Methodological quality and transferability will be important issues for the credibility and usefulness of both published studies and administrative methods for evaluating the socio-economic value of marketed medicines in China. This paper critically examines factors commonly contributing to, or inhibiting, the quality and transferability of socio-economic evidence of the value of medicines, with specific reference to the Chinese community. It discusses appropriate approaches to design, performance, and reporting of published economic evaluation studies, as well as guides on assessment of quality of economic evaluations and recommends two internationally established methods that may be suitable for training in this setting.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the status of economic evaluation of liver cancer screening in China, so as to provide reference for further studies.MethodsPubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, WanFang Data, CBM and VIP databases were searched to collect economic evaluation studies of liver cancer screening in China from inception to December, 2017. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and conducted descriptive analysis of basic characteristics, methods of economic evaluation and main results as well as quality and uniformity of reporting.ResultsA total of 5 studies were included. Among them, the starting age of screening were found to be 35 to 45 years old; α-fetoprotein (AFP) testing and ultrasound examination combined procedure and screening interval of every 6 months were mostly evaluated. The quality of the 5 studies was satisfactory, and the uniformity of reporting was relatively acceptable, with a median score of 78% (range: 60% ~ 78%). Two population-based studies reported cost per liver cancer detected (44 thousand and 575 thousand yuan). Three studies reported cost-effectiveness ratio(CER) based on life year saved (LYS) and quality adjusted life year (QALY). Among these results, only 1 study from mainland China reported CER based on LYS (1 775 yuan), and the calculated ratio of CER to local GDP per capita was estimated as 0.1, while 2 studies from Taiwan province reported 4 CERs, and the ratios of CER to local GDP per capita ranged from 1.0 to 2.2.ConclusionsInformation from liver cancer endemic areas such as Taiwan province indicates promising cost-effectiveness to conduct liver cancer screening in local general population, while data from mainland suggests that conducting liver cancer screening combining AFP and ultrasound in high-risk population will be cost-effective, however only supported by 1 regional study. This needs to be verified by further economic evaluations based on randomized controlled trials or cohort studies as well as health economic evaluations.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the comparative cost-effectiveness of thrombolysis treatment of ischemic stroke based on outcomes of CT perfusion (CTP).
MethodsWe applied the methods of systematic review to evaluate the studies abroad about the cost effectiveness of CTP diagnosis outcomes used for selecting stroke patients for thrombolysis treatment. We also evaluated the domestic studies about the cost-effectiveness of CTP in China by establishing a decision tree model.
ResultsA total of 2 economics studies were included. The results showed that, the cost-effectiveness ratios of CT, CTP and MRI for selecting stroke patients for thrombolysis treatment were 2 983.7 ￡/QALY, 2 951.4 ￡/QALY and 2 982.9 ￡/ QALY, respectively, in the UK; 100 483.5＄/QALY and 99 406.1＄/QALY just for CT and CTP, respectively, in the US; and the evaluation outcomes by establishing the decision tree model showed that, 113 492.4 ￥/QALY, 113 615￥/QALY and 120 831.9 ￥/QALY, respectively, in China.
ConclusionAll international and domestic studies' results show that CTP is more cost-effective than CT/MRI in selecting stroke patients for thrombolysis treatment.
Objective
To evaluate the ambulatory surgery mode by using health economical mothods and provide reference for optimization and decision of surgical operation mode.
Methods
The patients who underwent unilateral flexible ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotriphy for ureteral calculi in Xiangya Hospital, Central South University between January 1st to December 31th, 2015 were selected in this study, including 59 with ambulatory surgery mode (the ambulatory group) and 65 with special in-hospital surgery mode (the special group). The differences in average bed occupancy time, cost, therapeutic effect, and satisfaction between the two operation modes were compared.
Results
The average bed occupancy time in the ambulatory group and the special group was (1.03±0.18) and (6.35±0.74) days, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The patients in both groups were followed up for one month after the operation, and the incidence of complications was 6.8% (4/59) in the ambulatory group and 6.2% (4/65) in the special group, without significant difference (P>0.05). The satisfaction score in the ambulatory group and the special group was 96.48±0.23vs. 96.53±0.18 without significant difference (P>0.05). The differences in direct medical cost [(17 738.28±1 027.85)vs. (21 307.67±554.41) yuan], direct non-medical cost [(103.39±18.25) vs. (630.76±78.90) yuan], indirect cost[ (266.93±47.12) vs. (1 640.44±190.55) yuan], and total cost [(18 128.10±1 037.76) vs. (23 558.29±619.20) yuan] between the ambulatory group and the special group were all statistically significant (P<0.05). The treatment effect index in the ambulatory group and the special group was 0.96 and 1.05, respectively; the cost-effect ratio was 18 883.44 and 22 436.47, respectively. Sensitivity analysis showed that the adjusted cost-effect ratio in the ambulatory group (16 629.64) was still lower than that in the special group (20 534.91).
Conclusions
The cost-effect ratio of ambulatory surgery mode is superior than that of special in-hospital surgery mode, and there is no obvious difference in patients satisfaction between the two modes. Ambulatory surgery mode can be recommended to patients who meet the indications of day surgery.
Onehealth, an evidence-based decision-making software, is based on the United Nations' epidemiological reference modules to predict the effect of health services. Onehealth is a large database. The software is using activitybased costing, simulating investment costs of health system and changes of mortality in different coverage levels. By the cost of inputs/avoid deaths, it could quantify the cost of health services effectiveness and provide an intuitive basis for the rational allocation of health resources. This study introduces the relevant concepts, model structures and applications of Onehealth. We took the study of child nutrition interventions in Sudan for example and to present Onehealth tool's operating. As a new auxiliary and evidence-based decision-making software with scientific and rigorous theoretical approach, Onehealth has practical significance on the national or regional macro decision-making.
Objective
To systematically review the cost-effectiveness of gefitinib for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), in order to provide the economics values of gefitinib for clinical application.
Method
We electronically searched databases including PubMed, Ovid, Embase, Cochrane Library, Medline, China National Knowledge Internet, VIP, and Wanfang database for articles about the cost-effectiveness of gefitinib for advanced NSCLC patients from January 1946 to October 2017, and then performed a systematic literature review of economic evaluations of geftinib.
Results
A total of 20 independent studies were included in the present systematic review, in which 8 were the first-line treatment, 9 were the second-line treatment, 1 was the third-line treatment, and 2 were maintenance treatment. The most common comparison was gefitinib vs. chemotherapy (n=7), and other comparisons were gefitinib vs. erlotinib (n=4), gefitinib vs. docetaxel (n=3), gefitinib vs. placebo (n=2), gefitinib vs. icotinib (n=2), gefitinib vs. afatinib (n=1), and gefitinib vs. other treatments (n=1). For the advanced NSCLC patients, the first- or second-line treatment with gefitinib compared to chemotherapy was considered to be more cost-effective, especially in patients with mutated epidermal growth factor receptor gene. As the second-line treatment, gefitinib was considered to be more economical than erlotinib and docetaxel.
Conclusion
Gefitinib is considered to be a cost-effective strategy for the advanced NSCLC patients as the first- or second-line therapy.
Objective
To investigate cost-effectiveness of no indwelling urinary catheter in pulmonary lobectomy patients and to confirm the advances of no indwelling urinary catheter.
Methods
We recruited 148 lung cancer patients who were scheduled for pulmonary lobectomy under general anesthesia in West China Hospital from July through December 2015. These patients were divided into two groups including an indwelling urinary catheter group (74 patients, 45 males and 29 females, at age of 52.55±19.87 years) and a no indwelling urinary catheter group (74 patients, 42 males and 32 females, at age of 54.03±16.66 years). Indexes of cost-effectiveness of the two groups were compared.
Results
There was no statistical difference between the two groups in duration of indwelling catheter (1.56±0.0.65 d versus 1.68±0.91 d, P=0.077). Material expense(4 811.48 yuan versus 296.74 yuan, P=0.045), cost of nursing care (7 413.32 yuan versus 457.32 yuan, P=0.013), and total expense (12 224.8 yuan versus 754.06 yuan, P=0.000) in the indwelling catheter group were higher than those in the no indwelling catheter group. Material expense per patient (65.02±5.62 yuan/patient-time versus 4.01±0.00 yuan/patient-time, P=0.000), cost of nursing care per patient (100.18±7.19 yuan/patient-time versus 6.18±1.22 yuan/patient-time, P=0.000), and total cost per patient (165.20±12.81 yuan/patienttime versus 10.19±1.22 yuan/patient-time, P=0.000) in the indwelling catheter group were higher than those in the no indwelling catheter group.
Conclusion
Both costs and labor of nurse can be cut down for appropriate lung cancer patients undergoing lobectomy without routine indwelling urinary catheter.
Objective
To retrospectively analyze the analgesic effect and cost-effectiveness of combined analgesia versus intermittent analgesia for patients underwent retroperitoneal laparoscopic surgery.
Methods
We retrospectively collected clinical parameters and outcomes of analgesic effect from patients who underwent retroperitoneal laparoscopic surgery. Included patients were divided into two groups: local injection of ropivacaine combined with intermittent administration with analgesic via intravenous injection and intermittent administration with analgesic via intravenous injection only. Visual analogue scale (VAS) at different time points (2 h, 4 h, 6 h, 12 h, 24 h), usage of postoperative non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), adverse events, costs and other information were collected and assessed for further analysis of analgesic effect and cost-effectiveness.
Results
A total of 80 patients were enrolled in this study, each group consists of 40 patients. The results of this study found that VAS scores at 2 h and 4 h after operation in the combined analgesic group were significantly lower than that in the intermittent intravenous analgesia group (P<0.05), while there were no significant differences between the two groups in VAS scores at 6, 12 and 24 h after operation. The usage of NSAIDs were significantly lower in the combined group than intermittent group (P<0.05). The effective rate in the combined group was significantly higher than that in the intermittent group (P<0.05). The average cost of postoperative hospitalization and postoperative analgesic of the two groups were similar (allP values >0.05), and cost-effectiveness evaluation of the combined analgesia group was better than that of intermittent group.
Conclusion
Compared to intermittent administration with analgesic via intravenous injection, subcutaneous injection of ropivacaine hydrochloride combined with intermittent intravenous injection of parecoxib in patients underwent retroperitoneal laparoscopic surgery significantly could alleviate patients' painful complaints and reduce the postoperative usage of NSAIDs without increasing adverse events. Furthermore, the combination strategy has a lower cost-effectiveness ratio than intermittent group, which represents economic advantages.
Objective
To evaluate the cost effectiveness of four different mechanisms clinical commonly used antidepressants, namely, amitriptyline, escitalopram, mirtazapine and venlafaxine in the treatment of moderate-severe depressive disorder in China and to provide clinicians with some advice.
Methods
We carried out the cost-effectiveness analysis of four antidepressants by establishing a decision tree model. The parameters uncertainty in the model was estimated through one-way sensitivity analysis.
Results
In terms of average cost-effectiveness ratio (CER), amitriptyline’s was 45.24 RMB, which was the lowest. And the CERs of mirtazapine, escitalopram and venlafaxine were 273.71 RMB, 332.00 RMB and 716.58 RMB, respectively. While in terms of incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), venlafaxine was excluded as the dominated strategy. When the threshold value of willingness to pay (WTP) was less than 3?420.92 RMB, amitriptyline was the most cost-effective; when the threshold value ranges between 3?420.92 RMB and 4?200 RMB, mirtazapine was the most cost-effective; and when the threshold value was over 4?200 RMB, escitalopram was the most cost-effective. In the one-way sensitivity analysis, when we changed the four kinds of drugs costs within a certain range, the results was not changed with the change of venlafaxine’s cost but changed with the other three drugs costs.
Conclusion
Clinicians may choose the most cost-effective therapy according to patients’ different WTP values. We suggests that health care institutions should encourage the use of escitalopram clinically and provide subsidies for patients so as to increase the overall society benefit.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the pharmacoeconomics of hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis in patients with end-stage renal disease. MethodsCRD, NICE, CADTH, HITAP, NECA, IWIQG, ISPOR, PubMed, EMbase, CNKI, and WanFang Data databases were electronically searched to collect pharmacoeconomic studies on the hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis in the treatment of end-stage renal disease from inception to December 2020. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then, the conclusions of research models, pharmacoeconomic evaluation results, and sensitivity analysis were summarized. ResultsA total of 15 pharmacoeconomic studies were included, among which 9 studies used the Markov state transition model, and 6 were observational studies. From the perspective of health outcomes, peritoneal dialysis had cost-effectiveness advantages over hemodialysis in the treatment of end-stage renal disease under the condition of a clear threshold. ConclusionsCurrent evidence shows that compared with hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis has certain cost-effectiveness advantages in the treatment of end-stage renal disease. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high-quality studies are required to verify the above conclusions.
