1. <div id="8sgz1"><ol id="8sgz1"></ol></div>

        <em id="8sgz1"><label id="8sgz1"></label></em>
      2. <em id="8sgz1"><label id="8sgz1"></label></em>
        <em id="8sgz1"></em>
        <div id="8sgz1"><ol id="8sgz1"><mark id="8sgz1"></mark></ol></div>

        <button id="8sgz1"></button>
        west china medical publishers
        Keyword
        • Title
        • Author
        • Keyword
        • Abstract
        Advance search
        Advance search

        Search

        find Keyword "plate" 391 results
        • DESIGN OF NONINVASIVE STEEL MINIPLATE FOR TENODESIS AND ITS CLINICAL APPLICATION

          To fix the ligaments, tendons or other transplantation materials by passing through bone channels was commonly used and a relialde method in the reconstruction of joint stability. Usually an additional incision was necessary on the side of the outlet of the bone channel, that the screws, plates or U-shaped staple could be applied. An instrument was designed that the steel miniplate could be fixed to the bone by noninvasive method. This technique was applied in 20 cases in which anterior cruciate ligament in 14, posterior cruciate ligament in 4, and collateral ligaments in 2 with carbon fibers. The result was successful in all patients. It was shown that it gave simple manipulation, reliable fixation and no need to have an additional incision, and it could lessen patients’ suffering and lead to satisfactory clinical result.

          Release date:2016-09-01 11:08 Export PDF Favorites Scan
        • Effectiveness comparison of two minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis techniques for proximal humeral shaft fractures

          ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness of lateral approach minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) and helical plate MIPO in the treatment of proximal humeral shaft fractures. Methods The clinical data of patients with proximal humeral shaft fractures who underwent MIPO via lateral approach (group A, 25 cases) and MIPO with helical plate (group B, 30 cases) between December 2009 and April 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. There was no significant difference in gender, age, injured side, cause of injury, American Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA) fracture classification, and time from fracture to operation between the two groups (P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, fluoroscopy times, and complications were compared between two groups. The angular deformity and the fracture healing were evaluated according to anteroposterior and lateral X-ray films postoperatively. The modified University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) score for shoulder and the Mayo Elbow Performance (MEP) score for elbow were analyzed at last follow-up. Results The operation time in group A was significantly shorter than that in group B (P<0.05). However, the intraoperative blood loss and fluoroscopy times presented no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). All patients were followed up 12-90 months, with an average of 19.4 months. There was no significant difference in follow-up time between the two groups (P>0.05). In terms of the quality of postoperative fracture reduction, there were 4 (16.0%) and 11 (36.7%) patients with angulation deformity in group A and group B, respectively, and there was no significant difference in the incidence of angulation deformity (χ2=2.936, P=0.087). All fractures achieved bony union, there was no significant difference in fracture healing time between group A and group B (P>0.05); delayed union occurred in 2 cases and 1 case in group A and group B, respectively (healing time was 30, 42, and 36 weeks after operation, respectively). In group A and group B, 1 patient had superficial infection of incision, respectively; 2 patients and 1 patient had subacromial impact after operation, respectively; and 3 patients in group A had symptoms of radial nerve paralysis of different degrees; all of them were cured after symptomatic treatment. The overall complication incidence of group A (32%) was significantly higher than that of group B (10%) (χ2=4.125, P=0.042). At last follow-up, there was no significant difference in the modified UCLA score and MEPs score between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion Both lateral approach MIPO and helical plate MIPO can achieve satisfied effectiveness in the treatment of proximal humeral shaft fractures. Lateral approach MIPO may be beneficial to shorten the operation time, while the overall complication incidence of helical plate MIPO is lower.

          Release date:2023-02-13 09:57 Export PDF Favorites Scan
        • REPAIR OF GROWTH PLATE DEFECTS OF RABBITS WITH CULTURED CARTILAGE TRANSPLANTA-TION

          OBJECTIVE To prevent early closure of growth plate and developmental deformities of limbs by allografts of cultured cartilages into growth plate defects of rabbits. METHODS Chondrocytes isolated from articular cartilage of 1-month rabbits formed cartilage after cultivation in centrifuge tubes. The cartilages cultured for two weeks were implanted into growth plate defects of proximal tibiae of 6-weeks rabbits. At 4th and 16th weeks, X-ray, histologic and immunohistochemical examination were performed. RESULTS The tibiae had no marked deformities after 4 weeks of operation. Histologic examinations showed that the defects were filled with cartilage. Immunohistochemical results of type II collagen were positive. The tibiae with allografts of cultured cartilages had no evident deformities after 16 weeks of operation. Histologic examination showed nearly closure of growth plates. On the contrary, the tibiae on control side formed severe deformities and growth plate were closed. CONCLUSION Allograft of cultured cartilages into growth plate defects may replace lost growth plate tissues, maintain normal growth of limbs and prevent developmental deformity.

          Release date:2016-09-01 10:20 Export PDF Favorites Scan
        • Comparative study on effectiveness of double reverse traction reduction versus open reduction internal fixation in treating complex tibial plateau fractures

          Objective To compare the effectiveness and advantages of the double reverse traction reduction versus open reduction internal fixation for treating complex tibial plateau fractures. Methods A clinical data of 25 patients with Schatzker type Ⅴ or Ⅵ tibial plateau fractures, who met the selection criteria and were admitted between January 2019 and January 2023, was retrospectively analyzed. Thirteen patients underwent double reverse traction reduction and internal fixation (double reverse traction group), while 12 patients underwent open reduction and internal fixation (traditional open group). There was no significant difference in the baseline data (age, gender, injury mechanism, Schatzker classification, interval between injury and operation) between the two groups (P>0.05). The effectiveness were evaluated and compared between the two groups, included operation time, intraoperative blood loss, incision length, hospital stay, full weight-bearing time, complications, fracture healing, Rasmussen radiological score (reduction quality), knee Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score, and knee flexion/extension range of motion. Results The double reverse traction group demonstrated significantly superior outcomes in operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, incision length, and time to full weight-bearing (P<0.05). Two patients in traditional open group developed incisional complications, while the double reverse traction group had no complication. There was no significant difference in the incidence of complication between the two groups (P>0.05). All patients were followed up 24-36 months (mean, 30 months), with no significant difference in follow-up duration between groups (P>0.05). Fractures healed in both groups with no significant difference in healing time (P>0.05). At 6 months after operation, Rasmussen radiological scores and grading showed no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05); the double reverse traction group had significantly higher HSS scores compared to the traditional open group (P<0.05). At 12 months after operation, knee flexion/extension range of motion were significantly greater in the double reverse traction group than in the traditional open group (P<0.05). ConclusionDouble reverse traction reduction offers advantages over traditional open reduction, including shorter operation time, reduced blood loss, minimized soft tissue trauma, and improved joint functional recovery. It is a safe and reliable method for complex tibial plateau fractures.

          Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
        • A BIOMECHANICAL STUDY ON DIFFERENT FIXATION OF CORTICAL BONE PLATE ALLOGRAFT

          Objective To explore the biomechanical difference between the different fixations of cortical bone plate allograft. Methods Twenty-seven cadaveric femurs were harvested and were made into the simulated fracture models, which were equally divided into Groups A, B and C. In Group A, the models were fixed with 2 bone plate allografts (110 mm×10 mm×3 mm); in Group B, the models were fixed with 2 struts (110 mm×10 mm×3 mm) and 5 bone screws; in Group C, the models were fixed with 1 strut (110 mm×10 mm×3 mm) and 5 bone screws. The biomechanical tests for the three-piont bending, torsion, and compression were performed. The parameters studied included the values of the displacements in the three-piont bending tests and the compression tests, and the maximum loads during the bending, the compression, and the torsion. Results As for all the stiffness parameters tested, Group A showed the greatest displacements among the threegroups(P<0.05), except the compressive stiffness parameter, which was similar to that in Group B. The maximum loads of the three-point bending, the torsion, and the compression in Group A were 1.65±0.34 kN, 554.3±49.34 N, and 7.78±0.82 Nm, respectively; in Group B, they were 1.12±0.37 kN, 428.00±37.40 N,and 3.39±0.22 Nm, respectively; in Group C, they were 0.71±0.46 kN, 218.67±36.53N, and 1.74±0.12 Nm, respectively. Group A had a significantly greater strengththan the other 2 groups(P<0.05). Conclusion The strength of the cortical bone plate allograft is related to its different fixations. The two cortical bone plate allografts have a greater strength and stiffness than the struts fixed with the bone screws, which can meet the clinical requirement.

          Release date:2016-09-01 09:23 Export PDF Favorites Scan
        • TREATMENT OF POSTEROLATERAL TIBIAL PLATEAU COLLAPSED AND SPLITED FR ACTURES BY POSTEROMEDIAL AND ANTEROL ATER AL APPROACHES

          ObjectiveTo explore the effectiveness of posteromedial and anterolateral approaches in the treatment of posterolateral tibial plateau collapsed and splited fractures. MethodsNineteen consecutive patients with posterolateral tibial plateau collapsed and splited fractures were treated between August 2010 and August 2013, and the clinical data were retrospectively analyzed. There were 13 males and 6 females, with an average age of 36.9 years (range, 25-75 years). All cases had closed fractures, involving 8 left sides and 11 right sides. Fractures involved posterior column according to the threecolumn classification based on CT scans; according to the Schatzker classification, all fractures were type Ⅱ; according to the AO/Association for the Study of Internal Fixation classification (AO/OTA), all fractures were type 41-B3.1.2. The interval between injury and operation was 7-14 days (mean, 9 days). The reduction of collapsed fractures and implantation of artificial bone allograft were supported by T-shaped distal radius plate via the posteromedial approach. The splited fractures was fixed by less invasive stabilization system (LISS) plate via the anterolateral approach. ResultsThe mean operation time was 69.0 minutes (range, 50-105 minutes). All incisions healed by first intention without neurovascular complications or wound infection. All patients were followed up 14-20 months (mean, 18.2 months). X-ray and CT examinations showed that collapsed tibial plateau and joint surface were completely corrected; bony union was obtained at 12 weeks on average (range, 10-16 weeks). No secondary collapsed fracture and knee varus or valgus occurred. The results were excellent in 12 cases, good in 5 cases, and fair in 2 cases with an excellent and good rate of 89.5% according to the Rasmussen's scoring system for knee function. ConclusionThe posteromedial approach combined with anterolateral approach for posterolateral tibial plateau fractures can fully expose the posterolateral aspects of the tibial plateau, and thus collapsed and splited fractures can be treated at the same time, which will lead to less operative time and good outcomes in the treatment of posterolateral tibial plateau collapsed and splited fractures.

          Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
        • Application of reverse traction device in preoperative treatment of high-energy tibial plateau fracture

          Objective To investigate the effectiveness of the reverse traction device in the preoperative treatment of high-energy tibial plateau fractures. Methods A retrospective study was conducted to analyze the clinical data of 33 patients with high-energy tibial plateau fractures who met the selection criteria between December 2020 and December 2023. All patients were treated by open reduction and internal fixation. According to the preoperative traction method, they were divided into the observation group (16 cases, treated with a reverse traction device on the day of admission) and the control group (17 cases, treated with heel traction on the day of admission). There was no significant difference in baseline data such as gender, age, body mass index, affected side, cause of injury, fracture Schatzker classification between the two groups (P>0.05). Preoperative waiting time, preoperative related complications (nail channel loosening, nail channel oozing, nail channel infection, soft tissue necrosis, soft tissue infection, deep vein thrombosis of the lower extremity, etc.), operation time, and total hospitalization time were recorded and compared between the two groups. On the 4th day after traction, visual analogue scale (VAS) score was used to evaluate the pain relief of the patients, the swelling value of the affected limb was measured, and the Immobilization Comfort Questionnaire (ICQ) score was used to evaluate the perioperative hospital comfort of the patients. Results Both groups of patients completed the operation successfully, and the operation time, total hospitalization time, and preoperative waiting time of the observation group were significantly less than those of the control group (P<0.05). There was no preoperative related complications in the observation group; in the control group, 3 patients had nail channel loosening and oozing, and 2 cases had the deep vein thrombosis of the lower extremity; the difference in the incidence of complication between the two groups was significant (P<0.05). On the 4th day after traction, the ICQ score, VAS score, and limb swelling value of the observation group were significantly better than those of the control group (P<0.05). X-ray films showed that the tibial plateau fracture separation and lower limb alignment recovered after calcaneal traction in the control group, but not as obvious as in the observation group. The fracture gap in the observation group significantly reduced, the tibial plateau alignment was good, and the lateral angulation deformity was corrected. Conclusion The use of reverse traction treatment in patients with high-energy tibial plateau fractures on admission can accelerate the swelling around the soft tissues to subside, reduce patients’ pain, shorten the preoperative waiting time, improve the patients’ preoperative quality of life, and contribute to the shortening of the operation time, with a good effectiveness.

          Release date:2024-07-12 11:13 Export PDF Favorites Scan
        • CLINICAL APPLICATION OF ANTERIOR CERVICAL LOCKING PLATE SYSTEMS AND ANALYSIS OF COMPLICATIONS AS WELL AS THEIR COUNTERMEASURES

          Objective To summarize the methods andskills of anterior cervical locking plate systems in clinical application and to analyze the causes of some complications as well as give some preventive or remedial countermeasures. Methods From 1998 to 2002, 159 patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy,fracturedislocation,tumor or tuberculosis of the cervical spine were treated with anterior locking plate systems. The complications were reviewed and analyzed. Results Ten kinds of complications related to anterior locking plate systems occurred in 21 patients. Most of the complications were caused by improperly-selecting implants, experience and technique deficiency. Conclusio The important preventive or remedial countermeasures are correctly-selecting patients, meticulous preoperative preparation, properly-selecting implants, standard and skillful manipulation and rational postoperative protection.

          Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
        • FAILURE AND PREVENTION OF RECONSTRUCTION IN ANTERIOR STABILITY OF SPINE BY DUAL BLADE PLATE

          Abstract Dual-blade plate is widely used in reconstruction of anterior stability of spine. Two hundred and ninety-eight cases were followed up since 1984. Among them, 181 cases were fractureof thoracolumbar spine; 63 cases were tuberculosis of thoracolumbar spine; 43 cases were tumor of thoracolumbar spine; 5 cases were spondylisthesis of lumbar spine; 2 cases were ankylosing spondylitis accompanied with gibbosity; 2 cases were adolescent vertebral epiphysis; I case was hemivertebra; I case was dysplasia of the first lumbar vertebra acompanied with gibbosity. Most cases were successful following operation, but in some cases, the results were unsuccessful, mainly due to the position of the dualblade plate in the vertebral body was not satisfactory. The mistakes most commonly occurred were one or two blades, or a part of the blade going into the intervertebral space, and less commonly seen was deviation of the dual -blade plate from itscorrect orientation or a little side-bent of the blade. Split of the vertebra and fall off of the dual-blade plate were happened in few cases. The causeswere analyzed and ways of prevention were provided in this article.

          Release date:2016-09-01 11:11 Export PDF Favorites Scan
        • COMPARATIVE STUDY ON INTERNAL FIXATION AND EXTERNAL FIXATION FOR THE TREATMENT OFCOMPLEX TIBIAL PLATEAU FRACTURE

          Objective To compare effects, advantages and disadvantages of simple internal fixation to that of l imited internal fixation with external supporting frame fixation in the treatment of complex fractures of tibial plateau. Methods From July 2002 to August 2006, 66 cases of complex fractures of the tibial plateau were divided into the internal fixation group (n=39) and the external fixator group (n=27). The interal fixation group had 18 cases of IV, 7 cases V and 14 cases VI according to Schatzker, including 25 males and 14 females aged 18-79 years with an average of 45.4 years. The external fixator group had 13 cases of IV, 6 cases V and 8 cases VI according to Schatzker, including 18 males and 9 femles aged 18-64 years with an average of 44.2 years. No significant difference was evident between the two groups (P gt; 0.05). Patients were treated by using screws, steel plates or external supporting frame fixation strictly based on the princi ple of internalfixation. Results All patients were followed up for 1-5 years. Fracture healed with no occurrence of nonunion. Two cases inthe internal fixation group presented partial skin infection and necrosis, and were cured through the dressing change and flap displacement. Fracture heal ing time was 6-14 months with an average of 7.3 months. The time of internal fixator removal was 6-15 months with an average of 8.3 months. In the external fixation group, 11 cases had nail treated fluid 7 days to 3 months after operation, combining with red local skin; 3 cases had skin necrosis; and 3 cases had loose bolts during follow-up. Through debridement, dressing change and flap displacement, the skin wounds healed. Fracture heal ing time was 3-11 months with an average of 5.1 months. The time of external fixator removal was 5-11 months with an average of 6.4 months. At 8-14 months after operation, the knee function was assessed according to Merchant criteria. In the internal fixation group, 29 cases were excellent, 4 good, 5 fair and 1 poor, while in the external fixation group, 20 cases were excellent, 3 good, 2 fair and 2 poor. There was no significant difference between the two groups (P gt; 0.05). Conclusion The therapeutic effects of simple internal fixation and l imited internal fixation with external supporting frame fixation were similar in the treatment of complex fractures of tibial plateau. Fixation materials should be selected according to the state of injury and bone conditions for the treatment of tibial plateau fracture of type IV, V and VI based on Sehatzker classification.

          Release date:2016-09-01 09:16 Export PDF Favorites Scan
        40 pages Previous 1 2 3 ... 40 Next

        Format

        Content

          1. <div id="8sgz1"><ol id="8sgz1"></ol></div>

            <em id="8sgz1"><label id="8sgz1"></label></em>
          2. <em id="8sgz1"><label id="8sgz1"></label></em>
            <em id="8sgz1"></em>
            <div id="8sgz1"><ol id="8sgz1"><mark id="8sgz1"></mark></ol></div>

            <button id="8sgz1"></button>
            欧美人与性动交α欧美精品