Objective To discuss the safety and effectiveness of removing esophageal foreign bodies in children by using Foley catheter. Method Retrospective analysis on the effect, operation method, complication and the types of foreign bodies of 138 cases of removing esophageal foreign bodies in children by using Foley catheter, which happened from January 1998 to January 2008 in Department of Otorhinolaryngology, the Third People’s Hospital of Chengdu. Result Among these 138 cases with esophageal foreign bodies, 126 cases (91.3%) were successfully taken out by using Foley catheter without anaesthesia, 7 cases were applied esophagoscopy under general anaesthesia, and 5 cases were cured owing to the slipping of foreign body into stomach. The operating time for Foley catheter was 5.1 minutes in average, and there’s no complicating disease in any case. The hard esophagoscope operation lasted for 15 minutes in average and one case was accompanied by dyspnea. The foreign bodies in 138 cases were coin (98 cases), button (14 cases), chess and I-go piece (13 cases), key-ring (4 cases), plastic bottle cap (3 cases), oblate battery (3 cases) and ring (3 cases), respectively. Conclusion Foley catheter is safe and effective for removing esophageal obtuse-rounded foreign bodies in children.
ObjectiveTo observe the clinical features and treatment outcomes of patients with intraocular foreign bodies with endophthalmitis, and analyze the prognostic factors affecting the anatomic and visual outcomes of patients. MethodsA retrospective clinical study. A total of 1 704 patients (1 704 eyes) with intraocular foreign body at Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University from January 2015 to June 2024 were included in this study. Endophthalmitis was diagnosed in 263 eyes (15.4%, 263/1 704). Patients who lost follow-up in our hospital after surgery were excluded, 155 patients with 155 eyes were finally included in the study. Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) examination was performed before operation. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) examination was performed both after the first stage debridement and during follow-up. The visual acuity test is performed using a standard logarithmic visual acuity chart, which is statistically converted to logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) visual acuity. Demographic characteristics (gender, age), trauma characteristics (time of injury, occupation characteristics, nature of foreign body), anatomical injury (wound zoning, nature of infection, etc.), clinical treatment (interval between operation and injury, rate of second operation, etc.) and outcome (vision outcome, complications, anatomic outcome, etc.) were recorded. Prophylactic intravitreous injection of 10 mg/ml of cefazolin sodium 0.1 ml (including 1 mg of cefazolin sodium) was given on the basis of perioperative systemic administration of cefazolin sodium from 2022. Anatomical outcomes included anatomical reduction, silicone oil-dependent, and ophthalmectomy. The visual outcomes of the patients were categorized into three groups based on the best-corrected visual acuity at the final follow-up: visual acuity worse than 0.05, visual acuity between 0.05 and 0.3, and visual acuity better than 0.3. Generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) was used to analyze the correlation between the timing of treatment, nature of foreign body, nature of infection, number of operations, location of injury and the anatomic and visual outcomes of patients. ResultsOf 155 patients, 149 were males and 6 were females, mean age was (45.7±12.9) years, patients with monocular injury. Magnetic, non-magnetic, unidentified metal and vegetable, mineral, animal and unidentified foreign bodies were 102 (65.8%, 102/155), 2 (1.3%, 2/155), 28 (18.1%, 28/155), 1 (0.6%, 1/155), 12 (7.7%, 12/155), 7 (4.5%, 7/155), 3 (1.9%, 3/155) cases, respectively. The time between injury and removal of foreign body was (98.1±359.5) h. The foreign bodies were removed in 136 eyes (87.2%, 136/155) in the primary surgery, 67 cases combined with debridement and suture, 68 cases combined with pars plana vitrectomy (PPV), and 1 case suffered ophthalmectomy. The slide and culture results revealed that the eyes positive for bacteria and those positive for a mixed infection of bacteria and fungi were 80 (51.2%, 80/155) and 2 (1.3%, 2/155) eyes, respectively; 73 eyes (46.8%, 73/155) were negative. Among the 80 eyes positive for bacteria, staphylococcus epidermidis and bacillus cereus were found in 26 (32.5%, 26/80) and 23 (28.8%, 23/80) eyes, respectively. Drug sensitivity testing indicated that vancomycin, gentamicin and amikacin had low drug resistance (1.79%, 6.67%, 0.0%, respectively). The mean preoperative logMAR UCVA was 1.67±0.79. In the outcome of visual function, 78, 26 and 51 patients with visual acuity ＜0.05, 0.05-0.3, ＞0.3, respectively. At the last follow-up, there were 56 cases (36.1%, 56/155) of silicone oil dependence, 93 cases (60%, 93/155) of anatomic reduction, and 6 cases (3.9%, 6/155) suffered ophthalmectomy, the mean intraocular pressure was (13.6±6.1) mm Hg (1 mm Hg= 0.133 kPa). Preoperative visual acuity was strongly correlated with visual outcomes (F=6.896, P=0.001). Preoperative visual acuity (F=5.310, P=0.023) and surgical method (F=20.448, P＜0.001) were closely related to the anatomical outcome, while age, treatment time, foreign body nature, wound zoning, infection nature, and foreign body removal time had no statistical correlation with the anatomic and functional outcome (P＞0.05). During 2015 to 2024, the incidence of intraocular foreign body-related endophthalmitis was 12.5%-22.7%, which showed a fluctuating upward trend. The incidence of endophthalmitis increased during 2022 to 2024 compared with the period from 2019 to 2021, but no statistically difference was found (χ2=3.856, P=0.05). ConclusionsThe incidence of intraocular foreign body related endophthalmitis was 15.4%. Staphylococcus epidermidis and Bacillus cereus are the first and second pathogenic bacteria. The incidence of endophthalmitis is not significantly reduced with intravitreal injection of cefazolin sodium. Preoperative UCVA and surgical method were closely related to the anatomic outcome of patients.
ObjectiveTo collect the data of esophageal foreign body patients, and to evaluate the clinical effects of two different surgical methods in our hospital.MethodsThe clinical data of 294 patients who were treated in Gansu Provincal Hospital from January 2012 to June 2018 were analyzed retrospectively. The clinical data were collected and analyzed by SPSS 22.0. In order to to evaluate the efficacy of flexible esophagoscope (FE) and rigid esophagoscope (RE) in the treatment of esophageal foreign bodies.The patients were divided into two groups: a RE group including 118 patients with 62 males and 56 females at age of 6 (3-37) years and a FE group including 176 patients with 84 males and 92 females at age of 6 (3-59) years.ResultsThere was no significant difference in age, age stratification, gender and foreign body type between the two groups. There was a statistical difference in the initial clinical symptoms (P=0.041) or in esophageal foreign bodies position (P=0.037) between the two groups. The success rate of foreign body removal was similar between the two groups (P=0.632). The success rate was 88.9% (105/118) in the RE group, 87.5% (154/176) in the FE group. The operation time was significantly longer in the RE group than that in the FE group (10.8 ±17.4 min vs. 17.5±21.6 min, P<0.001). The postoperative hospitalization time in the RE groups was longer than that in the FE group (21.5 ±24.2 hours vs. 12.5 ±21.3 hours, P<0.05). There was a statistical difference in the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups (P=0.034). In the RE group, the main complication was mucosal edema (15.3%). And the rate of bleeding was higher (15.9%) in the FE group. There were 30 patients (25.5%) in the RE group with minor postoperative complications versus the FE group with 40 patients (22.7%); and 1 patient (0.8%) in the RE group with severe complications versus the FE group with 5 paients (2.8%).ConclusionBased on the analysis of this study, it is found that RE has higher safety. But the indications are strict, the professional requirements of the operator and the selection of patients are stronger. The FE is convenient to use, the operation crowd is wide, and the suitable crowd is wide. Therefore, for specific patients, after improving the relevant examination and preoperative evaluation of patients, clinicians need to choose appropriate surgical methods to ensure the success of the operation, and reduce the postoperative complications as far as possible.
ObjectiveTo discuss the indication and vital procedure of lateral neck incision applied for the removal of relatively big esophageal incarcerated foreign body, in order to improve the level of diagnosis and treatment of esophageal foreign body.
MethodsThe clinical data of 23 patients suffering from esophageal incarcerated foreign body and treated between May 2009 and May 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. Time of onset, foreign body type and shape, and operation method were studied.
ResultsAll 23 patients recovered successfully and were discharged from the hospital within 1 week, without severe complications like esophageal perforation or esophageal peripheral inflammation.
ConclusionFor esophageal superior segment big incarcerated foreign body, lateral neck incision can expand the visual field, reduce operation blind area, avoid irregular injury of the esophageal wall and occurrence of complications.
This study reports the surgical treatment of a female patient at age of 64 years with novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) latent infection complicated with esophageal foreign body perforation with no significant changes in the lung CT. The patient was confirmed as SARS-CoV-2 infection on the 4th day after surgery and then was transferred into the Department of Infectious Disease in our hospital for treatment. This case has guiding value for the operation of thoracic surgery during the outbreak of novel coronavirus pneumonia.
Objective To systematically review the efficacy and safety of cap-assisted endoscopy in the treatment of esophageal foreign bodies. Methods PubMed, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, EMbase, CNKI and Wanfang databases were searched by computer for relevant literatures on cap-assisted endoscopy and traditional endoscopy for esophageal foreign bodies from inception to November 2022. The quality assessment of the literature was conducted using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4.1. Results Finally, 27 studies were collected, including 17 randomized controlled trials, 2 cohort studies and 8 case-control studies, with a total of 3 619 patients. NOS scores of all studies were ≥7 points. Meta-analysis results showed that compared with traditional endoscopic treatment, the success rate of removing esophageal foreign bodies in the cap-assisted endoscopy group was higher (OR=14.43, 95%CI 10.64 to 19.55, P<0.000 1), postoperative complications were fewer (OR=0.30, 95%CI 0.23 to 0.38, P<0.000 1), patients' tolerance was better (OR=4.07, 95%CI 2.95 to 5.60, P<0.000 1), intraoperative visual field clarity was better (OR=12.00, 95%CI 7.29 to 19.76, P<0.000 1) and operative time was shorter (SMD=?1.83, 95%CI ?2.31 to ?1.34, P<0.000 1). Conclusion Cap-assisted endoscopy for esophageal foreign bodies is an effective and safe method, worthy of further promotion and application in clinical practice.
ObjectiveTo highlight the characteristics of bronchial foreign body in Adults.
MethodsThe clinical data of three patients with bronchial foreign body were analyzed and related literatures were reviewed.
ResultsForeign bodies in three patients were all located in right bronchi. Their initial diagnoses were tumor, pneumonia and foreign body, respectively. They all didn't offer a definite history of foreign body aspiration. Foreign bodies in three patients were diagnosed and treated by bronchoscopy. Through reviewing 978 related literatures, we found 2920 cases of bronchial foreign body in adults. 75.00% of them didn't offer a history of foreign body aspiration. 80.13% of them were misdiagnosed as other diseases before bronchoscopy, such as pneumonia(31.23%), lung cancer(25.21%), tuberculosis(5.81%), bronchiectasis(6.58%) and asthma(12.47%). Some of them were misdiagnosed for over 30 years.
ConclusionsBronchial foreign bodies in adults are easily misdiagnosed. Bronchoscopy plays an important role in diagnosis and treatment of bronchial foreign body.
Foreign body ingestion is common in emergency. The vast majority of foreign body ingestion occurs in the pediatric population as well as mentally impaired and edentulous adults. The typical clinical manifestation of foreign body ingestion includes acute onset of dysphagia and chest pain. Most of the ingested foreign bodies pass without the need of intervention; however, about 20% of esophageal foreign body ingestion requires endoscopic removal. While less than 1% will need surgery for foreign body extraction. Timely diagnosis and proper treatment are associated with low mortality and morbidity rate, while delayed diagnosis and improper treatment always lead to severe complications such as esophageal perforation and death. This article reviews the diagnosis and treatment of adult esophageal foreign body ingestion.
Continuous glucose monitoring plays an important role in severe diabetic patients. However, there is no available commercial implanted glucose biosensor for long-term clinic application. This paper firstly introduces the classification of biosensors for continuous glucose monitoring, and then discusses the failure mechanism for implanted biosensors. After that, it points out the routes and tips to improve the life time of the biosensor, and finally looks forward to the future development of implanted glucose biosensors.
ObjectiveTo compare the safety, effectiveness, and stability of 3D Max lightweight patch and standard patch in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) herniorrhaphy.
MethodsThe clinical data of 147 patients who underwent laparoscopic TAPP herniorrhaphy with 3D Max from May 2013 to May 2014 in this hospital were collected. Of all the patients, the lightweight patches were used in 75 patients (observation group), the standard patches were used in 72 patients (control group). The mean operative time, mean early postoperative ambulation time, mean bleeding volume, postoperative pain, postoperative foreign body sensation, complications, average hospital stay, and average costs were compared between these two groups. The postoperative pain point was determined by using visual analogue scale (VAS). The foreign body sensation of postoperative groin area was determined basing on the pain point.
ResultsThere were no significant differences in the terms of the mean operation time, the mean early postoperative ambulation time, the mean bleeding volume, the average costs, and the average hospital stay between the observation group and the control group (P > 0.05). On postoperative 2 d, the pain point of the observation group was slightly lower than that of the control group, but there was no statistically significant difference between these two groups (P=0.132); On postoperative 1 month and 6 months, the postoperative pain points of the observation group were significantly lower than those of the control group, the differences were statistically significant (P=0.031, P=0.018). There was no recurrence of hernia and complications in the two groups.
ConclusionsThe cost of 3D Max lightweight patch in laparoscopic TAPP herniorrhaphy application is slightly higher than that in standard patch, but it could alleviate postoperative pain, reduce postoperative foreign body sensation, and make patients feel more comfortable. It is safe, effective, and stable in clinical application of laparoscopic TAPP herniorrhaphy.
