ObjectiveTo summarize the research status of the relationship between hepatitis B virus X protein (HBx), hepatitis B virus (HBV) genotypes and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) at home and abroad, and to prospect its clinical significance.MethodThe literatures about HBx, HBV genotypes and HCC were reviewed.ResultsThere was a close relationship between HBx and the occurrence, development, migration and metastasis of HCC. There was a certain association between HBV genotypes and HCC, but the specific mechanism had not been clarified.ConclusionsHBx and HBV genotypes play an important role in the occurrence and development of HCC. With the further study of molecular mechanism, it will promote the diagnosis and treatment of hepatitis B, liver cirrhosis and liver cancer, and provide more individualized intervention for clinical workers.
Objective To assess the efficacy between Peginterferon α-2a and common Interferon in HBeAg positive chronic hepatitis B. Methods MEDLINE, EBSCO, PubMed, CNKI, WangFang were searched from the beginning to May 2009, and the references of eligible studies were manually screened. Randomized controlled trials comparing Peginterferon-alpha2a with common interferon in HBeAg positive chronic hepatitis B were eligible for inclusion. Jadad score method was adopted to evaluate the methodological quality of included studies. Meta analysis was conducted by RevMan 5.0 software supplied by the Cochrane Collaboration. Subgroup analyses were used in treatment and observation course. Results Six randomized controlled trials were included (n=688). The treatment duration of 48 weeks and 24 weeks were reported in four and two studies, respectively. We carried out subgroup analysis according to treatment. Meta-analysis showed that Peginterferon-alpha2a (180 ug/d, 48 W) could significantly clear HBeAg, clear HBVDNA, normalize ALT and HBeAg seroconversion compared with common Interferon (Plt;0.05). Peginterferon-alpha2a (180 ug/d, 24 W) could effectively clear HBV DNA [P=0.04, RR=1.44, 95%CI (1.01, 2.05)], but was not effective in loss of HBeAg, HBeAg seroconversion and ALT normalization (Pgt;0.05). Conclusion The efficacy of 48 weeks treatment with Peginterferon α-2a is better than common Interferon. The efficacy of 24 weeks treatment with Peginterferon α-2a is only better in HBV-DNA negative rate than common Interferon. However, because the methodological quality of included studies is not high, this conclusion should be carefully considered in clinical use.
This study sought to investigate the in vivo antiviral effect of amantadine (AM) and biphenyl dimethyl dicarboxylate (DDB) on hepatitis B virus (HBV) in HBV replication mice. HBV replication-competent plasmid was transferred into male BALB/c mice by using hydrodynamics-based in vivo transfection procedure to develop HBV replication mouse model. The model mice were matched by body weigh, age and serum levels of hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) and were divided into four groups:AM group, DDB group, AM+DDB group and NS group, with the last one as control, and the mice of each group were administered corresponding agent orally twice a day, in a medication course lasting 3 d. On the third day, the mice were sacrificed 4-6 h after the last oral intake. HBV DNA replication intermediates in liver were analyzed by Southern blot hybridization. The serum hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and HBeAg were detected by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Compared to the animals in the control group, HBV DNA replication intermediates in liver and HBsAg and HBeAg in serum from the AM and AM plus DDB group of mice decreased, and there was no difference between these two groups of mice. The levels of HBV DNA intermediate from liver and the serum HBsAg and HBeAg between the control and DDB group, however, were not obviously different. In conclusion, the inhibition effect of AM on HBV was detected, but treatment with DDB for 3 days did not influence the viral replication and expression of HBV in the HBV replication mice.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of telbivudine (TEV) combined with adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) for chronic hepatitis B (CHB), so as to provide references for clinical practice and research.
MethodsWe electronically searched databases including The Cochrane Library (Issue 7, 2013), PubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, CBM, CNKI, VIP, and WanFang Data from inception to August 21st, 2013, for the relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Other sources were also retrieved. Two reviewers independently screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data, and assessed the quality of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.1 software.
ResultsA Total of 11 RCTs involving 1 010 patients were included. The trial group were given TEV combined with ADV, while the control group were given TEV alone or ADV alone. The results of metaanalysis showed that, the combined use was superior to TEV alone or ADV alone in improving HBV-DNA negative rates at 12-, 24-, 48-weeks, HBeAg negative rates at 12-, 24-, 48-weeks, and ALT recovery rates at 12-, 24-weeks (P < 0.05). The results of qualitative analysis showed that, the trial group had a lower drug resistance rate, and both were alike in the incidence of adverse reaction.
ConclusionCompared with TEV alone or ADV alone, TEV combined with ADV could improve the clinical efficacy of treating CHB which is also fairly safe. Due to the limited quantity and quality of the included studies, the aforementioned conclusion still needs to be further verified by conducting more large-scale and high quality RCTs.
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of kushenin for chronic hepatitis B. Methods We searched The Cochrane Hepato-Bil iary Group Controlled Trials Register (March, 2006), The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (Issue 1, 2006), MEDLINE (1966 to present), EMBASE (1966 to present), OVID (1965 to present), the Chinese Biomedical Database (CBM) (1978 to 2006) and CNKI. Qual ity assessment and data extraction were conducted by two reviewers independently, and disagreement, if any, was resolved by discussion. Meta-analyses were performed for homogeneous studies. Results A total of 56 studies involving 5156 patients met the inclusion criteria. These included 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), 7 quasi-RCTs, and 46 other studies that did not report randomization methods. None of the trials enforced allocation concealment and only one trial performed blinding.We conducted subgroup analyses based on the outcome measures and interventions. Compared with interferon,the HBeAg seroconversion rate at 12 months after treatment was lower in patients treated with kushenin (RR=0.72, 95%CI 0.58 to 0.90); compared with lamivudine, a lower HBV DNA seroconversion rate after 12 and 24 weeks of treatment was associated with kushenin (RR=0.48, 95%CI 0.33 to 0.70; RR=0.40, 95%CI 0.26 to 0.63). No significant differences were noted between the kushenin group and the control group for all the other outcome measures. Conclusion Kushenin might be effective in normal izing ALT levels, clearing HBV DNA, achieving virus seroconversion and improving hepatic fibrosis, without any serious adverse effects. However, because the overall effects cannot be pooled for analysis, more evidence is needed to support this finding.
Objective To investigate the current situation of randomized controlled trials or clinical controlled trial (RCT/CCT) on chronic hepatitis B and whether to offer reliable evidence for clinical practice in China. Methods RCT/CCT identified from six Chinese clinical journals were searched manually and assessed according to international standard of evidence-based medicine. Results 308 issues containing 212 therapeutic articles and 88 RCT/CCT on chronic hepatitis B were identified and analyzed. Conclusion the quantity and quality of RCT/CCT of chronic hepatitis B did not meet the need of clinical practice.
Background Hepatitis B virus infection is a serious health problem worldwide. Traditional Chinese medicinal herbs have been widely used to treat chronic liver diseases, and many controlled trials have been done to investigate their efficacy. Objectives To assess the efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicinal herbs for chronic hepatitis B infection. Search strategy Searches were applied to the following electronic databases: the CHBG Trials Register, the Cochrane Complementary Medicine Field Trials-Register, the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE and BIOSIS. Five Chinese journals and conference proceedings were handsearched. No language restriction was used. Selection criteria Randomized or quasi-randomized trials with at least three months follow-up. Thais of Chinese medicinal herbs (single or compound) compared with placebo, no intervention, general non-specific treatment or interferon treatment were included. Trials of Chinese medicinal herbs plus interferon versus interferon alone were also included. Trials could be double-blind, single-blind or not blinded. Data collection and analysis Data were extracted independently by two reviewers. The methodological quality of trials was evaluated using the Jadad-scale plus allocation concealment. Intention-to-treat analyses were performed. Main Resuits Nine randomized trials, including 936 patients, met the inclusion criteria. Methodological quality was considered adequate in only one trial. There was a significant funnel plot asymmetry (regression coefficient= 3.37, standard error 1.40, P=0.047). Ten different medicinal herbs were tested in the nine trials. Compared to non-specific treatment or placebo, Fuzheng Jiedu Tang (compound of herbs) showed significantly positive effects on clearance of serum HBsAg, HBeAg, and HBV DNA; Polyporus umbellatus, polysaccharide on serum HBeAg and HBV DNA; Phyllanthus amarus on serum HBeAg. Phyllanthus compound and kurorinone showed no significant effect on clearance of serum HBeAg and HBV DNA and on alanine aminotransferase normalization compared to interferon treatment. There were no significant effects of the other examined herbs. Reviewer’s conclusions Some Chinese medicinal herbs may work in chronic hepatitis B. However, the evidence too weak to recommend any single herb. Rigorously designed, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials are required.
Background Hepatitis B is one of the major infectious diseases of mankind, and up to now, there is no effective way to handle it. Recent clinical trials have shown the potential advantages of Kurorinone an extract of Chinese herb, in treament of chronic HBV infection. Objectives Systermically review the safety and efficacy of Kurorinone in treatment of chronic HBV infection. Search strategy With the searching terms including Kurorinone, its products’ name, hepatitis B and chronic carrier status, the trials registers of the Cochrane Hepato- Biliary Group, the Cochrane Complementary Medicine Field, and the central database of the Cochrane Library as well as MEDILINE, EMBASE and Chinese Biomedical CD Database were searched from their date of inception onward. 20 Chinese medical journals and relevant academic conference proceedings have been searched by hand. The reference lists of identified documents were checked as the complementary search. Inclusion Criteria All RCTs that tested Kurorinone for chronic HBV infection were included in this review. Method of the review According the demand of Cochrane systematic review, selection of trial for inclusion, assessment of methodological quality, data extraction and data syntheses would be conducted for each included trial.
Objective To investigate the prognostic value of serum gamma-glutamyltransferase-to-lymphocyte ratio (GLR) in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV)-associated hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after radical resection. Methods The clinical data of HBV-HCC patients diagnosed and treated with radical hepatectomy in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College (China National Nuclear Corporation 416 Hospital) from January 2012 to December 2022 were retrospectively collected and analyzed. Log-rank and multivariate Cox proportional hazard model were performed to analyze the risk factors affecting overall postoperative survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) of HBV-HCC patients, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the predictive value of GLR for OS and RFS of HBV-HCC patients. Results A total of 196 eligible HBV-HCC patients underwent radical hepatectomy were included. The optimal cutoff value of GLR was 182.31 through ROC curve, and 144 cases were in low GLR group and 52 cases in high GLR group. Compared with the low GLR group, ratios of preoperative portal vein tumor thrombus, China liver cancer staging (CNLC) stage Ⅲ, preoperative AFP level ≥400 ng/mL and low tumor differentiation were higher in the high GLR group (χ2=10.071, P=0.002; χ2=32.552, P<0.001). Cox proportional hazard model showed that higher maximum tumor diameter (HR=1.099, P=0.009), GLR>182.31 (≤182.31 vs. >182.31, HR=0.211, P<0.001) and low tumor differentiation grade (high+moderate vs. low, HR=0.182, P<0.001) were risk factors for postoperative OS of HBV-HCC patients, and the area under curve (AUC) of these risk factor for predicting OS of HBV-HCC patients was 0.930 [95%CI (0.884, 0.977)]. Preoperative portal vein tumor thrombus (No vs. Yes, HR=0.404, P=0.002) and GLR>182.31 (≤182.31 vs. >182.31, HR=0.435, P=0.001) were risk factors for postoperative RFS of HBV-HCC patients, and the AUC of these risk factor for predicting RFS was 0.729 [95%CI (0.654, 0.805)]. Conclusion This study preliminarily indicates that GLR is associated with postoperative prognosis of HBV-HCC patients, and GLR combined with maximum tumor diameter and tumor differentiation degree has a certain value in predicting OS.
Objective To compare the combination of Xiao Chai Hu Tang and interferon versus the simple interferon for the management of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) in terms of clinical therapeutic effect and safety. Methods Such databases as PubMed, CBM disc, CNKI, VIP, Japana Centra Revuo Medicina were searched to include the randomized control trials (RCTs) of treating chronic hepatitis B by using Xiao Chai Hu Tang plus interferon as the treatment group and the interferon as the control group. The quality of the inclusive methodology was evaluated by two reviewers independently. RevMan5.0.24 software was employed for meta-analyses. Results Seven RCTs involving 668 patients were included and all of them were classified as Grade C methodologically. The results of meta-analyses demonstrated: compared with the simple interferon treatment, adding Xiao Chai Hu Tang to interferon was able to significantly increase the HBV-DNA negative conversion ratio (RR=1.44, 95%CI 1.18 to 1.76, P=0.000 4) and the HBeAg negative conversion ratio (RR=1.54, 95%CI 1.21 to 1.94, P=0.000 4); when the intervention duration was more than 12 weeks, the ALT normalization rate was improved significantly (24 weeks: RR=1.39, 95%CI 1.17 to 1.66, P=0.000 2; 12 weeks: RR=1.79, 95%CI 1.23 to 2.61, P=0.002) and the incidence of flu-like symptoms induced by interferon was significantly reduced (liver-protection treatment: RR=0.54, 95%CI 0.40 to 0.73, Plt;0.000 1; Non-liver-protection treatment: RR=0.75, 95%CI 0.59 to 0.95, P=0.02). The funnel plot was asymmetric, indicating publication bias. Conclusion Although Xiao Chai Hu Tang maybe has certain potential supplementary benefits to interferon for the management of CHB. The results of the above meta-analyses should be interpreted prudently because there exit disparities in domestic and international trails with the shortage of double blind or multi-centered clinical trials with high quality. The current evidence provides no way to compare the combination of Xiao Chai Hu Tang plus interferon with the simple interferon for the treatment of CHB and no accurate conclusion in terms of clinical therapeutic effects and safety.
