Objective
To systematically review the efficacy of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) by helmet in adults with acute respiratory failure.
Methods
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or cohort studies about noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) by helmet in adults with acute respiratory failure were retrieved in PubMed, The Cochrane Library (Issue 11, 2016), Web of Science, EMbase, CBM, CNKI and WanFang Data databases from inception to November 2016. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Stata 12.0 software was then used to perform meta-analysis.
Results
A total of eight studies were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that, NPPV by helmet could significantly reduce the carbon dioxide partial pressure (cohort study: SMD=–0.46, 95%CI –0.75 to –0.18, P=0.001), tracheal intubation rate (RCT: OR=0.36, 95%CI 0.17 to 0.77, P=0.008) and hospital mortality (RCT: OR=0.48, 95%CI 0.24 to 0.98, P=0.044), improve the positive end expiratory pressure (RCT: SMD=1.27, 95%CI 0.87 to 1.67, P<0.05) and respiratory status (RCT: SMD=–0.45, 95%CI –0.81 to –0.08,P=0.017). There was no significant difference in the duration of NPPV(cohort study: OR=–0.20, 95%CI –0.50 to 0.09, P=0.177; RCT: OR=–0.24, 95%CI –0.86 to 0.38, P=0.445).
Conclusion
NPPV by helmet can reduce the carbon dioxide partial pressure, tracheal intubation rate, hospital mortality and improve the positive end expiratory pressure, respiratory status. But the effects in the duration of NPPV and oxygenation index are uncertain. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are needed to verify above conclusion.
Objectives
To assess the prognostic value of blood sugar level for acute respiratory failure patients undergoing mechanical ventilation.
Methods
The study collected 139 acute respiratory failure patients undergoing mechanical ventilation admitted between February 2012 and October 2013. The patients were divided into a hyperglycemic group (n=123, blood sugar ≥143 mg/dl) and a non-hyperglycemic group (n=16, blood sugar <143 mg/dl). The data for basic clinical pathological characteristics and the blood sugar levels were collected, and the correlation between the blood sugar level and the prognosis was assessed using single factor analysis and logistic regression method.
Results
In the study, 88.49% of patients with acute respiratory failure undergoing mechanical ventilation had hyperglycemia (blood sugar ≥143 mg/dl). The proportions of patients with APACHEⅡ score ≥10, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or hypoxemia in the hyperglycemic group were significantly higher than those in the non-hyperglycemic group (P<0.05). APACHEⅡ ≥10, COPD and hypoxemia were significant risk factors for hyperglycemia. At the same time, the proportions of patients in the death group with hyperglycemia ≥143 mg/dl ( OR=8.354, 95%CI 1.067-65.388, P=0.018), APACHEⅡ≥10 ( OR=2.545, 95%CI 1.109-6.356, P=0.046), COPD ( OR=2.871, 95%CI 1.203-6.852, P=0.015), and hypoxemia ( OR=3.500, 95%CI 1.556-7.874, P=0.002) were significantly higher than those in the survival group. Kaplan-Meier curve analysis found that the overall survival of the hyperglycemic patients with acute respiratory failure was significantly lower than that in the non-hyperglycemic patients (P<0.001).
Conclusion
Blood sugar level can be used as an independent predictor for acute respiratory failure patients undergoing mechanical ventilation.
Objective
To formulate an evidence-based position program for a ventilation patient with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).
Methods
Based on fully assessing the patient’s conditions, the clinical problems were put forward according to PICO principles. Such database as The Cochrane Library (2005 to January 2011), DARE (March 2011), CCTR (March 2011), MEDLINE (1996 to January 2011) and CNKI (1979 to January 2011) were retrieved to collect high quality clinical evidence, and then the optimum nursing program was designed in line with patient’s conditions and relatives’ willingness.
Results
Three meta-analyses, three randomized controlled trials, one systematic review and one anterior-posterior self-control study were included. The available clinical evidence displayed that: a) the prone position adopting earlier, especially for patients with bilateral lungs or left lung functional disorder, was propitious to effectively improve the oxygenation condition and reduce the incidence of ventilator induced lung injury (VILI); b) The long-term prone position could increase the risk of pressure sore; c) The prone position could prolong the survival time, but there was no enough evidence to prove that it could obviously decrease the mortality rate of ARDS. So finally a nursing plan was made in combination with literature evidence and patient’s condition: adopting the prone position after onset within 24 to 36 hours, and enhancing the skin nursing to prevent pressure sore at the same time. After 4-week comprehensive therapy and prone position ventilation, the patient got obvious alleviated in oxygenation, with SpO 2 up to 90% to 100%, stable vital signs, and no more VILI and pressure sore. And then the patient was stopped applying ventilator, and transferred to a general ward for further treatment. Conclusion The earlier adoption of prone position ventilation for severe ARDS can improve oxygenation and reduce ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP) and VILI, but whether it can prolong survival time and reduce mortality for mild ARDS or not still has to be proved with more high quality evidence in the future.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the safety and efficacy of non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) combined with fiberoptic bronchoscopy(FB) on acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive puhmonary disease (AECOPD) patients with acute respiratory failure.
MethodsA prospective study was conducted on the AECOPD patients with respiratory failure in respiratory intensive care unit of Tangdu Hospital of Fourth Military Medicine University from February 2010 to February 2011.They were randomly divided into a case group and a control group.The case group was administrated FB and lavage after one hour of NIPPV treatment.The control group was administrated NIPPV without FB and lavage.Other treatment regimen was the same in two groups.
ResultsThere were 51 subjects recruited in the study, 25 subjects in the case group and 26 subjects in the control group.All variables at baseline were matched (P > 0.05).All variables improved after one hour of NIPPV before FB, without significant difference between two groups (P > 0.05).During the period of FB, heart rate in the case group was faster than that in the control group (P < 0.05), and other variables were not significantly different between two groups (P > 0.05).Both groups received NIPPV for one hour after FB, the variables including heart rate, respiratory rate, pH, PaO2, PaCO2 were statistically significant between two groups(P < 0.05).At the time of 24 hours after FB, the variables including mean arterial pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, pH, PaO2 and PaCO2 in the case group were nearly recovered, and differences between two groups were significant (P < 0.05).The positive rate of sputum culture was significantly higher in the case group than that in the control group[88.0%(22/25) vs.58.6%(14/26)].Success rate in the case group were obviously superior to that in control group.The cases of failure, death and refusing in the case group were lower than those in the control group.Complications in two groups had no significant difference (P > 0.05).There was not serious complication such as hear arrest, hemoptysis and apnea during the process of NIPPV combined with early FB.
Conclusion It deserves to be used in clinic because of the safety, efficacy and feasible for most of AECOPD patients through NIPPV combined with early FB.
Objective
To analyze the risk factors of treatment failure by noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) in patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF) due to acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD), and explore the best time that NPPV be replaced by invasive ventilation when NPPV failure occurs.
Methods
The data of patients with ARF due to AECOPD who were treated with NPPV from January 2013 to December 2015 were retrospectively collected. The patients were divided into two groups: the NPPV success group and the NPPV failure group (individuals who required endotracheal intubation or tracheotomy at any time). The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) Ⅱ score was analyzed; the Glasgow Coma Scale score, respiratory rate (RR), pH value, partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2), PaO2/fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) ratio, and partial pressure of carbon dioxide were also analyzed at admission, after 2 hours of NPPV, and after 24 hours of NPPV.
Results
A total of 185 patients with ARF due to AECOPD were included. NPPV failed in 35.1% of the patients (65/185). Multivariate analysis identified the following factors to be independently associated with NPPV failure: APACHEⅡscore≥30 [odds ratio (OR)=20.603, 95% confidence interval (CI) (5.309, 80.525), P<0.001], RR at admission≥35 per minute [OR=3.723, 95%CI (1.197, 11.037), P=0.020], pH value after 2 hours of NPPV<7.25 [OR=2.517, 95%CI (0.905, 7.028), P=0.070], PaO2 after 2 hours of NPPV<60 mm Hg (1 mm Hg=0.133 kPa) [OR=3.915, 95%CI (1.374, 11.508), P=0.010], and PaO2/FiO2 after 2 hours of NPPV<200 mm Hg [OR=4.024, 95%CI (1.542, 11.004), P=0.010].
Conclusion
When patients with ARF due to AECOPD have a higher severity score, have a rapid RR at admission, or fail to improve in terms of pH and oxygenation after 2 hours of NPPV, the risk of NPPV failure is higher.
ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the effect of high-flow nasal cannula in immunocompromised patients with acute respiratory failure.MethodsRandomized controlled trials (RCT) or cohort studies on the efficacy of high-flow oxygen therapy in immunocompromised patients with acute respiratory failure were reviewed by computer in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and China Knowledge Network, Wanfang and VIP databases. The group used HFNC and the control group used a mask or a nasal catheter to give oxygen-based conventional oxygen therapy (COT) or noninvasive ventilation (NIV). Two investigators conducted quality assessments and data extractions based on the Cochrane Collaboration Risk Assessment Manual and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Meta analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software. The main outcome measures included tracheal intubation rate, and intensive care unit (ICU) mortality. The secondary outcomes included ICU hospitalization time.ResultsThe study included 13 articles (4 RCTs, 9 cohort studies), a total of 1133 subjects, with 583 in the HFNC group and 550 in the control group (280 in the COT and 270 in the NIV). Meta-analysis showed that HFNC was significantly different from COT in reducing tracheal intubation rate in immunocompromised patients with respiratory failure (OR=0.49, 95%CI 0.33 - 0.72, P=0.0003), but no statistical significance compared with NIV (OR=0.73, 95%CI 0.52 - 1.02, P=0.07); two-combination analysis showed that HFNC had a significant advantage in reducing tracheal intubation rate compared with COT/NIV (combined OR=0.61, 95%CI 0.47 - 0.79, P=0.0002). In terms of ICU mortality, there was a statistically significant difference between HFNC and COT (OR=0.59, 95%CI 0.35 - 1.01, P=0.05) or NIV (OR=0.63, 95%CI 0.44 - 0.91, P=0.01). The results of the two subcombinations and analysis did not change (combined OR=0.62, 95%CI 0.46 - 0.83, P=0.002). In terms of ICU hospital stay, there was no statistically significant difference between HFNC and COT (MD=?4.52, 95%CI ?9.43 - 0.39, P=0.07), but the difference was statistically significant compared with NIV (MD=?1.46, 95%CI ?2.41 - ?0.51, P =0.003); the two sub-combinations and analysis results showed significant difference (combined MD=?3.41, 95%CI ?6.16 - ?0.66, P=0.01). According to different research types, after subgroup analysis, the analysis results were not different from the combined results. Sensitivity analysis revealed that HFNC could significantly reduce the patient's ICU hospital stay compared with the control group oxygen therapy. The results of the funnel chart analysis show that there were publication offsets in the studies on tracheal intubation rate and ICU mortality included in the literature; studies on ICU hospital stays had a smaller publication offset.ConclusionsCompared with COT, HFNC can reduce the tracheal intubation rate of patients, but there is no significant difference compared with NIV; HFNC can reduce the ICU mortality of patients compared with COT/NIV. However, due to the high heterogeneity between the studies, whether HFNC can reduce ICU hospital stay remains to be further explored.
Objective To investigate the physiological effects of different oxygen injection site on ventilatory status and oxygenation during noninvasive positive pressure ventilation ( NPPV) with portable noninvasive ventilators. Methods A prospective crossover randomized study was performed. Oxygen injection site was randomized into the outlet of the ventilator, the connection site between mask and circuit, and the mask under the condition of leak port immobilized in the mask. Oxygen flow was retained in the baseline level at the initial 5 to 10 minutes, and adjusted to obtain arterial oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximetry ( SpO2 ) ranging from 90% to 95% after SpO2 remains stable. SpO2 at the initial 5 to 10 minutes, oxygen flow, ventilatory status, oxygenation, hemodynamics and dyspnea indexes at0. 5 hour, 1 hour, and 2 hours of NPPV were compared between different oxygen injection sites. Results 10 patients were recruited into the study. Under the condition of the same oxygen flow, SpO2 with oxygen injection site in the outlet of the ventilator was significantly higher than that with oxygen injection site in the connection site between mask and circuit [ ( 98.9 ±0.9) % vs. ( 96.9 ±1.1) % , P =0. 003] , whereas SpO2 with oxygen injection site in the connection site between mask and circuit was significantly higher than that with oxygen injection site in the mask [ ( 96.9 ±1.1) % vs. ( 94.1 ±1.6) %, P = 0.000] . Oxygen flow with oxygen injection site in the mask was statistically higher than that with oxygen injection site at other sites ( P lt; 0.05) . Arterial oxygen tension/ oxygen flow with oxygen injection site in the outlet of the ventilator was significantly higher than that with oxygen injection site in the connection site between mask and circuit ( 67.9 ±31.1 vs. 37.0 ±15.0, P =0.007) , and than that with oxygen injection site in the mask ( 67.9 ± 31.1 vs. 25.0 ±9.1, P = 0.000) . pH, arterial carbon dioxide tension, hemodynamics and dyspnea indexes were not significantly different between different oxygen injection sites ( P gt; 0.05) .Conclusions When portable noninvasive ventilator was applied during NPPV, oxygen injection site significantly affects improvement of oxygenation, and shows a trend for affecting ventilatory status and work of breathing. When the leak port was immobilized in the mask, the nearer oxygen injection site approaches the outlet of the ventilator, the more easily oxygenation is improved and the lower oxygen flow is demanded.
