＜0.05）. The overall postoperative surgical morbidity incidence of LDLT-D group， LD-NC group， and LD-WC group were 30.0%（12/40）， 27.5% （11/40）， and 37.5% （15/40） respectively， and were not statistically significant （P=0.606）. However， the ClavienⅢcomplication rate of LD-WC group was higher than LDLT-D group and LD-NC group 〔27.5% （11/40） vs. 7.5%（3/40） and 10.0% （4/40）， P=0.024〕. Conclusions Liver function of living donors is injured more seriously during the early postoperative period. The total complication rates after right hepatectomy are similar among the living liver donation and hepatic patients with or without cirrhosis. However， the serious complication rate of cirrhotic liver recipients is higher than living donors and patients without cirrhosis.
【Abstract】ObjectiveThe growing gap between the number of patients waiting for transplantation and available organs has continued to be the number one issue facing the transplant community. The major limitation of adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is the adequacy of the graft size. But donor safety is the major concern in LDLT. Methods Two patients with end-stage liver disease were successfully performed adult-to-adult LDLT using dual grafts in our division. One patient’s donors are left lobe and left lobe from his two old sisters , respectively. The other graft are right lobe from his 56 years-old mother and left lobe splitting from a cadaveric organ donor (the other part of split-liver transplants from the the cadaveric organ donor offer to another adult donor ). Results Both recipients and three donors display good graft function and normal triangularshape regeneration of their liver grafts after liver transplantation. There was neither a mortality nor a serious complications in the donors. Conclusion The critical issue of LDLT is donor morbidity. Dual grafts from two living donors can help to alleviate the problem of small-for-size grafts and yet secure the safety of the donor. But the complicated surgical technique give a great challenge for liver transplant surgeons.
ObjectiveTo summarize the clinical progress on living related liver transplantation (LRLT). MethodsThe latest progress were reviewed based on recent documents and the experience on LRLT in our department. ResultsLRLT made much progress on evaluation of donor, harvesting the graft liver, donor health assessment and outcomes after living donor liver transplantation, and main factors affecting the survival of liver graft and so on. Conclusion Living related liver transplantation has many unsurpassable advantages, which suits the situation of China and has capacious clinical application.
Lung transplantation is the only treatment for patients with end-stage lung diseases. And this field is also a research hotspot in the international field at presen. Relevant researches not only promote the progress and development of lung transplantation, but also improve the life quality of patients after transplantation. With the development of lung transplantation technology, the guidelines for identifying candidates are constantly being revised, and the source of donor lungs has always been an urgent problem for all transplantation centers. The standardized management during transplantation period involves anesthesia induction, intraoperative fluid management, airway management, management of important operative steps and postoperative pain management. Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) includes cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). With the progress and development of ECLS technology, the advantages of ECMO as a bridge for lung transplantation, intraoperative and postoperative circulatory support are becoming more and more prominent, enabling recipient patients to successfully pass the period of lung transplantation. Although lung transplantation in basic science and clinical researches has got a lot of progress, to improve the survival rate after transplantation, we must overcome many challenges including how to successfully perform lung transplantation, expand lung donor library, induce tolerance, and prevent complications after transplantation, primary graft dysfunction (PGD), cell and antibody mediated rejection and infection.
Objective To investigate the effectiveness of free vascularized fibula grafting with unilateral fibula as donor in treatment of bilateral avascular necrosis of femoral head (ANFH). Methods Between June 2007 and January 2008, 14 patients with bilateral ANFH were treated with free vascularized fibula grafting with unilateral fibula as donor. There were 12males and 2 females with an average age of 36.6 years (range, 17-57 years). The necrosis was caused by use of steroids in 3 cases, consumption of alcohol in 4 cases, and idiopathic condition in 7 cases. According to Steinberg system, 16 hips were classified as stage II, 10 hips as stage III, and 2 hips as stage IV. The preoperative Harris hip scores were 77.50 ± 4.19, 69.70 ± 2.76, 59.50 ± 0.50 in patients at stages II, III, and IV, respectively. The duration of operation and the bleeding volume were recorded. The X-ray examination, the Harris hip score, and the compl ications were used to evaluate the effectiveness. Results The duration of the fibula osteotomy was 10-32 minutes (mean, 20 minutes). The duration of the total operation was 100-240 minutes (mean, 140 minutes). The bleeding volume was 200-500 mL (mean, 280 mL). All patients achieved heal ing of incision by first intention. The patients were followed up 12-40 months (mean, 24 months). One case had numbness and hyperthesia of the anterolateral thigh; 1 case had abnormal sensation of the dorsal foot; 1 case had discomfort of the ankle; and they restored to normal at 1 year after operation. According to X-ray films 1 year after operation, the improvement was achieved in 23 hi ps (82.1%) and no deterioration in 5 hips (17.9%). At 1 year after operation, the Harris hip scores were 93.90 ± 4.84, 88.50 ± 8.13, and 78.00 ± 0.00 inpatients at stages II, III, and IV, respectively, showing significant differences when compared with preoperative ones (P lt; 0.05). Conclusion Unilateral free vascularized fibula grafting has lots of virtues, such as short surgical time, less bleeding volume, l ittle injury, and good results of function recovery. It could be an effective and safe method in treating bilateral ANFH.
【Abstract】ObjectiveTo study the advances in use of imaging in the evaluation of living donor liver. Methods The literatures in recent years on the use of imaging in evaluation of living donor liver were reviewed. ResultsPreoperative computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the donor allowed accurate determination of liver volume and rough determination of macrovesicular hepatic steatosis of the liver. CT angiography could assess the anatomy of hepatic artery, portal vein and hepatic veins. Intraoperative cholangiography allowed detection of the anatomy of the biliary tree. ConclusionImaging techniques are widely used in the evaluation of liver volume, vasculature and biliary system in the living donor liver.
Lung transplantation has developed in China for nearly half a century. The Wuxi lung transplant team completed our first lung transplantation on September 28, 2002. By the year of 2021, the total number of lung transplantation in China has been increased to 775, while 49 medical centers have been qualified to perform lung transplantation. During the past two decades, we vigorously promoted lung transplantation technique, cooperated and communicated with colleagues in relevant specialties. Thus, more and more patients with end-stage lung diseases could be evaluated and transplanted to save their lives, with the support of medical insurance and funds. The full-process monitoring and staged objective management, have been well established regarding to donor evaluation standards and acquisition procedures, the green channel for organ transportation, postoperative intensive care unit management, prevention of rejection and infection, as well as long-term follow-up of recipients. Based on the classical lung transplantation surgical techniques, technical breakthroughs have been made while the public’s acknowledgement of lung transplantation has been also enhanced. In the future, lung transplantation techniques will be increasingly challenged by new technologies and ethics, bringing diversified opportunities and challenges to the lung transplantation team collaboration.
Heart transplantation remains the most effective treatment for patients with end-stage heart failure. Over the past decade, significant advancements have been made in the field of heart transplant surgery. However, the enormous demand from heart failure patients and the severe shortage of available donor hearts continue to be major obstacles to the widespread application of heart transplantation. With the development of donor heart recovery, preservation, and evaluation techniques, the use of extended criteria donors and donation after circulatory death has increased. These technological advancements have expanded the safe ischemic time and geographic range for donor heart procurement, significantly enlarging the donor pool and driving a rapid increase in heart transplant cases. Concurrently, many new techniques have emerged in heart transplant surgery and perioperative management, particularly the rapid advancements in mechanical circulatory support and artificial intelligence, which hold the potential to revolutionize the field. This article reviews and discusses the current status and major surgical advancements in adult heart transplantation in the United States, aiming to provide insights and stimulate ongoing exploration and innovation in this field.
