摘要:目的：觀察復方苦參注射液配合化療治療晚期胃癌的臨床療效。方法：將60例晚期胃癌患者分為兩組,兩組均采用FOLFOX方案化療,21天為1個周期；2個周期評價效療。治療組30例加用復方苦參注射液治療,14天為1療程,2個療程評價療效。觀察近期療效及臨床證候變化、生存質量及毒副反應變化。結果:兩組近期療效比較,治療組與對照組總緩解率分別為433%和400%（P＞005）；兩組臨床證候變化比較,治療組與對照組總改善率分別為800%和600%（P＜005）；兩組生存質量變化比較,治療組與對照組提高穩定率分別為867%和567%（P＜005）；中位生存期分別為8個月和5個月；兩組毒副反應比較,治療組毒副反應明顯低于對照組（P＜005）。結論:復方苦參注射液配合化療治療晚期胃癌具有一定抗腫瘤作用,能緩解疼痛癥狀及臨床癥狀,減輕化療毒副反應,提高生活質量,延長生存期。Abstract: Objective: To study the effect of combination FuFang Ku Shen Zhusheye and chemotherapy for treatment of advanced gastric cancer. Methods: Sixty patientswith advanced gastric cancer were divided into two groups, all used with FOLFOXregimen, 21 days a cycle; twocycle assessment of treatment effect. The treatment group were treated with the FuFang Ku Shen Zhusheye plus treatment, a course of treatment for 14 days, the effect were evaluated after two courses. The clinical symptoms and living quality, toxicity were dynamically observed. Results: Both shortterm effect of comparison, the overall response rates of the treatment group and the control group were 433% and 400% (P＞005); The rates of clinical symptoms of the treatment group and the controlgroup were 800% and 600% respectively (P＜005); the rates of increasing of living quality were respectively 867% and 567% (P＜005); the median survival time was 8 months and 5 months; the toxicity of the treatment group was significantly lower than that of the control group (P ＜005).Conclusion: Treating advanced gastric cancer by use of FuFang Ku Shen Zhusheye combination with chemotherapy is helpful to reducing the pain symptoms, promoting the clinical symptoms, reducing the chemotherapy side effects, improving quality of life and prolonging the survival time.
ObjectiveTo understand the latest research progress in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer (AGC) and explore the optimal treatment strategy. Method The latest literature on the treatment of AGC was retrieved and reviewed. Results For patients with AGC, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy, palliative therapy, nutritional support, and traditional Chinese medicine therapy were currently adopted in clinic, the combination of them were used usually. Some patients obtained good therapeutic effects by new chemotherapy drugs and antibody conjugated drugs. In the era of first-line immunotherapy or targeted therapy, first-line immunotherapy alone, immunotherapy in combination with chemotherapy, double immunotherapy, and immunotherapy combined with anti-angiogenesis targeted drugs for AGC had represented some survival benefits. ConclusionsThe research, development, and widespread application of new anti-tumor drugs have continuously expanded the treatment methods for AGC. The development of tumor molecular biology provides an opportunity for the treatment of AGC, and the precise diagnosis and treatment pattern guided by molecular typing is gradually maturing. However, the treatment of AGC is still facing challenges. In the era of precision medicine, facing the higher heterogeneity of gastric cancer, the dilemma of precise treatment of drugs for AGC, and the research and development of new anti-tumor drugs, the optimal treatment mode of AGC still needs more clinical exploration. It is necessary to comprehensively consider various aspects such as the patient’s physical condition, previous treatment status, and drug accessibility.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the relationship between methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene C677T polymorphism and efficacy of fluorouracil-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC).
MethodsComputer retrieval in China Journal Full-text Database, Chinese Science and Technology Periodical Database, Wanfang database, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, PubMed, EMbase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science Database (from their establishment to May 28, 2013) was performed to include case-control studies on MTHFR gene C677T polymorphism and sensitivity to fluorouracil-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Statistical analysis was done by using RevMan 5.1 software.
ResultsSeven case-control studies with 775 patients were included. The meta-analysis showed that among MTHFR C677T genotypes, for TT vs. CC, OR=4.63, 95%CI (1.23, 17.4); and for CC+CT vs. TT, OR=0.21, 95%CI (0.06, 0.78). Subgroup analysis of Asian group showed that for TT vs. CC, OR=32.99, 95%CI (11.40,95.42); and for CC+CT vs. TT, OR=0.04, 95%CI (0.02, 0.10). Sensitivity analysis performed according to different detection methods showed that for TT vs. CC, OR=6.03, 95%CI (1.53, 23.72); and for CC+CT vs.TT, OR=0.17, 95%CI (0.04, 0.68).
ConclusionPolymorphism of MTHFR C677T gene may be associated with sensitivity to fluorouracil-based chemotherapy in patients with AGC.
【摘要】 目的 探討替吉奧膠囊聯合奧沙利鉑治療晚期胃癌的近期療效和毒性反應。 方法 2010年1-7月，16例晚期胃癌患者根據體表面積來確定初始劑量，體表面積lt;1.25 m2，替吉奧膠囊40 mg/次，2次/d；體表面積1.25~1.5 m2，替吉奧膠囊50 mg/次，2次/d；體表面積gt;1.5 m2，替吉奧膠囊60 mg/次，2次/d，早、晚飯后分別口服1次，連續服用28 d，停藥14 d。奧沙利鉑注射液130 mg/m2加入5%葡萄糖注射液500 mL避光緩慢靜gt;2 h，第1、21天重復，連用2周期。按RECIST 1.1標準評價客觀療效和不良反應。 結果 16例患者中PR 9例（56.3%），SD3例（18.8%），PD 4例（25%），總有效率為69.0%。不良反應主要是血液學毒性、胃腸道反應及外周神經毒性，且均在Ⅰ~Ⅱ。 結論 替吉奧膠囊聯合奧沙利鉑方案治療晚期胃癌的近期療效較好，不良反應可以耐受，值得進一步研究應用。【Abstract】 Objective To explore the early efficacy of Oxaliplatin combined with S1 capsule on advanced gastric cancer and observe the toxicity. Methods A total of 16 patients with advanced gastric cancer from January to July 2010 were treated with chemotherapy: oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 mixed with 5% glucose injection 500 mL in the first day and repeated in the 21st day; Po after breakfast and dinner: S1 capsule with an initial dose according to the body surface area. Body surface lt;1.25 m2, 40 mg once, twice per day; body surface:1.25-1.5 m2,50 mg once, twice per day; body surface gt;1.5 m2, 60 mg once, twice per day. The medication lasted for 28 days, withdrew for 14 days. All of the patients underwent the treatment for two cycles. Efficacy and toxicities were evaluated according to the RECIST 1.1 standard. Results Of the 16 patients, partial remission (PR) was in nine (56.3%), stable disease was in three (18.8%) (SD), and progression disease was in four (PD). The total response rate was 69.0%. The major toxicities included leucopenia, nausea, vomiting and neurosensory abnormity. Conclusion Oxaliplatin combined with S1 capsule is effective on advanced gastric cancer, and the adverse effects are tolerable.
ObjectiveTo explore the value of multi-slice spiral CT (MSCT) in the judgment of N stage and lymph node metastasis of patients with advanced gastric cancer who underwent surgery after transformation therapy.MethodsClinical data of 27 patients with advanced gastric cancer who underwent surgery after transformation therapy, form July 2017 to July 2019 in Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University were analyzed retrospectively, and all of patients underwent SOX regimen transformation therapy. The MSCT enhanced scan was performed before operation, and the postoperative pathology was used as the gold standard. The preoperative N stage and lymph node metastasis groups were evaluated by MSCT enhanced scan and compared with the pathological results.Results Before the operation, MSCT was used to evaluate the lymph node metastasis of the patients with advanced gastric cancer after transformation therapy, and compared with the lymph nodes metastasis of the corresponding pathological results, the accuracy rates of lymph node groups in No.1, No.3, No.5, No.6, No.7, No.8, and No.16 were 77.78% (21/27), 81.48% (22/27), 85.19% (23/27), 88.89% (24/27), 85.19% (23/27), 74.07% (20/27), and 96.30% (26/27), respectively. Compared with pathological results, the total accuracy of N stage after transformation therapy that evaluated by MSCT was 62.96% (17/27), with the Kappa coefficient was 0.419 (P=0.003).ConclusionsMSCT has high accuracy and consistency for the N stage of advanced gastric cancer after transformation therapy. Besides, MSCT has a certain diagnostic rate for lymph node metastasis in patients with advanced gastric cancer in lymph node groups of No.1, No.3, No.5, No.6, No.7, No.8, and No.16.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of docetaxel (DOC) combined with oxaliplatin (OXA) regimen in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer.
MethodsSixty patients with advanced gastric cancer treated in our hospital from January 2008 to January 2011 were randomly divided into two groups. The treatment group (n=30) was given DOC combined with OXA regimen. Patients in this group were treated with DOC 75 mg/m2, ivgtt, d1; OXA 130 mg/m2, ivgtt, d4; with 21 days as a cycle. The control group (n=30) was given DCF regimen. Patients in the control group were treated with DOC 75 mg/m2, ivgtt, d1; cisplatin 75 mg/m2, ivgtt, d1; calcium folinate 200/m2, ivgtt, 2 h, d1-2; fluorouracil 400 mg/m2, bolus 10 minutes, fluorouracil 600 mg/m2 civ 22 h d1-2; also with 21 days as a cycle. All patients received two cycles of chemotherapy at least. The effective rate (complete remission+partial remission), adverse reactions, median survival time and quality of life were analyzed and compared between the two groups.
ResultsThe effective rates in the treatment group and the control group were 60.0% and 46.7% respectively, showing a non-significant difference (P>0.05). The appetite increasing rate (70.0% vs 43.3%), the weight gain rate (60.0% vs 33.3%), and the Karnofsky score improvement rate (63.3% vs 30.0%) of the treatment group were significantly higher than those of the control group (P<0.05). The adverse reactions were fewer in the treatment group, and most of them were between grade Ⅰ and Ⅱ. The median time of disease progression (5.8 months vs 5.6 months) and the median survival period (11.8 months vs 9.2 months) of the treatment group were longer than those in the control group.
ConclusionDOC combined with OXA regimen is effective in treating advanced gastric cancer. It can significantly improve the quality of life of the patients, and it has fewer adverse reactions. Meanwhile, the median survival period is prolonged. DOC combined with OXA regimen is worth to be applied in clinic.
ObjectiveTo compare the clinical effects of continuous hyperthermic peritoneal perfusion chemotherapy (CHPPC) and intravenous chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer patients, and find better nursing methods.
MethodsSixty advanced gastric cancer patients who underwent chemotherapy between June 2013 and June 2014 were divided into CHPPC group (group C, n=30) and intravenous chemotherapy group (group V, n=30). We recorded the nursing methods for both the two groups, patients' satisfaction to the nursing and treatment, peritoneal metastasis rate and quality of life during the chemotherapy.
ResultsThe life quality in group V was lower than that in group C (P<0.05). The differences in patients' satisfaction rate, peritoneal metastasis rate, and one-year survival rate were not significantly different between the two groups (P>0.05).
ConclusionFor patients with advanced gastric cancer requiring chemotherapy, in spite of higher cost and more complicated operations, CHPPC is superior in lower adverse events rate, better quality of life during chemotherapy and doesn't decrease patients' satisfaction to the nursing and treatment.
