Objective
To evaluate the security and outcomes of thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy (TLE) versus open approach (OA) for thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Methods
From June 2014 to June 2015, 125 patients with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma underwent esophagectomy through McKeown approach, including TLE (a TLE group, 107 patients, 77 males and 30 females) and OA (an OA group, 18 patients, 13 males and 5 females). The data of operation and postoperative complications of the two groups were analyzed retrospectively.
Results
There was no statistical difference in the duration of operation and ICU stay and resected lymph nodes around laryngeal recurrent nerve between the TLE group and the OA group (333.58±72.84 min vs. 369.17±91.24 min, P=0.067; 2.84±1.44 d vs. 6.44±13.46 d, P=0.272; 4.71±3.87 vs. 3.89±3.97, P=0.408) . There was a statistical difference in blood loss, total resected lymph nodes and resected lymph nodes groups between TLE group and OA group (222.62±139.77 ml vs. 427.78±276.65, P=0.006; 19.62±9.61 vs. 14.61±8.07, P=0.038; 3.70±0.99 vs. 3.11±1.13, P=0.024). The rate of postoperative complications was 32.7% in the TLE group and 38.9% in the OA group (P=0.608). There was a statistical difference (P=0.011) in incidence of pulmonary infection (2.8% in the TLE group and 16.7% in the OA group). Incidences of complications, such as anastomotic leakage, cardiac complications, left-side hydrothorax, right-side pneumothorax, voice hoarse and incision infection, showed no statistical difference between two groups.
Conclusion
For patients with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, TLE possesses advantages of more harvested lymph nodes, less blood loss and less pulmonary infection comparing with open approach, and is complied with the principles of security and oncological radicality of surgery.
ObjectiveTo compare the clinical efficacy of modified Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy, which preserves azygos vein, thoracic duct and peripheral tissues, and classic Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy, which resects these tissues, in the treatment of esophageal cancer, so as to evaluate whether it is necessary to resect azygos vein, thoracic duct and peripheral tissues in esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.MethodsPatients scheduled for surgical treatment of thoracic esophageal cancer in Department of Thoracic Surgery of Sichuan Cancer Hospital from June 2011 to June 2013 were randomly assigned to the retention group and the resection group, each including 100 patients. The retention group included 87 males and 13 females with an average age of 60.53±7.72 years. In the resection group, there were 80 males and 20 females with an average age of 60.69±7.69 years. Patients in the two groups were compared for the duration of surgery, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative thoracic drainage volume, postoperative complications, and number of dissected lymph nodes, etc. Postoperative relapse and survival rates at 1, 3 and 5 years postoperatively were also followed up and compared for patients in the two groups.ResultsThere was no statistical difference between the two groups in general patient characteristics, number of dissected lymph nodes, or postoperative pathological stage, etc. (P>0.05). Compared to the resection group, there were shorter duration of surgery, less intraoperative blood loss, and less thoracic drainage volume in the first 3 days following surgery in the retention group, with statistical differences (P<0.05). There was no statistical difference between the two groups in type or site of relapse or metastasis (P>0.05). The survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years postoperatively was 78.7% vs. 81.3%, 39.4% vs. 37.5%, and 23.4% vs. 17.7%, respectively, in the retention group and the resection group, with no statistical difference (P>0.05).ConclusionModified Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy preserving azygos vein, thoracic duct and peripheral tissues could reduce surgical trauma, would not increase postoperative relapse or metastasis, and could produce long-term efficacy comparable to that of extended resection.
Neoadjuvant therapy has become the standard treatment for locally advanced resectable esophageal cancer, significantly improving long-term survival compared to surgery alone. Neoadjuvant therapy has evolved to include various strategies, such as concurrent chemoradiotherapy, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or targeted combination therapy. This enriches clinical treatment options and provides a more personalized and scientific treatment approach for patients. This article aims to comprehensively summarize current academic research hot topics, review the rationale and evaluation measures of neoadjuvant therapy, discuss challenges in restaging methods after neoadjuvant therapy, and identify the advantages and disadvantages of various neoadjuvant therapeutic strategies.
ObjectiveTo investigate the prognostic survival status and influence factors for surgical treatment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) in pathological stage T1b (pT1b).MethodsThe patients with ESCC in pT1b undergoing Ivor-Lewis or McKeown esophagectomy in Lanzhou University Second Hospital from 2012 to 2015 were collected, including 78 males (78.3%) and 17 females (21.7%) with an average age of 61.4±7.4 years.ResultsThe most common postoperative complications were pneumonia (15.8%), anastomotic leakage (12.6%) and arrhythmia (8.4%). Ninety-three (97.9%) patients underwent R0 resection, with an average number of lymph node dissections of 14.4±5.6. The rate of lymph node metastasis was 22.1%, and the incidence of lymph vessel invasion was 13.7%. The median follow-up time was 60.4 months, during which 25 patients died and 27 patients relapsed. The overall survival rate at 3 years was 86.3%, and at 5 years was 72.7%. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that lymph node metastasis (P=0.012, HR=2.60, 95%CI 1.23-5.50) and lympovascular invasion (P=0.014, HR=2.73, 95%CI 1.22-6.09) were independent risk factors for overall survival of pT1b ESCC.ConclusionEsophagectomy via right chest approach combined with two-fields lymphadenectomy is safe and feasible for patients with pT1b ESCC. The progress of pT1b ESCC with lymph node metastasis or lymphovascular invasion is relatively poor.
Objective
To compare the outcome of tubular stomach and cervical esophagus laminated anastomosis and mechanical anastomosis.
Methods
A total of 128 patients with middle and upper esophageal cancer in our hospital from January 2013 to January 2016 were randomly divided into two groups, 64 patients in each group and all patients underwent esophagectomy. In the group A, there were 46 males and 18 females with age of 40–75 years, treated with tubular stomach and cervical esophagus layered anastomosis. There were 51 males and 13 females with age of 43–71 years in the group B receiving mechanical anastomosis. We observed the short-term and long-term efficacy as well as complications.
Results
In the group A, there was cervical anastomotic fistula in 1 patient, anastomotic stenosis in 2 patients and reflux esophagitis in 12 patients. In the group B, 1 patient suffered chylothorax, 8 patients cervical anastomotic fistula, 4 patients anastomotic stenosis and 14 patients reflux esophagitis.
Conclusion
Layered anastomosis can effectively reduce the incidence of anastomotic fistula and stenosis. Tubular stomach can effectively prevent and reduce the reflux esophagitis, and the high long-term quality of life will be achieved after the operation.
ObjectiveTo explore the incidence and influencing factors of moderate-to-poor quality of recovery (QoR) in patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE). MethodsA secondary analysis was conducted based on data from a randomized controlled study on the effects of different anesthesia methods on postoperative pulmonary complications after MIE. Patients who underwent elective MIE at West China Hospital of Sichuan University from May 2019 to December 2021 were included. The QoR-15 scale was used to assess the QoR 30 days postoperatively, and logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors affecting moderate-to-poor QoR (defined as a QoR-15 score≤121). ResultsA total of 541 patients were included, including 426 males and 115 females, with an average age of (63.0±8.3) years. At 30 days postoperatively, the numbers of patients with excellent, good, moderate, and poor QoR were 101 (18.7%), 273 (50.5%), 147 (27.2%), and 20 (3.7%), respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that preoperative pain [OR=1.527, 95%CI (1.032, 2.258), P=0.034] and a nutrition risk screening-2002 score≥3 [OR=1.617, 95%CI (1.069, 2.447), P=0.023] were influencing factors for moderate-to-poor QoR 30 days postoperatively. ConclusionAbout 30.9% of patients undergoing MIE have a moderate-to-poor QoR 30 days postoperatively. Improving preoperative pain management and nutritional status may enhance postoperative QoR.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the prognostic value of preoperative inflammatory indexes in patients with local-advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical and prognostic data of 150 local-advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients who were treated by esophagectomy in Guangyuan Central Hospital from July 2014 to July 2015. There were 128 males and 22 females with average age of 62.23±8.48 years. The optimal cutoff value was determined by receiver operation characteristics (ROC) curve analysis. Patients were grouped according to the optimal cutoff values (NLR=3.49, PLR=152.28, MLR=0.36). Log-rank test, and multivariate Cox logistic regression modelling were used to assess the simultaneous influences of prognostic factors for survival outcomes after esophagectomy.ResultsThe patients with higher ratio (NLR>3.49, PLR>152.28, MLR>0.36) had significantly shorter median progression free survival (PFS) and lower postoperative recurrent rate than those of the patients with lower ratio. The stratified analyses found that thelymph node staging and postoperative recurrent rate were positively correlated with the higher ratio. However, the tumor differentiation was negatively correlated with it. In univariate analyses, patients with preoperative NLR>3.49, PLR>152.28 and MLR>0.36 had a poorer prognosis. Furthermore, in multivariate analyses we found MLR>0.36 was also significantly associated with a decreased postoperative recurrent rate (HR=12.945, 95%CI 2.31 to 72.548, P=0.00).ConclusionsThe preoperative NLR, PLR and MLR are useful prognostic markers in patients with stage ⅢA-ⅣA esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who conducted esophagectomy.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the safety, feasibility and short-term outcomes of single-direction gastric mobilization under 3D-laparoscopy in minimally invasive esophagectomy for the treatment of esophageal cancer.MethodsFrom February 2018 to December 2019, 118 consecutive patients who underwent minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in our hospital were included. There were 94 males and 24 females with an average age of 53.7 (41–77) years. They were divided into two groups based on the methods of gastric mobilization: a traditional dissociation (TD) group (n=55) and a single-direction mobilization (MD) group (n=63). The clinical data of the two groups were compared.ResultsEnbloc resection and a negative resection margin were obtained in all patients. There was no postoperative mortality or incision complication. The rate of postoperative complications was 22.9%. There was no significant difference in the spleen injury, gastric injury, conversion to open surgery, abdominal reoperation as well as cervical anastomotic leakage between the two groups (P>0.05). It took significantly less time in the MD group compared with the TD group (P<0.05). There was an obvious statistical difference in the incidence of gastric mobilization related complications between the MD group (1.6%, 1/63) and TD group (12.7%, 7/55, P<0.05).ConclusionApplication of single-direction gastric mobilization under 3D-laparoscopy in minimally invasive esophagectomy for the treatment of esophageal cancer is safe and easy to perform with a satisfactory short-term outcome.
Objective
To analyze the clinical characteristics of patients treated with esophagectomy following endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early stage esophageal cancer or precancerosis and the reasons for esophagectomy.
Methods
We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 57 patients who were treated with esophagectomy following ESD in West China Hospital and Shanxian Hygeia Hospital from January 2012 through October 2016. There were 42 males and 15 females at age of 65.4 (52–77) years. There were 15 patients of upper thoracic lesions, the middle thoracic lesions in 34 patients, and the lower thoracic lesions in 8 patients.
Results
The reasons for esophagectomy included 3 patients with residual tumor, 8 patients with local recurrence, 37 patients with esophageal stricture, and 9 patients with dysphagia, although the diameter was larger than 1.0 cm. The pathology after esophagectomy revealed that tumor was found in 16 patients, including 3 patients with residual tumor and 8 with recurrent tumor confirmed before esophagectomy, and 5 patients with new-found recurrent tumor.
Conclusion
In the treatment of early stage esophageal cancer or precancerosis, the major reasons for esophagectomy following ESD include esophageal stricture, abnormal esophageal dynamics, local residual or recurrence.
ObjectiveTo explore the effect of mediastinal drainage tube placed after the esophageal cancer resection with intrathoracic anastomosis on postoperative complications such as anastomotic fistula. MethodsLiterature on the application of mediastinal drainage tubes in esophageal cancer surgery published in databases such as PubMed, EMbase, CNKI, China Biomedical Literature Database, VIP, and Wanfang were searched using English or Chinese, from the establishment of the databases to December 31, 2023. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to evaluate the quality of the included retrospective studies, the Cochrane Handbook bias risk tool was used to assess the bias risk of randomized controlled trials (RCT), and Review Manager 5.4 software was used for meta-analysis. ResultsA total of 19 retrospective studies and 8 RCT involving 6320 patients were included, with 3257 patients in the observation group (mediastinal drainage tube+closed thoracic drainage tube) and 3063 patients in the control group (closed thoracic drainage tube or single mediastinal drainage tube). The NOS score of the included literature was≥6 points, and one RCT had a low risk of bias and the other RCT had a moderate risk of bias . Meta-analysis results showed that compared with the control group, the observation group had fewer postoperative lung complications [OR=0.44, 95%CI (0.36, 0.53), P<0.001], fewer postoperative cardiac complications [OR=0.40, 95%CI (0.33, 0.49), P<0.001], earlier average diagnosis time of anastomotic fistula [MD=?3.33, 95%CI (?3.95, ?2.71), P<0.001], lower inflammation indicators [body temperature: MD=?1.15, 95%CI (?1.36, ?0.93), P<0.001; white cell count: MD=?5.62, 95%CI (?7.29, ?3.96), P<0.001], and shorter postoperative hospital stay [MD=?15.13, 95%CI (?18.69, ?11.56), P<0.001]. However, there was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of postoperative anastomotic fistula between the two groups [OR=0.85, 95%CI (0.70, 1.05), P=0.13]. ConclusionPlacing a mediastinal drainage tube cannot reduce the incidence of anastomotic fistula, but it can effectively reduce the incidence of postoperative respiratory and circulatory system complications in patients and improve patients’ prognosis. It can early detect teh anastomotic fistula and fully drain digestive fluid to promote rapid healing of the fistula, alleviate the infection symptoms of postoperative anastomotic fistula, and shorten the hospital stay.
