Traditional Chinese medicine equipment plays an indispensable role in the prevention, diagnosis, treatment and rehabilitation of traditional Chinese medicine from the needs of people's life and health, and provides technical support for the simple, convenient, cheap and effective clinical practice of traditional Chinese medicine. The traditional Chinese medicine equipment industry has the development advantages of large demand gap, strong policy support and emerging technology empowerment. At the same time, there are also bottlenecks such as lagging standardization construction, weak industrial foundation, insufficient characteristics of traditional Chinese medicine and immature evidence-based evaluation research. The coming of the era of digital intelligence has brought new opportunities for the development and reform of the traditional Chinese medicine equipment industry. This paper provides development ideas for the transformation of traditional Chinese medicine equipment from traditional to modern from the aspects of standardization construction, digital intelligence industry upgrading, improvement of evidence-based evaluation system and in-depth international exchanges and cooperation.
Chinese medicine (CM) has significant clinical effects in the treatment of tracheal-bronchitis. It is of important clinical significance to formulate guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of tracheal-bronchitis based on the characteristics of TCM syndrome differentiation. The Respiratory Disease Branch of China Association of Chinese Medicine and Respiratory Disease Branch of China Medical Association of Minorities organized and established a multi-disciplinary background working group, based on the World Health Organization Handbook for Guideline Development and the Guideline Development Handbook for Diagnosis and Therapy of Integrative Medicine to develop this guideline. It was developed through technical links such as clinical problem investigation, evidence collection and evaluation, Delphi consultation, and expert consensus meetings. Based on the current best evidence, CM intervention costs and expert experience, 25 recommendations were established to standardize the etiology and pathogenesis of tracheal-bronchitis, syndrome differentiation and treatment, prevention, and care, etc., which can be used by physicians at different levels of medical institutions.
Objective The core indicator pool of ischemic stroke (IS) was constructed to provide a basis for the establishment of the core outcome set (COS), so as to improve the consistency of clinical research and evaluation results of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) treatment for IS. Methods In this study, the mixed methods research (MMR) convergent parallel design was used to carry out qualitative research and quantitative research at the same time, and the two research results were integrated to reach a conclusion. Quantitative research comprehensively collected the multi-source efficacy evaluation indicators of TCM treatment of IS, and carried out descriptive statistical analysis based on frequency theory. Semi-structured interviews were used in the qualitative research, relevant interest groups were selected to understand the evaluation indicators of the IS efficacy of TCM treatment that they were concerned about, and NVivo software was used for in-depth analysis, coding, classification, and extraction of the efficacy indicators. Based on the principle of pillar integration, quantitative and qualitative research results were integrated to construct an element pool of evaluation indicators for the treatment of IS with traditional Chinese medicine. Results A total of 437 standard papers, 71 registered trial protocols, 100 real-world medical data cases and several guideline consensus policy documents were included in the quantitative study, and a total of 314 indicators in the acute phase of IS, 154 indicators in the recovery phase, and 104 indicators in the sequelae phase were extracted. In the qualitative research part, a total of 32 indicators in the acute stage of IS, 34 indicators in the recovery stage and 35 indicators in the sequelae stage were extracted through interviews. Through group discussion and the principle of pillar integration, an element pool of IS indicators was formed, including 279 IS indicators in the acute stage, 142 indicators in the recovery stage and 91 indicators in the sequelae stage. Conclusion Based on the MMR convergent parallel design, the element pool of the characteristic indicators of the therapeutic effect of IS in TCM is constructed to meet the needs, which provides the preliminary work basis for the construction of the core outcome set of IS in the next stage.
Objective To review the current status of evidence-base medicine (EBM) research on traditional medicine in Japan. Methods Serial reports of EBM special committee of Japan Society for Oriental Medicine (JSOM) were reviewed. Results EBM special committee of JSOM was established earlier and carried out systematic reviews of Kampo treatment throughout Japan. The quality of preparations was standardized and reliable. Evidence Reports of Kampo Treatment 2009 (EKAT 2009) may be a promising promotion for Kampo treatment in Japan. Conclusion For the promotion and development of evidence-based Chinese medicine in China, we need to learn from EBM research projects of JSOM. Based on the current status of EBM research in China, special efforts should be made in validity of research data and scientific analysis and reports of non-randomized trials. According to the characteristics of traditional Chinese medicine, EBM research should be systematically carried out from simple to complex.
Objectives To explore the quality of the reporting of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) for chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS).Methods We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Clinical Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library, Issue 4, 2006), PubMed, EMbase, the Chinese Biomedical Database (CBMdisc), VIP Information, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) (from establishment to February 2007). We also checked the reference lists of included studies. The quality of the reporting of RCTs was assessed using the 22-item checklist of the CONSORT Statement and other self-established criteria. Results Thirty-eight RCTs were included. The word “randomization” was not present in any of the trials, and only 17 reports used a structured abstract. All trials did not report the scientific background and the rational for the trial, the estimation of the necessary sample size, the methods of allocation concealment and blinding, participant flow chart, ITT analysis, and ancillary analyses. Some authors misunderstood the diagnostic criteria and inclusion criteria, some selected inappropriate control interventions, and some did not clearly describe their statistical methods or used incorrect methods. All 38 trials reported positive outcomes, few reported adverse effects. No report included a general interpretation of the new trial’s results in the context of current evidence in their discussion section, and none mentioned the limitations of the study, the clinical and research implications or the external validity of the trial findings. Conclusion The overall reporting quality of RCTs of TCM for CFS is poor. Defects are found in each section of the reports. Researchers and journal editors should learn and use the principles and methods of evidence-based medicine—especially the use of a transparent prospective clinical trial register and the CONSORT Statement—to improve the design, conduct and report TCM trials.
Objective To assess the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) related to traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) published in the Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine by CONSORT statement and Jadad scale. Methods We handsearched the Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine to identify TCM RCTs. The revised CONSORT statement and Jadad scale combined with self-established criteria were applied. Results A total of 57 RCTs were identified of which there were 17 TCM RCTs. Some items in CONSORT checklist were completely reported in all TCM RCTs, such as abstract, inclusion and exclusion criteria, intervention, randomization sequence generation, description of statistic method, description of baseline data, outcomes and estimation, and explain results. Compared with the previous findings, there were more trials in this study to report allocation concealment, randomization implementation, use of flow chart and appliance. Only 3 RCTs (17.6%) reported acknowledgements. One RCT did not describe syndrome type of TCM, and 4 RCTs (23.5%) carried out dummy. The mean Jadad score was 4.35±1.11 in all trials, of which 11 RCTs (64.7) ranked 5 points. Conclusion The comprehensive quality of reporting of TCM RCTs published in the Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine from 2001 to 2008 has been improved. After the publication of CONSORT statement and CONSORT for traditional Chinese medicine, the quality of reporting of TCM RCTs is improved. We are looking forward to improving the CONSORT for TCM.
Objective To improve the sensitivity and broaden the applicability of N-of-1 trials in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), the clinical application and methodology of single-case experimental designs (N-of-1trials, multiple-baseline designs; MBDs) were expounded, compared, and discussed. Methods This paper introduced the current utility of N-of-1 trials in TCM research, introduced MBDs, and compared the methodologies of N-of-1 trials, MBDs and crossover design. Finally, two design schemes to improve the sensitivity and applicability of N-of-1 trials were illustrated. Results N-of-1 trials conformed to the TCM concept of treatment based on syndrome differentiation; however, due to the complex composition of TCM, the results were easily affected by carryover effect. In MBDs, the intervention was introduced in a staggered way, no washout period was needed, and the required sample size was small. MBDs were generally used to preliminarily indicate the effect of intervention; however, the statistical analysis was relatively complicated, and there were few MBDs used in clinical trials of TCM at present. Compared with crossover trials, single-case experimental designs had advantages and disadvantages. N-of-1 trials might best reflect the individualized treatment of TCM and a suitable statistical model (e.g., hierarchical Bayesian statistical method) was expected to improve the sensitivity and applicability of N-of-1 trials in TCM. Combining clinical trial designs (e.g., the combination of N-of-1 trials and MBDs) would complement the limitations of N-of-1 trials, and expand the scope of conditions applicable for study. Conclusion N-of-1 trials have both advantages and disadvantages in TCM research. Improved statistical models or combined study designs will improve the sensitivity and broaden the applicability of N-of-1 trials in TCM.
In the process of evidence-based practice, the evaluation of evidence applicability relied on the subjective judgment of clinicians, while the systematic method of which was still in lack. The complex clinical information of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) enhanced the uncertainty and risk of applying evidence. Based on the analysis of the process of evidence-based practice, this paper introduced the method of TCM evidence applicability evaluation and used the raw data of clinical trials to develop a clinical prediction model to enable the assessment of the evidence applicability on individual patients. The establishment of individual evidence applicability evaluation method could promote the rational application of TCM evidence in the long term.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the application status of Delphi method in clinical research of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM).MethodsPubMed, EMbase, CNKI, WanFang Data and VIP databases were electronically searched to collect original research and methodological research on Delphi method in TCM from inception to August 30th, 2020. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and then, descriptive analysis was performed by using qualitative methods.ResultsA total of 612 articles involving 573 original studies and 39 methodological studies were included, which involved 167 types of diseases. The primary research purposes were disease diagnosis and treatment, syndrome research, scale development, evaluation research, index research, clinical investigation, methodology research, and other 8 categories. 487 papers reported the implementation process and results of Delphi method in varying degrees.ConclusionsDelphi method is widely used in clinical research of TCM, however, there are deficiencies in the specific implementation process.
Objective To identify and investigate the quality of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) in 11 non-key Chinese medical journals so as to learn about the current status and problems. Methods Eleven non-key medical journals of TCM from 1995 to 2000 were hand searched to identify the RCT and controlled clinical trials (CCTs). Each identified RCT or CCT was page by page verified by handsearchers based on the criteria developed by the Cochrane Handbook; the RCTs’ design, randomization method description, blind, baseline comparison, inclusion and exclusion criteria, diagnostic criteria,criteria for theraputic effectiveness, sample size, statistical method，described outcome, side effects, and follow up etc. were analyzed. Results In the related journals from 1995 to 2000, a total of 66 volumes and 390 issues were checked. As a result, 22 739 clinical studies were identified, of which 1 416 RCTs, only 24 (1.69%) were done with double blinding. There were 141 CCTs from 1995 to 2000, the total number of RCT increased from 95 to 1 416 and most of studies were on digestives diseases. Most of these studies had no detailed randomization method description, only 38 (2.68%) studies provided a methodology description. In addition, 1 220 (86.16% ) described outcome index, 1 203 (84.96%) used statistical method，934 (65.96%) had baseline comparison，828 (58.47%) described diagnostic criteria, 197 (13.91%) had inclusion and exclusion criteria，finally only 89 (6.29%) reported side effects. Conclusions Although the number of RCT has increased in the 11 non-key medical journals of TCM in the past six years, the quality of these RCTs needs to be improved.
