ObjectiveTo compare the outcomes of concomitant mitral valve surgery and tricuspid valve surgery through right minithoracotomy and conventional median sternotomy approaches.
MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed clinical data of 475 patients underwent mitral valve surgery combined with tricuspid valve surgery through right minithoracotomy or conventional median sternotomy in Xinhua Hospital between June 2006 and June 2013. The patients were divided into two groups including a minimally invasive group(116 patients) and a conventional group (359 patients).
ResultsAll the patients successfully underwent mitral valve and tricuspid valve surgery. During operation, there were 426 patients with no trivial mitral regurgitation (MR) and 49 patients with trivial MR. There were 282 patients with no tricuspid regurgitation (TR) and 193 patients with trivil TR. At discharge, transesophageal echocardiography showed that trivial MR in 38 patients, mild MR in 5 patients, trivial tricuspid regurgitation (TR) in 150 patients and mild TR in 7 patients. There was no significant difference between the two groups in complications.
ConclusionRight minithoracotomy can achieve the similar therapeutic effect to conventional median sternotomy for patients with mitral valve disease and concomitant tricuspid valve disease. In addition, patients through right minithoracotomy had better cosmetic outcomes.
Objective
To investigate the myocardial protective effects of Del Nido cardioplegia and analyze its advantages in adult cardiac surgery.
Methods
We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 96 adult patients undergoing cardiac valve surgery who received Del Nido cardioplegia (a DNC group) from June 2016 to January 2017 in our hospital. There were 44 males and 52 females with a mean age of 51.36±13.31 years. Meanwhile 96 patients who received conventional cardioplegia were recruited as a control group (a CTC group) and there were 53 males and 43 females with a mean age of 52.91±10.95 years. Cross-clamping time, cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time, total volume of and transfusion frequency of cardioplegia, the rate of spontaneous defibrillation, red blood cell transfusion and vasoactive-inotropic score at postoperative 24 hours (VIS 24) were recorded.
Results
No significant difference was found in age, body weight, ejection fraction, hematokrit, CPB time and cross-clamping time between the DNC group and CTC group. There was no significant difference in the rate of spontaneous defibrillation, VIS 24, cardiac enzymes and cardiactroponin I and length of ICU stay between the two groups. The total volume and transfusion frequency of cardioplegia, perioperative blood transfusion were lower in the DNC group. There was no new atrial fibrillation or in-hospital death in the two groups.
Conclusion
Del Nido is a good myocardial protection solution in adult cardiac valve surgery, and requires less static preload volume and reduceshemodilution and perioperative blood transfusion.
Objective To retrospectively review the clinical experience and early surgical results of combined cardiac valve surgery and coronary artery bypass grafting （CABG）. Methods From Jan. 2000 to Dec. 2005, combined valve surgery and CABG was performed in 81 patients. 37 patients were rheumatic heart disease with coronary stenosis, and 44 patients were coronary artery disease with valvular dysfunction. Single vessel disease was in 18 patients, two vessels disease in 9 and triple-vessel disease in 54. All the patients received sternotomy and combined valve surgery and CABG under cardiopulmonary bypass. Mitral valve repair and CABG were done in 26 patients. Valve replacement and CABG were done in 55 patients with 49 mechanical valves and 16 tissue valves. Four patients had left ventricular aneurysm resection concomitantly. The number of distal anastomosis was 3.12 5= 1.51 with 66 left internal mammary arteries bypassed to left anterior descending. Post-operative intra-aortic balloon pump was required in 4 cases for low cardiac output syndrome. Results Two patients died of low cardiac output syndrome with multiple organs failure. 79 patients had smooth recovery and discharged from hospital with improved heart function. 64 patients had completed follow-up with 5 late non cardiac related death in a mean follow-up period of 14.2 months. Conclusion Combined one stage valve surgery and CABG is effective with acceptable morbidity and mortality.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of concomitant tricuspid valve repair during mitral valve surgery on the early and mid-term prognosis of the tricuspid valve and right heart function in the patients with moderate or less tricuspid regurgitation. MethodsA retrospective study of 461 patients with mitral valve disease requiring cardiac surgery combined with moderate or less tricuspid regurgitation in our hospital from 2011 to 2014 was done. They were 309 males and 152 females with a median age of 53.00 (44.00, 60.00) years. According to whether they received tricuspid valve repair (Kay’s annuloplasty, DeVega’s annuloplasty or annular ring implantation), the patients were divided into a mitral valve surgery only group (a nTAP group, n=289) and a concomitant tricuspid valve repair group (a TAP group, n=172). At the same time, 43 patients whose tricuspid valve annulus diameter was less than 40 mm in the TAP group were analyzed in subgroups. ResultsThe median follow-up duration was 3.00 years (range from 0.10 to 9.30 years). There was no perioperative death. Three months after surgery, the anteroposterior diameter of the right ventricle in the TAP group was significantly improved compared with that in the nTAP group [–1.00 (–3.00, 1.00) mm vs. 0.00 (–0.20, 2.00) mm, P=0.048]. Three years after surgery, the improvement of right ventricular anteroposterior diameter in the TAP group was still significant compared with the nTAP group [–1.00 (–2.75, 2.00) mm vs. 2.00 (–0.75, 4.00) mm, P=0.014], and the patients in the TAP group were less likely to develop moderate or more tricuspid regurgitation (3.64% vs. 35.64%, P<0.001). Annuloplasty ring implantation was more effective in preventing regurgitation progression (P=0.044). For patients with a tricuspid annulus diameter less than 40 mm, concomitant tricuspid valve repair was still effective in improving the anteroposterior diameter of the right ventricle in the early follow-up (P=0.036). Conclusion Concomitant tricuspid valve repair for patients with moderate or less tricuspid regurgitation during mitral valve surgery can effectively improve the tricuspid valve and right heart function in the early and mid-term after surgery. Annuloplasty ring implantation is more effective in preventing regurgitation progression. Patients whose tricuspid annulus diameter is less than 40 mm can also benefit from concomitant tricuspid repair.
Objective To analyze and explore the risk factors of secondary tricuspid regurgitation (TR) after left-sided valve surgery (left cardiac valve replacement or valvuloplasty) using meta-analysis, so as to provide evidence for clinical diagnosis and treatment of secondary TR. Methods We electronically searched databases including PubMed, MEDLINE, CBM, CNKI, VIP, for literature on the risk factors of secondary TR after left-sided valve surgery from 1995 to 2012. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, we screened literature, extracted data, and assessed methodological quality. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.0 software. Results A total of 6 case-control studies were included, involving 437 patients and 2 102 controls. The results of meta-analysis showed that, the risk factors of progressive exacerbation of secondary TR after left-sided valve surgery included preoperative atrial fibrillation (OR=3.90, 95%CI 3.00 to 5.07; adjusted OR=3.04, 95%CI 2.21 to 4.16), age (MD=5.36, 95%CI 3.49 to 7.23), huge left atrium (OR=5.17, 95%CI 3.12 to 8.57; adjusted OR=1.91, 95%CI 1.49 to 2.44) or left atrium diameter (MD=4.85, 95%CI 3.18 to 6.53), degradation of left heart function (OR=2.97, 95%CI 1.73 to 5.08), rheumatic pathological change (OR=3.06, 95%CI 1.66 to 4.68), preoperative TR no less than 2+ (OR=3.52, 95%CI 1.26 to 9.89), and mitral valve replacement (MVR) (OR=2.35, 95%CI 1.68 to 3.30). Sex (OR=1.54, 95%CI 0.94 to 2.52) and preoperative pulmonary arterial hypertension (OR=1.28, 95%CI 0.77 to 2.12) were not associated with secondary TR after left-sided valve surgery. Conclusion The risk factors of progressive exacerbation of secondary TR after left-sided valve surgery include preoperative atrial fibrillation, age, huge left atrium or left atrium diameter, degradation of left heart function, rheumatic pathological change, preoperative TR no less than 2+, and MVR. Understanding these risk factors helps us to improve the long-time effectiveness of preventing and treating TR after left-sided valve surgery.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect of driving pressure-guided lung protective ventilation strategy on lung function in adult patients under elective cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass.MethodsIn this randomized controlled trial, 106 patients scheduled for elective valve surgery via median sternal incision under cardiopulmonary bypass from July to October 2020 at West China Hospital of Sichuan University were included in final analysis. Patients were divided into two groups randomly. Both groups received volume-controlled ventilation. A protective ventilation group (a control group, n=53) underwent traditional lung protective ventilation strategy with positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 5 cm H2O and received conventional protective ventilation with tidal volume of 7 mL/kg of predicted body weight and PEEP of 5 cm H2O, and recruitment maneuver. An individualized PEEP group (a driving pressure group, n=53) received the same tidal volume and recruitment, but with individualized PEEP which produced the lowest driving pressure. The primary outcome was oxygen index (OI) after ICU admission in 30 minutes, and the secondary outcomes were the incidence of OI below 300 mm Hg, the severity of OI descending scale (the Berlin definition), the incidence of pulmonary complications at 7 days after surgery and surgeons’ satisfaction on ventilation.ResultsThere was a statistical difference in OI after ICU admission in 30 minutes between the two groups (273.5±75.5 mm Hg vs. 358.0±65.3 mm Hg, P=0.00). The driving pressure group had lower incidence of postoperative OI<300 mm Hg (16.9% vs. 49.0%, OR=0.21, 95%CI 0.08-0.52, P=0.00) and less severity of OI classification than the control group (P=0.00). The incidence of pulmonary complications at 7 days after surgery was comparable between the driving pressure group and the control group (28.3% vs. 33.9%, OR=0.76, 95%CI 0.33-1.75, P=0.48). The atelectasis rate was lower in the driving pressure group (1.0% vs. 15.0%, OR=0.10, 95%CI 0.01-0.89, P=0.01).ConclusionApplication of driving pressure-guided ventilation is associated with a higher OI and less lung injury after ICU admission compared with the conventional protective ventilation in patients having valve surgery.
Objective To compare the effect of palliative mitral valve surgeries and medication therapies for secondary non-ischemic mitral regurgitation. Methods The clinical data of patients with non-ischemic functional mitral regurgitation treated in our hospital between 2009 and 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)＜40% underwent a dobutamine stress test, and a positive result was determined when the LVEF improved by more than 15% compared to the baseline value. Positive patients were divided into a surgery group and a medication group. The surgery group underwent surgical mitral valve repair or replacement, while the medication group received simple medication treatment. Follow-up on survival and cardiac function status through outpatient or telephone visits every six months after surgery, and patients underwent cardiac ultrasound examination one year after surgery. The main research endpoint was a composite endpoint of all-cause death, heart failure readmission, and heart transplantation, and the differences in cardiac function and cardiac ultrasound parameters between the two groups were compared. ResultsUltimately 41 patients were collected, including 28 males and 13 females with an average age of 55.5±11.1 years. Twenty-five patients were in the surgery group and sixteen patients in the medication group. The median follow-up time was 16 months, ranging 1-96 months. The occurrence of all-cause death in the surgery group was lower than that in the medication group (HR=0.124, 95%CI 0.024-0.641, P=0.034). The difference between the two groups was not statistically significant in the composite endpoint (HR=0.499, 95%CI 0.523-1.631, P=0.229). The New York Heart Association (NYHA) grade of the surgery group was better (NYHA Ⅰ-Ⅱ accounted for 68.0% in the surgury group and 18.8% in the medication group, P<0.01) as well as the grade of mitral valve regurgitation (87.5% of the patients in the medication group had moderate or above regurgitation at follow-up, while all the patients in the surgery group had moderate below regurgitation, P<0.01). There was no statistical difference in preoperative and follow-up changes in echocardiograph parameters between the two groups (P＞0.05). Conclusion For non-ischemic functional mitral regurgitation, if the cardiac systolic function is well reserved, mitral valve surgery can improve survival and quality of life compare to simple medication therapy.
Objective To summarize the experiences of surgical treatment for post infarction ventricular aneurysm and mi tral regurgitation， thus to improve surgical curative effect and survival rates . Clinical data of 37 patients with myocardial infarction complicated with ven tricular aneurysm and severer than moderate mitral regurgitation were retrospectively an alyzed between December 2000 and June 2007, all 37 patients underwent coron ary artery bypass grafting and reconstruction of left ventricular after aneurysm resection, mitral valve repair or replacement. Results Three patients died during hospital stay after surgery,mortality rate was 81%, of th em two died in renal failure, one died in brain complications.Thirty patients we re followed up, followup rate was 88.2%(30/34), with 4 patients missed. Follow up time ranged from 1 month to 6 years after surgery, 2 patients died in foll o wup period, of them one died in anticoagulant treatment failure complicated w ith the large cerebral infarction, one died of lung infection and heart failure. The inner diameter of le ft atrium and enddiastolic left ventricle reduced obviously than those before operation （30.1±3.5mm vs.39.3±3.7mm, P=0.004;48.4±4.3mm vs.61.2±5.1mm, P=0.003）by color doppler echocardiography examination at 6th month a fter su rgery.There was no obvious change in size of untouched ventricular aneurysm(diam eterlt;5cm). No regurgitation or slight regurgitation were observed in 12 patient s, mild regurgitation was observed in 2 patients and moderate in 1 patients. Conclusion According to different types of post infarctio n ventricular aneurysm and mitral regurgitation, constitution o f different surgical treatment programs, can result in favorable early and long-term curative effect. There’s marked improvement in most patients’cardiac f unction and survival rate.
ObjectiveThrough comparing the therapeutic efficacy of robot-assisted surgery (RS) and conventional surgery (CS) for mitral valve disease by meta-analysis to guide the choice of clinical operation.MethodsDatabases including The Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMbase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), China Biology Medicine disc (CBMdisc) and Wanfang Database were searched by computer from inception to June 2020. The literature of efficacy comparison between RS and CS was collected. Two reviewers independently screened the literature according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted the data, and evaluated the quality of the literature. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 software.ResultsWe identified 11 studies of RS versus CS with 4 330 patients. Among them, 2 212 patients underwent RS and 2 118 underwent CS. Meta-analysis demonstrated that compared with the CS, RS had longer cross-clamp time (MD=25.00, 95%CI 15.04 to 34.95, P<0.000 01), cardiopulmonary bypass time (MD=44.11, 95%CI 29.26 to 58.96, P<0.000 01) and operation time (MD=46.40, 95%CI 31.55 to 61.26, P<0.000 01). However, ICU stay (MD=–22.13, 95%CI –31.88 to –12.38, P<0.000 01) and hospital stay (MD=–1.81, 95%CI –2.69 to –0.92, P<0.000 01) were significantly shorter in the RS group; and the incidences of blood transfusion (OR=0.38, 95%CI 0.16 to 0.89, P=0.03) and complications (OR=0.73, 95%CI 0.57 to 0.94, P=0.01) were significantly lower in the RS group.ConclusionAlthough RS has a longer operation time than CS, it has less damage, less bleeding, faster recovery and better curative efficacy.
Objective To investigate surgical treatment and evaluate the curative effect in patients with moderate to severe ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR). Methods The clinical data of the patients with coronary heart disease complicated with moderate to severe IMR who agreed to receive surgical treatment from June 2014 to June 2019 in our hospital were analyzed retrospectively. The patients were divided into two groups: a coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) group and a CABG+mitral valve surgery (MVS) group. The preoperative and postoperative clinical data between the two groups were compared. Results Finally 105 patients were collected, including 75 males and 30 females, aged 40-79 (62.70±7.90) years. There were 34 patients in the CABG group, and 71 patients in the CABG+MVS group including 2 patients of mitral valvuloplasty and 29 patients of mitral valve replacement. Among the 105 patients, 5 died during the perioperative period and 2 died in 3 months after operation, all of whom were from the CABG+MVS group. There was no statistical difference in perioperative and postoperative 3-month mortality rate between the two groups (P=0.14). Eighty-seven patients were followed up in the medium and long term. There was no statistical difference in the degree of preoperative mitral insufficiency (MI) (P=0.59) and left atrium diameter (P=0.51) between the two groups, but the degree of postoperative MI in the CABG group was significantly higher than that in the CABG+MVS group (P<0.01). However, the left atrium diameter in the CABG group was significantly smaller than that in the CABG+MVS group (P<0.01). Paired analysis showed that systolic pulmonary artery pressure, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, left ventricular end-systolic diameter, left ventricular ejection fraction and MI were significantly improved after operation (P<0.01); left atrium diameter was significantly improved after operation in the CABG group (P<0.01), but there was no statistical difference before and after operation in the CABG+MVS group (P=0.10). Conclusion For patients with moderate to severe IMR, CABG with mitral valve treatment can improve left ventricular remodeling, but can not significantly improve left atrial remodeling. Whether performing mitral valve treatment during CABG should be cautious. CABG alone is a safe and effective scheme for elderly patients with poor physical condition and low life expectancy.
