The limitation of resource of blood and risk of transfusion-transmitted infections contribute to development and generalization of restrictive transfusion strategy. However, advanced evidences of clinical trials indicated a restrictive transfusion threshold after cardiac surgery was not superior to a liberal threshold with respect to morbidity or health care costs. It is time to optimize patient blood management but not free-transfusion and increase of risk of patients. The duration of red-cell storage was not associated with significant differences in the mortality and morbidity of patients. Three new pathogen-reduction technologies and pharmaceutical intervenes may provide safe of transfusion and improvement of outcomes.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the additional catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) and conventional treatment (CT) for treatment primary deep vein thrombosis.
MethodsDatabases such as CNKI, WanFang Data, Pubmed, EMBASE.com, Medline, CBM, CSJD, CJFD, and the Cochrane Library were electronically searched from the date of their establishment to 30 June, 2013, and the relevant literatures and conference proceedings were also manually searched to include randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on comparison of additional CDT versus CT for primary deep vein thrombosis. Two reviewers independently screened studies according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data, and accessed the methodological quality of the included studies. Then the meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.1 software. Publication bias was assessed by STATA software. A meta-regression model was used to describe between study variability.
ResultsTwo RCTs including 3 literatures contain 224 patients reporting data on safety and efficacy of CDT versus CT were included. There were no publication bias (Begg'S test, Z=1.02. P > 0.05;Egger'S test, t=0.98, P > 0.05). The results of meta-analysis showed that:in 6 months after surgery iliofemoral vein patency rate of CDT group was higher than that of CT group (OR=3.62, 95% CI:1.51-8.64, P=0.004), in 6 months after surgery CDT group with a lower rate than CT group of the iliofemoral vein occlusion and (or)venous reflux rate (OR=0.24, 95% CI:0.11-0.53, P=0.000), and the incidence rate of PTS in 24 months after surgery in CTD group was less than that of CT group (OR=0.55, 95% CI:0.31-0.96, P=0.040). There were no statistically significant of the major complications after surgery between CDT group and CT group (OR=1.34, 95% CI:0.12-15.69, P=0.810). But the incidence rates of minor complications and total complications after surgery in CT group were lower than those of CDT group (OR=13.67, 95% CI:4.08-45.83, P < 0.00 01 and OR=11.67, 95% CI:4.40-30.99, P < 0.000 01).
ConclusionsCDT is a effective and positive way to treat early deep venous thrombosis especially in terms of the patency of vascular and prevent the occlusion and PTS. Due to the limitation of the included studies, large sample size, multicenter, and high quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion, such as the ATTRACT Study. The intracavitary therapy could be applied to clinic combining individual conditions of patients.
After the May 12th Wenchuan earthquake, the Department of Architecture and Operation of West China Hospital took prompt action to examine the damage of the hospital buildings. And then experts were invited to perform a safety evaluation of all the hospital buildings. Meanwhile, a real-time monitoring system was initiated to identify any subsequent damage caused by after-shocks. In timely response to the clinical demand, potential dangers were removed so as to ensure the medical rescue work for the wounded.
Objective To learn and analyse the current clinicians’ knowledge and attitudes towards patient safety, and to provide relevant evidence for future medical education. Method We conducted a survey on clinicians mainly in West China Hospital of Sichuan University with group random sampling method. We analysed the data on the clinicians’ knowledge and attitudes with SPSS softerware. Result Totally 300 questionnaires were distributed, of which 258 were completed adequately. The results showed the clinicians’ knowledge on patient safety was poor, however, the respcnse from the clinicians in Outpatient Department were better than those in Inpatient Department. The majority of the clinicians (above 95.00%) were willing to learn the knowledge of patient safety. Conclusion As the clinicians are willing to learn the knowledge of patient safety positively, it is necessary to integrate patient safety education into the current medical education curriculum.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the in vivo biological safety of porous zinc oxide (ZnO)/hydroxyapatite (HA) composite materials.MethodsThe porous ZnO/HA composite materials and porous HA materials were prepared by the spark plasma sintering technology. First, the materials were characterized, including scanning electron microscopy to observe the material structure, in vitro degradation experiments to detect the degradation rate of the materials, and inductively coupled plasma emission spectrometer to detect the concentration of Zn2+ dissolved out of the composite material degradation. Then the two kinds of material extracts were prepared for acute systemic toxicity test. Fifteen male Kunming mice were randomly divided into groups A, B, and C (n=5) and injected intraperitoneally with normal saline, HA extracts, and ZnO/HA extracts, respectively. The body mass of the mice was recorded before injection and at 24, 48, and 72 hours after injection. The liver and kidney tissues were taken at 72 hours for HE staining to evaluate the safety of the composite material. Finally, the biological safety of the material in vivo was evaluated by implantation experiment. The eighteen male New Zealand white rabbits were randomly divided into HA group and ZnO/HA group (n=9); a bilateral radius defect model (1 cm) was established, and the right forelimbs of the two groups were implanted with porous HA materials and porous ZnO/HA composite materials, respectively; the left untreated as a blank control. The general condition of the animals were observed after operation. The rabbit blood was collected at 1 day before operation and at 1 day, 1 week, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks after operation for routine blood test (inflammation-related indicators) and blood biochemistry (liver and kidney function-related indicators). X-ray films were taken at 4, 8, and 12 weeks after operation to observe the repair of bone defects.ResultsMaterial characterization showed that porous ZnO/HA composite materials had interconnected large and small pore structures with a pore size between 50 and 500 μm, which degraded faster than porous HA materials, and continuously and slowly dissolved Zn2+. The acute systemic toxicity test showed that the mice in each group had no abnormal performance after injection, and the body mass increased (P<0.05). HE staining showed that the cells shape and structure of liver and kidney tissue were normal. Animal implantation experiments showed that all rabbits survived until the experiment was completed; routine blood tests showed inflammation in each group (neutrophils, monocytes, and lymphocytes increased) at 1 day after operation, and all returned to normal at 8 weeks (P>0.05); compared with 1 day before operation, the content of inflammatory cells in the HA group increased at 1 day, 1 week, and 4 weeks after operation (P<0.05), and the ZnO/HA group increased at 1 day after operation (P<0.05); blood biochemistry showed that the liver and kidney function indexes were in the normal range; X-ray films showed that the ZnO/HA group had better osseointegration than the HA group at 4 weeks after operation.ConclusionThe porous ZnO/HA composite material has good in vivo biological safety and good bone repair ability, which is a potential bone repair material.
Objective To evaluate on immunogenicity and safety of measles-mumps-rubella-varicella vaccine. Methods The PubMed, BIOSIS Previews, CDSR, The Cochrane Library, CBM, CNKI and VIP were searched between Jan. 1990 and April 2010. Studies were included in the review if they were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about measles (M) – mumps (M) – rubella (R) and varicella (V) vaccine. Trial screening, data exaction and quality assessment of the included trials were conducted by the method recommended by Cochrane Collaboration. Statistical analyses were conducted by using RevMan 4.2.10 software. Results Five RCTs were included. Among those there were 2 trials of B degree and 3 trials of C degree. Meta-analyses showed that to different inoculation methods, (MMRV or MMR+V) the rate of pain was not significantly different with RR 0.94 and 95%CI 0.83 to 1.05 (P=0.28). The rate of redness was not significantly different with RR 1.08 and 95%CI 0.90 to 1.29 (P=0.40). The rate of hardening was not significantly different with RR 1.16 and 95%CI 0.95 to 1.43 (P=0.14). The rate of fever was significantly different with RR 1.20 and 95%CI 1.12 to 1.29 (Plt;0.000 01). The rate of skin rash was not significantly different with RR 1.18 and 95%CI 1.00 to 1.41 (P=0.05). The serum measles antibody positive rate was not significantly different with RR 1.00 and 95%CI 0.99 to 1.01 (P=0.68). The serum mumps antibody positive rate was not significantly different with RR 0.99 and 95%CI 0.50 to 1.01 (P=0.11). The serum rubella antibody positive rate was not significantly different with RR 1.00 and 95%CI 0.99 to 1.01 (P=0.68). The se-rum varicella antibody positive rate was not significantly different with RR 1.00 and 95%CI 0.99 to 1.01 (P=0.58). Conclusion Compared with MMR+V vaccine, the MMRV vaccine has the same immune effect. In respect of immune safety, in addition to higher rate of fever after vaccination, other local or systemic reaction is good. For the role of reducing vaccination times and good performance on immune effect and safety, the MMRV vaccine can be regarded as candidate vaccine for children. The fever caused by the new component should be strengthened in the following study. Limited to the quality and account for the current original documents, citing evidence of this systematic review would be cautious. Future studies would expand the sample size, fulfill the test design, increase indicators to improve the quality of research and demonstration intensity.
Objective
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of total hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD).
Methods
Between December 2009 and May 2016, 30 THAs were performed in 28 patients with dialysis-dependent renal failure (18 patients) or renal transplantation (10 patients). A retrospective case control study was carried out to compare these 28 ESRD patients (ESRD group) with a matched cohort of 28 nonrenal patients (control group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, hip side, American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) classification, comorbidities, and preoperative Harris score and hemoglobin (Hb) level between 2 groups (P>0.05). The complications during hospitalization, Hb level changes, perioperative transfusion rate, hospital stay, and hospitalization costs in 2 groups were evaluated; and the creatinine changes of dialysis patients in ESRD group were evaluated. During the follow-up period, 90 days readmissions, periprosthetic infection, prosthesis loosening, hip Harris score, and deaths were recorded.
Results
There was no loss of follow-up. The mean postoperative follow-up of ESRD group was 3.4 years (range, 1.0-7.4 years) and control group was 3.5 years (range, 1.0-7.4 years). Differences in hospital stay and the drop of Hb was not significant between 2 groups (P>0.05). The hospitalization costs and perioperative transfusion rate were significantly higher in ESRD group than in control group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in creatinine value of dialysis patients in ESRD group between pre- and post-operation (t=1.804, P=0.089). At last follow-up, the Harris score was significantly higher than preoperative score in both groups (P<0.05); however, there was no significant difference in Harris score between groups (t=1.278, P=0.207). In ESRD group, 5 patients presented complications, 1 patient was readmitted to hospital, and 2 patients died during the follow-up. In control group, 1 patient presented complications, and there was no 90 days readmission and no death. During the follow-up period, there was no loosening or revision in 2 groups and the prosthesis was in good position.
Conclusion
THA can improve joint function and life quality of ESRD patients, but the risks of operation, perioperative complications, transfusion rate, and cost are high. Correct perioperative evaluation and management can help ESRD patients safely go through the perioperative period.
