Objective To investigate the changes of gastrointestinal hormone and body composition in patients with gastric cancer after gastrectomy. Methods Thirty-eight patients with gastric cancer were divided into three groups: distal gastrectomy group, proximal gastrectomy group and total gastrectomy group and 9 volunteers as control group. The nutrition status and gastrointestinal function were evaluated by four times. The time of postoperative first anal exsufflation and defacation, hospital stay and complications were recorded, and the pre-meal and the post-meal level of gastrointestinal hormones 1 month after operation were detected. Results Compared with control group, the basic levels of somatostatin (SS), cholecystokinin (CCK) and motilin (MTL) of distal gastrectomy group, proximal gastrectomy group and total gastrectomy group significantly increased (Plt;0.01). The post-meal level of gastrointestinal hormones significantly increased as compared with the pre-meal level in each group (Plt;0.01). The CCK in proximal gastrectomy group was lower than that of distal gastrectomy group and total gastrectomy group (Plt;0.01). The postoperative body weight and body composition in each group decreased. One month after operation, patients of total gastrectomy group got the lowest body weight (Plt;0.01). The decreasing level of fat free mass (FFM) was listed by total gastrectomy group, proximal gastrectomy group and distal gastrectomy group. The edema index had significant difference in distal gastrectomy group, proximal gastrectomy group and total gastrectomy group (Plt;0.01), and total gastrectomy group was the most obvious. The postoperative passing flatus and defecation time and average hospital stay in total gastrectomy group were significantly prolonged (Plt;0.05). The gastrointestinal symptoms score among three groups was significantly different (Plt;0.05). Conclusion There are different changes of gastrointestinal hormone and body composition in patients with gastric cancer after different gastrectomy, the basic levels of SS, CCK and MTL of distal gastrectomy group, proximal gastrectomy group and total gastrectomy group are higher than those of control group. The CCK of proximal gastrectomy group is lower than that of distal gastrectomy group and total gastrectomy group. Patients received total gastrectomy lose much body weight and FFM and get higher edema index.
Robotic gastric cancer surgery had developed rapidly in recent years, and its clinical application had come a long way. More and more studies had demonstrated that the robotic gastric cancer surgery was a safe and feasible procedure, and showed the technical advantages in the lymph node dissection, bleeding control, precise surgery, and postoperative recovery over laparoscopic surgery. However, some limitations such as the high surgical costs, lack of high-quality evidence, insufficient intelligence limited the development of robotic gastric cancer surgery. In the future, with more high-quality evidence-based medicine research and the development of intelligent surgical robots, the robotic gastric cancer surgery will be further standardized and promoted. We believe that robotic gastric cancer surgery will become the mainstream of minimally invasive surgery for the treatment of gastric cancer.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of stomach intestinal pylorus sparing surgery in metabolic surgery for weight loss.MethodThe literatures about stomach intestinal pylorus sparing surgery were reviewed by searching domestic and foreign literatures.ResultsIn recent years, stomach intestinal pylorus sparing surgery had been gradually applied in clinical practice. Compared with other weight-loss surgeries, it had better clinical effects in weight reduction and blood glucose control. It not only provided a new surgical treatment for patients with severe obesity, but also promoted the development of weight-loss metabolic surgery.ConclusionAs a new metabolic surgery, stomach intestinal pylorus sparing surgery is safe and feasible for weight loss.
ObjectiveTo compare clinical outcomes between triluminal-tube feeding combined with tubular stomach and traditional esophagectomy for the treatment of esophageal carcinoma (EC)in elderly patients.
MethodsA total of 196 elderly patients (>60 years)with EC who received esophagectomy in the Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Mianyang Central Hospital from January 2007 to January 2013 were enrolled in this study. According to different surgical methods, all the patients were divided into triluminal-tube feeding combined with tubular stomach group (group A)and traditional esophagectomy group (group B). There were 96 patients including 51 males and 45 females in group A with their age of 60-81 (66.21±7.32)years, and 100 patients including 54 males and 46 females in group B with their age of 60-82 (65.43±6.37)years. Clinical indexes were compared between the 2 groups.
ResultsRadical esophagectomy was successfully performed for all the patients. There was no statistical difference in operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative incidence of chylothorax, recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis, anastomotic leakage, anastomotic stricture or mortality between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). Time to first passage of flatus and postoperative length of hospital stay of group A were significantly shorter than those of group B, and the incidences of postoperative arrhythmias, pulmonary complications and thoracic-stomach syndrome of group A were significantly lower than those of group B (P < 0.05).
ConclusionTriluminal-tube feeding combined with tubular stomach can significantly reduce postoperative morbidity, shorten hospital stay and improve quality of life of elderly patients undergoing esophagectomy.
Objective To explore the comprehensive treatment of synchronous double cancers of the esophagus and stomach. Methods The treatment procedures of 8 patients with synchronous double cancers of the esophagus andstomach admitted in the Department of Digestive Tumor Surgery of The Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine of Jiangsu Province between Oct. 2006 to Feb. 2013 were analyzed. Some experience of comprehensive treatment of synch-ronous double cancers of the esophagus and stomach was explored. Results Eight cases of synchronous double cancers of the esophagus and stomach were all diagnosed by endoscopic biopsy. According to the results of CT and endoscopic ultrasonography assessment， lesions which were staged earlier than T1a were cured by endoscopic mucosal resection（6 cases， including 4 cases of esophagus cancer and 2 cases of gastric cancer）， and resection operation （1 cases of esop-hagus cancer）. The lesions staged later than T2 were treated by preoperative neoadjuvant chemoradiation， surgery， and adjuvant chemoradiation after operation （8 cases， including 2 cases of esophagus cancer and 6 cases of gastric cancer）， and simple operation （1 case）. Eight patients had been followed-up for 10-76 months （averaged 41.3 months）. Six patients survived without recurrence and metastasis during the followed-up， 1 patient died in 7 months after operation， and 1 patient relapsed in 20 months after operation. Conclusions Individually designed comprehensive treatment using neo-chemotherapy， intervention chemotherapy， radio-chemotherapy， radical resction surgery， adjuvant chemotherapy， and endoscopic mucosal resection can treat synchronous double cancers of the esophagus and stomach effectively. Impr-actical pursuit for radical surgery will not result in good prognosis
ObjectiveTo summarize the experience in the treatment of anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic D2 radical gastrectomy.MethodThe clinicopathologic data of 11 patients with anastomotic leakage after the laparoscopic D2 radical gastrectomy in the Nanchong Central Hospital from May 2016 to January 2018 were analyzed retrospectively.ResultsAmong the 11 patients with anastomotic leakage, 3 were grade Ⅱ leakages and 8 were grade Ⅲa leakages. There were no symptoms in the 3 cases of anastomotic leakage, which were confirmed only by the gastrointestinal radiography and were healed after 7 d of conservative treatment. Among the 8 patients with the clinical symptoms, 5 cases were treated by the endoscopic drainage and negative pressure suction for 60–90 d, 3 cases were treated by the endoscopic covered stent, 2 cases were cured after 30–60 d, and 1 case died of massive bleeding after 45 d.ConclusionsDue to differences of location, time, limitation, and size of anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic D2 radical gastrectomy, individualized treatment should be performed according to specific situation of patients in local treatment. Endoluminal covered stent has certain clinical application value.
ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the efficacy of tubular stomach and whole stomach reconstruction in the treatment of esophageal cancer.MethodsWe searched PubMed, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, EMbase, CNKI, Wanfang Data, VIP and CBM databases to collect the randomized controlled trial (RCT) studies on the efficacy comparison between tubular stomach and total gastric reconstruction of esophagus in esophagectomy from their date of inception to May 2019. Then meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of Twenty-nine RCTs were included, and 3 012 patients were involved. The results of meta-analysis showed that the postoperative complications such as anastomotic fistula [RR=0.64, 95%CI (0.50, 0.83), P=0.000 6], anastomotic stenosis [RR=0.65, 95%CI (0.50, 0.86), P=0.002], thoracic gastric syndrome [RR=0.19, 95%CI (0.13, 0.27), P<0.001], reflux esophagitis [RR=0.23, 95%CI (0.19, 0.30), P<0.001], gastric emptying disorder [RR=0.39, 95%CI (0.27, 0.57), P<0.001] and pulmonary infection [RR=0.44, 95%CI (0.31, 0.62), P<0.001] were significantly reduced, and the postoperative quality of life score and satisfaction were higher at 6 months and 1 year in the tubular stomach group (P<0.05). In terms of intraoperative blood loss and postoperative hospital stay, they were better in the tubular stomach group than those in the whole stomach group (P<0.05). However, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in operation time, postoperative gastrointestinal decompression time, postoperative closed drainage time, postoperative 1-year, 2-year and 3-year survival rate, postoperative quality of life score at 3 weeks and 3 months, and postoperative life satisfaction at 3 weeks.ConclusionThe tubular stomach is more advantageous than the whole stomach in the reconstruction of esophagus after esophagectomy.
Objective This study was conducted to evaluate and analyze the clinical effect between subtotal stomach-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (SSPPD) and pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (PPPD), especially compare the incidences of delayed gastric emptying (DGE) between them. Methods The documents about SSPPD and PPPD were searched in Cochrane Library, PubMed database, Embase database, Web of Science, Chinese biomedicine database, CNKI database, VIP database, and WanFang database. The quality of included studies was assessed according to the Cochrane systematic review methods, and statistical analysis of data was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software. Firstly, comparison of incidence of DGE and other effective indexes between SSPPD group and PPPD group was performed by enrolling all included studies, whether met the DGE standards of International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) or not, and then comparison of incidence of DGE and clinical DGE was performed by enrolling included studies that met the DGE standards of ISGPS. Results Ten studies were included, with a total of 804 patients, in which, 433 cases underwent SSPPD and 371 cases underwent PPPD. The results of meta-analysis indicated that, in all the included studies, the total incidence of DGE〔OR = 0.33, 95%CI is (0.17, 0.63),P = 0.000 9〕, and the time of nasogastric tube〔MD = –2.65，95%CI is (–4.49, –0.80),P = 0.005〕, and time of stared liquid diet〔MD = –4.13, 95%CI is (–7.35, –0.91),P = 0.01〕 showed significant differences. The total incidence of DGE, the time of nasogastric tube, and time of stared liquid diet were less in SSPPD group. But there was no significant difference between the SSPPD group and PPPD group in operating time, intraoperative blood loss, time of started solid diet, hospital stay, and incidences of reinsertion of nasogastric tube, pancreatic fistula, intra-abdominal abscess, reoperation, wound infection, postoperative hemorrhage, and mortality (P>0.05). In the 8 studies adopted DGE standard of ISGPS, the total incidence of DGE〔OR = 0.31, 95%CI is (0.15, 0.65)，P = 0.002〕 and incidence of clinical DGE 〔OR = 0.13，95%CI is (0.05, 0.40),P = 0.000 3〕showed significant differences. The total incidence of DGE and incidence of clinical DGE were both lower in SSPPD group. Conclusions Compared with PPPD group, SSPPD group was associated with significantly less incidence of DGE. Meanwhile, the time of the nasogastric tube and started liquid diet are shorter than those of SSPPD. And there is no significant difference in the other aspects.
Objective
To compare short-term quality of life and postoperative complications in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients with different routes reconstruction after McKeown esophagectomy.
Methods
The clinical data of 144 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who received McKeown esophagectomy in Shanghai Chest Hospital from January 2016 to October 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Among them 93 patients accepted retrosternal approach (a RR group, 71 males and 22 females at an average age of 63.5±7.7 years) and 51 patients accepted posterior mediastinal approach (a PR group, 39 males and 12 females at an average age of 62.3±8.0 years). Short-term surgical outcomes were compared and a Quality of Life Questionnaire of Patients Underwent Esophagectomy 1.0 was performed at postoperative 1st and 3rd month.
Results
There was no difference in two groups in sex, age, Body Mass Index (BMI), and location and clinical stage of tumors (P>0.05). The neoadjuvant therapy was more performed in the RR group (16.1%vs. 5.9%, P=0.075). There were more robot-assisted esophagecctomy operations performed in the PR group (52.9% vs. 45.2%, P=0.020). No significant difference was noted in operation duration, intraoperative blood loss or length of ICU stay between the RR and PR groups (251.3±59.1 min vs. 253.1±27.7 min, P=0.862; 223.7±75.1 ml vs. 240.0±75.1 ml, P=0.276; 3.7±6.6 d vs. 2.3±2.1 d, P=0.139). The patients in the PR group had more lymph nodes dissected and shorter hospital stay (P<0.001). Rate of R1/2 resection was higher in the RR group (12.9%vs. 5.9%, P=0.187). No surgery-related mortality was observed in both groups. The anastomotic leak and the anastomotic stricture was higher in the RR group than that in the PR group (25.8% vs. 5.9%, P=0.003). No significant difference was found between the two groups in the quality of life at postoperative 1st and 3rd month. However, the quality of life at postoperative 3rd month significantly improved in both groups (P<0.001). Compared with the PR group, the dysphagia was more severe in the RR group at postoperative 1st month (3.3±1.5 vs. 2.6±1.1, P=0.007), while the reflux symptom was lighter at postoperative 3rd month (3.0±1.8 vs. 3.6±1.6, P=0.045).
Conclusion
The two different routes reconstruction after McKeown esophagectomy are both safe and feasible. The anterior mediastinal approach increases the risk of anastomotic leak, but with low incidence of reflux symptom.
Objective
To compare the outcome of tubular stomach and cervical esophagus laminated anastomosis and mechanical anastomosis.
Methods
A total of 128 patients with middle and upper esophageal cancer in our hospital from January 2013 to January 2016 were randomly divided into two groups, 64 patients in each group and all patients underwent esophagectomy. In the group A, there were 46 males and 18 females with age of 40–75 years, treated with tubular stomach and cervical esophagus layered anastomosis. There were 51 males and 13 females with age of 43–71 years in the group B receiving mechanical anastomosis. We observed the short-term and long-term efficacy as well as complications.
Results
In the group A, there was cervical anastomotic fistula in 1 patient, anastomotic stenosis in 2 patients and reflux esophagitis in 12 patients. In the group B, 1 patient suffered chylothorax, 8 patients cervical anastomotic fistula, 4 patients anastomotic stenosis and 14 patients reflux esophagitis.
Conclusion
Layered anastomosis can effectively reduce the incidence of anastomotic fistula and stenosis. Tubular stomach can effectively prevent and reduce the reflux esophagitis, and the high long-term quality of life will be achieved after the operation.
