摘要:目的:觀察超短波治療對痔術后創面愈合的影響。方法:將100例混合痔術后患者分為治療組和對照組各40例,治療組于術后24小時給予超短波治療和復方紫草油紗條換藥,對照組僅給以復方紫草油紗條換藥,觀察兩組創面愈合時間和創面上皮生長速度。結果:治療組較對照組創面愈合時間更短(Plt;0.01),創面上皮生長速度更快(Plt;0.01)。結論〗:超短波治療能夠加速痔術后創面愈合時間,減少痛苦,療效確切安全。Abstract: Objective: To observe the clinical efficacy of ultrashort wave on the healing of wound after operation for hemorrhoids. Methods: One hundred cases of disease subjected to operation were divided into the treatment group (50 cases) and the control group (50 cases).The treatment group had been given ultrashort wave 24 hours after operation and Fufangzicaoyousa ointment gauze. The control group had been give Fufangzicaoyousa ointment gauze. Results: The results showed that the woundhealing time was much shorter in the treatment group than in the control group (Plt;0.01), the epidermis growth was much faster in the treatment group than in he control group (Plt;0.01). Conclusion: Ultrashort wave can promote the healing of wound after the operation for hemorrhoids and relieve pain, and it can be externally used safely.
ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy and safety of automatic ligation of hemorrhoids (ALH) and procedure for prolapsed hemorrhoids (PPH) in the treatment of elderly patients with hemorrhoids.
MethodsOne hundred and eighty elderly patients with hemorrhoids who were admitted into the First People's Hospital of Jining City from January 2012 to December 2014 were enrolled. According to the operative mode, the patients were divided into ALH group and PPH group, with 90 cases in each group, received ALH and PPH treatment respectively. The postoperative pain, urinary retention, edema, bleeding, infection, anal swelling and anal stenosis were observed in the two groups, and two methods of operation were evaluated in terms of operation time, intraoperative bleeding, postoperative bleeding, postoperative pain, healing time, hospitalization expenses and postoperative complications.
ResultsThe VAS scores of the ALH group in the day 1-3 after operation were lower than that of the PPH group, the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05); the frequency of the use of analgesics in ALH group was less than that in PPH group (P < 0.01); the amount of blood loss and the healing time of the ALH group were significantly less or shoter than those of the PPH group (P < 0.01); the incidence of postoperative urinary retention in the ALH group was 2.22% (2/90), which was significantly lower than that of the PPH group, 27.78% (25/90), the difference was statistically significant (χ2=23.050, P=0.000); the incidence of perianal edema after operation in the ALH group was 5.56% (5/90), which was significantly lower than that of PPH group of 15.56% (14/90), the difference was statistically significant (χ2=4.766, P=0.029). There was no obvious postoperative bleeding in the ALH group(0/90), while the incidence of postoperative bleeding in the PPH group was 7.78% (7/90), and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (Fisher's exact test, P=0.007). The efficiency of ALH group was 98.89% (89/90) and the PPH group was 97.78% (88/90), the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (χ2=0.339, P=0.560). Conciusions There is no significant difference between ALH and PPH in the treatment of elderly patients with hemorrhoids, but ALH has the advantages of less pain, quicker recovery and fewer complications, it is worthy of popularization and application.
Objective
To explore the medium- and long-term clinical effects of procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH) combined with Block operation for obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS).
Methods
Clinical data of 187 patients with ODS caused by rectocele (RE) who received PPH+Block operation or pure PPH operation in The Chaoyang City Central Hospital from Mar. 2011 to May. 2013, were collected retrospectively, in which 95 patients underwent PPH+Block operation (PPH+Block group) and 92 patients underwent PPH operation (PPH group). Compared the postoperative Longo’s score, postoperative clinical effect, operative effect, and recurrence rate between the 2 groups.
Results
① The postoperative Longo’s score: the postoperative Longo’s scores of the PPH+Block group were both lower than those of the PPH group at 1- and 3-year after operation (P<0.05). ② Postoperative curative effect: the total effective rate of the PPH+Block group and the PPH group were both 100%, but the clinical effect of the the PPH+Block group was better than that of the PPH group (Z=–10.15, P<0.05). ③ Operative effect: there was no statistical significance on operative time, intraoperative blood loss, returned to normal activity time, hospital stay, and postoperative visual analogy score (VAS) between the 2 groups (P>0.05). In addition, there were no statistical significance on the incidences of urinary retention, hematochezia, exhaust anal incontinence, and anal fissure between the 2 groups (P>0.05), but the incidence of urgent or high anal straining feeling in the PPH+Block group was significantly higher than that of the PPH group (P<0.05). ④ Medium- and long-term recurrence rate: the recurrence rate of 1-year after operation was similar between these2 groups (P>0.05), but the recurrence rate of 3-year after operation in the PPH+Block group was significantly lower than that of the PPH group (P<0.05).
Conclusions
The medium clinical effect has no obvious difference between PPH+Block and PPH operation, but the long-term recurrence rate of the former is lower than that of the latter, and the medium- and long-term effect is stable in PPH+Block operation for ODS caused by RE.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of external dissection and internal ligation, plus partial internal sphincterotomy in the treatment of mixed hemorrhoids.
MethodsDuring January 2010 to January 2012, 364 patients with mixed hemorrhoids selected for surgery were divided into two groups based on whether the patients should accept the treatment of partial internal sphincterotomy. We observed the curative effect of the two groups, including anal pain, bleeding, edema, average healing days and the anorectal stenosis after operation.
ResultsThere were statistical differences between the two groups in terms of anal pain, complication rate and hospital stay (P<0.01). The curative effect of the group treated with partial internal sphincterotomy was better than that of the other group.
ConclustionExternal dissection and internal ligation, plus partial internal sphincterotomy is a better choice in the treatment of mixed hemorrhoids, which can relieve postoperative symptoms, reduce complications and shorten treatment course.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the safety of shearing fracture ligation combining procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids （PPH） in treatment for mixed hemorrhoids via a multicenter clinical study. MethodsTwo hundred and fortysix patients with mixed hemorroids were included from four a level of firstclass hospitals, which were averagely divided into shearing fracture ligation combining PPH group, PPH group, and shearing fracture ligation group according to the order of admission. The occurrence status of rectovaginal fistula, urethrorectal fistula, postoperative bleeding, acute urinary retention, anorectal stenosis, and anal incontinence were observed. And the anal function was evaluated by the anorectal pressure measurement. ResultsNo rectovaginal fistula or urethrorectal fistula happened among three groups. No anorectal stenosis happened in the shearing fracture ligation combining PPH group or the PPH group. The score of anorectal stenosis and anal incontinence in these two groups were lower than those in the shearing fracture ligation group (Plt;0.05). The rate of postoperative bleeding in the shearing fracture ligation combining PPH group was lower than that in the shearing fracture ligation group (Plt;0.05). There were acute urinary retentions happened among three groups, but without significant differences among them (Pgt;0.05). The anal canal resting pressure after operation was lower than that before operation among three groups (Plt;0.01), which in the shearing fracture ligation combining PPH group was lower than that in the shearing fracture ligation group after operation (Plt;0.05). There were no significant differences of the rectum feeling capacity or maximum rectum capacity between the shearing fracture ligation combining PPH group and PPH group before and after operation (Pgt;0.05), but compared with the level before operation in the shearing fracture ligation group, the rectum feeling capacity obviously decreased after operation (Plt;0.05), the maximum rectum capacity obviously increased (Plt;0.05). There were no significant differences of the maxinum anal canal systolic blood pressure between before and after operation in three groups and among three groups (Pgt;0.05). ConclusionsThe operation of shearing fracture ligation combined with PPH can protect the tissue of rectal cushion, remain the normal anatomy structure of anal canal. It has better clinical effect and is much safer than other methods.
ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical effect and the incidence of postoperative complications of Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoids combined with reducing tension of alary incision in the treatment of annular mixed hemorrhoids.MethodsProspectively collected 120 patients with annular mixed hemorrhoids who received treatment from the Department of Colorectal Surgery of Bazhong Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicinel during the April, 2016 to October, 2018. All of the 120 patients with annular mixed hemorrhoids were randomly divided into the experimental group and the control group, with 60 patients in each one group. Patients in the experimental group was treated with Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoids combined with reducing tension of alary incision, while patients in the control group with conventional Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoid.ResultsIn the experimental group, 49 cases were cured, 11 cases showed obvious effect; in the control group, 39 cases were cured, 20 cases showed obvious effect, and 1 case was effective. The curative effect in experimental groups was better than that of the control group (Z=–2.090, P=0.037), and the effective rates of these two group were both 100% in total. The mean healing time was (19±3) d (14–21 d) in the experimental group and (21±3) d (14–24 d) in the control group, respectively, which was better in the experimental group (Z=–13.636, P<0.001). Experimental group with lower score of wound pain, hemafecia, and anal margin edema, which were much better than control group on 1 d and 3 d after operation (P<0.05). There was no statistically significant differences on incidence of uroschesis and recurrence rate between the two groups (P>0.05).ConclusionsMilligan-Morgan hemorrhoids combined with reducing tension of alary incision in the treatment of annular mixed hemorrhoids has good clinical effect and deserves clinical application.
Objective To summarize the clinical effect and the key part of operation of procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids （PPH） in treatment for severe mixed hemorrhoids or circular hemorrhoids. Method The data of 183 patients with severe mixed hemorrhoids or circular hemorrhoids underwent PPH in this hospital from August 2006 to November 2012 were analyzed retrospectively. Results The operation time was （28.5±3.1） min. The operations were successfully completed at one-stage in all the patients. The average hospital stay was 5.2 d. No postoperative bleeding， fecal incontinence， and infection happened. No recurrence and complications such as postoperative rebleeding，anal stenosis， fecal incontinence， etc were found during 1 month to 3 years of follow-up with an average 26 months. Conclusions PPH as a minimally invasive operation， every detail of it should be well performed in order to improve the clinical treatment effect and reduce complications of the patients with severe mixed hemorrhoids or circular hemorrhoids.
ObjectiveTo explore the effects of procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH) combined with partial internal anal sphincterotomy (Abbreviation: PPH+sphincterotomy) on postoperative wound margin edema and anal function in patients with severe mixed hemorrhoids.MethodsEighty-five patients with severe mixed hemorrhoids admitted to this hospital from February 2017 to February 2018 were selected as the study subjects, then they were divided into a PPH group (n=42) and PPH+sphincterotomy group (n=43) according to the different treatment methods. The patient in the PPH group was treated with the PPH, while in the PPH+sphincterotomy group was treated with the partial internal anal sphincterotomy on the basis of the PPH group. The clinical efficacy, degree of pain, edema of wound margin, anal function, and the recurrence rate of symptoms were observed in two groups.Results① There were no significant differences in the baseline data such as the gender, age, course of disease, grading of internal hemorrhoids, and symptoms between the two groups (P>0.05). ② The total effective rate of the PPH+sphincterotomy group was significantly higher than that of the PPH group [100% (43/43) versus 90.48% (38/42), χ2=4.297, P=0.038]. ③ The VAS score of the PPH+sphincterotomy group was significantly lower than that of the PPH group on the 3rd and 7th day after the treatment (P<0.05), the VAS score of each group at the 3rd or 7th day after the treatment was significantly lower than that before the treatment (P<0.05), and it was significantly lower on the 7th day than that on the 3rd day after the treatment (P<0.05). ④ The postoperative wound margin edema in the PPH group was more serious than that in PPH+sphincterotomy group (χ2=20.237, P<0.001), and the score in the PPH group was significantly higher than that in the PPH+sphincterotomy group (t=13.514, P<0.001). ⑤ The resting pressure of anal canal after the treatment was significantly lower than that before treatment (P<0.05), and the diastolic pressure of anal canal after the treatment was significantly higher than that before the treatment (P<0.05) in the two groups. The resting pressure of anal canal in the PPH+sphincterotomy group was significantly lower than that in the PPH group and the diastolic pressure of anal canal was significantly higher than that in the PPH group (P<0.05) after the treatment. ⑥ In addition, the total recurrence rate of symptoms at 1 year in the PPH+sphincterotomy group was significantly lower than that of the PPH group [6.98% (3/43) versus 23.81% (10/42), χ2=4.647, P=0.031].ConclusionPPH+sphincterotomy could effectively relieve symptoms of severe mixed hemorrhoids, improve clinical efficacy, and reduce recurrence rate.
ObjectiveTo observe the efficacy of "Fuchuang Xunxi Formula" at different concentrations on patients after mixed hemorrhoidectomy.
MethodsTwo hundred and ten patients having undergone mixed hemorrhoidectomy between October and November 2013 were randomized into seven groups, with 30 patients in each group. Group A was treated with 6% "Fuchuang Xunxi Formula"; Group B was treated with 6% "Zhiji Fumigation Formula"; Group C was treated with 4% "Fuchuang Xunxi Formula"; Group D was treated with 4% "Zhiji Fumigation Formula"; Group E was treated with 3% "Fuchuang Xunxi Formula"; Group F was treated with 3% "Zhiji Fumigation Formula"; And Group G was treated with branch water. Each group was fumigated at 45℃ for five minutes, then hip bath at 40℃ for five minutes with a course of 10 days. The curative effect of pain of wound, edema, effusion, urinary disturbance were observed.
ResultsThe therapeutic effect in group C was the best (P<0.05), and the relief of postoperative complications (pain, edema, effusion) was better than the other groups (P<0.05).
ConclusionTreatment with 4% "Fuchuang Xunxi Formula" for postoperative complications is the most effective.
Objective To compare the therapeutic effect of procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids （PPH） and Block repair procedure for rectocele．Methods A retrospective study of 62 patients with surgical treatment for rectocele was analyzed．The patients were divided into PPH group （n=32） and Block group （n=30） according to the different operation procedure．The symptoms score of improvement of the patients after surgery was compared between the two groups， including operation time，intraoperative blood loss， postoperative pain score， required analgesic times， postoperative complications，hospitalization time，and hospitalization expenses．Results The symptoms of constipation of patients in two groups was significantly improved afer operation．Comparing one month with three months of Longo’s obstructed defecation syndrome （ODS） score after the operation，there was no significant difference in the PPH group（P＞0.05）， but significant difference in the Block group（P＜0.01）．Although the expenses of the PPH group was much higher than that of the Block group （P＜0.01）， the outcomes of the PPH group were much better than those of the Block group （P＜0.01）， including the postoperative Longo’s ODS score of one month and three months，operation time，intraoperative blood loss， postoperative pain score，required analgesic times，and hospitalization time．Two cases of lightly postoperative incontinence occurred in the PPH group，but completely recovered after three months in the clinical follow-up．Conclusions The PPH is as safe and effective as Block repair procedure for rectocele. The short time effect and lower recurrence rate of the PPH are better than those of the Block repair procedure．
