Objective To construct an evaluation index system of the competitiveness of private hospitals, and to provide references for guiding, supervising, and managing the high-quality development of private hospitals. Methods An index pool was constructed by the literature analysis method. Index screening was completed using the modified Delphi method. The analytic hierarchy process, entropy weight method, and combination weight method were used to determine the index weight. Results The competitiveness evaluation index system of private hospitals was constructed, which included 5 primary indexes and 36 secondary indexes. The combination weight methods were resource allocation (0.366 8), service capacity (0.470 8), service efficiency (0.033 7), quality and safety (0.121 3), and financial management (0.007 3). Conclusion The constructed evaluation index system of competitiveness of private hospitals is scientific, targeted, and operable.
As an important auxiliary means of pharmacoeconomics evaluation, budget impact analysis can effectively measure the affordability of medical insurance fund, and plays a significant role in the process of medical insurance access negotiation, adjustment of medical insurance reimbursement directory and establishment of payment price. The quality of budget impact analysis data has a great impact on the analysis results and the scientific decision-making. When the existing data cannot meet the requirements of the paper, relevant software is needed to carry out Delphi method to ensure the data accuracy. Infopoll is a powerful, easy-to-use application that designs consultation questionnaires by providing multiple question choices and multiple forms of answer settings, as well as detailed statistical charts for results analysis. This paper introduces how to obtain the data of budget impact analysis based on Delphi method using Infopoll software, and analyzes the main results in detail.
ObjectivesTo use the Delphi method to preliminarily perfect the comprehensive evaluation index system which had been initially constructed by systematic review processes of diabetes food for special medical purposes (FSMP).MethodsThree rounds of expert consultation by Delphi method were compared to define indices held in the evidence-based comprehensive evaluation index system of diabetes FSMP and ways to distinguish effects.ResultsThe preliminary perfect index system after 3 rounds of expert consultation contained 4 primary directory indicators, 15 secondary directory indicators, and 20 tertiary indicators. Among them, the end index which could directly be used for evaluation contained a total of 27 indicators.ConclusionsThe index system is categorized into 4 segments of parameters, which are medical, nutritional, safety and other indices, which has addressed the problem posed by CFDA documents on how to scientifically validate the medical effect and safety of FSMP. It provides great significance to assess and supervise FSMP prior to and after it goes to public, assess characteristics and advantages of MNT, and improves nutrition economy and its social benefits.
In the context of the rapid development of contemporary medical industry and the unbalanced development of various subspecialties, expert consensus plays an extremely important role in guiding clinical practice and improving the quality of medical care. However, there are some deficiencies and limitations in the formation process and final report of the expert consensus. Therefore, this paper summarizes and reviews the definition, applications, and functions of expert consensus and the new progress of expert consensus formation methods by fully reviewing the literature, and puts forward the prospect. The purpose is to provide a reference for the production and application of expert consensus related to medical care, improve the outcomes of medical care, and upgrade the quality and level of medical services.
Objective To construct the expert consensus on comprehensive rehabilitation assessment system for the elderly in the hospital and community. MethodsMedline, Embase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure and VIP databases were searched for geriatric rehabilitation assessment materials from June 2016 to June 2021. The primary items were summarized through literature review and research group discussion, and then Delphi method was used among 20 experts in geriatric rehabilitation medicine to develop consensus-based core items for the elderly comprehensive rehabilitation assessment system. Results A total of 158 references were included. Through integration, sorting and screening, the research team initially formulated 41 items and four major sections including cardiopulmonary exercise, sensory perception, cognition and psychology (speech contained), and swallowing, urination and defecation. The effective recovery rates of the two rounds of experts consultation were both 100%, the mean expert authority coefficient was 0.92±0.05, the variation coefficients were 0.174±0.043 and 0.172±0.063, respectively; the Kendall coefficients of concordance were 0.587 and 0.601, with P values<0.05 for both, respectively. Finally, The comprehensive rehabilitation assessment system for the elderly including 16 items would be formed. Conclusion The expert consensus on comprehensive rehabilitation assessment system for the elderly constructed by Delphi method includes motor, sensory perception, cognition, swallowing, speech, cardiopulmonary, defecation, mental and psychological elements, which are identified with high recognition and consistency from experts.
ObjectiveTo construct a health in all policies (HiAP) evaluation index system for earthquake-stricken areas based on national health policies.MethodsFrom April to December 2020, this study combined the methods of comprehensive review of relevant literature, on the foundation of the evaluation indicators pool was preliminarily constructed. The Delphi method and analytic hierarchy process were adopted to construct the evaluation indicators system in earthquake-stricken areas and analyzed the weights of indicators.ResultsA total of 5 first-level indicators (investment, action, short-term effect, medium-term effect, long-term effect), 15 second-level indicators, and 44 third-level indicators with satisfactory logical consistency of HiAP evaluation indicators system in earthquake-stricken areas had been constructed.ConclusionsThe HiAP evaluation indicators system constructed in this study can be used to comprehensively evaluate the implementation of HiAP earthquake-stricken areas.
Objective To construct a multi-dimensional evaluation system for physical function and functional rehabilitation of elderly patients with lung cancer during perioperative period based on the modified Delphi method.Methods From December 2024 to April 2025, based on literature search and group research, a multi-dimensional evaluation indicator system for perioperative physical function and functional rehabilitation of elderly patients with lung cancer was initially constructed, and 13 experts in the field of elderly lung cancer treatment and perioperative rehabilitation were selected. Based on the modified Delphi method, two rounds of consultation and in-depth communication were conducted with experts to objectively evaluate the importance of indicators at all levels and finally appropriate indicators were selected. Results Through two rounds of expert consultation, a multi-dimensional comprehensive evaluation system was established, including 6 primary indicators (general situation and disease characteristics; physical fitness; pulmonary function; respiratory muscle function; balance function; activities of daily living, quality of life and emotional and psychological conditions) and 24 secondary indicators. The response rate of the two rounds of consultation questionnaires reached 100%, the coefficient of expert authority was 0.93±0.05, and the Kendall’s coefficient of concordance of the primary and secondary indicators were 0.391 and 0.187, respectively (P<0.05).ConclusionsThe multi-dimensional perioperative evaluation system of elderly patients with lung cancer constructed based on the modified Delphi method has good rationality and scientificity, which is helpful to comprehensively and multi-dimensionally evaluate the perioperative risk and functional status of elderly patients with lung cancer, and provide guidance and reference for clinical practice.
ObjectiveTo select the key questions of the reporting quality of acupuncture therapy network meta-analysis. MethodsA question pool about reporting quality of acupuncture therapy network meta-analysis was conducted by preliminary literature research and qualitative systematic review. A correspondence questionnaire was designed and the selection of key questions was carried out through two rounds of expert consultation using the Delphi method. ResultsA total of 21 key questions were selected for the network meta-analysis report standard of acupuncture, including whether to report details of acupuncture interventions (e.g., needle type, acupoints used, number of needles inserted, depth of needle insertion, retention time, needling techniques, and treatment duration), diagnostic criteria for diseases or traditional Chinese medicine syndromes, and qualifications of acupuncture practitioners. Of these, the only three key questions answered by the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and network meta-analysis (PRISMA-NMA) were summary, protocol and registration, and source of funding, while the remaining 19 were specific to acupuncture-related report standards. ConclusionThe conducted key question on reporting guideline of acupuncture network meta-analysis can improve the standardization and rigor of relevant research and better utilize its academic and clinical value.
ObjectivesTo construct a symptom assessment system suitable for surgical lung cancer patients, and to objectively evaluate the types and severity of postoperative symptoms in patients so as to provide evidence-based basis for the treatment of postoperative symptoms of lung cancer patients.MethodsPostoperative symptom items of lung cancer were formed according to previous researches, literature review, the current lung cancer symptom assessment tools, and expert interviews. The Delphi method was used to conduct two rounds of expert consultation and a postoperative symptom inventory was established for lung cancer patients.ResultsNine first-level symptom items were eventually formed: cough, pain, shortness of breath, fatigue, dizziness, nausea or vomiting, subcutaneous emphysema, insomnia, and constipation. The first round of active coefficient and authority coefficient of experts were 85.0% and 0.88, and the second round were 88.2% and 0.87. The Kendall coordination coefficients of the nine first-level symptom items were 0.47 (P<0.001) and 0.43 (P<0.001), respectively.ConclusionsThe evaluation system of postoperative symptom items for lung cancer patients is highly recognized by experts and has good consistency.
ObjectiveTo construct the terminology standard of hospital quality and safety. MethodsThe draft terminology standard was constructed through group discussions, and the final draft terminology standard was formed after one round of Delphi expert consultation and two rounds of expert consensus meetings. ResultsThe recovery rate of the questionnaire was 100%, and the authority coefficient of experts was 0.87. A total of 15 experts were invited to two rounds of expert consensus meetings. The terminology standard for hospital quality and safety (TCHAS 10-1-1-4—2022) was finally released, including 4 first-level categories, 20 second-level categories, and 370 terms in total. ConclusionThe terminology standard of hospital quality and safety developed in this study is scientific and reliable, which can be used as a tool to assist medical institutions in carrying out standardized management.
